-
Differences in structure and dynamics of networks retrieved from dark and public web forums
Authors:
Maryam Zamani,
Fereshteh Rabbani,
Attila Horicsányi,
Anna Zafeiris,
Tamas Vicsek
Abstract:
Humans make decisions based on the information they obtain from several major sources, among which the comments of others in Internet forums play an increasing role. Such forums cover a wide spectrum of topics and represent an essential tool in choosing the best products, manipulating views or optimizing our decisions regarding a number of aspects of our everyday life. However, many forums have ex…
▽ More
Humans make decisions based on the information they obtain from several major sources, among which the comments of others in Internet forums play an increasing role. Such forums cover a wide spectrum of topics and represent an essential tool in choosing the best products, manipulating views or optimizing our decisions regarding a number of aspects of our everyday life. However, many forums have extremely controversial topics and contents including those which radicalize the readers or spread information about dangerous products and ideas (e.g., drugs, weapons or aggressive ideologies). These just mentioned activities are taking place mainly on the so-called "dark web" allowing the hiding of the identity of members using dark forums. We use network theoretical approaches to analyze the data we obtained by studying the connectivity features of the members and the threads within a wide selection of forums (including dark and semi-dark) and establish several characteristic behavioral patterns. Our findings reveal both common and rather different features in the two types of behavior. In particular, we show that the various distributions of quantities, like the activity of the commenters, the dynamics of the threads (defined using their lifetime) or the degree distributions corresponding to the three major types of forums we have investigated display characteristic deviations. This knowledge can be useful, for example, in identifying an activity typical for the dark web when it appears on the public web (since the public web can be accessed and used much more easily).
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Phenomenological theory of collective decision-making
Authors:
Anna Zafeiris,
Zsombor Koman,
Enys Mones,
Tamás Vicsek
Abstract:
An essential task of groups is to provide efficient solutions for the complex problems they face. Indeed, considerable efforts have been devoted to the question of collective decision-making related to problems involving a single dominant feature. Here we introduce a quantitative formalism for finding the optimal distribution of the group members' competences in the more typical case when the unde…
▽ More
An essential task of groups is to provide efficient solutions for the complex problems they face. Indeed, considerable efforts have been devoted to the question of collective decision-making related to problems involving a single dominant feature. Here we introduce a quantitative formalism for finding the optimal distribution of the group members' competences in the more typical case when the underlying problem is complex, i.e., multidimensional. Thus, we consider teams that are aiming at obtaining the best possible answer to a problem having a number of independent sub-problems. Our approach is based on a generic scheme for the process of evaluating the proposed solutions (i.e., negotiation). We demonstrate that the best performing groups have at least one specialist for each sub-problem -- but a far less intuitive result is that finding the optimal solution by the interacting group members requires that the specialists also have some insight into the sub-problems beyond their unique field(s). We present empirical results obtained by using a large-scale database of citations being in good agreement with the above theory. The framework we have developed can easily be adapted to a variety of realistic situations since taking into account the weights of the sub-problems, the opinions or the relations of the group is straightforward. Consequently, our method can be used in several contexts, especially when the optimal composition of a group of decision-makers is designed.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2016; v1 submitted 30 November, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
Group performance is maximized by hierarchical competence distribution
Authors:
Anna Zafeiris,
Tamas Vicsek
Abstract:
Groups of people or even robots often face problems they need to solve together. Examples include collectively searching for resources, choosing when and where to invest time and effort, and many more. Although a hierarchical ordering of the relevance of the group members' inputs during collective decision making is abundant, a quantitative demonstration of its origin and advantages using a generi…
▽ More
Groups of people or even robots often face problems they need to solve together. Examples include collectively searching for resources, choosing when and where to invest time and effort, and many more. Although a hierarchical ordering of the relevance of the group members' inputs during collective decision making is abundant, a quantitative demonstration of its origin and advantages using a generic approach has not been described yet. Here we introduce a family of models based on the most general features of group decision making to show that the optimal distribution of competences is a highly skewed function with a structured fat tail. Our results have been obtained by optimizing the groups' compositions through identifying the best performing distributions for both the competences and for the members' flexibilities/pliancies. Potential applications include choosing the best composition for a group intended to solve a given task.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2013; v1 submitted 6 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
