-
Improving Quality Control Of MRI Images Using Synthetic Motion Data
Authors:
Charles Bricout,
Kang Ik K. Cho,
Michael Harms,
Ofer Pasternak,
Carrie E. Bearden,
Patrick D. McGorry,
Rene S. Kahn,
John Kane,
Barnaby Nelson,
Scott W. Woods,
Martha E. Shenton,
Sylvain Bouix,
Samira Ebrahimi Kahou
Abstract:
MRI quality control (QC) is challenging due to unbalanced and limited datasets, as well as subjective scoring, which hinder the development of reliable automated QC systems. To address these issues, we introduce an approach that pretrains a model on synthetically generated motion artifacts before applying transfer learning for QC classification. This method not only improves the accuracy in identi…
▽ More
MRI quality control (QC) is challenging due to unbalanced and limited datasets, as well as subjective scoring, which hinder the development of reliable automated QC systems. To address these issues, we introduce an approach that pretrains a model on synthetically generated motion artifacts before applying transfer learning for QC classification. This method not only improves the accuracy in identifying poor-quality scans but also reduces training time and resource requirements compared to training from scratch. By leveraging synthetic data, we provide a more robust and resource-efficient solution for QC automation in MRI, paving the way for broader adoption in diverse research settings.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2025; v1 submitted 31 January, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
SoK: Measuring Blockchain Decentralization
Authors:
Christina Ovezik,
Dimitris Karakostas,
Mary Milad,
Aggelos Kiayias,
Daniel W. Woods
Abstract:
In the context of blockchain systems, the importance of decentralization is undermined by the lack of a widely accepted methodology to measure it. To address this gap, we set out a systematization effort targeting the decentralization measurement workflow. To facilitate our systematization, we put forth a framework that categorizes all measurement techniques used in previous work based on the reso…
▽ More
In the context of blockchain systems, the importance of decentralization is undermined by the lack of a widely accepted methodology to measure it. To address this gap, we set out a systematization effort targeting the decentralization measurement workflow. To facilitate our systematization, we put forth a framework that categorizes all measurement techniques used in previous work based on the resource they target, the methods they use to extract resource allocation, and the functions they apply to produce the final measurements. We complement this framework with an empirical analysis designed to evaluate whether the various pre-processing steps and metrics used in prior work capture the same underlying concept of decentralization. Our analysis brings about a number of novel insights and observations. First, the seemingly innocuous choices performed during data extraction, such as the size of estimation windows or the application of thresholds that affect the resource distribution, have important repercussions when calculating the level of decentralization. Second, exploratory factor analysis suggests that in Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchains, participation on the consensus layer is not correlated with decentralization, but rather captures a distinct signal, unlike in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) systems, where the different metrics align under a single factor. These findings challenge the long-held assumption within the blockchain community that higher participation drives higher decentralization. Finally, we combine the results of our empirical analysis with first-principles reasoning to derive practical recommendations for researchers that set out to measure blockchain decentralization, and we further systematize the existing literature in line with these recommendations.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2025; v1 submitted 30 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
-
Criticality and Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Alexander Grushin,
Walt Woods,
Alvaro Velasquez,
Simon Khan
Abstract:
State of the art reinforcement learning methods sometimes encounter unsafe situations. Identifying when these situations occur is of interest both for post-hoc analysis and during deployment, where it might be advantageous to call out to a human overseer for help. Efforts to gauge the criticality of different points in time have been developed, but their accuracy is not well established due to a l…
▽ More
State of the art reinforcement learning methods sometimes encounter unsafe situations. Identifying when these situations occur is of interest both for post-hoc analysis and during deployment, where it might be advantageous to call out to a human overseer for help. Efforts to gauge the criticality of different points in time have been developed, but their accuracy is not well established due to a lack of ground truth, and they are not designed to be easily interpretable by end users. Therefore, we seek to define a criticality framework with both a quantifiable ground truth and a clear significance to users. We introduce true criticality as the expected drop in reward when an agent deviates from its policy for n consecutive random actions. We also introduce the concept of proxy criticality, a low-overhead metric that has a statistically monotonic relationship to true criticality. Safety margins make these interpretable, when defined as the number of random actions for which performance loss will not exceed some tolerance with high confidence. We demonstrate this approach in several environment-agent combinations; for an A3C agent in an Atari Beamrider environment, the lowest 5% of safety margins contain 47% of agent losses; i.e., supervising only 5% of decisions could potentially prevent roughly half of an agent's errors. This criticality framework measures the potential impacts of bad decisions, even before those decisions are made, allowing for more effective debugging and oversight of autonomous agents.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2025; v1 submitted 26 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality
Authors:
Walt Woods,
Alexander Grushin,
Simon Khan,
Alvaro Velasquez
Abstract:
AI-enabled capabilities are reaching the requisite level of maturity to be deployed in the real world, yet do not always make correct or safe decisions. One way of addressing these concerns is to leverage AI control systems alongside and in support of human decisions, relying on the AI control system in safe situations while calling on a human co-decider for critical situations. We extend a method…
▽ More
AI-enabled capabilities are reaching the requisite level of maturity to be deployed in the real world, yet do not always make correct or safe decisions. One way of addressing these concerns is to leverage AI control systems alongside and in support of human decisions, relying on the AI control system in safe situations while calling on a human co-decider for critical situations. We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks, including MuZero. Multiple improvements to the base agent architecture are proposed. We demonstrate how this technology has two applications: for intelligent decision tools and to enhance training / learning frameworks. In a decision support context, adversarial explanations help a user make the correct decision by highlighting those contextual factors that would need to change for a different AI-recommended decision. As another benefit of adversarial explanations, we show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. Additionally, we supplement AE by introducing strategically similar autoencoders (SSAs) to help users identify and understand all salient factors being considered by the AI system. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction. Finally, to identify when AI decisions would most benefit from human oversight, we tie this combined system to our prior art on statistically verified analyses of the criticality of decisions at any point in time.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2024; v1 submitted 3 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
InfoSec.pptx: A Longitudinal Study of Speakers, Topics, and Sponsors at Security Conferences in Academia and Industry
Authors:
Lukas Walter,
Clemens Sauerwein,
Daniel W. Woods
Abstract:
Security conferences are important venues at which academics and practitioners share knowledge about new attacks and state-of-the-art defenses. Despite this, researchers have not studied who shares information and about which security topics. To address this, our study characterizes the speakers, sponsors, and topics presented at the most prestigious academic and industry conferences. We collect a…
▽ More
Security conferences are important venues at which academics and practitioners share knowledge about new attacks and state-of-the-art defenses. Despite this, researchers have not studied who shares information and about which security topics. To address this, our study characterizes the speakers, sponsors, and topics presented at the most prestigious academic and industry conferences. We collect a longitudinal data set that contains 9,728 abstracts and 1,686 sponsors across 4 academic and 6 industry conferences. There is limited knowledge sharing between industry and academia. Conferences vary significantly in the equality of how talks/authorship is distributed across individuals. The topics of academic and industry abstracts display consistent coverage of techniques within the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Top tier academic conferences, as well as DEFCON and Black Hat, inconsistently address the governance, response and recovery functions of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Commercial InfoSec and insurance conferences (RSA, Gartner, Advisen and NetDillgience) cover the framework more consistently. Prevention and detection remain the most common topic of talks, with no clear temporal trend.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Statistical Confidence in Mining Power Estimates for PoW Blockchains
Authors:
Mary Milad,
Christina Ovezik,
Dimitris Karakostas,
Daniel W. Woods
Abstract:
The security of blockchain systems depends on the distribution of mining power across participants. If sufficient mining power is controlled by one entity, they can force their own version of events. This may allow them to double spend coins, for example. For Proof of Work (PoW) blockchains, however, the distribution of mining power cannot be read directly from the blockchain and must instead be i…
▽ More
The security of blockchain systems depends on the distribution of mining power across participants. If sufficient mining power is controlled by one entity, they can force their own version of events. This may allow them to double spend coins, for example. For Proof of Work (PoW) blockchains, however, the distribution of mining power cannot be read directly from the blockchain and must instead be inferred from the number of blocks mined in a specific sample window. We introduce a framework to quantify this statistical uncertainty for the Nakamoto coefficient, which is a commonly-used measure of blockchain decentralization. We show that aggregating blocks over a day can lead to considerable uncertainty, with Bitcoin failing more than half the hypothesis tests (α = 0.05) when using a daily granularity. For these reasons, we recommend that blocks are aggregated over a sample window of at least 7 days. Instead of reporting a single value, our approach produces a range of possible Nakamoto coefficient values that have statistical support at a particular significance level α.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Alexander Grushin,
Walt Woods,
Alvaro Velasquez,
Simon Khan
Abstract:
Any autonomous controller will be unsafe in some situations. The ability to quantitatively identify when these unsafe situations are about to occur is crucial for drawing timely human oversight in, e.g., freight transportation applications. In this work, we demonstrate that the true criticality of an agent's situation can be robustly defined as the mean reduction in reward given some number of ran…
▽ More
Any autonomous controller will be unsafe in some situations. The ability to quantitatively identify when these unsafe situations are about to occur is crucial for drawing timely human oversight in, e.g., freight transportation applications. In this work, we demonstrate that the true criticality of an agent's situation can be robustly defined as the mean reduction in reward given some number of random actions. Proxy criticality metrics that are computable in real-time (i.e., without actually simulating the effects of random actions) can be compared to the true criticality, and we show how to leverage these proxy metrics to generate safety margins, which directly tie the consequences of potentially incorrect actions to an anticipated loss in overall performance. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment, and demonstrate how safety margins decrease as agents approach failure states. The integration of safety margins into programs for monitoring deployed agents allows for the real-time identification of potentially catastrophic situations.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2024; v1 submitted 25 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
LAGOON: An Analysis Tool for Open Source Communities
Authors:
Sourya Dey,
Walt Woods
Abstract:
This paper presents LAGOON -- an open source platform for understanding the complex ecosystems of Open Source Software (OSS) communities. The platform currently utilizes spatiotemporal graphs to store and investigate the artifacts produced by these communities, and help analysts identify bad actors who might compromise an OSS project's security. LAGOON provides ingest of artifacts from several com…
▽ More
This paper presents LAGOON -- an open source platform for understanding the complex ecosystems of Open Source Software (OSS) communities. The platform currently utilizes spatiotemporal graphs to store and investigate the artifacts produced by these communities, and help analysts identify bad actors who might compromise an OSS project's security. LAGOON provides ingest of artifacts from several common sources, including source code repositories, issue trackers, mailing lists and scraping content from project websites. Ingestion utilizes a modular architecture, which supports incremental updates from data sources and provides a generic identity fusion process that can recognize the same community members across disparate accounts. A user interface is provided for visualization and exploration of an OSS project's complete sociotechnical graph. Scripts are provided for applying machine learning to identify patterns within the data. While current focus is on the identification of bad actors in the Python community, the platform's reusability makes it easily extensible with new data and analyses, paving the way for LAGOON to become a comprehensive means of assessing various OSS-based projects and their communities.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Conflicting Privacy Preference Signals in the Wild
Authors:
Maximilian Hils,
Daniel W. Woods,
Rainer Böhme
Abstract:
Privacy preference signals allow users to express preferences over how their personal data is processed. These signals become important in determining privacy outcomes when they reference an enforceable legal basis, as is the case with recent signals such as the Global Privacy Control and the Transparency & Consent Framework. However, the coexistence of multiple privacy preference signals creates…
▽ More
Privacy preference signals allow users to express preferences over how their personal data is processed. These signals become important in determining privacy outcomes when they reference an enforceable legal basis, as is the case with recent signals such as the Global Privacy Control and the Transparency & Consent Framework. However, the coexistence of multiple privacy preference signals creates ambiguity as users may transmit more than one signal. This paper collects evidence about ambiguity flowing from the aforementioned two signals and the historic Do Not Track signal. We provide the first empirical evidence that ambiguous signals are sent by web users in the wild. We also show that preferences stored in the browser are reliable predictors of privacy preferences expressed in web dialogs. Finally, we provide the first evidence that popular cookie dialogs are blocked by the majority of users who adopted the Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control standards. These empirical results inform forthcoming legal debates about how to interpret privacy preference signals.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Anomaly Detection with Neural Parsers That Never Reject
Authors:
Alexander Grushin,
Walt Woods
Abstract:
Reinforcement learning has recently shown promise as a technique for training an artificial neural network to parse sentences in some unknown format, through a body of work known as RL-GRIT. A key aspect of the RL-GRIT approach is that rather than explicitly inferring a grammar that describes the format, the neural network learns to perform various parsing actions (such as merging two tokens) over…
▽ More
Reinforcement learning has recently shown promise as a technique for training an artificial neural network to parse sentences in some unknown format, through a body of work known as RL-GRIT. A key aspect of the RL-GRIT approach is that rather than explicitly inferring a grammar that describes the format, the neural network learns to perform various parsing actions (such as merging two tokens) over a corpus of sentences, with the goal of maximizing the estimated frequency of the resulting parse structures. This can allow the learning process to more easily explore different action choices, since a given choice may change the optimality of the parse (as expressed by the total reward), but will not result in the failure to parse a sentence. However, this also presents a limitation: because the trained neural network can successfully parse any sentence, it cannot be directly used to identify sentences that deviate from the format of the training sentences, i.e., that are anomalous. In this paper, we address this limitation by presenting procedures for extracting production rules from the neural network, and for using these rules to determine whether a given sentence is nominal or anomalous. When a sentence is anomalous, an attempt is made to identify the location of the anomaly. We empirically demonstrate that our approach is capable of grammatical inference and anomaly detection for both non-regular formats and those containing regions of high randomness/entropy. While a format with high randomness typically requires large sets of production rules, we propose a two pass grammatical inference method to generate parsimonious rule sets for such formats. By further improving parser learning, and leveraging the presented rule extraction and anomaly detection algorithms, one might begin to understand common errors, either benign or malicious, in practical formats.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2022; v1 submitted 30 July, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Privacy Preference Signals: Past, Present and Future
Authors:
Maximilian Hils,
Daniel W. Woods,
Rainer Böhme
Abstract:
Privacy preference signals are digital representations of how users want their personal data to be processed. Such signals must be adopted by both the sender (users) and intended recipients (data processors). Adoption represents a coordination problem that remains unsolved despite efforts dating back to the 1990s. Browsers implemented standards like the Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) and D…
▽ More
Privacy preference signals are digital representations of how users want their personal data to be processed. Such signals must be adopted by both the sender (users) and intended recipients (data processors). Adoption represents a coordination problem that remains unsolved despite efforts dating back to the 1990s. Browsers implemented standards like the Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) and Do Not Track (DNT), but vendors profiting from personal data faced few incentives to receive and respect the expressed wishes of data subjects. In the wake of recent privacy laws, a coalition of AdTech firms published the Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF), which defines an opt-in consent signal. This paper integrates post-GDPR developments into the wider history of privacy preference signals. Our main contribution is a high-frequency longitudinal study describing how TCF signal gained dominance as of February 2021. We explore which factors correlate with adoption at the website level. Both the number of third parties on a website and the presence of Google Ads are associated with higher adoption of TCF. Further, we show that vendors acted as early adopters of TCF 2.0 and provide two case-studies describing how Consent Management Providers shifted existing customers to TCF 2.0. We sketch ways forward for a pro-privacy signal.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2021; v1 submitted 4 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
RL-GRIT: Reinforcement Learning for Grammar Inference
Authors:
Walt Woods
Abstract:
When working to understand usage of a data format, examples of the data format are often more representative than the format's specification. For example, two different applications might use very different JSON representations, or two PDF-writing applications might make use of very different areas of the PDF specification to realize the same rendered content. The complexity arising from these dis…
▽ More
When working to understand usage of a data format, examples of the data format are often more representative than the format's specification. For example, two different applications might use very different JSON representations, or two PDF-writing applications might make use of very different areas of the PDF specification to realize the same rendered content. The complexity arising from these distinct origins can lead to large, difficult-to-understand attack surfaces, presenting a security concern when considering both exfiltration and data schizophrenia. Grammar inference can aid in describing the practical language generator behind examples of a data format. However, most grammar inference research focuses on natural language, not data formats, and fails to support crucial features such as type recursion. We propose a novel set of mechanisms for grammar inference, RL-GRIT, and apply them to understanding de facto data formats. After reviewing existing grammar inference solutions, it was determined that a new, more flexible scaffold could be found in Reinforcement Learning (RL). Within this work, we lay out the many algorithmic changes required to adapt RL from its traditional, sequential-time environment to the highly interdependent environment of parsing. The result is an algorithm which can demonstrably learn recursive control structures in simple data formats, and can extract meaningful structure from fragments of the PDF format. Whereas prior work in grammar inference focused on either regular languages or constituency parsing, we show that RL can be used to surpass the expressiveness of both classes, and offers a clear path to learning context-sensitive languages. The proposed algorithm can serve as a building block for understanding the ecosystems of de facto data formats.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Spoken Digit Classification by In-Materio Reservoir Computing with Neuromorphic Atomic Switch Networks
Authors:
Sam Lilak,
Walt Woods,
Kelsey Scharnhorst,
Christopher Dunham,
Christof Teuscher,
Adam Z. Stieg,
James K. Gimzewski
Abstract:
Atomic Switch Networks (ASN) comprising silver iodide (AgI) junctions, a material previously unexplored as functional memristive elements within highly-interconnected nanowire networks, were employed as a neuromorphic substrate for physical Reservoir Computing (RC). This new class of ASN-based devices has been physically characterized and utilized to classify spoken digit audio data, demonstrating…
▽ More
Atomic Switch Networks (ASN) comprising silver iodide (AgI) junctions, a material previously unexplored as functional memristive elements within highly-interconnected nanowire networks, were employed as a neuromorphic substrate for physical Reservoir Computing (RC). This new class of ASN-based devices has been physically characterized and utilized to classify spoken digit audio data, demonstrating the utility of substrate-based device architectures where intrinsic material properties can be exploited to perform computation in-materio. This work demonstrates high accuracy in the classification of temporally analyzed Free-Spoken Digit Data (FSDD). These results expand upon the class of viable memristive materials available for the production of functional nanowire networks and bolster the utility of ASN-based devices as unique hardware platforms for neuromorphic computing applications involving memory, adaptation and learning.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Post-Incident Audits on Cyber Insurance Discounts
Authors:
Sakshyam Panda,
Daniel W Woods,
Aron Laszka,
Andrew Fielder,
Emmanouil Panaousis
Abstract:
We introduce a game-theoretic model to investigate the strategic interaction between a cyber insurance policyholder whose premium depends on her self-reported security level and an insurer with the power to audit the security level upon receiving an indemnity claim. Audits can reveal fraudulent (or simply careless) policyholders not following reported security procedures, in which case the insurer…
▽ More
We introduce a game-theoretic model to investigate the strategic interaction between a cyber insurance policyholder whose premium depends on her self-reported security level and an insurer with the power to audit the security level upon receiving an indemnity claim. Audits can reveal fraudulent (or simply careless) policyholders not following reported security procedures, in which case the insurer can refuse to indemnify the policyholder. However, the insurer has to bear an audit cost even when the policyholders have followed the prescribed security procedures. As audits can be expensive, a key problem insurers face is to devise an auditing strategy to deter policyholders from misrepresenting their security levels to gain a premium discount. This decision-making problem was motivated by conducting interviews with underwriters and reviewing regulatory filings in the U.S.; we discovered that premiums are determined by security posture, yet this is often self-reported and insurers are concerned by whether security procedures are practised as reported by the policyholders.
To address this problem, we model this interaction as a Bayesian game of incomplete information and devise optimal auditing strategies for the insurers considering the possibility that the policyholder may misrepresent her security level. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first theoretical consideration of post-incident claims management in cyber security. Our model captures the trade-off between the incentive to exaggerate security posture during the application process and the possibility of punishment for non-compliance with reported security policies. Simulations demonstrate that common sense techniques are not as efficient at providing effective cyber insurance audit decisions as the ones computed using game theory.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Adversarial Explanations for Understanding Image Classification Decisions and Improved Neural Network Robustness
Authors:
Walt Woods,
Jack Chen,
Christof Teuscher
Abstract:
For sensitive problems, such as medical imaging or fraud detection, Neural Network (NN) adoption has been slow due to concerns about their reliability, leading to a number of algorithms for explaining their decisions. NNs have also been found vulnerable to a class of imperceptible attacks, called adversarial examples, which arbitrarily alter the output of the network. Here we demonstrate both that…
▽ More
For sensitive problems, such as medical imaging or fraud detection, Neural Network (NN) adoption has been slow due to concerns about their reliability, leading to a number of algorithms for explaining their decisions. NNs have also been found vulnerable to a class of imperceptible attacks, called adversarial examples, which arbitrarily alter the output of the network. Here we demonstrate both that these attacks can invalidate prior attempts to explain the decisions of NNs, and that with very robust networks, the attacks themselves may be leveraged as explanations with greater fidelity to the model. We show that the introduction of a novel regularization technique inspired by the Lipschitz constraint, alongside other proposed improvements, greatly improves an NN's resistance to adversarial examples. On the ImageNet classification task, we demonstrate a network with an Accuracy-Robustness Area (ARA) of 0.0053, an ARA 2.4x greater than the previous state of the art. Improving the mechanisms by which NN decisions are understood is an important direction for both establishing trust in sensitive domains and learning more about the stimuli to which NNs respond.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2019; v1 submitted 7 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Fast and Accurate Sparse Coding of Visual Stimuli with a Simple, Ultra-Low-Energy Spiking Architecture
Authors:
Walt Woods,
Christof Teuscher
Abstract:
Memristive crossbars have become a popular means for realizing unsupervised and supervised learning techniques. In previous neuromorphic architectures with leaky integrate-and-fire neurons, the crossbar itself has been separated from the neuron capacitors to preserve mathematical rigor. In this work, we sought to simplify the design, creating a fast circuit that consumed significantly lower power…
▽ More
Memristive crossbars have become a popular means for realizing unsupervised and supervised learning techniques. In previous neuromorphic architectures with leaky integrate-and-fire neurons, the crossbar itself has been separated from the neuron capacitors to preserve mathematical rigor. In this work, we sought to simplify the design, creating a fast circuit that consumed significantly lower power at a minimal cost of accuracy. We also showed that connecting the neurons directly to the crossbar resulted in a more efficient sparse coding architecture, and alleviated the need to pre-normalize receptive fields. This work provides derivations for the design of such a network, named the Simple Spiking Locally Competitive Algorithm, or SSLCA, as well as CMOS designs and results on the CIFAR and MNIST datasets. Compared to a non-spiking model which scored 33% on CIFAR-10 with a single-layer classifier, this hardware scored 32% accuracy. When used with a state-of-the-art deep learning classifier, the non-spiking model achieved 82% and our simplified, spiking model achieved 80%, while compressing the input data by 92%. Compared to a previously proposed spiking model, our proposed hardware consumed 99% less energy to do the same work at 21x the throughput. Accuracy held out with online learning to a write variance of 3%, suitable for the often-reported 4-bit resolution required for neuromorphic algorithms; with offline learning to a write variance of 27%; and with read variance to 40%. The proposed architecture's excellent accuracy, throughput, and significantly lower energy usage demonstrate the utility of our innovations.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2019; v1 submitted 19 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
