-
Counting Vanishing Matrix-Vector Products
Authors:
Cornelius Brand,
Viktoriia Korchemna,
Michael Skotnica,
Kirill Simonov
Abstract:
Consider the following parameterized counting variation of the classic subset sum problem, which arises notably in the context of higher homotopy groups of topological spaces: Let $\mathbf{v} \in \mathbb{Q}^d$ be a rational vector, $(T_{1}, T_{2} \ldots T_{m})$ a list of $d \times d$ rational matrices, $S \in \mathbb{Q}^{h \times d}$ a rational matrix not necessarily square and $k$ a parameter. Th…
▽ More
Consider the following parameterized counting variation of the classic subset sum problem, which arises notably in the context of higher homotopy groups of topological spaces: Let $\mathbf{v} \in \mathbb{Q}^d$ be a rational vector, $(T_{1}, T_{2} \ldots T_{m})$ a list of $d \times d$ rational matrices, $S \in \mathbb{Q}^{h \times d}$ a rational matrix not necessarily square and $k$ a parameter. The goal is to compute the number of ways one can choose $k$ matrices $T_{i_1}, T_{i_2}, \ldots, T_{i_k}$ from the list such that $ST_{i_k} \cdots T_{i_1}\mathbf{v} = \mathbf{0} \in \mathbb{Q}^h$.
In this paper, we show that this problem is $\# W[2]$-hard for parameter $k$. As a consequence, computing the $k$-th homotopy group of a $d$-dimensional 1-connected topological space for $d > 3$ is $\# W[2]$-hard for parameter $k$. We also discuss a decision version of the problem and its several modifications for which we show $W[1]/W[2]$-hardness. This is in contrast to the parameterized $k$-sum problem, which is only $W[1]$-hard (Abboud-Lewi-Williams, ESA'14). In addition, we show that the decision version of the problem without parameter is an undecidable problem, and we give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for matrices of bounded size over finite fields, parameterized the matrix dimensions and the order of the field.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2023; v1 submitted 24 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
VEST is W[2]-hard
Authors:
Michael Skotnica
Abstract:
In this short note, we show that the problem of VEST is $W[2]$-hard for parameter $k$. This strengthens a result of Matoušek, who showed $W[1]$-hardness of that problem. The consequence of this result is that computing the $k$-th homotopy group of a $d$-dimensional space for $d > 3$ is $W[2]$-hard for parameter $k$.
In this short note, we show that the problem of VEST is $W[2]$-hard for parameter $k$. This strengthens a result of Matoušek, who showed $W[1]$-hardness of that problem. The consequence of this result is that computing the $k$-th homotopy group of a $d$-dimensional space for $d > 3$ is $W[2]$-hard for parameter $k$.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
NP-hardness of computing PL geometric category in dimension 2
Authors:
Michael Skotnica,
Martin Tancer
Abstract:
The PL geometric category of a polyhedron $P$, denoted $\hbox{plgcat}(P)$, provides a natural upper bound for the Lusternik--Schnirelmann category and it is defined as the minimum number of PL collapsible subpolyhedra of $P$ that cover $P$. In dimension 2 the PL geometric category is at most~3. It is easy to characterize/recognize $2$-polyhedra $P$ with $\hbox{plgcat}(P) = 1$. Borghini provided a…
▽ More
The PL geometric category of a polyhedron $P$, denoted $\hbox{plgcat}(P)$, provides a natural upper bound for the Lusternik--Schnirelmann category and it is defined as the minimum number of PL collapsible subpolyhedra of $P$ that cover $P$. In dimension 2 the PL geometric category is at most~3. It is easy to characterize/recognize $2$-polyhedra $P$ with $\hbox{plgcat}(P) = 1$. Borghini provided a partial characterization of $2$-polyhedra with $\hbox{plgcat}(P) = 2$. We complement his result by showing that it is NP-hard to decide whether $\hbox{plgcat}(P)\leq 2$. Therefore, we should not expect much more than a partial characterization, at least in algorithmic sense. Our reduction is based on the observation that 2-dimensional polyhedra $P$ admitting a shellable subdivision satisfy $\hbox{plgcat}(P) \leq 2$ and a (nontrivial) modification of the reduction of Goaoc, Paták, Patáková, Tancer and Wagner showing that shellability of $2$-complexes is NP-hard.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2023; v1 submitted 29 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
How Expressive Are Friendly School Partitions?
Authors:
Josef Minařík,
Shay Moran,
Michael Skotnica
Abstract:
A natural procedure for assigning students to classes in the beginning of the school-year is to let each student write down a list of $d$ other students with whom she/he wants to be in the same class (typically $d=3$). The teachers then gather all the lists and try to assign the students to classes in a way that each student is assigned to the same class with at least one student from her/his list…
▽ More
A natural procedure for assigning students to classes in the beginning of the school-year is to let each student write down a list of $d$ other students with whom she/he wants to be in the same class (typically $d=3$). The teachers then gather all the lists and try to assign the students to classes in a way that each student is assigned to the same class with at least one student from her/his list. We refer to such partitions as friendly. In realistic scenarios, the teachers may also consider other constraints when picking the friendly partition: e.g. there may be a group of students whom the teachers wish to avoid assigning to the same class; alternatively, there may be two close friends whom the teachers want to put together; etc.
Inspired by such challenges, we explore questions concerning the expressiveness of friendly partitions. For example: Does there always exist a friendly partition? More generally, how many friendly partitions are there? Can every student $u$ be separated from any other student $v$? Does there exist a student $u$ that can be separated from any other student $v$?
We show that when $d\geq 3$ there always exist at least $2$ friendly partitions and when $d\geq 15$ there always exists a student $u$ which can be separated from any other student $v$. The question regarding separability of each pair of students is left open, but we give a positive answer under the additional assumption that each student appears in at most roughly $\exp(d)$ lists. We further suggest several open questions and present some preliminary findings towards resolving them.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
No-three-in-line problem on a torus: periodicity
Authors:
Michael Skotnica
Abstract:
Let $τ_{m,n}$ denote the maximal number of points on the discrete torus (discrete toric grid) of sizes $m \times n$ with no three collinear points. The value $τ_{m,n}$ is known for the case where $\gcd(m,n)$ is prime. It is also known that $τ_{m,n} \leq 2\gcd(m,n)$.
In this paper we generalize some of the known tools for determining $τ_{m,n}$ and also show some new. Using these tools we prove th…
▽ More
Let $τ_{m,n}$ denote the maximal number of points on the discrete torus (discrete toric grid) of sizes $m \times n$ with no three collinear points. The value $τ_{m,n}$ is known for the case where $\gcd(m,n)$ is prime. It is also known that $τ_{m,n} \leq 2\gcd(m,n)$.
In this paper we generalize some of the known tools for determining $τ_{m,n}$ and also show some new. Using these tools we prove that the sequence $(τ_{z,n})_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ is periodic for all fixed $z > 1$. In general, we do not know the period; however, if $z = p^a$ for $p$ prime, then we can bound it. We prove that $τ_{p^a,p^{(a-1)p+2}} = 2p^a$ which implies that the period for the sequence is $p^b$ where $b$ is at most $(a-1)p+2$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2019; v1 submitted 25 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
