-
How Malicious AI Swarms Can Threaten Democracy
Authors:
Daniel Thilo Schroeder,
Meeyoung Cha,
Andrea Baronchelli,
Nick Bostrom,
Nicholas A. Christakis,
David Garcia,
Amit Goldenberg,
Yara Kyrychenko,
Kevin Leyton-Brown,
Nina Lutz,
Gary Marcus,
Filippo Menczer,
Gordon Pennycook,
David G. Rand,
Frank Schweitzer,
Christopher Summerfield,
Audrey Tang,
Jay Van Bavel,
Sander van der Linden,
Dawn Song,
Jonas R. Kunst
Abstract:
Advances in AI portend a new era of sophisticated disinformation operations. While individual AI systems already create convincing -- and at times misleading -- information, an imminent development is the emergence of malicious AI swarms. These systems can coordinate covertly, infiltrate communities, evade traditional detectors, and run continuous A/B tests, with round-the-clock persistence. The r…
▽ More
Advances in AI portend a new era of sophisticated disinformation operations. While individual AI systems already create convincing -- and at times misleading -- information, an imminent development is the emergence of malicious AI swarms. These systems can coordinate covertly, infiltrate communities, evade traditional detectors, and run continuous A/B tests, with round-the-clock persistence. The result can include fabricated grassroots consensus, fragmented shared reality, mass harassment, voter micro-suppression or mobilization, contamination of AI training data, and erosion of institutional trust. With democratic processes worldwide increasingly vulnerable, we urge a three-pronged response: (1) platform-side defenses -- always-on swarm-detection dashboards, pre-election high-fidelity swarm-simulation stress-tests, transparency audits, and optional client-side "AI shields" for users; (2) model-side safeguards -- standardized persuasion-risk tests, provenance-authenticating passkeys, and watermarking; and (3) system-level oversight -- a UN-backed AI Influence Observatory.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2025; v1 submitted 18 May, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
-
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Authors:
Valerio Capraro,
Austin Lentsch,
Daron Acemoglu,
Selin Akgun,
Aisel Akhmedova,
Ennio Bilancini,
Jean-François Bonnefon,
Pablo Brañas-Garza,
Luigi Butera,
Karen M. Douglas,
Jim A. C. Everett,
Gerd Gigerenzer,
Christine Greenhow,
Daniel A. Hashimoto,
Julianne Holt-Lunstad,
Jolanda Jetten,
Simon Johnson,
Chiara Longoni,
Pete Lunn,
Simone Natale,
Iyad Rahwan,
Neil Selwyn,
Vivek Singh,
Siddharth Suri,
Jennifer Sutcliffe
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing i…
▽ More
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024; v1 submitted 16 December, 2023;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Robust neuromorphic coupled oscillators for adaptive pacemakers
Authors:
Renate Krause,
Joanne J. A. van Bavel,
Chenxi Wu,
Marc A. Vos,
Alain Nogaret,
Giacomo Indiveri
Abstract:
Neural coupled oscillators are a useful building block in numerous models and applications. They were analyzed extensively in theoretical studies and more recently, in biologically realistic simulations of spiking neural networks. The advent of mixed-signal analog/digital neuromorphic electronic circuits provides new means for implementing neural coupled oscillators on compact low-power spiking ne…
▽ More
Neural coupled oscillators are a useful building block in numerous models and applications. They were analyzed extensively in theoretical studies and more recently, in biologically realistic simulations of spiking neural networks. The advent of mixed-signal analog/digital neuromorphic electronic circuits provides new means for implementing neural coupled oscillators on compact low-power spiking neural network hardware platforms. However, their implementation on this noisy, low-precision and inhomogeneous computing substrate raises new challenges with regards to stability and controllability. In this work, we present a robust, spiking neural network model of neural coupled oscillators and validate it with an implementation on a mixed-signal neuromorphic processor. We demonstrate its robustness showing how to reliably control and modulate the oscillator's frequency and phase shift, despite the variability of the silicon synapse and neuron properties. We show how this ultra-low power neural processing system can be used to build an adaptive cardiac pacemaker modulating the heart rate with respect to the respiration phases and compare it with surface ECG and respiratory signal recordings of dogs at rest. The implementation of our model in neuromorphic electronic hardware shows its robustness on a highly variable substrate and extends the toolbox for applications requiring rhythmic outputs such as pacemakers.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
