A Multi-layer Recursive Residue Number System
Authors:
Henk D. L. Hollmann,
Ronald Rietman,
Sebastiaan de Hoogh,
Ludo M. G. M. Tolhuizen,
Paul Gorissen
Abstract:
We present a method to increase the dynamical range of a Residue Number System (RNS) by adding virtual RNS layers on top of the original RNS, where the required modular arithmetic for a modulus on any non-bottom layer is implemented by means of an RNS Montgomery multiplication algorithm that uses the RNS on the layer below. As a result, the actual arithmetic is deferred to the bottom layer. The mu…
▽ More
We present a method to increase the dynamical range of a Residue Number System (RNS) by adding virtual RNS layers on top of the original RNS, where the required modular arithmetic for a modulus on any non-bottom layer is implemented by means of an RNS Montgomery multiplication algorithm that uses the RNS on the layer below. As a result, the actual arithmetic is deferred to the bottom layer. The multiplication algorithm that we use is based on an algorithm by Bajard and Imbert, extended to work with pseudo-residues (remainders with a larger range than the modulus). The resulting Recursive Residue Number System (RRNS) can be used to implement modular addition, multiplication, and multiply-and-accumulate for very large (2000+ bits) moduli, using only modular operations for small (for example 8-bits) moduli. A hardware implementation of this method allows for massive parallelization.
Our method can be applied in cryptographic algorithms such as RSA to realize modular exponentiation with a large (2048-bit, or even 4096-bit) modulus. Due to the use of full RNS Montgomery algorithms, the system does not involve any carries, therefore cryptographic attacks that exploit carries cannot be applied.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
Flow-based reputation with uncertainty: Evidence-Based Subjective Logic
Authors:
Boris Skoric,
Sebastiaan J. A. de Hoogh,
Nicola Zannone
Abstract:
The concept of reputation is widely used as a measure of trustworthiness based on ratings from members in a community. The adoption of reputation systems, however, relies on their ability to capture the actual trustworthiness of a target. Several reputation models for aggregating trust information have been proposed in the literature. The choice of model has an impact on the reliability of the agg…
▽ More
The concept of reputation is widely used as a measure of trustworthiness based on ratings from members in a community. The adoption of reputation systems, however, relies on their ability to capture the actual trustworthiness of a target. Several reputation models for aggregating trust information have been proposed in the literature. The choice of model has an impact on the reliability of the aggregated trust information as well as on the procedure used to compute reputations. Two prominent models are flow-based reputation (e.g., EigenTrust, PageRank) and Subjective Logic based reputation. Flow-based models provide an automated method to aggregate trust information, but they are not able to express the level of uncertainty in the information. In contrast, Subjective Logic extends probabilistic models with an explicit notion of uncertainty, but the calculation of reputation depends on the structure of the trust network and often requires information to be discarded. These are severe drawbacks.
In this work, we observe that the `opinion discounting' operation in Subjective Logic has a number of basic problems. We resolve these problems by providing a new discounting operator that describes the flow of evidence from one party to another. The adoption of our discounting rule results in a consistent Subjective Logic algebra that is entirely based on the handling of evidence. We show that the new algebra enables the construction of an automated reputation assessment procedure for arbitrary trust networks, where the calculation no longer depends on the structure of the network, and does not need to throw away any information. Thus, we obtain the best of both worlds: flow-based reputation and consistent handling of uncertainties.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2015; v1 submitted 13 February, 2014;
originally announced February 2014.
