Recommendations for repositories and scientific gateways from a neuroscience perspective
Authors:
Malin Sandström,
Mathew Abrams,
Jan Bjaalie,
Mona Hicks,
David Kennedy,
Arvind Kumar,
JB Poline,
Prasun Roy,
Paul Tiesinga,
Thomas Wachtler,
Wojtek Goscinski
Abstract:
Digital services such as repositories and science gateways have become key resources for the neuroscience community, but users often have a hard time orienting themselves in the service landscape to find the best fit for their particular needs. INCF (International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility) has developed a set of recommendations and associated criteria for choosing or setting up and r…
▽ More
Digital services such as repositories and science gateways have become key resources for the neuroscience community, but users often have a hard time orienting themselves in the service landscape to find the best fit for their particular needs. INCF (International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility) has developed a set of recommendations and associated criteria for choosing or setting up and running a repository or scientific gateway, intended for the neuroscience community, with a FAIR neuroscience perspective. These recommendations have neurosciences as their primary use case but are often general. Considering the perspectives of researchers and providers of repositories as well as scientific gateways, the recommendations harmonize and complement existing work on criteria for repositories and best practices. The recommendations cover a range of important areas including accessibility, licensing, community responsibility and technical and financial sustainability of a service.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
