Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Urruela, M

ArgHiTZ at ArchEHR-QA 2025: A Two-Step Divide and Conquer Approach to Patient Question Answering for Top Factuality

Authors: Adrián Cuadrón, Aimar Sagasti, Maitane Urruela, Iker De la Iglesia, Ane G Domingo-Aldama, Aitziber Atutxa, Josu Goikoetxea, Ander Barrena

Abstract: This work presents three different approaches to address the ArchEHR-QA 2025 Shared Task on automated patient question answering. We introduce an end-to-end prompt-based baseline and two two-step methods to divide the task, without utilizing any external knowledge. Both two step approaches first extract essential sentences from the clinical text, by prompt or similarity ranking, and then generate… ▽ More This work presents three different approaches to address the ArchEHR-QA 2025 Shared Task on automated patient question answering. We introduce an end-to-end prompt-based baseline and two two-step methods to divide the task, without utilizing any external knowledge. Both two step approaches first extract essential sentences from the clinical text, by prompt or similarity ranking, and then generate the final answer from these notes. Results indicate that the re-ranker based two-step system performs best, highlighting the importance of selecting the right approach for each subtask. Our best run achieved an overall score of 0.44, ranking 8th out of 30 on the leaderboard, securing the top position in overall factuality. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2025; originally announced June 2025.

Comments: This paper has been accepted for publication in Proceedings of the 24th Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing (BioNLP) at ACL 2025

Medical Argument Mining: Exploitation of Scarce Data Using NLI Systems

Authors: Maitane Urruela, Sergio Martín, Iker De la Iglesia, Ander Barrena

Abstract: This work presents an Argument Mining process that extracts argumentative entities from clinical texts and identifies their relationships using token classification and Natural Language Inference techniques. Compared to straightforward methods like text classification, this methodology demonstrates superior performance in data-scarce settings. By assessing the effectiveness of these methods in ide… ▽ More This work presents an Argument Mining process that extracts argumentative entities from clinical texts and identifies their relationships using token classification and Natural Language Inference techniques. Compared to straightforward methods like text classification, this methodology demonstrates superior performance in data-scarce settings. By assessing the effectiveness of these methods in identifying argumentative structures that support or refute possible diagnoses, this research lays the groundwork for future tools that can provide evidence-based justifications for machine-generated clinical conclusions. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2025; originally announced June 2025.

Comments: Accepted in the journal Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural