Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Witzel, A

Towards Cancer Hybrid Automata

Authors: Loes Olde Loohuis, Andreas Witzel, Bud Mishra

Abstract: This paper introduces Cancer Hybrid Automata (CHAs), a formalism to model the progression of cancers through discrete phenotypes. The classification of cancer progression using discrete states like stages and hallmarks has become common in the biology literature, but primarily as an organizing principle, and not as an executable formalism. The precise computational model developed here aims to exp… ▽ More This paper introduces Cancer Hybrid Automata (CHAs), a formalism to model the progression of cancers through discrete phenotypes. The classification of cancer progression using discrete states like stages and hallmarks has become common in the biology literature, but primarily as an organizing principle, and not as an executable formalism. The precise computational model developed here aims to exploit this untapped potential, namely, through automatic verification of progression models (e.g., consistency, causal connections, etc.), classification of unreachable or unstable states and computer-generated (individualized or universal) therapy plans. The paper builds on a phenomenological approach, and as such does not need to assume a model for the biochemistry of the underlying natural progression. Rather, it abstractly models transition timings between states as well as the effects of drugs and clinical tests, and thus allows formalization of temporal statements about the progression as well as notions of timed therapies. The model proposed here is ultimately based on hybrid automata, and we show how existing controller synthesis algorithms can be generalized to CHA models, so that therapies can be generated automatically. Throughout this paper we use cancer hallmarks to represent the discrete states through which cancer progresses, but other notions of discretely or continuously varying state formalisms could also be used to derive similar therapies. △ Less

Submitted 19 August, 2012; originally announced August 2012.

Comments: In Proceedings HSB 2012, arXiv:1208.3151

Journal ref: EPTCS 92, 2012, pp. 137-151

Characterizing perfect recall using next-step temporal operators in S5 and sub-S5 Epistemic Temporal Logic

Authors: Andreas Witzel

Abstract: We review the notion of perfect recall in the literature on interpreted systems, game theory, and epistemic logic. In the context of Epistemic Temporal Logic (ETL), we give a (to our knowledge) novel frame condition for perfect recall, which is local and can straightforwardly be translated to a defining formula in a language that only has next-step temporal operators. This frame condition also giv… ▽ More We review the notion of perfect recall in the literature on interpreted systems, game theory, and epistemic logic. In the context of Epistemic Temporal Logic (ETL), we give a (to our knowledge) novel frame condition for perfect recall, which is local and can straightforwardly be translated to a defining formula in a language that only has next-step temporal operators. This frame condition also gives rise to a complete axiomatization for S5 ETL frames with perfect recall. We then consider how to extend and consolidate the notion of perfect recall in sub-S5 settings, where the various notions discussed are no longer equivalent. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2011; v1 submitted 1 October, 2010; originally announced October 2010.

Distributed iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies

Authors: Andreas Witzel, Krzysztof R. Apt, Jonathan A. Zvesper

Abstract: We characterize epistemic consequences of truthful communication among rational agents in a game-theoretic setting. To this end we introduce normal-form games equipped with an interaction structure, which specifies which groups of players can communicate their preferences with each other. We then focus on a specific form of interaction, namely a distributed form of iterated elimination of strictly… ▽ More We characterize epistemic consequences of truthful communication among rational agents in a game-theoretic setting. To this end we introduce normal-form games equipped with an interaction structure, which specifies which groups of players can communicate their preferences with each other. We then focus on a specific form of interaction, namely a distributed form of iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies (IESDS), driven by communication among the agents. We study the outcome of IESDS after some (possibly all) messages about players' preferences have been sent. The main result of the paper provides an epistemic justification of this form of IESDS. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2011; v1 submitted 17 August, 2009; originally announced August 2009.

Common Knowledge in Interaction Structures

Authors: Krzysztof R. Apt, Andreas Witzel, Jonathan A. Zvesper

Abstract: We consider two simple variants of a framework for reasoning about knowledge amongst communicating groups of players. Our goal is to clarify the resulting epistemic issues. In particular, we investigate what is the impact of common knowledge of the underlying hypergraph connecting the players, and under what conditions common knowledge distributes over disjunction. We also obtain two versions of… ▽ More We consider two simple variants of a framework for reasoning about knowledge amongst communicating groups of players. Our goal is to clarify the resulting epistemic issues. In particular, we investigate what is the impact of common knowledge of the underlying hypergraph connecting the players, and under what conditions common knowledge distributes over disjunction. We also obtain two versions of the classic result that common knowledge cannot be achieved in the absence of a simultaneous event (here a message sent to the whole group). △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2009; originally announced July 2009.

Symmetric and Synchronous Communication in Peer-to-Peer Networks

Authors: Andreas Witzel

Abstract: Motivated by distributed implementations of game-theoretical algorithms, we study symmetric process systems and the problem of attaining common knowledge between processes. We formalize our setting by defining a notion of peer-to-peer networks(*) and appropriate symmetry concepts in the context of Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP), due to the common knowledge creating effects of its synch… ▽ More Motivated by distributed implementations of game-theoretical algorithms, we study symmetric process systems and the problem of attaining common knowledge between processes. We formalize our setting by defining a notion of peer-to-peer networks(*) and appropriate symmetry concepts in the context of Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP), due to the common knowledge creating effects of its synchronous communication primitives. We then prove that CSP with input and output guards makes common knowledge in symmetric peer-to-peer networks possible, but not the restricted version which disallows output statements in guards and is commonly implemented. (*) Please note that we are not dealing with fashionable incarnations such as file-sharing networks, but merely use this name for a mathematical notion of a network consisting of directly connected peers "treated on an equal footing", i.e. not having a client-server structure or otherwise pre-determined roles.) △ Less

Submitted 14 April, 2008; v1 submitted 11 October, 2007; originally announced October 2007.

Comments: polished, modernized references; incorporated referee feedback from MPC'08

A Generic Approach to Coalition Formation

Authors: Krzysztof R. Apt, Andreas Witzel

Abstract: We propose an abstract approach to coalition formation that focuses on simple merge and split rules transforming partitions of a group of players. We identify conditions under which every iteration of these rules yields a unique partition. The main conceptual tool is a specific notion of a stable partition. The results are parametrized by a preference relation between partitions of a group of pl… ▽ More We propose an abstract approach to coalition formation that focuses on simple merge and split rules transforming partitions of a group of players. We identify conditions under which every iteration of these rules yields a unique partition. The main conceptual tool is a specific notion of a stable partition. The results are parametrized by a preference relation between partitions of a group of players and naturally apply to coalitional TU-games, hedonic games and exchange economy games. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2009; v1 submitted 4 September, 2007; originally announced September 2007.

Comments: 21 pages. To appear in International Game Theory Review (IGTR)