-
CoRet: Improved Retriever for Code Editing
Authors:
Fabio Fehr,
Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad,
Luca Franceschi,
Giovanni Zappella
Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce CoRet, a dense retrieval model designed for code-editing tasks that integrates code semantics, repository structure, and call graph dependencies. The model focuses on retrieving relevant portions of a code repository based on natural language queries such as requests to implement new features or fix bugs. These retrieved code chunks can then be presented to a user or to…
▽ More
In this paper, we introduce CoRet, a dense retrieval model designed for code-editing tasks that integrates code semantics, repository structure, and call graph dependencies. The model focuses on retrieving relevant portions of a code repository based on natural language queries such as requests to implement new features or fix bugs. These retrieved code chunks can then be presented to a user or to a second code-editing model or agent. To train CoRet, we propose a loss function explicitly designed for repository-level retrieval. On SWE-bench and Long Code Arena's bug localisation datasets, we show that our model substantially improves retrieval recall by at least 15 percentage points over existing models, and ablate the design choices to show their importance in achieving these results.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
SWE-PolyBench: A multi-language benchmark for repository level evaluation of coding agents
Authors:
Muhammad Shihab Rashid,
Christian Bock,
Yuan Zhuang,
Alexander Buchholz,
Tim Esler,
Simon Valentin,
Luca Franceschi,
Martin Wistuba,
Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad,
Woo Jung Kim,
Anoop Deoras,
Giovanni Zappella,
Laurent Callot
Abstract:
Coding agents powered by large language models have shown impressive capabilities in software engineering tasks, but evaluating their performance across diverse programming languages and real-world scenarios remains challenging. We introduce SWE-PolyBench, a new multi-language benchmark for repository-level, execution-based evaluation of coding agents. SWE-PolyBench contains 2110 instances from 21…
▽ More
Coding agents powered by large language models have shown impressive capabilities in software engineering tasks, but evaluating their performance across diverse programming languages and real-world scenarios remains challenging. We introduce SWE-PolyBench, a new multi-language benchmark for repository-level, execution-based evaluation of coding agents. SWE-PolyBench contains 2110 instances from 21 repositories and includes tasks in Java (165), JavaScript (1017), TypeScript (729) and Python (199), covering bug fixes, feature additions, and code refactoring. We provide a task and repository-stratified subsample (SWE-PolyBench500) and release an evaluation harness allowing for fully automated evaluation. To enable a more comprehensive comparison of coding agents, this work also presents a novel set of metrics rooted in syntax tree analysis. We evaluate leading open source coding agents on SWE-PolyBench, revealing their strengths and limitations across languages, task types, and complexity classes. Our experiments show that current agents exhibit uneven performances across languages and struggle with complex problems while showing higher performance on simpler tasks. SWE-PolyBench aims to drive progress in developing more versatile and robust AI coding assistants for real-world software engineering. Our datasets and code are available at: https://github.com/amazon-science/SWE-PolyBench
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2025; v1 submitted 11 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Choice of PEFT Technique in Continual Learning: Prompt Tuning is Not All You Need
Authors:
Martin Wistuba,
Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad,
Lukas Balles,
Giovanni Zappella
Abstract:
Recent Continual Learning (CL) methods have combined pretrained Transformers with prompt tuning, a parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) technique. We argue that the choice of prompt tuning in prior works was an undefended and unablated decision, which has been uncritically adopted by subsequent research, but warrants further research to understand its implications. In this paper, we conduct this…
▽ More
Recent Continual Learning (CL) methods have combined pretrained Transformers with prompt tuning, a parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) technique. We argue that the choice of prompt tuning in prior works was an undefended and unablated decision, which has been uncritically adopted by subsequent research, but warrants further research to understand its implications. In this paper, we conduct this research and find that the choice of prompt tuning as a PEFT method hurts the overall performance of the CL system. To illustrate this, we replace prompt tuning with LoRA in two state-of-the-art continual learning methods: Learning to Prompt and S-Prompts. These variants consistently achieve higher accuracy across a wide range of domain-incremental and class-incremental benchmarks, while being competitive in inference speed. Our work highlights a crucial argument: unexamined choices can hinder progress in the field, and rigorous ablations, such as the PEFT method, are required to drive meaningful adoption of CL techniques in real-world applications.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Continual Learning with Low Rank Adaptation
Authors:
Martin Wistuba,
Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad,
Lukas Balles,
Giovanni Zappella
Abstract:
Recent work using pretrained transformers has shown impressive performance when fine-tuned with data from the downstream problem of interest. However, they struggle to retain that performance when the data characteristics changes. In this paper, we focus on continual learning, where a pre-trained transformer is updated to perform well on new data, while retaining its performance on data it was pre…
▽ More
Recent work using pretrained transformers has shown impressive performance when fine-tuned with data from the downstream problem of interest. However, they struggle to retain that performance when the data characteristics changes. In this paper, we focus on continual learning, where a pre-trained transformer is updated to perform well on new data, while retaining its performance on data it was previously trained on. Earlier works have tackled this primarily through methods inspired from prompt tuning. We question this choice, and investigate the applicability of Low Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to continual learning. On a range of domain-incremental learning benchmarks, our LoRA-based solution, CoLoR, yields state-of-the-art performance, while still being as parameter efficient as the prompt tuning based methods.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
PAUMER: Patch Pausing Transformer for Semantic Segmentation
Authors:
Evann Courdier,
Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad,
François Fleuret
Abstract:
We study the problem of improving the efficiency of segmentation transformers by using disparate amounts of computation for different parts of the image. Our method, PAUMER, accomplishes this by pausing computation for patches that are deemed to not need any more computation before the final decoder. We use the entropy of predictions computed from intermediate activations as the pausing criterion,…
▽ More
We study the problem of improving the efficiency of segmentation transformers by using disparate amounts of computation for different parts of the image. Our method, PAUMER, accomplishes this by pausing computation for patches that are deemed to not need any more computation before the final decoder. We use the entropy of predictions computed from intermediate activations as the pausing criterion, and find this aligns well with semantics of the image. Our method has a unique advantage that a single network trained with the proposed strategy can be effortlessly adapted at inference to various run-time requirements by modulating its pausing parameters. On two standard segmentation datasets, Cityscapes and ADE20K, we show that our method operates with about a $50\%$ higher throughput with an mIoU drop of about $0.65\%$ and $4.6\%$ respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Test time Adaptation through Perturbation Robustness
Authors:
Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad,
François Fleuret
Abstract:
Data samples generated by several real world processes are dynamic in nature \textit{i.e.}, their characteristics vary with time. Thus it is not possible to train and tackle all possible distributional shifts between training and inference, using the host of transfer learning methods in literature. In this paper, we tackle this problem of adapting to domain shift at inference time \textit{i.e.}, w…
▽ More
Data samples generated by several real world processes are dynamic in nature \textit{i.e.}, their characteristics vary with time. Thus it is not possible to train and tackle all possible distributional shifts between training and inference, using the host of transfer learning methods in literature. In this paper, we tackle this problem of adapting to domain shift at inference time \textit{i.e.}, we do not change the training process, but quickly adapt the model at test-time to handle any domain shift. For this, we propose to enforce consistency of predictions of data sampled in the vicinity of test sample on the image manifold. On a host of test scenarios like dealing with corruptions (CIFAR-10-C and CIFAR-100-C), and domain adaptation (VisDA-C), our method is at par or significantly outperforms previous methods.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Optimizer Benchmarking Needs to Account for Hyperparameter Tuning
Authors:
Prabhu Teja Sivaprasad,
Florian Mai,
Thijs Vogels,
Martin Jaggi,
François Fleuret
Abstract:
The performance of optimizers, particularly in deep learning, depends considerably on their chosen hyperparameter configuration. The efficacy of optimizers is often studied under near-optimal problem-specific hyperparameters, and finding these settings may be prohibitively costly for practitioners. In this work, we argue that a fair assessment of optimizers' performance must take the computational…
▽ More
The performance of optimizers, particularly in deep learning, depends considerably on their chosen hyperparameter configuration. The efficacy of optimizers is often studied under near-optimal problem-specific hyperparameters, and finding these settings may be prohibitively costly for practitioners. In this work, we argue that a fair assessment of optimizers' performance must take the computational cost of hyperparameter tuning into account, i.e., how easy it is to find good hyperparameter configurations using an automatic hyperparameter search. Evaluating a variety of optimizers on an extensive set of standard datasets and architectures, our results indicate that Adam is the most practical solution, particularly in low-budget scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 15 August, 2020; v1 submitted 25 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
