-
Safe physical HRI: Toward a unified treatment of speed and separation monitoring together with power and force limiting
Authors:
Petr Svarny,
Michael Tesar,
Jan Kristof Behrens,
Matej Hoffmann
Abstract:
So-called collaborative robots are a current trend in industrial robotics. However, they still face many problems in practical application such as reduced speed to ascertain their collaborativeness. The standards prescribe two regimes: (i) speed and separation monitoring and (ii) power and force limiting, where the former requires reliable estimation of distances between the robot and human body p…
▽ More
So-called collaborative robots are a current trend in industrial robotics. However, they still face many problems in practical application such as reduced speed to ascertain their collaborativeness. The standards prescribe two regimes: (i) speed and separation monitoring and (ii) power and force limiting, where the former requires reliable estimation of distances between the robot and human body parts and the latter imposes constraints on the energy absorbed during collisions prior to robot stopping. Following the standards, we deploy the two collaborative regimes in a single application and study the performance in a mock collaborative task under the individual regimes, including transitions between them. Additionally, we compare the performance under "safety zone monitoring" with keypoint pair-wise separation distance assessment relying on an RGB-D sensor and skeleton extraction algorithm to track human body parts in the workspace. Best performance has been achieved in the following setting: robot operates at full speed until a distance threshold between any robot and human body part is crossed; then, reduced robot speed per power and force limiting is triggered. Robot is halted only when the operator's head crosses a predefined distance from selected robot parts. We demonstrate our methodology on a setup combining a KUKA LBR iiwa robot, Intel RealSense RGB-D sensor and OpenPose for human pose estimation.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2020; v1 submitted 8 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Teaching robots to imitate a human with no on-teacher sensors. What are the key challenges?
Authors:
Radoslav Skoviera,
Karla Stepanova,
Michael Tesar,
Gabriela Sejnova,
Jiri Sedlar,
Michal Vavrecka,
Robert Babuska,
Josef Sivic
Abstract:
In this paper, we consider the problem of learning object manipulation tasks from human demonstration using RGB or RGB-D cameras. We highlight the key challenges in capturing sufficiently good data with no tracking devices - starting from sensor selection and accurate 6DoF pose estimation to natural language processing. In particular, we focus on two showcases: gluing task with a glue gun and simp…
▽ More
In this paper, we consider the problem of learning object manipulation tasks from human demonstration using RGB or RGB-D cameras. We highlight the key challenges in capturing sufficiently good data with no tracking devices - starting from sensor selection and accurate 6DoF pose estimation to natural language processing. In particular, we focus on two showcases: gluing task with a glue gun and simple block-stacking with variable blocks. Furthermore, we discuss how a linguistic description of the task could help to improve the accuracy of task description. We also present the whole architecture of our transfer of the imitated task to the simulated and real robot environment.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Locally Constrained Homomorphisms on Graphs of Bounded Treewidth and Bounded Degree
Authors:
Steven Chaplick,
Jiří Fiala,
Pim van 't Hof,
Daniël Paulusma,
Marek Tesař
Abstract:
A homomorphism from a graph G to a graph H is locally bijective, surjective, or injective if its restriction to the neighborhood of every vertex of G is bijective, surjective, or injective, respectively. We prove that the problems of testing whether a given graph G allows a homomorphism to a given graph H that is locally bijective, surjective, or injective, respectively, are NP-complete, even when…
▽ More
A homomorphism from a graph G to a graph H is locally bijective, surjective, or injective if its restriction to the neighborhood of every vertex of G is bijective, surjective, or injective, respectively. We prove that the problems of testing whether a given graph G allows a homomorphism to a given graph H that is locally bijective, surjective, or injective, respectively, are NP-complete, even when G has pathwidth at most 5, 4, or 2, respectively, or when both G and H have maximum degree 3. We complement these hardness results by showing that the three problems are polynomial-time solvable if G has bounded treewidth and in addition G or H has bounded maximum degree.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2014;
originally announced August 2014.
-
Rainbow Colouring of Split Graphs
Authors:
L. Sunil Chandran,
Deepak Rajendraprasad,
Marek Tesař
Abstract:
A rainbow path in an edge coloured graph is a path in which no two edges are coloured the same. A rainbow colouring of a connected graph G is a colouring of the edges of G such that every pair of vertices in G is connected by at least one rainbow path. The minimum number of colours required to rainbow colour G is called its rainbow connection number. Between them, Chakraborty et al. [J. Comb. Opti…
▽ More
A rainbow path in an edge coloured graph is a path in which no two edges are coloured the same. A rainbow colouring of a connected graph G is a colouring of the edges of G such that every pair of vertices in G is connected by at least one rainbow path. The minimum number of colours required to rainbow colour G is called its rainbow connection number. Between them, Chakraborty et al. [J. Comb. Optim., 2011] and Ananth et al. [FSTTCS, 2012] have shown that for every integer k, k \geq 2, it is NP-complete to decide whether a given graph can be rainbow coloured using k colours.
A split graph is a graph whose vertex set can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. Chandran and Rajendraprasad have shown that the problem of deciding whether a given split graph G can be rainbow coloured using 3 colours is NP-complete and further have described a linear time algorithm to rainbow colour any split graph using at most one colour more than the optimum [COCOON, 2012]. In this article, we settle the computational complexity of the problem on split graphs and thereby discover an interesting dichotomy. Specifically, we show that the problem of deciding whether a given split graph can be rainbow coloured using k colours is NP-complete for k \in {2,3}, but can be solved in polynomial time for all other values of k.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.