-
Enabling Seamless Transitions from Experimental to Production HPC for Interactive Workflows
Authors:
Brian D. Etz,
David M. Rogers,
Michael J. Brim,
Ketan Maheshwari,
Kellen Leland,
Tyler J. Skluzacek,
Jack Lange,
Daniel Pelfrey,
Jordan Webb,
Patrick Widener,
Ryan Adamson,
Christopher Zimmer,
Veronica G. Melesse Vergara,
Mallikarjun Shankar,
Sarp Oral,
Rafael Ferreira da Silva
Abstract:
The evolving landscape of scientific computing requires seamless transitions from experimental to production HPC environments for interactive workflows. This paper presents a structured transition pathway developed at OLCF that bridges the gap between development testbeds and production systems. We address both technological and policy challenges, introducing frameworks for data streaming architec…
▽ More
The evolving landscape of scientific computing requires seamless transitions from experimental to production HPC environments for interactive workflows. This paper presents a structured transition pathway developed at OLCF that bridges the gap between development testbeds and production systems. We address both technological and policy challenges, introducing frameworks for data streaming architectures, secure service interfaces, and adaptive resource scheduling for time-sensitive workloads and improved HPC interactivity. Our approach transforms traditional batch-oriented HPC into a more dynamic ecosystem capable of supporting modern scientific workflows that require near real-time data analysis, experimental steering, and cross-facility integration.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
-
FAIR Ecosystems for Science at Scale
Authors:
Sean R. Wilkinson,
Patrick Widener
Abstract:
High Performance Computing (HPC) centers provide resources to users who require greater scale to "get science done". They deploy infrastructure with singular hardware architectures, cutting-edge software environments, and stricter security measures as compared with users' own resources. As a result, users often create and configure digital artifacts in ways that are specialized for the unique infr…
▽ More
High Performance Computing (HPC) centers provide resources to users who require greater scale to "get science done". They deploy infrastructure with singular hardware architectures, cutting-edge software environments, and stricter security measures as compared with users' own resources. As a result, users often create and configure digital artifacts in ways that are specialized for the unique infrastructure at a given HPC center. Each user of that center will face similar challenges as they develop specialized solutions to take full advantages of the center's resources, potentially resulting in significant duplication of effort. Much duplicated effort could be avoided, however, if users of these centers found it easier to discover others' solutions and artifacts as well as share their own.
The FAIR principles address this problem by presenting guidelines focused around metadata practices to be implemented by vaguely defined "communities"; in practice, these tend to gather by domain (e.g. bioinformatics, geosciences, agriculture). Domain-based communities can unfortunately end up functioning as silos that tend both to inhibit sharing of solutions and best practices as well as to encourage fragile and unsustainable improvised solutions in the absence of best-practice guidance. We propose that these communities pursuing "science at scale" be nurtured both individually and collectively by HPC centers so that users can take advantage of shared challenges across disciplines and potentially across HPC centers. We describe an architecture based on the EOSC-Life FAIR Workflows Collaboratory, specialized for use with and inside HPC centers such as the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF), and we speculate on user incentives to encourage adoption. We note that a focus on FAIR workflow components rather than FAIR workflows is more likely to benefit the users of HPC centers.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Workflows Community Summit 2022: A Roadmap Revolution
Authors:
Rafael Ferreira da Silva,
Rosa M. Badia,
Venkat Bala,
Debbie Bard,
Peer-Timo Bremer,
Ian Buckley,
Silvina Caino-Lores,
Kyle Chard,
Carole Goble,
Shantenu Jha,
Daniel S. Katz,
Daniel Laney,
Manish Parashar,
Frederic Suter,
Nick Tyler,
Thomas Uram,
Ilkay Altintas,
Stefan Andersson,
William Arndt,
Juan Aznar,
Jonathan Bader,
Bartosz Balis,
Chris Blanton,
Kelly Rosa Braghetto,
Aharon Brodutch
, et al. (80 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific workflows have become integral tools in broad scientific computing use cases. Science discovery is increasingly dependent on workflows to orchestrate large and complex scientific experiments that range from execution of a cloud-based data preprocessing pipeline to multi-facility instrument-to-edge-to-HPC computational workflows. Given the changing landscape of scientific computing and t…
▽ More
Scientific workflows have become integral tools in broad scientific computing use cases. Science discovery is increasingly dependent on workflows to orchestrate large and complex scientific experiments that range from execution of a cloud-based data preprocessing pipeline to multi-facility instrument-to-edge-to-HPC computational workflows. Given the changing landscape of scientific computing and the evolving needs of emerging scientific applications, it is paramount that the development of novel scientific workflows and system functionalities seek to increase the efficiency, resilience, and pervasiveness of existing systems and applications. Specifically, the proliferation of machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI) workflows, need for processing large scale datasets produced by instruments at the edge, intensification of near real-time data processing, support for long-term experiment campaigns, and emergence of quantum computing as an adjunct to HPC, have significantly changed the functional and operational requirements of workflow systems. Workflow systems now need to, for example, support data streams from the edge-to-cloud-to-HPC enable the management of many small-sized files, allow data reduction while ensuring high accuracy, orchestrate distributed services (workflows, instruments, data movement, provenance, publication, etc.) across computing and user facilities, among others. Further, to accelerate science, it is also necessary that these systems implement specifications/standards and APIs for seamless (horizontal and vertical) integration between systems and applications, as well as enabling the publication of workflows and their associated products according to the FAIR principles. This document reports on discussions and findings from the 2022 international edition of the Workflows Community Summit that took place on November 29 and 30, 2022.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
F*** workflows: when parts of FAIR are missing
Authors:
Sean R. Wilkinson,
Greg Eisenhauer,
Anuj J. Kapadia,
Kathryn Knight,
Jeremy Logan,
Patrick Widener,
Matthew Wolf
Abstract:
The FAIR principles for scientific data (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) are also relevant to other digital objects such as research software and scientific workflows that operate on scientific data. The FAIR principles can be applied to the data being handled by a scientific workflow as well as the processes, software, and other infrastructure which are necessary to specify and exe…
▽ More
The FAIR principles for scientific data (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) are also relevant to other digital objects such as research software and scientific workflows that operate on scientific data. The FAIR principles can be applied to the data being handled by a scientific workflow as well as the processes, software, and other infrastructure which are necessary to specify and execute a workflow. The FAIR principles were designed as guidelines, rather than rules, that would allow for differences in standards for different communities and for different degrees of compliance. There are many practical considerations which impact the level of FAIR-ness that can actually be achieved, including policies, traditions, and technologies. Because of these considerations, obstacles are often encountered during the workflow lifecycle that trace directly to shortcomings in the implementation of the FAIR principles. Here, we detail some cases, without naming names, in which data and workflows were Findable but otherwise lacking in areas commonly needed and expected by modern FAIR methods, tools, and users. We describe how some of these problems, all of which were overcome successfully, have motivated us to push on systems and approaches for fully FAIR workflows.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
