Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Wijnberg, N M

Toward a Dempster-Shafer theory of concepts

Authors: Sabine Frittella, Krishna Manoorkar, Alessandra Palmigiano, Apostolos Tzimoulis, Nachoem M. Wijnberg

Abstract: In this paper, we generalize the basic notions and results of Dempster-Shafer theory from predicates to formal concepts. Results include the representation of conceptual belief functions as inner measures of suitable probability functions, and a Dempster-Shafer rule of combination on belief functions on formal concepts. In this paper, we generalize the basic notions and results of Dempster-Shafer theory from predicates to formal concepts. Results include the representation of conceptual belief functions as inner measures of suitable probability functions, and a Dempster-Shafer rule of combination on belief functions on formal concepts. △ Less

Submitted 21 January, 2020; v1 submitted 14 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Rough concepts

Authors: Willem Conradie, Sabine Frittella, Krishna Manoorkar, Sajad Nazari, Alessandra Palmigiano, Apostolos Tzimoulis, Nachoem M. Wijnberg

Abstract: The present paper proposes a novel way to unify Rough Set Theory and Formal Concept Analysis. Our method stems from results and insights developed in the algebraic theory of modal logic, and is based on the idea that Pawlak's original approximation spaces can be seen as special instances of enriched formal contexts, i.e. relational structures based on formal contexts from Formal Concept Analysis. The present paper proposes a novel way to unify Rough Set Theory and Formal Concept Analysis. Our method stems from results and insights developed in the algebraic theory of modal logic, and is based on the idea that Pawlak's original approximation spaces can be seen as special instances of enriched formal contexts, i.e. relational structures based on formal contexts from Formal Concept Analysis. △ Less

Submitted 3 February, 2020; v1 submitted 30 June, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Toward an Epistemic-Logical Theory of Categorization

Authors: Willem Conradie, Sabine Frittella, Alessandra Palmigiano, Michele Piazzai, Apostolos Tzimoulis, Nachoem M. Wijnberg

Abstract: Categorization systems are widely studied in psychology, sociology, and organization theory as information-structuring devices which are critical to decision-making processes. In the present paper, we introduce a sound and complete epistemic logic of categories and agents' categorical perception. The Kripke-style semantics of this logic is given in terms of data structures based on two domains:… ▽ More Categorization systems are widely studied in psychology, sociology, and organization theory as information-structuring devices which are critical to decision-making processes. In the present paper, we introduce a sound and complete epistemic logic of categories and agents' categorical perception. The Kripke-style semantics of this logic is given in terms of data structures based on two domains: one domain representing objects (e.g. market products) and one domain representing the features of the objects which are relevant to the agents' decision-making. We use this framework to discuss and propose logic-based formalizations of some core concepts from psychological, sociological, and organizational research in categorization theory. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: In Proceedings TARK 2017, arXiv:1707.08250

Journal ref: EPTCS 251, 2017, pp. 167-186