Assessment of Left Atrium Motion Deformation Through Full Cardiac Cycle
Authors:
Abdul Qayyum,
Moona Mazher,
Angela Lee,
Jose A Solis-Lemus,
Imran Razzak,
Steven A Niederer
Abstract:
Unlike Right Atrium (RA), Left Atrium (LA) presents distinctive challenges, including much thinner myocardial walls, complex and irregular morphology, as well as diversity in individual's structure, making off-the-shelf methods designed for the Left Ventricle (LV) may not work in the context of the left atrium. To overcome aforementioned challenges, we are the first to present comprehensive techni…
▽ More
Unlike Right Atrium (RA), Left Atrium (LA) presents distinctive challenges, including much thinner myocardial walls, complex and irregular morphology, as well as diversity in individual's structure, making off-the-shelf methods designed for the Left Ventricle (LV) may not work in the context of the left atrium. To overcome aforementioned challenges, we are the first to present comprehensive technical workflow designed for 4D registration modeling to automatically analyze LA motion using high-resolution 3D Cine MR images. We integrate segmentation network and 4D registration process to precisely delineate LA segmentation throughout the full cardiac cycle. Additionally, an image 4D registration network is employed to extract LA displacement vector fields (DVFs). Our findings show the potential of proposed end to end framework in providing clinicians with novel regional biomarkers for left atrium motion tracking and deformation, carrying significant clinical implications.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
Evaluation of an Open-Source Pipeline to Create Patient-Specific Left Atrial Models: A Reproducibility Study
Authors:
Jose Alonso Solis-Lemus,
Tiffany Baptiste,
Rosie Barrows,
Charles Sillett,
Ali Gharaviri,
Giulia Raffaele,
Orod Razeghi,
Marina Strocchi,
Iain Sim,
Irum Kotadia,
Neil Bodagh,
Daniel O'Hare,
Mark O'Neill,
Steven E Williams,
Caroline Roney,
Steven Niederer
Abstract:
We present an open-source software pipeline to create patient-specific left atrial (LA) models with fibre orientations and a fibrosis map, suitable for electrophysiology simulations. The semi-automatic pipeline takes as input a contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiogram, and a late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) contrast magnetic resonance (CMR). Five operators were allocated 20 cases each from a s…
▽ More
We present an open-source software pipeline to create patient-specific left atrial (LA) models with fibre orientations and a fibrosis map, suitable for electrophysiology simulations. The semi-automatic pipeline takes as input a contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiogram, and a late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) contrast magnetic resonance (CMR). Five operators were allocated 20 cases each from a set of 50 CMR datasets to create a total of 100 models to evaluate inter/intra-operator variability. Each output model consisted of (1) a labelled surface mesh open at the pulmonary veins (PV) and mitral valve (MV), (2) fibre orientations mapped from a diffusion tensor MRI human atlas, (3) fibrosis map from the LGE-CMR scan, and (4) simulation of local activation time (LAT) and phase singularity (PS) mapping. We evaluated reproducibility in our pipeline by comparing agreement in shape of the output meshes, fibrosis distribution in the LA body, and fibre orientations; simulations outputs were evaluated comparing total activation times of LAT maps, mean conduction velocity (CV), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) of PS maps. Our workflow allows a single model to be created in 16.72 +/- 12.25 minutes. Results in this abstract are reported as inter/intra. Shape only differed noticeably with users' selection of the MV and the length of the PV from the ostia to the distal end; fibrosis agreement (0.91/0.99 ICC) and fibre orientation agreement (60.63/71.77 %) were high. LAT maps showed good agreement, the median of the absolute difference of the total activation times was 2.02ms/1.37ms. The average of the mean CV difference was -4.04mm/s / 2.1mm/s. PS maps showed a moderately good agreement with SSIM of 0.648/0.608. Although we found notable differences in the models due to user input, our tests show that operator variability was comparable to that of image resolution or fibre estimation.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 17 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
