-
Fine-tuning Language Models for Recipe Generation: A Comparative Analysis and Benchmark Study
Authors:
Anneketh Vij,
Changhao Liu,
Rahul Anil Nair,
Theodore Eugene Ho,
Edward Shi,
Ayan Bhowmick
Abstract:
This research presents an exploration and study of the recipe generation task by fine-tuning various very small language models, with a focus on developing robust evaluation metrics and comparing across different language models the open-ended task of recipe generation. This study presents extensive experiments with multiple model architectures, ranging from T5-small (Raffel et al., 2023) and Smol…
▽ More
This research presents an exploration and study of the recipe generation task by fine-tuning various very small language models, with a focus on developing robust evaluation metrics and comparing across different language models the open-ended task of recipe generation. This study presents extensive experiments with multiple model architectures, ranging from T5-small (Raffel et al., 2023) and SmolLM-135M(Allal et al., 2024) to Phi-2 (Research, 2023), implementing both traditional NLP metrics and custom domain-specific evaluation metrics. Our novel evaluation framework incorporates recipe-specific metrics for assessing content quality and introduces approaches to allergen substitution. The results indicate that, while larger models generally perform better on standard metrics, the relationship between model size and recipe quality is more nuanced when considering domain-specific metrics. SmolLM-360M and SmolLM-1.7B demonstrate comparable performance despite their size difference before and after fine-tuning, while fine-tuning Phi-2 shows notable limitations in recipe generation despite its larger parameter count. The comprehensive evaluation framework and allergen substitution systems provide valuable insights for future work in recipe generation and broader NLG tasks that require domain expertise and safety considerations.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2025; v1 submitted 4 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
Domain Adaptation of Llama3-70B-Instruct through Continual Pre-Training and Model Merging: A Comprehensive Evaluation
Authors:
Shamane Siriwardhana,
Mark McQuade,
Thomas Gauthier,
Lucas Atkins,
Fernando Fernandes Neto,
Luke Meyers,
Anneketh Vij,
Tyler Odenthal,
Charles Goddard,
Mary MacCarthy,
Jacob Solawetz
Abstract:
We conducted extensive experiments on domain adaptation of the Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct model on SEC data, exploring its performance on both general and domain-specific benchmarks. Our focus included continual pre-training (CPT) and model merging, aiming to enhance the model's domain-specific capabilities while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Through this study, we evaluated the impact of int…
▽ More
We conducted extensive experiments on domain adaptation of the Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct model on SEC data, exploring its performance on both general and domain-specific benchmarks. Our focus included continual pre-training (CPT) and model merging, aiming to enhance the model's domain-specific capabilities while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Through this study, we evaluated the impact of integrating financial regulatory data into a robust language model and examined the effectiveness of our model merging techniques in preserving and improving the model's instructive abilities. The model is accessible at hugging face: https://huggingface.co/arcee-ai/Llama-3-SEC-Base, arcee-ai/Llama-3-SEC-Base. This is an intermediate checkpoint of our final model, which has seen 20B tokens so far. The full model is still in the process of training. This is a preprint technical report with thorough evaluations to understand the entire process.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Choice modelling in the age of machine learning -- discussion paper
Authors:
S. Van Cranenburgh,
S. Wang,
A. Vij,
F. Pereira,
J. Walker
Abstract:
Since its inception, the choice modelling field has been dominated by theory-driven modelling approaches. Machine learning offers an alternative data-driven approach for modelling choice behaviour and is increasingly drawing interest in our field. Cross-pollination of machine learning models, techniques and practices could help overcome problems and limitations encountered in the current theory-dr…
▽ More
Since its inception, the choice modelling field has been dominated by theory-driven modelling approaches. Machine learning offers an alternative data-driven approach for modelling choice behaviour and is increasingly drawing interest in our field. Cross-pollination of machine learning models, techniques and practices could help overcome problems and limitations encountered in the current theory-driven modelling paradigm, such as subjective labour-intensive search processes for model selection, and the inability to work with text and image data. However, despite the potential benefits of using the advances of machine learning to improve choice modelling practices, the choice modelling field has been hesitant to embrace machine learning. This discussion paper aims to consolidate knowledge on the use of machine learning models, techniques and practices for choice modelling, and discuss their potential. Thereby, we hope not only to make the case that further integration of machine learning in choice modelling is beneficial, but also to further facilitate it. To this end, we clarify the similarities and differences between the two modelling paradigms; we review the use of machine learning for choice modelling; and we explore areas of opportunities for embracing machine learning models and techniques to improve our practices. To conclude this discussion paper, we put forward a set of research questions which must be addressed to better understand if and how machine learning can benefit choice modelling.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2021; v1 submitted 28 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
