Linear Coding Schemes for the Distributed Computation of Subspaces
Authors:
V. Lalitha,
N. Prakash,
K. Vinodh,
P. Vijay Kumar,
S. Sandeep Pradhan
Abstract:
Let $X_1, ..., X_m$ be a set of $m$ statistically dependent sources over the common alphabet $\mathbb{F}_q$, that are linearly independent when considered as functions over the sample space. We consider a distributed function computation setting in which the receiver is interested in the lossless computation of the elements of an $s$-dimensional subspace $W$ spanned by the elements of the row vect…
▽ More
Let $X_1, ..., X_m$ be a set of $m$ statistically dependent sources over the common alphabet $\mathbb{F}_q$, that are linearly independent when considered as functions over the sample space. We consider a distributed function computation setting in which the receiver is interested in the lossless computation of the elements of an $s$-dimensional subspace $W$ spanned by the elements of the row vector $[X_1, \ldots, X_m]Γ$ in which the $(m \times s)$ matrix $Γ$ has rank $s$. A sequence of three increasingly refined approaches is presented, all based on linear encoders.
The first approach uses a common matrix to encode all the sources and a Korner-Marton like receiver to directly compute $W$. The second improves upon the first by showing that it is often more efficient to compute a carefully chosen superspace $U$ of $W$. The superspace is identified by showing that the joint distribution of the $\{X_i\}$ induces a unique decomposition of the set of all linear combinations of the $\{X_i\}$, into a chain of subspaces identified by a normalized measure of entropy. This subspace chain also suggests a third approach, one that employs nested codes. For any joint distribution of the $\{X_i\}$ and any $W$, the sum-rate of the nested code approach is no larger than that under the Slepian-Wolf (SW) approach. Under the SW approach, $W$ is computed by first recovering each of the $\{X_i\}$. For a large class of joint distributions and subspaces $W$, the nested code approach is shown to improve upon SW. Additionally, a class of source distributions and subspaces are identified, for which the nested-code approach is sum-rate optimal.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
D-MG Tradeoff and Optimal Codes for a Class of AF and DF Cooperative Communication Protocols
Authors:
Petros Elia,
K. Vinodh,
M. Anand,
P. Vijay Kumar
Abstract:
We consider cooperative relay communication in a fading channel environment under the Orthogonal Amplify and Forward (OAF) and Orthogonal and Non-Orthogonal Selection Decode and Forward (OSDF and NSDF) protocols. For all these protocols, we compute the Diversity-Multiplexing Gain Tradeoff (DMT). We construct DMT optimal codes for the protocols which are sphere decodable and, in certain cases, in…
▽ More
We consider cooperative relay communication in a fading channel environment under the Orthogonal Amplify and Forward (OAF) and Orthogonal and Non-Orthogonal Selection Decode and Forward (OSDF and NSDF) protocols. For all these protocols, we compute the Diversity-Multiplexing Gain Tradeoff (DMT). We construct DMT optimal codes for the protocols which are sphere decodable and, in certain cases, incur minimum possible delay. Our results establish that the DMT of the OAF protocol is identical to the DMT of the Non-Orthogonal Amplify and Forward (NAF) protocol. Two variants of the NSDF protocol are considered: fixed-NSDF and variable-NSDF protocol. In the variable-NSDF protocol, the fraction of time duration for which the source alone transmits is allowed to vary with the rate of communication. Among the class of static amplify-and-forward and decode-and-forward protocols, the variable-NSDF protocol is shown to have the best known DMT for any number of relays apart from the two-relay case. When there are two relays, the variable-NSDF protocol is shown to improve on the DMT of the best previously-known protocol for higher values of the multiplexing gain. Our results also establish that the fixed-NSDF protocol has a better DMT than the NAF protocol for any number of relays. Finally, we present a DMT optimal code construction for the NAF protocol.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2006;
originally announced November 2006.
