-
Matrix Factorization for Inferring Associations and Missing Links
Authors:
Ryan Barron,
Maksim E. Eren,
Duc P. Truong,
Cynthia Matuszek,
James Wendelberger,
Mary F. Dorn,
Boian Alexandrov
Abstract:
Missing link prediction is a method for network analysis, with applications in recommender systems, biology, social sciences, cybersecurity, information retrieval, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) reasoning in Knowledge Graphs. Missing link prediction identifies unseen but potentially existing connections in a network by analyzing the observed patterns and relationships. In proliferation detection…
▽ More
Missing link prediction is a method for network analysis, with applications in recommender systems, biology, social sciences, cybersecurity, information retrieval, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) reasoning in Knowledge Graphs. Missing link prediction identifies unseen but potentially existing connections in a network by analyzing the observed patterns and relationships. In proliferation detection, this supports efforts to identify and characterize attempts by state and non-state actors to acquire nuclear weapons or associated technology - a notoriously challenging but vital mission for global security. Dimensionality reduction techniques like Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) and Logistic Matrix Factorization (LMF) are effective but require selection of the matrix rank parameter, that is, of the number of hidden features, k, to avoid over/under-fitting. We introduce novel Weighted (WNMFk), Boolean (BNMFk), and Recommender (RNMFk) matrix factorization methods, along with ensemble variants incorporating logistic factorization, for link prediction. Our methods integrate automatic model determination for rank estimation by evaluating stability and accuracy using a modified bootstrap methodology and uncertainty quantification (UQ), assessing prediction reliability under random perturbations. We incorporate Otsu threshold selection and k-means clustering for Boolean matrix factorization, comparing them to coordinate descent-based Boolean thresholding. Our experiments highlight the impact of rank k selection, evaluate model performance under varying test-set sizes, and demonstrate the benefits of UQ for reliable predictions using abstention. We validate our methods on three synthetic datasets (Boolean and uniformly distributed) and benchmark them against LMF and symmetric LMF (symLMF) on five real-world protein-protein interaction networks, showcasing an improved prediction performance.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Workshop on Quantification, Communication, and Interpretation of Uncertainty in Simulation and Data Science
Authors:
Ross Whitaker,
William Thompson,
James Berger,
Baruch Fischhof,
Michael Goodchild,
Mary Hegarty,
Christopher Jermaine,
Kathryn S. McKinley,
Alex Pang,
Joanne Wendelberger
Abstract:
Modern science, technology, and politics are all permeated by data that comes from people, measurements, or computational processes. While this data is often incomplete, corrupt, or lacking in sufficient accuracy and precision, explicit consideration of uncertainty is rarely part of the computational and decision making pipeline. The CCC Workshop on Quantification, Communication, and Interpretatio…
▽ More
Modern science, technology, and politics are all permeated by data that comes from people, measurements, or computational processes. While this data is often incomplete, corrupt, or lacking in sufficient accuracy and precision, explicit consideration of uncertainty is rarely part of the computational and decision making pipeline. The CCC Workshop on Quantification, Communication, and Interpretation of Uncertainty in Simulation and Data Science explored this problem, identifying significant shortcomings in the ways we currently process, present, and interpret uncertain data. Specific recommendations on a research agenda for the future were made in four areas: uncertainty quantification in large-scale computational simulations, uncertainty quantification in data science, software support for uncertainty computation, and better integration of uncertainty quantification and communication to stakeholders.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Quantum Algorithm Implementations for Beginners
Authors:
Abhijith J.,
Adetokunbo Adedoyin,
John Ambrosiano,
Petr Anisimov,
William Casper,
Gopinath Chennupati,
Carleton Coffrin,
Hristo Djidjev,
David Gunter,
Satish Karra,
Nathan Lemons,
Shizeng Lin,
Alexander Malyzhenkov,
David Mascarenas,
Susan Mniszewski,
Balu Nadiga,
Daniel O'Malley,
Diane Oyen,
Scott Pakin,
Lakshman Prasad,
Randy Roberts,
Phillip Romero,
Nandakishore Santhi,
Nikolai Sinitsyn,
Pieter J. Swart
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
As quantum computers become available to the general public, the need has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers, many of whom have been developing classical computer programs for most of their careers. While currently available quantum computers have less than 100 qubits, quantum computing hardware is widely expected to grow in terms of qubit count, quality, and connectivity. This review…
▽ More
As quantum computers become available to the general public, the need has arisen to train a cohort of quantum programmers, many of whom have been developing classical computer programs for most of their careers. While currently available quantum computers have less than 100 qubits, quantum computing hardware is widely expected to grow in terms of qubit count, quality, and connectivity. This review aims to explain the principles of quantum programming, which are quite different from classical programming, with straightforward algebra that makes understanding of the underlying fascinating quantum mechanical principles optional. We give an introduction to quantum computing algorithms and their implementation on real quantum hardware. We survey 20 different quantum algorithms, attempting to describe each in a succinct and self-contained fashion. We show how these algorithms can be implemented on IBM's quantum computer, and in each case, we discuss the results of the implementation with respect to differences between the simulator and the actual hardware runs. This article introduces computer scientists, physicists, and engineers to quantum algorithms and provides a blueprint for their implementations.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2022; v1 submitted 10 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
