-
How to Train Your LLM Web Agent: A Statistical Diagnosis
Authors:
Dheeraj Vattikonda,
Santhoshi Ravichandran,
Emiliano Penaloza,
Hadi Nekoei,
Megh Thakkar,
Thibault Le Sellier de Chezelles,
Nicolas Gontier,
Miguel Muñoz-Mármol,
Sahar Omidi Shayegan,
Stefania Raimondo,
Xue Liu,
Alexandre Drouin,
Laurent Charlin,
Alexandre Piché,
Alexandre Lacoste,
Massimo Caccia
Abstract:
LLM-based web agents have recently made significant progress, but much of it has occurred in closed-source systems, widening the gap with open-source alternatives. Progress has been held back by two key challenges: first, a narrow focus on single-step tasks that overlooks the complexity of multi-step web interactions; and second, the high compute costs required to post-train LLM-based web agents.…
▽ More
LLM-based web agents have recently made significant progress, but much of it has occurred in closed-source systems, widening the gap with open-source alternatives. Progress has been held back by two key challenges: first, a narrow focus on single-step tasks that overlooks the complexity of multi-step web interactions; and second, the high compute costs required to post-train LLM-based web agents. To address this, we present the first statistically grounded study on compute allocation for LLM web-agent post-training. Our approach uses a two-stage pipeline, training a Llama 3.1 8B student to imitate a Llama 3.3 70B teacher via supervised fine-tuning (SFT), followed by on-policy reinforcement learning. We find this process highly sensitive to hyperparameter choices, making exhaustive sweeps impractical. To spare others from expensive trial-and-error, we sample 1,370 configurations and use bootstrapping to estimate effective hyperparameters. Our results show that combining SFT with on-policy RL consistently outperforms either approach alone on both WorkArena and MiniWob++. Further, this strategy requires only 55% of the compute to match the peak performance of pure SFT on MiniWob++, effectively pushing the compute-performance Pareto frontier, and is the only strategy that can close the gap with closed-source models.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2025;
originally announced July 2025.
-
SLACK: Attacking LiDAR-based SLAM with Adversarial Point Injections
Authors:
Prashant Kumar,
Dheeraj Vattikonda,
Kshitij Madhav Bhat,
Kunal Dargan,
Prem Kalra
Abstract:
The widespread adoption of learning-based methods for the LiDAR makes autonomous vehicles vulnerable to adversarial attacks through adversarial \textit{point injections (PiJ)}. It poses serious security challenges for navigation and map generation. Despite its critical nature, no major work exists that studies learning-based attacks on LiDAR-based SLAM. Our work proposes SLACK, an end-to-end deep…
▽ More
The widespread adoption of learning-based methods for the LiDAR makes autonomous vehicles vulnerable to adversarial attacks through adversarial \textit{point injections (PiJ)}. It poses serious security challenges for navigation and map generation. Despite its critical nature, no major work exists that studies learning-based attacks on LiDAR-based SLAM. Our work proposes SLACK, an end-to-end deep generative adversarial model to attack LiDAR scans with several point injections without deteriorating LiDAR quality. To facilitate SLACK, we design a novel yet simple autoencoder that augments contrastive learning with segmentation-based attention for precise reconstructions. SLACK demonstrates superior performance on the task of \textit{point injections (PiJ)} compared to the best baselines on KITTI and CARLA-64 dataset while maintaining accurate scan quality. We qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrate PiJ attacks using a fraction of LiDAR points. It severely degrades navigation and map quality without deteriorating the LiDAR scan quality.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Learning Action and Reasoning-Centric Image Editing from Videos and Simulations
Authors:
Benno Krojer,
Dheeraj Vattikonda,
Luis Lara,
Varun Jampani,
Eva Portelance,
Christopher Pal,
Siva Reddy
Abstract:
An image editing model should be able to perform diverse edits, ranging from object replacement, changing attributes or style, to performing actions or movement, which require many forms of reasoning. Current general instruction-guided editing models have significant shortcomings with action and reasoning-centric edits. Object, attribute or stylistic changes can be learned from visually static dat…
▽ More
An image editing model should be able to perform diverse edits, ranging from object replacement, changing attributes or style, to performing actions or movement, which require many forms of reasoning. Current general instruction-guided editing models have significant shortcomings with action and reasoning-centric edits. Object, attribute or stylistic changes can be learned from visually static datasets. On the other hand, high-quality data for action and reasoning-centric edits is scarce and has to come from entirely different sources that cover e.g. physical dynamics, temporality and spatial reasoning. To this end, we meticulously curate the AURORA Dataset (Action-Reasoning-Object-Attribute), a collection of high-quality training data, human-annotated and curated from videos and simulation engines. We focus on a key aspect of quality training data: triplets (source image, prompt, target image) contain a single meaningful visual change described by the prompt, i.e., truly minimal changes between source and target images. To demonstrate the value of our dataset, we evaluate an AURORA-finetuned model on a new expert-curated benchmark (AURORA-Bench) covering 8 diverse editing tasks. Our model significantly outperforms previous editing models as judged by human raters. For automatic evaluations, we find important flaws in previous metrics and caution their use for semantically hard editing tasks. Instead, we propose a new automatic metric that focuses on discriminative understanding. We hope that our efforts : (1) curating a quality training dataset and an evaluation benchmark, (2) developing critical evaluations, and (3) releasing a state-of-the-art model, will fuel further progress on general image editing.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2024; v1 submitted 3 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Differentiable SLAM Helps Deep Learning-based LiDAR Perception Tasks
Authors:
Prashant Kumar,
Dheeraj Vattikonda,
Vedang Bhupesh Shenvi Nadkarni,
Erqun Dong,
Sabyasachi Sahoo
Abstract:
We investigate a new paradigm that uses differentiable SLAM architectures in a self-supervised manner to train end-to-end deep learning models in various LiDAR based applications. To the best of our knowledge there does not exist any work that leverages SLAM as a training signal for deep learning based models. We explore new ways to improve the efficiency, robustness, and adaptability of LiDAR sys…
▽ More
We investigate a new paradigm that uses differentiable SLAM architectures in a self-supervised manner to train end-to-end deep learning models in various LiDAR based applications. To the best of our knowledge there does not exist any work that leverages SLAM as a training signal for deep learning based models. We explore new ways to improve the efficiency, robustness, and adaptability of LiDAR systems with deep learning techniques. We focus on the potential benefits of differentiable SLAM architectures for improving performance of deep learning tasks such as classification, regression as well as SLAM. Our experimental results demonstrate a non-trivial increase in the performance of two deep learning applications - Ground Level Estimation and Dynamic to Static LiDAR Translation, when used with differentiable SLAM architectures. Overall, our findings provide important insights that enhance the performance of LiDAR based navigation systems. We demonstrate that this new paradigm of using SLAM Loss signal while training LiDAR based models can be easily adopted by the community.
△ Less
Submitted 17 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
