-
CheckMate: Evaluating Checkpointing Protocols for Streaming Dataflows
Authors:
George Siachamis,
Kyriakos Psarakis,
Marios Fragkoulis,
Arie van Deursen,
Paris Carbone,
Asterios Katsifodimos
Abstract:
Stream processing in the last decade has seen broad adoption in both commercial and research settings. One key element for this success is the ability of modern stream processors to handle failures while ensuring exactly-once processing guarantees. At the moment of writing, virtually all stream processors that guarantee exactly-once processing implement a variant of Apache Flink's coordinated chec…
▽ More
Stream processing in the last decade has seen broad adoption in both commercial and research settings. One key element for this success is the ability of modern stream processors to handle failures while ensuring exactly-once processing guarantees. At the moment of writing, virtually all stream processors that guarantee exactly-once processing implement a variant of Apache Flink's coordinated checkpoints - an extension of the original Chandy-Lamport checkpoints from 1985. However, the reasons behind this prevalence of the coordinated approach remain anecdotal, as reported by practitioners of the stream processing community. At the same time, common checkpointing approaches, such as the uncoordinated and the communication-induced ones, remain largely unexplored.
This paper is the first to address this gap by i) shedding light on why practitioners have favored the coordinated approach and ii) by investigating whether there are viable alternatives. To this end, we implement three checkpointing approaches that we surveyed and adapted for the distinct needs of streaming dataflows. Our analysis shows that the coordinated approach outperforms the uncoordinated and communication-induced protocols under uniformly distributed workloads. To our surprise, however, the uncoordinated approach is not only competitive to the coordinated one in uniformly distributed workloads, but it also outperforms the coordinated approach in skewed workloads. We conclude that rather than blindly employing coordinated checkpointing, research should focus on optimizing the very promising uncoordinated approach, as it can address issues with skew and support prevalent cyclic queries. We believe that our findings can trigger further research into checkpointing mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Styx: Transactional Stateful Functions on Streaming Dataflows
Authors:
Kyriakos Psarakis,
George Christodoulou,
George Siachamis,
Marios Fragkoulis,
Asterios Katsifodimos
Abstract:
Developing stateful cloud applications, such as low-latency workflows and microservices with strict consistency requirements, remains arduous for programmers. The Stateful Functions-as-a-Service (SFaaS) paradigm aims to serve these use cases. However, existing approaches provide weak transactional guarantees or perform expensive external state accesses requiring inefficient transactional protocols…
▽ More
Developing stateful cloud applications, such as low-latency workflows and microservices with strict consistency requirements, remains arduous for programmers. The Stateful Functions-as-a-Service (SFaaS) paradigm aims to serve these use cases. However, existing approaches provide weak transactional guarantees or perform expensive external state accesses requiring inefficient transactional protocols that increase execution latency.
In this paper, we present Styx, a novel dataflow-based SFaaS runtime that executes serializable transactions consisting of stateful functions that form arbitrary call-graphs with exactly-once guarantees. Styx extends a deterministic transactional protocol by contributing: i) a function acknowledgment scheme to determine transaction boundaries required in SFaaS workloads, ii) a function-execution caching mechanism, and iii) an early-commit reply mechanism that substantially reduces transaction execution latency. Experiments with the YCSB, TPC-C, and Deathstar benchmarks show that Styx outperforms state-of-the-art approaches by achieving at least one order of magnitude higher throughput while exhibiting near-linear scalability and low latency.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2025; v1 submitted 11 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Valentine: Evaluating Matching Techniques for Dataset Discovery
Authors:
Christos Koutras,
George Siachamis,
Andra Ionescu,
Kyriakos Psarakis,
Jerry Brons,
Marios Fragkoulis,
Christoph Lofi,
Angela Bonifati,
Asterios Katsifodimos
Abstract:
Data scientists today search large data lakes to discover and integrate datasets. In order to bring together disparate data sources, dataset discovery methods rely on some form of schema matching: the process of establishing correspondences between datasets. Traditionally, schema matching has been used to find matching pairs of columns between a source and a target schema. However, the use of sche…
▽ More
Data scientists today search large data lakes to discover and integrate datasets. In order to bring together disparate data sources, dataset discovery methods rely on some form of schema matching: the process of establishing correspondences between datasets. Traditionally, schema matching has been used to find matching pairs of columns between a source and a target schema. However, the use of schema matching in dataset discovery methods differs from its original use. Nowadays schema matching serves as a building block for indicating and ranking inter-dataset relationships. Surprisingly, although a discovery method's success relies highly on the quality of the underlying matching algorithms, the latest discovery methods employ existing schema matching algorithms in an ad-hoc fashion due to the lack of openly-available datasets with ground truth, reference method implementations, and evaluation metrics. In this paper, we aim to rectify the problem of evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of schema matching methods for the specific needs of dataset discovery. To this end, we propose Valentine, an extensible open-source experiment suite to execute and organize large-scale automated matching experiments on tabular data. Valentine includes implementations of seminal schema matching methods that we either implemented from scratch (due to absence of open source code) or imported from open repositories. The contributions of Valentine are: i) the definition of four schema matching scenarios as encountered in dataset discovery methods, ii) a principled dataset fabrication process tailored to the scope of dataset discovery methods and iii) the most comprehensive evaluation of schema matching techniques to date, offering insight on the strengths and weaknesses of existing techniques, that can serve as a guide for employing schema matching in future dataset discovery methods.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2021; v1 submitted 14 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
