-
Random-sketching Techniques to Enhance the Numerical Stability of Block Orthogonalization Algorithms for s-step GMRES
Authors:
Ichitaro Yamazaki,
Andrew J. Higgins,
Erik G. Boman,
Daniel B. Szyld
Abstract:
We integrate random sketching techniques into block orthogonalization schemes needed for s-step GMRES. The resulting block orthogonalization schemes generate the basis vectors whose overall orthogonality error is bounded by machine precision as long as each of the corresponding block vectors are numerically full rank. We implement these randomized block orthogonalization schemes using standard dis…
▽ More
We integrate random sketching techniques into block orthogonalization schemes needed for s-step GMRES. The resulting block orthogonalization schemes generate the basis vectors whose overall orthogonality error is bounded by machine precision as long as each of the corresponding block vectors are numerically full rank. We implement these randomized block orthogonalization schemes using standard distributed-memory linear algebra kernels for s-step GMRES available in the Trilinos software packages. Our performance results on the Perlmutter supercomputer (with four NVIDIA A100 GPUs per node) demonstrate that these randomized techniques can enhance the numerical stability of the orthogonalization and overall solver, without a significant increase in the execution time.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2025; v1 submitted 20 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Trilinos: Enabling Scientific Computing Across Diverse Hardware Architectures at Scale
Authors:
Matthias Mayr,
Alexander Heinlein,
Christian Glusa,
Siva Rajamanickam,
Maarten Arnst,
Roscoe Bartlett,
Luc Berger-Vergiat,
Erik Boman,
Karen Devine,
Graham Harper,
Michael Heroux,
Mark Hoemmen,
Jonathan Hu,
Brian Kelley,
Kyungjoo Kim,
Drew P. Kouri,
Paul Kuberry,
Kim Liegeois,
Curtis C. Ober,
Roger Pawlowski,
Carl Pearson,
Mauro Perego,
Eric Phipps,
Denis Ridzal,
Nathan V. Roberts
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Trilinos is a community-developed, open-source software framework that facilitates building large-scale, complex, multiscale, multiphysics simulation code bases for scientific and engineering problems. Since the Trilinos framework has undergone substantial changes to support new applications and new hardware architectures, this document is an update to ``An Overview of the Trilinos project'' by He…
▽ More
Trilinos is a community-developed, open-source software framework that facilitates building large-scale, complex, multiscale, multiphysics simulation code bases for scientific and engineering problems. Since the Trilinos framework has undergone substantial changes to support new applications and new hardware architectures, this document is an update to ``An Overview of the Trilinos project'' by Heroux et al. (ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 31(3):397-423, 2005). It describes the design of Trilinos, introduces its new organization in product areas, and highlights established and new features available in Trilinos. Particular focus is put on the modernized software stack based on the Kokkos ecosystem to deliver performance portability across heterogeneous hardware architectures. This paper also outlines the organization of the Trilinos community and the contribution model to help onboard interested users and contributors.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Two-Stage Block Orthogonalization to Improve Performance of $s$-step GMRES
Authors:
Ichitaro Yamazaki,
Andrew J. Higgins,
Erik G. Boman,
Daniel B. Szyld
Abstract:
On current computer architectures, GMRES' performance can be limited by its communication cost to generate orthonormal basis vectors of the Krylov subspace. To address this performance bottleneck, its $s$-step variant orthogonalizes a block of $s$ basis vectors at a time, potentially reducing the communication cost by a factor of $s$. Unfortunately, for a large step size $s$, the solver can genera…
▽ More
On current computer architectures, GMRES' performance can be limited by its communication cost to generate orthonormal basis vectors of the Krylov subspace. To address this performance bottleneck, its $s$-step variant orthogonalizes a block of $s$ basis vectors at a time, potentially reducing the communication cost by a factor of $s$. Unfortunately, for a large step size $s$, the solver can generate extremely ill-conditioned basis vectors, and to maintain stability in practice, a conservatively small step size is used, which limits the performance of the $s$-step solver. To enhance the performance using a small step size, in this paper, we introduce a two-stage block orthogonalization scheme. Similar to the original scheme, the first stage of the proposed method operates on a block of $s$ basis vectors at a time, but its objective is to maintain the well-conditioning of the generated basis vectors with a lower cost. The orthogonalization of the basis vectors is delayed until the second stage when enough basis vectors are generated to obtain higher performance.
Our analysis shows the stability of the proposed two-stage scheme. The performance is improved because while the same amount of computation as the original scheme is required, most of the communication is done at the second stage of the proposed scheme, reducing the overall communication requirements. Our performance results with up to 192 NVIDIA V100 GPUs on the Summit supercomputer demonstrate that when solving a 2D Laplace problem, the two-stage approach can reduce the orthogonalization time and the total time-to-solution by the respective factors of up to $2.6\times$ and $1.6\times$ over the original $s$-step GMRES, which had already obtained the respective speedups of $2.1\times$ and $1.8\times$ over the standard GMRES. Similar speedups were obtained for 3D problems and for matrices from the SuiteSparse Matrix Collection.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
An Experimental Study of Two-Level Schwarz Domain Decomposition Preconditioners on GPUs
Authors:
Ichitaro Yamazaki,
Alexander Heinlein,
Sivasankaran Rajamanickam
Abstract:
The generalized Dryja--Smith--Widlund (GDSW) preconditioner is a two-level overlapping Schwarz domain decomposition (DD) preconditioner that couples a classical one-level overlapping Schwarz preconditioner with an energy-minimizing coarse space. When used to accelerate the convergence rate of Krylov subspace iterative methods, the GDSW preconditioner provides robustness and scalability for the sol…
▽ More
The generalized Dryja--Smith--Widlund (GDSW) preconditioner is a two-level overlapping Schwarz domain decomposition (DD) preconditioner that couples a classical one-level overlapping Schwarz preconditioner with an energy-minimizing coarse space. When used to accelerate the convergence rate of Krylov subspace iterative methods, the GDSW preconditioner provides robustness and scalability for the solution of sparse linear systems arising from the discretization of a wide range of partial different equations. In this paper, we present FROSch (Fast and Robust Schwarz), a domain decomposition solver package which implements GDSW-type preconditioners for both CPU and GPU clusters. To improve the solver performance on GPUs, we use a novel decomposition to run multiple MPI processes on each GPU, reducing both solver's computational and storage costs and potentially improving the convergence rate. This allowed us to obtain competitive or faster performance using GPUs compared to using CPUs alone. We demonstrate the performance of FROSch on the Summit supercomputer with NVIDIA V100 GPUs, where we used NVIDIA Multi-Process Service (MPS) to implement our decomposition strategy.
The solver has a wide variety of algorithmic and implementation choices, which poses both opportunities and challenges for its GPU implementation. We conduct a thorough experimental study with different solver options including the exact or inexact solution of the local overlapping subdomain problems on a GPU. We also discuss the effect of using the iterative variant of the incomplete LU factorization and sparse-triangular solve as the approximate local solver, and using lower precision for computing the whole FROSch preconditioner. Overall, the solve time was reduced by factors of about $2\times$ using GPUs, while the GPU acceleration of the numerical setup time depend on the solver options and the local matrix sizes.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
A Study of Mixed Precision Strategies for GMRES on GPUs
Authors:
Jennifer A. Loe,
Christian A. Glusa,
Ichitaro Yamazaki,
Erik G. Boman,
Sivasankaran Rajamanickam
Abstract:
Support for lower precision computation is becoming more common in accelerator hardware due to lower power usage, reduced data movement and increased computational performance. However, computational science and engineering (CSE) problems require double precision accuracy in several domains. This conflict between hardware trends and application needs has resulted in a need for mixed precision stra…
▽ More
Support for lower precision computation is becoming more common in accelerator hardware due to lower power usage, reduced data movement and increased computational performance. However, computational science and engineering (CSE) problems require double precision accuracy in several domains. This conflict between hardware trends and application needs has resulted in a need for mixed precision strategies at the linear algebra algorithms level if we want to exploit the hardware to its full potential while meeting the accuracy requirements. In this paper, we focus on preconditioned sparse iterative linear solvers, a key kernel in several CSE applications. We present a study of mixed precision strategies for accelerating this kernel on an NVIDIA V$100$ GPU with a Power 9 CPU. We seek the best methods for incorporating multiple precisions into the GMRES linear solver; these include iterative refinement and parallelizable preconditioners. Our work presents strategies to determine when mixed precision GMRES will be effective and to choose parameters for a mixed precision iterative refinement solver to achieve better performance. We use an implementation that is based on the Trilinos library and employs Kokkos Kernels for performance portability of linear algebra kernels. Performance results demonstrate the promise of mixed precision approaches and demonstrate even further improvements are possible by optimizing low-level kernels.
△ Less
Submitted 2 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Experimental Evaluation of Multiprecision Strategies for GMRES on GPUs
Authors:
Jennifer A. Loe,
Christian A. Glusa,
Ichitaro Yamazaki,
Erik G. Boman,
Sivasankaran Rajamanickam
Abstract:
Support for lower precision computation is becoming more common in accelerator hardware due to lower power usage, reduced data movement and increased computational performance. However, computational science and engineering (CSE) problems require double precision accuracy in several domains. This conflict between hardware trends and application needs has resulted in a need for multiprecision strat…
▽ More
Support for lower precision computation is becoming more common in accelerator hardware due to lower power usage, reduced data movement and increased computational performance. However, computational science and engineering (CSE) problems require double precision accuracy in several domains. This conflict between hardware trends and application needs has resulted in a need for multiprecision strategies at the linear algebra algorithms level if we want to exploit the hardware to its full potential while meeting the accuracy requirements. In this paper, we focus on preconditioned sparse iterative linear solvers, a key kernel in several CSE applications. We present a study of multiprecision strategies for accelerating this kernel on GPUs. We seek the best methods for incorporating multiple precisions into the GMRES linear solver; these include iterative refinement and parallelizable preconditioners. Our work presents strategies to determine when multiprecision GMRES will be effective and to choose parameters for a multiprecision iterative refinement solver to achieve better performance. We use an implementation that is based on the Trilinos library and employs Kokkos Kernels for performance portability of linear algebra kernels. Performance results demonstrate the promise of multiprecision approaches and demonstrate even further improvements are possible by optimizing low-level kernels.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Two-Stage Gauss--Seidel Preconditioners and Smoothers for Krylov Solvers on a GPU cluster
Authors:
Luc Berger-Vergiat,
Brian Kelley,
Sivasankaran Rajamanickam,
Jonathan Hu,
Katarzyna Swirydowicz,
Paul Mullowney,
Stephen Thomas,
Ichitaro Yamazaki
Abstract:
Gauss-Seidel (GS) relaxation is often employed as a preconditioner for a Krylov solver or as a smoother for Algebraic Multigrid (AMG). However, the requisite sparse triangular solve is difficult to parallelize on many-core architectures such as graphics processing units (GPUs). In the present study, the performance of the traditional GS relaxation based on a triangular solve is compared with two-s…
▽ More
Gauss-Seidel (GS) relaxation is often employed as a preconditioner for a Krylov solver or as a smoother for Algebraic Multigrid (AMG). However, the requisite sparse triangular solve is difficult to parallelize on many-core architectures such as graphics processing units (GPUs). In the present study, the performance of the traditional GS relaxation based on a triangular solve is compared with two-stage variants, replacing the direct triangular solve with a fixed number of inner Jacobi-Richardson (JR) iterations. When a small number of inner iterations is sufficient to maintain the Krylov convergence rate, the two-stage GS (GS2) often outperforms the traditional algorithm on many-core architectures. We also compare GS2 with JR. When they perform the same number of flops for SpMV (e.g. three JR sweeps compared to two GS sweeps with one inner JR sweep), the GS2 iterations, and the Krylov solver preconditioned with GS2, may converge faster than the JR iterations. Moreover, for some problems (e.g. elasticity), it was found that JR may diverge with a damping factor of one, whereas two-stage GS may improve the convergence with more inner iterations. Finally, to study the performance of the two-stage smoother and preconditioner for a practical problem, %(e.g. using tuned damping factors), these were applied to incompressible fluid flow simulations on GPUs.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2021; v1 submitted 2 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Kokkos Kernels: Performance Portable Sparse/Dense Linear Algebra and Graph Kernels
Authors:
Sivasankaran Rajamanickam,
Seher Acer,
Luc Berger-Vergiat,
Vinh Dang,
Nathan Ellingwood,
Evan Harvey,
Brian Kelley,
Christian R. Trott,
Jeremiah Wilke,
Ichitaro Yamazaki
Abstract:
As hardware architectures are evolving in the push towards exascale, developing Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) applications depend on performance portable approaches for sustainable software development. This paper describes one aspect of performance portability with respect to developing a portable library of kernels that serve the needs of several CSE applications and software frame…
▽ More
As hardware architectures are evolving in the push towards exascale, developing Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) applications depend on performance portable approaches for sustainable software development. This paper describes one aspect of performance portability with respect to developing a portable library of kernels that serve the needs of several CSE applications and software frameworks. We describe Kokkos Kernels, a library of kernels for sparse linear algebra, dense linear algebra and graph kernels. We describe the design principles of such a library and demonstrate portable performance of the library using some selected kernels. Specifically, we demonstrate the performance of four sparse kernels, three dense batched kernels, two graph kernels and one team level algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
A Survey of Numerical Methods Utilizing Mixed Precision Arithmetic
Authors:
Ahmad Abdelfattah,
Hartwig Anzt,
Erik G. Boman,
Erin Carson,
Terry Cojean,
Jack Dongarra,
Mark Gates,
Thomas Grützmacher,
Nicholas J. Higham,
Sherry Li,
Neil Lindquist,
Yang Liu,
Jennifer Loe,
Piotr Luszczek,
Pratik Nayak,
Sri Pranesh,
Siva Rajamanickam,
Tobias Ribizel,
Barry Smith,
Kasia Swirydowicz,
Stephen Thomas,
Stanimire Tomov,
Yaohung M. Tsai,
Ichitaro Yamazaki,
Urike Meier Yang
Abstract:
Within the past years, hardware vendors have started designing low precision special function units in response to the demand of the Machine Learning community and their demand for high compute power in low precision formats. Also the server-line products are increasingly featuring low-precision special function units, such as the NVIDIA tensor cores in ORNL's Summit supercomputer providing more t…
▽ More
Within the past years, hardware vendors have started designing low precision special function units in response to the demand of the Machine Learning community and their demand for high compute power in low precision formats. Also the server-line products are increasingly featuring low-precision special function units, such as the NVIDIA tensor cores in ORNL's Summit supercomputer providing more than an order of magnitude higher performance than what is available in IEEE double precision. At the same time, the gap between the compute power on the one hand and the memory bandwidth on the other hand keeps increasing, making data access and communication prohibitively expensive compared to arithmetic operations. To start the multiprecision focus effort, we survey the numerical linear algebra community and summarize all existing multiprecision knowledge, expertise, and software capabilities in this landscape analysis report. We also include current efforts and preliminary results that may not yet be considered "mature technology," but have the potential to grow into production quality within the multiprecision focus effort. As we expect the reader to be familiar with the basics of numerical linear algebra, we refrain from providing a detailed background on the algorithms themselves but focus on how mixed- and multiprecision technology can help improving the performance of these methods and present highlights of application significantly outperforming the traditional fixed precision methods.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
