Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Speicher, M

Listen to Users, but Only 85% of the Time: How Black Swans Can Save Innovation in a Data-Driven World

Authors: Maximilian Speicher

Abstract: Data-driven design is a proven success factor that more and more digital businesses embrace. At the same time, academics and practitioners alike warn that when virtually everything must be tested and proven with numbers, that can stifle creativity and innovation. This article argues that Taleb's Black Swan theory can solve this dilemma. It shows that online experimentation, and therefore digital d… ▽ More Data-driven design is a proven success factor that more and more digital businesses embrace. At the same time, academics and practitioners alike warn that when virtually everything must be tested and proven with numbers, that can stifle creativity and innovation. This article argues that Taleb's Black Swan theory can solve this dilemma. It shows that online experimentation, and therefore digital design, are fat-tailed phenomena and, hence, prone to Black Swans. It introduces the notion of Black Swan designs -- "crazy" designs that make sense only in hindsight -- along with four specific criteria. To ensure incremental improvements and their potential for innovation, businesses should apply Taleb's barbell strategy: Invest 85-90% of resources into data-driven approaches and 10-15% into potential Black Swans. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 17 pages; Originally published in The UX Collective (ISSN: 2766-5267) on August 9, 2022, under https://uxdesign.cc/listen-to-users-but-only-85-of-the-time-da96c2f9dde6

ACM Class: H.5.2; K.6.1

REFOCUS: Current & Future Search Interface Requirements for German-speaking Users

Authors: Maximilian Speicher, Andreas Both, Martin Gaedke

Abstract: While smartphones are widely used for web browsing, also other novel devices like Smart TVs become increasingly popular. Yet, current interfaces do not cater for the newly available devices beyond touch and small screens, if at all for the latter. Particularly search engines -- today's entry points of the WWW -- must ensure their interfaces are easy to use on any web-enabled device. We report on a… ▽ More While smartphones are widely used for web browsing, also other novel devices like Smart TVs become increasingly popular. Yet, current interfaces do not cater for the newly available devices beyond touch and small screens, if at all for the latter. Particularly search engines -- today's entry points of the WWW -- must ensure their interfaces are easy to use on any web-enabled device. We report on a survey that investigated (1) users' perception and usage of current search interfaces, and (2) their expectations towards current and future search interfaces. Users are mostly satisfied with desktop and mobile search, but seem to be skeptical towards web search with novel devices and input modalities. Hence, we derive REFOCUS -- a novel set of requirements for current and future search interfaces, which shall address the demand for improvement of novel web search and has been validated by 12 dedicated experts. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2022; v1 submitted 29 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: Originally published by IADIS in the Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on WWW/Internet (ICWI '16). The final publication is available at http://iadisportal.org/digital-library/refocus-current-future-search-interface-requirements-for-german-speaking-users

What is Usability? A Characterization based on ISO 9241-11 and ISO/IEC 25010

Authors: Maximilian Speicher

Abstract: According to Brooke [1] "Usability does not exist in any absolute sense; it can only be defined with reference to particular contexts." That is, one cannot speak of usability without specifying what that particular usability is characterized by. Driven by the feedback of a reviewer at an international conference, I explore in which way one can precisely specify the kind of usability they are inves… ▽ More According to Brooke [1] "Usability does not exist in any absolute sense; it can only be defined with reference to particular contexts." That is, one cannot speak of usability without specifying what that particular usability is characterized by. Driven by the feedback of a reviewer at an international conference, I explore in which way one can precisely specify the kind of usability they are investigating in a given setting. Finally, I come up with a formalism that defines usability as a quintuple comprising the elements level of usability metrics, product, users, goals and context of use. Providing concrete values for these elements then constitutes the investigated type of usability. The use of this formalism is demonstrated in two case studies. [1] J. Brooke. SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, and A. L. McClelland, editors, Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis, 1996. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2022; v1 submitted 24 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: Technical Report; Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Chemnitz; also available from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-159949

Report number: CSR-15-02