-
Triadic Social Structure Facilitates Backing for Crowdfunding Projects
Authors:
Yutaka Nakai,
Hiroki Takikawa
Abstract:
Crowdfunding is a new funding method through which founders request small amounts of funding from a large number of people through an online platform. Crowdfunding facilitates a new type of social capital and exhibits a unique form of social dynamics, thus attracting the interest of sociologists and other social scientists. Previous studies have focused on social relationships in crowdfunding such…
▽ More
Crowdfunding is a new funding method through which founders request small amounts of funding from a large number of people through an online platform. Crowdfunding facilitates a new type of social capital and exhibits a unique form of social dynamics, thus attracting the interest of sociologists and other social scientists. Previous studies have focused on social relationships in crowdfunding such as direct reciprocity and consider how they contribute to the success of funding. The social structure of crowdfunding, however, involves more complex social relationships and it may contribute to the success of a new venture or project in many ways. In this study, we focus on a specific type of triadic social structure, the buddy relation, which can be described as a relationship through which project founder x, who previously backed another founder z's project, receives financial backing from the other backers of z's project. We found that the buddy relation occurs significantly more often than randomly, concluding that this structure facilitates the gathering of financial backing and may contribute to the success of a crowdfunded project.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2018; v1 submitted 12 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Political Polarization in Social Media: Analysis of the "Twitter Political Field" in Japan
Authors:
Hiroki Takikawa,
Kikuko Nagayoshi
Abstract:
There is an ongoing debate about whether the Internet is like a public sphere or an echo chamber. Among many forms of social media, Twitter is one of the most crucial online places for political debate. Most of the previous studies focus on the formal structure of the Twitter political field, such as its homophilic tendency, or otherwise limit the analysis to a few topics. In order to explore whet…
▽ More
There is an ongoing debate about whether the Internet is like a public sphere or an echo chamber. Among many forms of social media, Twitter is one of the most crucial online places for political debate. Most of the previous studies focus on the formal structure of the Twitter political field, such as its homophilic tendency, or otherwise limit the analysis to a few topics. In order to explore whether Twitter functions as an echo chamber in general, however, we have to investigate not only the structure but also the contents of Twitter's political field. Accordingly, we conducted both large-scale social network analysis and natural language processing. We firstly applied a community detection method to the reciprocal following network in Twitter and found five politically distinct communities in the field. We further examined dominant topics discussed therein by employing a topic model in analyzing the content of the tweets, and we found that a topic related to xenophobia is circulated solely in right-wing communities. To our knowledge, this is the first study to address echo chambers in Japanese Twitter political field and to examine the formal structure and the contents of tweets with the combination of large-scale social network analysis and natural language processing.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Cross-National Measurement of Polarization in Political Discourse: Analyzing floor debate in the U.S. and the Japanese legislatures
Authors:
Takuto Sakamoto,
Hiroki Takikawa
Abstract:
Political polarization in public space can seriously hamper the function and the integrity of contemporary democratic societies. In this paper, we propose a novel measure of such polarization, which, by way of simple topic modelling, quantifies differences in collective articulation of public agendas among relevant political actors. Unlike most other polarization measures, our measure allows cross…
▽ More
Political polarization in public space can seriously hamper the function and the integrity of contemporary democratic societies. In this paper, we propose a novel measure of such polarization, which, by way of simple topic modelling, quantifies differences in collective articulation of public agendas among relevant political actors. Unlike most other polarization measures, our measure allows cross-national comparison. Analyzing a large amount of speech records of legislative debate in the United States Congress and the Japanese Diet over a long period of time, we have reached two intriguing findings. First, on average, Japanese political actors are far more polarized in their issue articulation than their counterparts in the U.S., which is somewhat surprising given the recent notion of U.S. politics as highly polarized. Second, the polarization in each country shows its own temporal dynamics in response to a different set of factors. In Japan, structural factors such as the roles of the ruling party and the opposition often dominate such dynamics, whereas the U.S. legislature suffers from persistent ideological differences over particular issues between major political parties. The analysis confirms a strong influence of institutional differences on legislative debate in parliamentary democracies.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Moral Foundations of Political Discourse: Comparative Analysis of the Speech Records of the US Congress and the Japanese Diet
Authors:
Hiroki Takikawa,
Takuto Sakamoto
Abstract:
There has been a growing body of study on the relationship between public/political discourse and its moral-emotional foundations. Most of the studies, however, have been confined to a single country's context, lacking cross-cultural perspectives. Taking a comparative perspective, we examined the emotional and moral structures of political and public discussion observed in the U.S. and Japan by em…
▽ More
There has been a growing body of study on the relationship between public/political discourse and its moral-emotional foundations. Most of the studies, however, have been confined to a single country's context, lacking cross-cultural perspectives. Taking a comparative perspective, we examined the emotional and moral structures of political and public discussion observed in the U.S. and Japan by employing extensive text data that cover these two countries. Specifically, we conducted dictionary-based sentiment and moral analyses of floor debate in the U.S. Congress and the Japanese Diet over a long period of time. The analyses revealed intriguing cross-national patterns in the moral-emotional framework employed in parliamentary deliberations, which cast doubt on some of the dominant arguments in the field, including, among others, J. Haidt's moral foundation hypothesis.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
