-
Rethinking low extra delay background transport protocols
Authors:
Giovanna Carofiglio,
Luca Muscariello,
Dario Rossi,
Claudio Testa,
Silvio Valenti
Abstract:
BitTorrent has recently introduced LEDBAT, a novel application-layer congestion control protocol for data exchange. The protocol design starts from the assumption that network bottlenecks are at the access of the network, and that thus user traffic competes creating self-inducing congestion. To relieve from this phenomenon, LEDBAT is designed to quickly infer that self-induced congestion is approa…
▽ More
BitTorrent has recently introduced LEDBAT, a novel application-layer congestion control protocol for data exchange. The protocol design starts from the assumption that network bottlenecks are at the access of the network, and that thus user traffic competes creating self-inducing congestion. To relieve from this phenomenon, LEDBAT is designed to quickly infer that self-induced congestion is approaching (by detecting relative changes of the one-way delay in the transmission path), and to react by reducing the sending rate prior that congestion occurs. Prior work has however shown LEDBAT to be affected by a latecomer advantage, where newly arriving connections can starve already existing flows. In this work, we propose modifications to the congestion window update mechanism of the LEDBAT protocol that aim at solving this issue, guaranteeing thus intra-protocol fairness and efficiency. Closed-form expressions for the stationary throughput and queue occupancy are provided via a fluid model, whose accuracy is confirmed by means of ns2 packet level simulations. Our results show that the proposed change can effective solve the latecomer issue, without affecting the other original LEDBAT goals at the same time.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2010;
originally announced October 2010.
-
The quest for LEDBAT fairness
Authors:
Giovanna Carofiglio,
Luca Muscariello,
Dario Rossi,
Silvio Valenti
Abstract:
BitTorrent developers have recently introduced a new application layer congestion control algorithm based on UDP framing at transport layer and currently under definition at the IETF LEDBAT Working Group. LEDBAT is a delay-based protocol which aims at offering a "lower than Best Effort" data transfer service, with a lower priority with respect to elastic TCP and interactive traffic (e.g., VoIP, ga…
▽ More
BitTorrent developers have recently introduced a new application layer congestion control algorithm based on UDP framing at transport layer and currently under definition at the IETF LEDBAT Working Group. LEDBAT is a delay-based protocol which aims at offering a "lower than Best Effort" data transfer service, with a lower priority with respect to elastic TCP and interactive traffic (e.g., VoIP, game). However, in its current specification, LEDBAT is affected by a late-comer advantage: indeed the last flow arriving at the bottleneck is more aggressive due to a wrong estimation of the base delay and finally takes over all resources. In this work, we study several solutions to the late-comer problem by means of packet level simulations and simple analysis: in the investigation process, we individuate the root cause for LEDBAT unfairness and propose effective countermeasures.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2010;
originally announced June 2010.
-
News from the Internet congestion control world
Authors:
Dario Rossi,
Claudio Testa,
Silvio Valenti,
Paolo Veglia,
Luca Muscariello
Abstract:
A few months ago, the BitTorrent developers announced that the transfer of torrent data in the official client was about to switch to uTP, an application-layer congestion-control protocol using UDP at the transport-layer. This announcement immediately raised an unmotivated buzz about a new, imminent congestion collapse of the whole Internet. Though this reaction was not built on solid technical…
▽ More
A few months ago, the BitTorrent developers announced that the transfer of torrent data in the official client was about to switch to uTP, an application-layer congestion-control protocol using UDP at the transport-layer. This announcement immediately raised an unmotivated buzz about a new, imminent congestion collapse of the whole Internet. Though this reaction was not built on solid technical foundation, nevertheless a legitimate question remains: i.e., whether this novel algorithm is a necessary building block for future Internet applications, or whether it may result in an umpteenth addition to the already well populated world of Internet congestion control algorithms.
In this paper, we tackle precisely this issue. The novel protocol is now under discussion at the IETF LEDBAT working group, and has been defined in a draft document in March 2009, whose adoption decision will be taken at the beginning of August 2009. Adhering to the IETF draft definition, we implement the LEDBAT congestion control algorithm and investigate its performance by means of packet-level simulations. Considering a simple bottleneck scenario where LEDBAT competes against either TCP or other LEDBAT flows, we evaluate the fairness of the resource share as well as its efficiency. Our preliminary results show that indeed, there is an undoubted appeal behind the novel application-layer congestion-control protocol. Yet, care must be taken in order to ensure that some important points, such as intra-protocol fairness, are fully clarified in the draft specification -- which we hope that this work can contribute to.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2009;
originally announced August 2009.
