Showing 1–1 of 1 results for author: Shimoya, A

Discovering the critical number of respondents to validate an item in a questionnaire: The Binomial Cut-level Content Validity proposal

Authors: Helder Gomes Costa, Eduardo Shimoda, José Fabiano da Serra Costa, Aldo Shimoya, Edilvando Pereira Eufrazio

Abstract: The question that drives this research is: "How to discover the number of respondents that are necessary to validate items of a questionnaire as actually essential to reach the questionnaire's proposal?" Among the efforts in this subject, \cite{Lawshe1975, Wilson2012, Ayre_CVR_2014} approached this issue by proposing and refining the Content Validation Ratio (CVR) that looks to identify items that… ▽ More The question that drives this research is: "How to discover the number of respondents that are necessary to validate items of a questionnaire as actually essential to reach the questionnaire's proposal?" Among the efforts in this subject, \cite{Lawshe1975, Wilson2012, Ayre_CVR_2014} approached this issue by proposing and refining the Content Validation Ratio (CVR) that looks to identify items that are actually essentials. Despite their contribution, these studies do not check if an item validated as "essential" should be also validated as "not essential" by the same sample, which should be a paradox. Another issue is the assignment a probability equal a 50\% to a item be randomly checked by a respondent as essential, despite an evaluator has three options to choose. Our proposal faces these issues, making it possible to verify if a paradoxical situation occurs, and being more precise in recommending whether an item should either be retained or discarded from a questionnaire. △ Less

Submitted 14 October, 2024; originally announced October 2024.

Comments: 17 pages, 1 figure

MSC Class: 62P05; 62P10; 62P10; 62P12; 62P15; 62P20; 62P25; 90B50; 91B06; 90C29; 90C31; 91A35; 91B06 ACM Class: G.3; H.4; H.4.2