Is one annotation enough? A data-centric image classification benchmark for noisy and ambiguous label estimation
Authors:
Lars Schmarje,
Vasco Grossmann,
Claudius Zelenka,
Sabine Dippel,
Rainer Kiko,
Mariusz Oszust,
Matti Pastell,
Jenny Stracke,
Anna Valros,
Nina Volkmann,
Reinhard Koch
Abstract:
High-quality data is necessary for modern machine learning. However, the acquisition of such data is difficult due to noisy and ambiguous annotations of humans. The aggregation of such annotations to determine the label of an image leads to a lower data quality. We propose a data-centric image classification benchmark with ten real-world datasets and multiple annotations per image to allow researc…
▽ More
High-quality data is necessary for modern machine learning. However, the acquisition of such data is difficult due to noisy and ambiguous annotations of humans. The aggregation of such annotations to determine the label of an image leads to a lower data quality. We propose a data-centric image classification benchmark with ten real-world datasets and multiple annotations per image to allow researchers to investigate and quantify the impact of such data quality issues. With the benchmark we can study the impact of annotation costs and (semi-)supervised methods on the data quality for image classification by applying a novel methodology to a range of different algorithms and diverse datasets. Our benchmark uses a two-phase approach via a data label improvement method in the first phase and a fixed evaluation model in the second phase. Thereby, we give a measure for the relation between the input labeling effort and the performance of (semi-)supervised algorithms to enable a deeper insight into how labels should be created for effective model training. Across thousands of experiments, we show that one annotation is not enough and that the inclusion of multiple annotations allows for a better approximation of the real underlying class distribution. We identify that hard labels can not capture the ambiguity of the data and this might lead to the common issue of overconfident models. Based on the presented datasets, benchmarked methods, and analysis, we create multiple research opportunities for the future directed at the improvement of label noise estimation approaches, data annotation schemes, realistic (semi-)supervised learning, or more reliable image collection.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
A data-centric approach for improving ambiguous labels with combined semi-supervised classification and clustering
Authors:
Lars Schmarje,
Monty Santarossa,
Simon-Martin Schröder,
Claudius Zelenka,
Rainer Kiko,
Jenny Stracke,
Nina Volkmann,
Reinhard Koch
Abstract:
Consistently high data quality is essential for the development of novel loss functions and architectures in the field of deep learning. The existence of such data and labels is usually presumed, while acquiring high-quality datasets is still a major issue in many cases. In real-world datasets we often encounter ambiguous labels due to subjective annotations by annotators. In our data-centric appr…
▽ More
Consistently high data quality is essential for the development of novel loss functions and architectures in the field of deep learning. The existence of such data and labels is usually presumed, while acquiring high-quality datasets is still a major issue in many cases. In real-world datasets we often encounter ambiguous labels due to subjective annotations by annotators. In our data-centric approach, we propose a method to relabel such ambiguous labels instead of implementing the handling of this issue in a neural network. A hard classification is by definition not enough to capture the real-world ambiguity of the data. Therefore, we propose our method "Data-Centric Classification & Clustering (DC3)" which combines semi-supervised classification and clustering. It automatically estimates the ambiguity of an image and performs a classification or clustering depending on that ambiguity. DC3 is general in nature so that it can be used in addition to many Semi-Supervised Learning (SSL) algorithms. On average, this results in a 7.6% better F1-Score for classifications and 7.9% lower inner distance of clusters across multiple evaluated SSL algorithms and datasets. Most importantly, we give a proof-of-concept that the classifications and clusterings from DC3 are beneficial as proposals for the manual refinement of such ambiguous labels. Overall, a combination of SSL with our method DC3 can lead to better handling of ambiguous labels during the annotation process.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2022; v1 submitted 30 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
