Showing 1–15 of 15 results for author: Wadhwa, M

ChartMuseum: Testing Visual Reasoning Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models

Authors: Liyan Tang, Grace Kim, Xinyu Zhao, Thom Lake, Wenxuan Ding, Fangcong Yin, Prasann Singhal, Manya Wadhwa, Zeyu Leo Liu, Zayne Sprague, Ramya Namuduri, Bodun Hu, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Puyuan Peng, Greg Durrett

Abstract: Chart understanding presents a unique challenge for large vision-language models (LVLMs), as it requires the integration of sophisticated textual and visual reasoning capabilities. However, current LVLMs exhibit a notable imbalance between these skills, falling short on visual reasoning that is difficult to perform in text. We conduct a case study using a synthetic dataset solvable only through vi… ▽ More Chart understanding presents a unique challenge for large vision-language models (LVLMs), as it requires the integration of sophisticated textual and visual reasoning capabilities. However, current LVLMs exhibit a notable imbalance between these skills, falling short on visual reasoning that is difficult to perform in text. We conduct a case study using a synthetic dataset solvable only through visual reasoning and show that model performance degrades significantly with increasing visual complexity, while human performance remains robust. We then introduce ChartMuseum, a new Chart Question Answering (QA) benchmark containing 1,162 expert-annotated questions spanning multiple reasoning types, curated from real-world charts across 184 sources, specifically built to evaluate complex visual and textual reasoning. Unlike prior chart understanding benchmarks -- where frontier models perform similarly and near saturation -- our benchmark exposes a substantial gap between model and human performance, while effectively differentiating model capabilities: although humans achieve 93% accuracy, the best-performing model Gemini-2.5-Pro attains only 63.0%, and the leading open-source LVLM Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct achieves only 38.5%. Moreover, on questions requiring primarily visual reasoning, all models experience a 35%-55% performance drop from text-reasoning-heavy question performance. Lastly, our qualitative error analysis reveals specific categories of visual reasoning that are challenging for current LVLMs. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2025; originally announced May 2025.

EvalAgent: Discovering Implicit Evaluation Criteria from the Web

Authors: Manya Wadhwa, Zayne Sprague, Chaitanya Malaviya, Philippe Laban, Junyi Jessy Li, Greg Durrett

Abstract: Evaluation of language model outputs on structured writing tasks is typically conducted with a number of desirable criteria presented to human evaluators or large language models (LLMs). For instance, on a prompt like "Help me draft an academic talk on coffee intake vs research productivity", a model response may be evaluated for criteria like accuracy and coherence. However, high-quality response… ▽ More Evaluation of language model outputs on structured writing tasks is typically conducted with a number of desirable criteria presented to human evaluators or large language models (LLMs). For instance, on a prompt like "Help me draft an academic talk on coffee intake vs research productivity", a model response may be evaluated for criteria like accuracy and coherence. However, high-quality responses should do more than just satisfy basic task requirements. An effective response to this query should include quintessential features of an academic talk, such as a compelling opening, clear research questions, and a takeaway. To help identify these implicit criteria, we introduce EvalAgent, a novel framework designed to automatically uncover nuanced and task-specific criteria. EvalAgent first mines expert-authored online guidance. It then uses this evidence to propose diverse, long-tail evaluation criteria that are grounded in reliable external sources. Our experiments demonstrate that the grounded criteria produced by EvalAgent are often implicit (not directly stated in the user's prompt), yet specific (high degree of lexical precision). Further, EvalAgent criteria are often not satisfied by initial responses but they are actionable, such that responses can be refined to satisfy them. Finally, we show that combining LLM-generated and EvalAgent criteria uncovers more human-valued criteria than using LLMs alone. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Pairwise or Pointwise? Evaluating Feedback Protocols for Bias in LLM-Based Evaluation

Authors: Tuhina Tripathi, Manya Wadhwa, Greg Durrett, Scott Niekum

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used as proxies for human labelers in both training (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback) and large-scale response evaluation (LLM-as-a-judge). Alignment and evaluation are critical components in the development of reliable LLMs, and the choice of feedback protocol plays a central role in both but remains understudied. In this work, we show that the choi… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used as proxies for human labelers in both training (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback) and large-scale response evaluation (LLM-as-a-judge). Alignment and evaluation are critical components in the development of reliable LLMs, and the choice of feedback protocol plays a central role in both but remains understudied. In this work, we show that the choice of feedback protocol (absolute scores versus relative preferences) can significantly affect evaluation reliability and induce systematic biases. In particular, we show that pairwise evaluation protocols are more vulnerable to distracted evaluation. Generator models can exploit spurious attributes (or distractor features) favored by the LLM judge, resulting in inflated scores for lower-quality outputs and misleading training signals. We find that absolute scoring is more robust to such manipulation, producing judgments that better reflect response quality and are less influenced by distractor features. Our results demonstrate that generator models can flip preferences by embedding distractor features, skewing LLM-as-a-judge comparisons and leading to inaccurate conclusions about model quality in benchmark evaluations. Pairwise preferences flip in about 35% of the cases, compared to only 9% for absolute scores. We offer recommendations for choosing feedback protocols based on dataset characteristics and evaluation objectives. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

QUDsim: Quantifying Discourse Similarities in LLM-Generated Text

Authors: Ramya Namuduri, Yating Wu, Anshun Asher Zheng, Manya Wadhwa, Greg Durrett, Junyi Jessy Li

Abstract: As large language models become increasingly capable at various writing tasks, their weakness at generating unique and creative content becomes a major liability. Although LLMs have the ability to generate text covering diverse topics, there is an overall sense of repetitiveness across texts that we aim to formalize and quantify via a similarity metric. The familiarity between documents arises fro… ▽ More As large language models become increasingly capable at various writing tasks, their weakness at generating unique and creative content becomes a major liability. Although LLMs have the ability to generate text covering diverse topics, there is an overall sense of repetitiveness across texts that we aim to formalize and quantify via a similarity metric. The familiarity between documents arises from the persistence of underlying discourse structures. However, existing similarity metrics dependent on lexical overlap and syntactic patterns largely capture $\textit{content}$ overlap, thus making them unsuitable for detecting $\textit{structural}$ similarities. We introduce an abstraction based on linguistic theories in Questions Under Discussion (QUD) and question semantics to help quantify differences in discourse progression. We then use this framework to build $\textbf{QUDsim}$, a similarity metric that can detect discursive parallels between documents. Using QUDsim, we find that LLMs often reuse discourse structures (more so than humans) across samples, even when content differs. Furthermore, LLMs are not only repetitive and structurally uniform, but are also divergent from human authors in the types of structures they use. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoning

Authors: Zayne Sprague, Fangcong Yin, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Dongwei Jiang, Manya Wadhwa, Prasann Singhal, Xinyu Zhao, Xi Ye, Kyle Mahowald, Greg Durrett

Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) via prompting is the de facto method for eliciting reasoning capabilities from large language models (LLMs). But for what kinds of tasks is this extra ``thinking'' really helpful? To analyze this, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis covering over 100 papers using CoT and ran our own evaluations of 20 datasets across 14 models. Our results show that CoT gives strong per… ▽ More Chain-of-thought (CoT) via prompting is the de facto method for eliciting reasoning capabilities from large language models (LLMs). But for what kinds of tasks is this extra ``thinking'' really helpful? To analyze this, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis covering over 100 papers using CoT and ran our own evaluations of 20 datasets across 14 models. Our results show that CoT gives strong performance benefits primarily on tasks involving math or logic, with much smaller gains on other types of tasks. On MMLU, directly generating the answer without CoT leads to almost identical accuracy as CoT unless the question or model's response contains an equals sign, indicating symbolic operations and reasoning. Following this finding, we analyze the behavior of CoT on these problems by separating planning and execution and comparing against tool-augmented LLMs. Much of CoT's gain comes from improving symbolic execution, but it underperforms relative to using a symbolic solver. Our results indicate that CoT can be applied selectively, maintaining performance while saving inference costs. Furthermore, they suggest a need to move beyond prompt-based CoT to new paradigms that better leverage intermediate computation across the whole range of LLM applications. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2025; v1 submitted 18 September, 2024; originally announced September 2024.

Comments: Published at ICLR 2025

Learning to Refine with Fine-Grained Natural Language Feedback

Authors: Manya Wadhwa, Xinyu Zhao, Junyi Jessy Li, Greg Durrett

Abstract: Recent work has explored the capability of large language models (LLMs) to identify and correct errors in LLM-generated responses. These refinement approaches frequently evaluate what sizes of models are able to do refinement for what problems, but less attention is paid to what effective feedback for refinement looks like. In this work, we propose looking at refinement with feedback as a composit… ▽ More Recent work has explored the capability of large language models (LLMs) to identify and correct errors in LLM-generated responses. These refinement approaches frequently evaluate what sizes of models are able to do refinement for what problems, but less attention is paid to what effective feedback for refinement looks like. In this work, we propose looking at refinement with feedback as a composition of three distinct LLM competencies: (1) detection of bad generations; (2) fine-grained natural language critique generation; (3) refining with fine-grained feedback. The first step can be implemented with a high-performing discriminative model and steps 2 and 3 can be implemented either via prompted or fine-tuned LLMs. A key property of the proposed Detect, Critique, Refine ("DCR") method is that the step 2 critique model can give fine-grained feedback about errors, made possible by offloading the discrimination to a separate model in step 1. We show that models of different capabilities benefit from refining with DCR on the task of improving factual consistency of document grounded summaries. Overall, DCR consistently outperforms existing end-to-end refinement approaches and current trained models not fine-tuned for factuality critiquing. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2025; v1 submitted 2 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: Code and models available at: https://github.com/ManyaWadhwa/DCR; Findings of EMNLP 2024

Using Natural Language Explanations to Rescale Human Judgments

Authors: Manya Wadhwa, Jifan Chen, Junyi Jessy Li, Greg Durrett

Abstract: The rise of large language models (LLMs) has brought a critical need for high-quality human-labeled data, particularly for processes like human feedback and evaluation. A common practice is to label data via consensus annotation over human judgments. However, annotators' judgments for subjective tasks can differ in many ways: they may reflect different qualitative judgments about an example, and t… ▽ More The rise of large language models (LLMs) has brought a critical need for high-quality human-labeled data, particularly for processes like human feedback and evaluation. A common practice is to label data via consensus annotation over human judgments. However, annotators' judgments for subjective tasks can differ in many ways: they may reflect different qualitative judgments about an example, and they may be mapped to a labeling scheme in different ways. We show that these nuances can be captured by natural language explanations, and propose a method to rescale ordinal annotations and explanations using LLMs. Specifically, we feed annotators' Likert ratings and corresponding explanations into an LLM and prompt it to produce a numeric score anchored in a scoring rubric. These scores should reflect the annotators' underlying assessments of the example. The rubric can be designed or modified after annotation, and include distinctions that may not have been known when the original error taxonomy was devised. We explore our technique in the context of rating system outputs for a document-grounded question answering task, where LLMs achieve near-human performance. Our method rescales the raw judgments without impacting agreement and brings the scores closer to human judgments grounded in the same scoring rubric. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2025; v1 submitted 24 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Accepted to COLM 2024; code and data: https://github.com/ManyaWadhwa/explanation_based_rescaling

PFSL: Personalized & Fair Split Learning with Data & Label Privacy for thin clients

Authors: Manas Wadhwa, Gagan Raj Gupta, Ashutosh Sahu, Rahul Saini, Vidhi Mittal

Abstract: The traditional framework of federated learning (FL) requires each client to re-train their models in every iteration, making it infeasible for resource-constrained mobile devices to train deep-learning (DL) models. Split learning (SL) provides an alternative by using a centralized server to offload the computation of activations and gradients for a subset of the model but suffers from problems of… ▽ More The traditional framework of federated learning (FL) requires each client to re-train their models in every iteration, making it infeasible for resource-constrained mobile devices to train deep-learning (DL) models. Split learning (SL) provides an alternative by using a centralized server to offload the computation of activations and gradients for a subset of the model but suffers from problems of slow convergence and lower accuracy. In this paper, we implement PFSL, a new framework of distributed split learning where a large number of thin clients perform transfer learning in parallel, starting with a pre-trained DL model without sharing their data or labels with a central server. We implement a lightweight step of personalization of client models to provide high performance for their respective data distributions. Furthermore, we evaluate performance fairness amongst clients under a work fairness constraint for various scenarios of non-i.i.d. data distributions and unequal sample sizes. Our accuracy far exceeds that of current SL algorithms and is very close to that of centralized learning on several real-life benchmarks. It has a very low computation cost compared to FL variants and promises to deliver the full benefits of DL to extremely thin, resource-constrained clients. △ Less

Submitted 19 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: To be published in : THE 23RD IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing. Granted: Open Research Objects (ORO) and Research Objects Reviewed (ROR) badges. See https://www.niso.org/publications/rp-31-2021-badging for definitions of the badges. Code available at: https://github.com/mnswdhw/PFSL

Fairness for Text Classification Tasks with Identity Information Data Augmentation Methods

Authors: Mohit Wadhwa, Mohan Bhambhani, Ashvini Jindal, Uma Sawant, Ramanujam Madhavan

Abstract: Counterfactual fairness methods address the question: How would the prediction change if the sensitive identity attributes referenced in the text instance were different? These methods are entirely based on generating counterfactuals for the given training and test set instances. Counterfactual instances are commonly prepared by replacing sensitive identity terms, i.e., the identity terms present… ▽ More Counterfactual fairness methods address the question: How would the prediction change if the sensitive identity attributes referenced in the text instance were different? These methods are entirely based on generating counterfactuals for the given training and test set instances. Counterfactual instances are commonly prepared by replacing sensitive identity terms, i.e., the identity terms present in the instance are replaced with other identity terms that fall under the same sensitive category. Therefore, the efficacy of these methods depends heavily on the quality and comprehensiveness of identity pairs. In this paper, we offer a two-step data augmentation process where (1) the former stage consists of a novel method for preparing a comprehensive list of identity pairs with word embeddings, and (2) the latter consists of leveraging prepared identity pairs list to enhance the training instances by applying three simple operations (namely identity pair replacement, identity term blindness, and identity pair swap). We empirically show that the two-stage augmentation process leads to diverse identity pairs and an enhanced training set, with an improved counterfactual token-based fairness metric score on two well-known text classification tasks. △ Less

Submitted 4 February, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

SSMF: Shifting Seasonal Matrix Factorization

Authors: Koki Kawabata, Siddharth Bhatia, Rui Liu, Mohit Wadhwa, Bryan Hooi

Abstract: Given taxi-ride counts information between departure and destination locations, how can we forecast their future demands? In general, given a data stream of events with seasonal patterns that innovate over time, how can we effectively and efficiently forecast future events? In this paper, we propose Shifting Seasonal Matrix Factorization approach, namely SSMF, that can adaptively learn multiple se… ▽ More Given taxi-ride counts information between departure and destination locations, how can we forecast their future demands? In general, given a data stream of events with seasonal patterns that innovate over time, how can we effectively and efficiently forecast future events? In this paper, we propose Shifting Seasonal Matrix Factorization approach, namely SSMF, that can adaptively learn multiple seasonal patterns (called regimes), as well as switching between them. Our proposed method has the following properties: (a) it accurately forecasts future events by detecting regime shifts in seasonal patterns as the data stream evolves; (b) it works in an online setting, i.e., processes each observation in constant time and memory; (c) it effectively realizes regime shifts without human intervention by using a lossless data compression scheme. We demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art baseline methods by accurately forecasting upcoming events on three real-world data streams. △ Less

Submitted 25 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: NeurIPS, 2021

Sketch-Based Anomaly Detection in Streaming Graphs

Authors: Siddharth Bhatia, Mohit Wadhwa, Kenji Kawaguchi, Neil Shah, Philip S. Yu, Bryan Hooi

Abstract: Given a stream of graph edges from a dynamic graph, how can we assign anomaly scores to edges and subgraphs in an online manner, for the purpose of detecting unusual behavior, using constant time and memory? For example, in intrusion detection, existing work seeks to detect either anomalous edges or anomalous subgraphs, but not both. In this paper, we first extend the count-min sketch data structu… ▽ More Given a stream of graph edges from a dynamic graph, how can we assign anomaly scores to edges and subgraphs in an online manner, for the purpose of detecting unusual behavior, using constant time and memory? For example, in intrusion detection, existing work seeks to detect either anomalous edges or anomalous subgraphs, but not both. In this paper, we first extend the count-min sketch data structure to a higher-order sketch. This higher-order sketch has the useful property of preserving the dense subgraph structure (dense subgraphs in the input turn into dense submatrices in the data structure). We then propose 4 online algorithms that utilize this enhanced data structure, which (a) detect both edge and graph anomalies; (b) process each edge and graph in constant memory and constant update time per newly arriving edge, and; (c) outperform state-of-the-art baselines on 4 real-world datasets. Our method is the first streaming approach that incorporates dense subgraph search to detect graph anomalies in constant memory and time. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2023; v1 submitted 8 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: Accepted at SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2023

Directed Graph Representation through Vector Cross Product

Authors: Ramanujam Madhavan, Mohit Wadhwa

Abstract: Graph embedding methods embed the nodes in a graph in low dimensional vector space while preserving graph topology to carry out the downstream tasks such as link prediction, node recommendation and clustering. These tasks depend on a similarity measure such as cosine similarity and Euclidean distance between a pair of embeddings that are symmetric in nature and hence do not hold good for directed… ▽ More Graph embedding methods embed the nodes in a graph in low dimensional vector space while preserving graph topology to carry out the downstream tasks such as link prediction, node recommendation and clustering. These tasks depend on a similarity measure such as cosine similarity and Euclidean distance between a pair of embeddings that are symmetric in nature and hence do not hold good for directed graphs. Recent work on directed graphs, HOPE, APP, and NERD, proposed to preserve the direction of edges among nodes by learning two embeddings, source and target, for every node. However, these methods do not take into account the properties of directed edges explicitly. To understand the directional relation among nodes, we propose a novel approach that takes advantage of the non commutative property of vector cross product to learn embeddings that inherently preserve the direction of edges among nodes. We learn the node embeddings through a Siamese neural network where the cross-product operation is incorporated into the network architecture. Although cross product between a pair of vectors is defined in three dimensional, the approach is extended to learn N dimensional embeddings while maintaining the non-commutative property. In our empirical experiments on three real-world datasets, we observed that even very low dimensional embeddings could effectively preserve the directional property while outperforming some of the state-of-the-art methods on link prediction and node recommendation tasks △ Less

Submitted 20 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Fairness-Aware Learning with Prejudice Free Representations

Authors: Ramanujam Madhavan, Mohit Wadhwa

Abstract: Machine learning models are extensively being used to make decisions that have a significant impact on human life. These models are trained over historical data that may contain information about sensitive attributes such as race, sex, religion, etc. The presence of such sensitive attributes can impact certain population subgroups unfairly. It is straightforward to remove sensitive features from t… ▽ More Machine learning models are extensively being used to make decisions that have a significant impact on human life. These models are trained over historical data that may contain information about sensitive attributes such as race, sex, religion, etc. The presence of such sensitive attributes can impact certain population subgroups unfairly. It is straightforward to remove sensitive features from the data; however, a model could pick up prejudice from latent sensitive attributes that may exist in the training data. This has led to the growing apprehension about the fairness of the employed models. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm that can effectively identify and treat latent discriminating features. The approach is agnostic of the learning algorithm and generalizes well for classification as well as regression tasks. It can also be used as a key aid in proving that the model is free of discrimination towards regulatory compliance if the need arises. The approach helps to collect discrimination-free features that would improve the model performance while ensuring the fairness of the model. The experimental results from our evaluations on publicly available real-world datasets show a near-ideal fairness measurement in comparison to other methods. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Group Affect Prediction Using Multimodal Distributions

Authors: Saqib Shamsi, Bhanu Pratap Singh Rawat, Manya Wadhwa

Abstract: We describe our approach towards building an efficient predictive model to detect emotions for a group of people in an image. We have proposed that training a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model on the emotion heatmaps extracted from the image, outperforms a CNN model trained entirely on the raw images. The comparison of the models have been done on a recently published dataset of Emotion Rec… ▽ More We describe our approach towards building an efficient predictive model to detect emotions for a group of people in an image. We have proposed that training a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model on the emotion heatmaps extracted from the image, outperforms a CNN model trained entirely on the raw images. The comparison of the models have been done on a recently published dataset of Emotion Recognition in the Wild (EmotiW) challenge, 2017. The proposed method achieved validation accuracy of 55.23% which is 2.44% above the baseline accuracy, provided by the EmotiW organizers. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2018; v1 submitted 17 September, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Comments: This research paper has been accepted at Workshop on Computer Vision for Active and Assisted Living, WACV 2018

Rules in Play: On the Complexity of Routing Tables and Firewalls

Authors: Mohit Wadhwa, Ambar Pal, Ayush Shah, Paritosh Mittal, H. B. Acharya

Abstract: A fundamental component of networking infras- tructure is the policy, used in routing tables and firewalls. Accordingly, there has been extensive study of policies. However, the theory of such policies indicates that the size of the decision tree for a policy is very large ( O((2n)d), where the policy has n rules and examines d features of packets). If this was indeed the case, the existing algori… ▽ More A fundamental component of networking infras- tructure is the policy, used in routing tables and firewalls. Accordingly, there has been extensive study of policies. However, the theory of such policies indicates that the size of the decision tree for a policy is very large ( O((2n)d), where the policy has n rules and examines d features of packets). If this was indeed the case, the existing algorithms to detect anomalies, conflicts, and redundancies would not be tractable for practical policies (say, n = 1000 and d = 10). In this paper, we clear up this apparent paradox. Using the concept of 'rules in play', we calculate the actual upper bound on the size of the decision tree, and demonstrate how three other factors - narrow fields, singletons, and all-matches make the problem tractable in practice. We also show how this concept may be used to solve an open problem: pruning a policy to the minimum possible number of rules, without changing its meaning. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Comments: On the complexity of Firewalls and Routing Tables