Trustworthy and Responsible AI for Human-Centric Autonomous Decision-Making Systems
Authors:
Farzaneh Dehghani,
Mahsa Dibaji,
Fahim Anzum,
Lily Dey,
Alican Basdemir,
Sayeh Bayat,
Jean-Christophe Boucher,
Steve Drew,
Sarah Elaine Eaton,
Richard Frayne,
Gouri Ginde,
Ashley Harris,
Yani Ioannou,
Catherine Lebel,
John Lysack,
Leslie Salgado Arzuaga,
Emma Stanley,
Roberto Souza,
Ronnie de Souza Santos,
Lana Wells,
Tyler Williamson,
Matthias Wilms,
Zaman Wahid,
Mark Ungrin,
Marina Gavrilova
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has paved the way for revolutionary decision-making processes, which if harnessed appropriately, can contribute to advancements in various sectors, from healthcare to economics. However, its black box nature presents significant ethical challenges related to bias and transparency. AI applications are hugely impacted by biases, presenting inconsistent and unreliable fin…
▽ More
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has paved the way for revolutionary decision-making processes, which if harnessed appropriately, can contribute to advancements in various sectors, from healthcare to economics. However, its black box nature presents significant ethical challenges related to bias and transparency. AI applications are hugely impacted by biases, presenting inconsistent and unreliable findings, leading to significant costs and consequences, highlighting and perpetuating inequalities and unequal access to resources. Hence, developing safe, reliable, ethical, and Trustworthy AI systems is essential.
Our team of researchers working with Trustworthy and Responsible AI, part of the Transdisciplinary Scholarship Initiative within the University of Calgary, conducts research on Trustworthy and Responsible AI, including fairness, bias mitigation, reproducibility, generalization, interpretability, and authenticity. In this paper, we review and discuss the intricacies of AI biases, definitions, methods of detection and mitigation, and metrics for evaluating bias. We also discuss open challenges with regard to the trustworthiness and widespread application of AI across diverse domains of human-centric decision making, as well as guidelines to foster Responsible and Trustworthy AI models.
△ Less
Submitted 2 September, 2024; v1 submitted 28 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
Federated Diabetes Prediction in Canadian Adults Using Real-world Cross-Province Primary Care Data
Authors:
Guojun Tang,
Jason E. Black,
Tyler S. Williamson,
Steve H. Drew
Abstract:
Integrating Electronic Health Records (EHR) and the application of machine learning present opportunities for enhancing the accuracy and accessibility of data-driven diabetes prediction. In particular, developing data-driven machine learning models can provide early identification of patients with high risk for diabetes, potentially leading to more effective therapeutic strategies and reduced heal…
▽ More
Integrating Electronic Health Records (EHR) and the application of machine learning present opportunities for enhancing the accuracy and accessibility of data-driven diabetes prediction. In particular, developing data-driven machine learning models can provide early identification of patients with high risk for diabetes, potentially leading to more effective therapeutic strategies and reduced healthcare costs. However, regulation restrictions create barriers to developing centralized predictive models. This paper addresses the challenges by introducing a federated learning approach, which amalgamates predictive models without centralized data storage and processing, thus avoiding privacy issues. This marks the first application of federated learning to predict diabetes using real clinical datasets in Canada extracted from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) without crossprovince patient data sharing. We address class-imbalance issues through downsampling techniques and compare federated learning performance against province-based and centralized models. Experimental results show that the federated MLP model presents a similar or higher performance compared to the model trained with the centralized approach. However, the federated logistic regression model showed inferior performance compared to its centralized peer.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
