Skip to main content

Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Strobel, M

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2405.19351  [pdf, other

    eess.SP cs.LG cs.NE

    Resonate-and-Fire Spiking Neurons for Target Detection and Hand Gesture Recognition: A Hybrid Approach

    Authors: Ahmed Shaaban, Zeineb Chaabouni, Maximilian Strobel, Wolfgang Furtner, Robert Weigel, Fabian Lurz

    Abstract: Hand gesture recognition using radar often relies on computationally expensive fast Fourier transforms. This paper proposes an alternative approach that bypasses fast Fourier transforms using resonate-and-fire neurons. These neurons directly detect the hand in the time-domain signal, eliminating the need for fast Fourier transforms to retrieve range information. Following detection, a simple Goert… ▽ More

    Submitted 22 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

    Journal ref: 2024 Smart Systems Integration Conference and Exhibition (SSI)

  2. Gesture Recognition for FMCW Radar on the Edge

    Authors: Maximilian Strobel, Stephan Schoenfeldt, Jonas Daugalas

    Abstract: This paper introduces a lightweight gesture recognition system based on 60 GHz frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar. We show that gestures can be characterized efficiently by a set of five features, and propose a slim radar processing algorithm to extract these features. In contrast to previous approaches, we avoid heavy 2D processing, i.e. range-Doppler imaging, and perform instead an… ▽ More

    Submitted 25 January, 2024; v1 submitted 13 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

    Comments: 4 pages, 5 figures, accepted in 2024 IEEE Topical Conference on Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks (WiSNeT)

    Journal ref: 2024 IEEE Topical Conference on Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks (WiSNeT), San Antonio, TX, USA, 2024, pp. 45-48

  3. On The Impact of Machine Learning Randomness on Group Fairness

    Authors: Prakhar Ganesh, Hongyan Chang, Martin Strobel, Reza Shokri

    Abstract: Statistical measures for group fairness in machine learning reflect the gap in performance of algorithms across different groups. These measures, however, exhibit a high variance between different training instances, which makes them unreliable for empirical evaluation of fairness. What causes this high variance? We investigate the impact on group fairness of different sources of randomness in tra… ▽ More

    Submitted 9 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

    Comments: 10 pages + Appendix

  4. arXiv:2306.12609  [pdf, other

    cs.AI cs.CY

    Towards Regulatable AI Systems: Technical Gaps and Policy Opportunities

    Authors: Xudong Shen, Hannah Brown, Jiashu Tao, Martin Strobel, Yao Tong, Akshay Narayan, Harold Soh, Finale Doshi-Velez

    Abstract: There is increasing attention being given to how to regulate AI systems. As governing bodies grapple with what values to encapsulate into regulation, we consider the technical half of the question: To what extent can AI experts vet an AI system for adherence to regulatory requirements? We investigate this question through the lens of two public sector procurement checklists, identifying what we ca… ▽ More

    Submitted 27 March, 2024; v1 submitted 21 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

    Comments: scheduled for publication in the Communications of the ACM, titled "Directions of Technical Innovation for Regulatable AI Systems"

  5. arXiv:2302.05807  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    Pushing the Accuracy-Group Robustness Frontier with Introspective Self-play

    Authors: Jeremiah Zhe Liu, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham, Jihyeon Lee, Quan Yuan, Martin Strobel, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Deepak Ramachandran

    Abstract: Standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) training can produce deep neural network (DNN) models that are accurate on average but under-perform in under-represented population subgroups, especially when there are imbalanced group distributions in the long-tailed training data. Therefore, approaches that improve the accuracy-group robustness trade-off frontier of a DNN model (i.e. improving worst-g… ▽ More

    Submitted 11 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

    Comments: Accepted to ICLR 2023. Included additional contribution from Martin Strobel

  6. Data Privacy and Trustworthy Machine Learning

    Authors: Martin Strobel, Reza Shokri

    Abstract: The privacy risks of machine learning models is a major concern when training them on sensitive and personal data. We discuss the tradeoffs between data privacy and the remaining goals of trustworthy machine learning (notably, fairness, robustness, and explainability).

    Submitted 14 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

    Comments: Copyright ©2022, IEEE

    Journal ref: Published in: IEEE Security & Privacy ( Volume: 20, Issue: 5, Sept.-Oct. 2022)

  7. arXiv:2006.08969  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    High Dimensional Model Explanations: an Axiomatic Approach

    Authors: Neel Patel, Martin Strobel, Yair Zick

    Abstract: Complex black-box machine learning models are regularly used in critical decision-making domains. This has given rise to several calls for algorithmic explainability. Many explanation algorithms proposed in literature assign importance to each feature individually. However, such explanations fail to capture the joint effects of sets of features. Indeed, few works so far formally analyze high-dimen… ▽ More

    Submitted 29 March, 2021; v1 submitted 16 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

    Comments: 31 pages, 10 Figures, 2 Tables

  8. arXiv:1907.00164  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    On the Privacy Risks of Model Explanations

    Authors: Reza Shokri, Martin Strobel, Yair Zick

    Abstract: Privacy and transparency are two key foundations of trustworthy machine learning. Model explanations offer insights into a model's decisions on input data, whereas privacy is primarily concerned with protecting information about the training data. We analyze connections between model explanations and the leakage of sensitive information about the model's training set. We investigate the privacy ri… ▽ More

    Submitted 5 February, 2021; v1 submitted 29 June, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

    Comments: 19 pages, 13 figures

  9. arXiv:1801.07648  [pdf, other

    cs.LG cs.AI cs.CV cs.NE stat.ML

    Clustering with Deep Learning: Taxonomy and New Methods

    Authors: Elie Aljalbout, Vladimir Golkov, Yawar Siddiqui, Maximilian Strobel, Daniel Cremers

    Abstract: Clustering methods based on deep neural networks have proven promising for clustering real-world data because of their high representational power. In this paper, we propose a systematic taxonomy of clustering methods that utilize deep neural networks. We base our taxonomy on a comprehensive review of recent work and validate the taxonomy in a case study. In this case study, we show that the taxon… ▽ More

    Submitted 13 September, 2018; v1 submitted 23 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

    MSC Class: 62H30; 62M45; 91C20 ACM Class: H.3.3; I.2.6; I.5; I.5.3; I.5.4

  10. arXiv:1708.02153  [pdf, other

    cs.AI

    Axiomatic Characterization of Data-Driven Influence Measures for Classification

    Authors: Jakub Sliwinski, Martin Strobel, Yair Zick

    Abstract: We study the following problem: given a labeled dataset and a specific datapoint x, how did the i-th feature influence the classification for x? We identify a family of numerical influence measures - functions that, given a datapoint x, assign a numeric value phi_i(x) to every feature i, corresponding to how altering i's value would influence the outcome for x. This family, which we term monotone… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 November, 2018; v1 submitted 7 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.