-
Late-Binding Scholarship in the Age of AI: Navigating Legal and Normative Challenges of a New Form of Knowledge Production
Authors:
Bill Tomlinson,
Andrew W. Torrance,
Rebecca W. Black,
Donald J. Patterson
Abstract:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is poised to enable a new leap in the creation of scholarly content. New forms of engagement with AI systems, such as collaborations with large language models like GPT-3, offer affordances that will change the nature of both the scholarly process and the artifacts it produces. This article articulates ways in which those artifacts can be written, distributed, read, or…
▽ More
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is poised to enable a new leap in the creation of scholarly content. New forms of engagement with AI systems, such as collaborations with large language models like GPT-3, offer affordances that will change the nature of both the scholarly process and the artifacts it produces. This article articulates ways in which those artifacts can be written, distributed, read, organized, and stored that are more dynamic, and potentially more effective, than current academic practices. Specifically, rather than the current "early-binding" process (that is, one in which ideas are fully reduced to a final written form before they leave an author's desk), we propose that there are substantial benefits to a "late-binding" process, in which ideas are written dynamically at the moment of reading. In fact, the paradigm of "binding" knowledge may transition to a new model in which scholarship remains ever "unbound" and evolving. An alternative form for a scholarly work could be encapsulated via several key components: a text abstract of the work's core arguments; hyperlinks to a bibliography of relevant related work; novel data that had been collected and metadata describing those data; algorithms or processes necessary for analyzing those data; a reference to a particular AI model that would serve as a "renderer" of the canonical version of the text; and specified parameters that would allow for a precise, word-for-word reconstruction of the canonical version. Such a form would enable both the rendering of the canonical version, and also the possibility of dynamic AI reimaginings of the text in light of future findings, scholarship unknown to the original authors, alternative theories, and precise tailoring to specific audiences (e.g., children, adults, professionals, amateurs).
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
ChatGPT and Works Scholarly: Best Practices and Legal Pitfalls in Writing with AI
Authors:
Bill Tomlinson,
Andrew W. Torrance,
Rebecca W. Black
Abstract:
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have raised questions about whether the use of AI is appropriate and legal in various professional contexts. Here, we present a perspective on how scholars may approach writing in conjunction with AI, and offer approaches to evaluating whether or not such AI-writing violates copyright or falls within the safe harbor of fair use. We present a set of b…
▽ More
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have raised questions about whether the use of AI is appropriate and legal in various professional contexts. Here, we present a perspective on how scholars may approach writing in conjunction with AI, and offer approaches to evaluating whether or not such AI-writing violates copyright or falls within the safe harbor of fair use. We present a set of best practices for standard of care with regard to plagiarism, copyright, and fair use. As AI is likely to grow more capable in the coming years, it is appropriate to begin integrating AI into scholarly writing activities. We offer a framework for establishing sound legal and scholarly foundations.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Training Is Everything: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Fair Training
Authors:
Andrew W. Torrance,
Bill Tomlinson
Abstract:
To learn how to behave, the current revolutionary generation of AIs must be trained on vast quantities of published images, written works, and sounds, many of which fall within the core subject matter of copyright law. To some, the use of copyrighted works as training sets for AI is merely a transitory and non-consumptive use that does not materially interfere with owners' content or copyrights pr…
▽ More
To learn how to behave, the current revolutionary generation of AIs must be trained on vast quantities of published images, written works, and sounds, many of which fall within the core subject matter of copyright law. To some, the use of copyrighted works as training sets for AI is merely a transitory and non-consumptive use that does not materially interfere with owners' content or copyrights protecting it. Companies that use such content to train their AI engine often believe such usage should be considered "fair use" under United States law (sometimes known as "fair dealing" in other countries). By contrast, many copyright owners, as well as their supporters, consider the incorporation of copyrighted works into training sets for AI to constitute misappropriation of owners' intellectual property, and, thus, decidedly not fair use under the law. This debate is vital to the future trajectory of AI and its applications.
In this article, we analyze the arguments in favor of, and against, viewing the use of copyrighted works in training sets for AI as fair use. We call this form of fair use "fair training". We identify both strong and spurious arguments on both sides of this debate. In addition, we attempt to take a broader perspective, weighing the societal costs (e.g., replacement of certain forms of human employment) and benefits (e.g., the possibility of novel AI-based approaches to global issues such as environmental disruption) of allowing AI to make easy use of copyrighted works as training sets to facilitate the development, improvement, adoption, and diffusion of AI. Finally, we suggest that the debate over AI and copyrighted works may be a tempest in a teapot when placed in the wider context of massive societal challenges such as poverty, equality, climate change, and loss of biodiversity, to which AI may be part of the solution.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Governance of the AI, by the AI, and for the AI
Authors:
Andrew W. Torrance,
Bill Tomlinson
Abstract:
Over the past half century, there have been several false dawns during which the "arrival" of world-changing artificial intelligence (AI) has been heralded. Tempting fate, the authors believe the age of AI has, indeed, finally arrived. Powerful image generators, such as DALL-E2 and Midjourney have suddenly allowed anyone with access the ability easily to create rich and complex art. In a similar v…
▽ More
Over the past half century, there have been several false dawns during which the "arrival" of world-changing artificial intelligence (AI) has been heralded. Tempting fate, the authors believe the age of AI has, indeed, finally arrived. Powerful image generators, such as DALL-E2 and Midjourney have suddenly allowed anyone with access the ability easily to create rich and complex art. In a similar vein, text generators, such as GPT3.5 (including ChatGPT) and BLOOM, allow users to compose detailed written descriptions of many topics of interest. And, it is even possible now for a person without extensive expertise in writing software to use AI to generate code capable of myriad applications. While AI will continue to evolve and improve, probably at a rapid rate, the current state of AI is already ushering in profound changes to many different sectors of society. Every new technology challenges the ability of humanity to govern it wisely. However, governance is usually viewed as both possible and necessary due to the disruption new technology often poses to social structures, industries, the environment, and other important human concerns. In this article, we offer an analysis of a range of interactions between AI and governance, with the hope that wise decisions may be made that maximize benefits and minimize costs. The article addresses two main aspects of this relationship: the governance of AI by humanity, and the governance of humanity by AI. The approach we have taken is itself informed by AI, as this article was written collaboratively by the authors and ChatGPT.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Scientists' Warning on Technology
Authors:
Bill Tomlinson,
Andrew W. Torrance,
William J. Ripple
Abstract:
In the past several years, scientists have issued a series of warnings about the threats of climate change and other forms of environmental disruption. Here, we provide a scientists' warning on how technology affects these issues. Technology simultaneously provides substantial benefits for humanity, and also profound costs. Current technological systems are exacerbating climate change and the whol…
▽ More
In the past several years, scientists have issued a series of warnings about the threats of climate change and other forms of environmental disruption. Here, we provide a scientists' warning on how technology affects these issues. Technology simultaneously provides substantial benefits for humanity, and also profound costs. Current technological systems are exacerbating climate change and the wholesale conversion of the Earth's ecosystems. Adopting new technologies, such as clean energy technologies and artificial intelligence, may be necessary for addressing these crises. Such transformation is not without risks, but it may help set human civilizations on a path to a sustainable future.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The Carbon Emissions of Writing and Illustrating Are Lower for AI than for Humans
Authors:
Bill Tomlinson,
Rebecca W. Black,
Donald J. Patterson,
Andrew W. Torrance
Abstract:
As AI systems proliferate, their greenhouse gas emissions are an increasingly important concern for human societies. We analyze the emissions of several AI systems (ChatGPT, BLOOM, DALL-E2, Midjourney) relative to those of humans completing the same tasks. We find that an AI writing a page of text emits 130 to 1500 times less CO2e than a human doing so. Similarly, an AI creating an image emits 310…
▽ More
As AI systems proliferate, their greenhouse gas emissions are an increasingly important concern for human societies. We analyze the emissions of several AI systems (ChatGPT, BLOOM, DALL-E2, Midjourney) relative to those of humans completing the same tasks. We find that an AI writing a page of text emits 130 to 1500 times less CO2e than a human doing so. Similarly, an AI creating an image emits 310 to 2900 times less. Emissions analysis do not account for social impacts such as professional displacement, legality, and rebound effects. In addition, AI is not a substitute for all human tasks. Nevertheless, at present, the use of AI holds the potential to carry out several major activities at much lower emission levels than can humans.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
