-
Status Quo in Requirements Engineering: A Theory and a Global Family of Surveys
Authors:
Stefan Wagner,
Daniel Méndez Fernández,
Michael Felderer,
Antonio Vetró,
Marcos Kalinowski,
Roel Wieringa,
Dietmar Pfahl,
Tayana Conte,
Marie-Therese Christiansson,
Desmond Greer,
Casper Lassenius,
Tomi Männistö,
Maleknaz Nayebi,
Markku Oivo,
Birgit Penzenstadler,
Rafael Prikladnicki,
Guenther Ruhe,
André Schekelmann,
Sagar Sen,
Rodrigo Spínola,
Ahmed Tuzcu,
Jose Luis de la Vara,
Dietmar Winkler
Abstract:
Requirements Engineering (RE) has established itself as a software engineering discipline during the past decades. While researchers have been investigating the RE discipline with a plethora of empirical studies, attempts to systematically derive an empirically-based theory in context of the RE discipline have just recently been started. However, such a theory is needed if we are to define and mot…
▽ More
Requirements Engineering (RE) has established itself as a software engineering discipline during the past decades. While researchers have been investigating the RE discipline with a plethora of empirical studies, attempts to systematically derive an empirically-based theory in context of the RE discipline have just recently been started. However, such a theory is needed if we are to define and motivate guidance in performing high quality RE research and practice. We aim at providing an empirical and valid foundation for a theory of RE, which helps software engineers establish effective and efficient RE processes. We designed a survey instrument and theory that has now been replicated in 10 countries world-wide. We evaluate the propositions of the theory with bootstrapped confidence intervals and derive potential explanations for the propositions. We report on the underlying theory and the full results obtained from the replication studies with participants from 228 organisations. Our results represent a substantial step forward towards developing an empirically-based theory of RE giving insights into current practices with RE processes. The results reveal, for example, that there are no strong differences between organisations in different countries and regions, that interviews, facilitated meetings and prototyping are the most used elicitation techniques, that requirements are often documented textually, that traces between requirements and code or design documents is common, requirements specifications themselves are rarely changed and that requirements engineering (process) improvement endeavours are mostly intrinsically motivated. Our study establishes a theory that can be used as starting point for many further studies for more detailed investigations. Practitioners can use the results as theory-supported guidance on selecting suitable RE methods and techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2018; v1 submitted 21 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering: Contemporary Problems, Causes, and Effects in Practice
Authors:
D. Méndez Fernández,
S. Wagner,
M. Kalinowski,
M. Felderer,
P. Mafra,
A. Vetrò,
T. Conte,
M. -T. Christiansson,
D. Greer,
C. Lassenius,
T. Männistö,
M. Nayabi,
M. Oivo,
B. Penzenstadler,
D. Pfahl,
R. Prikladnicki,
G. Ruhe,
A. Schekelmann,
S. Sen,
R. Spinola,
A. Tuzcu,
J. L. de la Vara,
R. Wieringa
Abstract:
Requirements Engineering (RE) has received much attention in research and practice due to its importance to software project success. Its interdisciplinary nature, the dependency to the customer, and its inherent uncertainty still render the discipline difficult to investigate. This results in a lack of empirical data. These are necessary, however, to demonstrate which practically relevant RE prob…
▽ More
Requirements Engineering (RE) has received much attention in research and practice due to its importance to software project success. Its interdisciplinary nature, the dependency to the customer, and its inherent uncertainty still render the discipline difficult to investigate. This results in a lack of empirical data. These are necessary, however, to demonstrate which practically relevant RE problems exist and to what extent they matter. Motivated by this situation, we initiated the Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering (NaPiRE) initiative which constitutes a globally distributed, bi-yearly replicated family of surveys on the status quo and problems in practical RE. In this article, we report on the qualitative analysis of data obtained from 228 companies working in 10 countries in various domains and we reveal which contemporary problems practitioners encounter. To this end, we analyse 21 problems derived from the literature with respect to their relevance and criticality in dependency to their context, and we complement this picture with a cause-effect analysis showing the causes and effects surrounding the most critical problems. Our results give us a better understanding of which problems exist and how they manifest themselves in practical environments. Thus, we provide a first step to ground contributions to RE on empirical observations which, until now, were dominated by conventional wisdom only.
△ Less
Submitted 27 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Practitioners' Perspectives on Change Impact Analysis for Safety-Critical Software - A Preliminary Analysis
Authors:
Markus Borg,
José-Luis de la Vara,
Krzysztof Wnuk
Abstract:
Safety standards prescribe change impact analysis (CIA) during evolution of safety-critical software systems. Although CIA is a fundamental activity, there is a lack of empirical studies about how it is performed in practice. We present a case study on CIA in the context of an evolving automation system, based on 14 interviews in Sweden and India. Our analysis suggests that engineers on average sp…
▽ More
Safety standards prescribe change impact analysis (CIA) during evolution of safety-critical software systems. Although CIA is a fundamental activity, there is a lack of empirical studies about how it is performed in practice. We present a case study on CIA in the context of an evolving automation system, based on 14 interviews in Sweden and India. Our analysis suggests that engineers on average spend 50-100 hours on CIA per year, but the effort varies considerably with the phases of projects. Also, the respondents presented different connotations to CIA and perceived the importance of CIA differently. We report the most pressing CIA challenges, and several ideas on how to support future CIA. However, we show that measuring the effect of such improvement solutions is non-trivial, as CIA is intertwined with other development activities. While this paper only reports preliminary results, our work contributes empirical insights into practical CIA.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
