-
When to Give Up on a Parallel Implementation
Authors:
Nathan S. Sheffield,
Alek Westover
Abstract:
In the Serial Parallel Decision Problem (SPDP), introduced by Kuszmaul and Westover [SPAA'24], an algorithm receives a series of tasks online, and must choose for each between a serial implementation and a parallelizable (but less efficient) implementation. Kuszmaul and Westover describe three decision models: (1) \defn{Instantly-committing} schedulers must decide on arrival, irrevocably, which im…
▽ More
In the Serial Parallel Decision Problem (SPDP), introduced by Kuszmaul and Westover [SPAA'24], an algorithm receives a series of tasks online, and must choose for each between a serial implementation and a parallelizable (but less efficient) implementation. Kuszmaul and Westover describe three decision models: (1) \defn{Instantly-committing} schedulers must decide on arrival, irrevocably, which implementation of the task to run. (2) \defn{Eventually-committing} schedulers can delay their decision beyond a task's arrival time, but cannot revoke their decision once made. (3) \defn{Never-committing} schedulers are always free to abandon their progress on the task and start over using a different implementation. Kuszmaul and Westover gave a simple instantly-committing scheduler whose total completion time is $3$-competitive with the offline optimal schedule. They conjectured that the three decision models should admit different competitive ratios, but left upper bounds below $3$ in any model as an open problem.
In this paper, we show that the powers of instantly, eventually, and never committing schedulers are distinct, at least in the ``massively parallel regime''. The massively parallel regime of the SPDP is the special case where the number of available processors is asymptotically larger than the number of tasks to process, meaning that the \emph{work} associated with running a task in serial is negligible compared to its \emph{runtime}. In this regime, we show (1) The optimal competitive ratio for instantly-committing schedulers is $2$, (2) The optimal competitive ratio for eventually-committing schedulers lies in $[1.618, 1.678]$, (3) The optimal competitive ratio for never-committing schedulers lies in $[1.366, 1.500]$.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Complexity of Multiple-Hamiltonicity in Graphs of Bounded Degree
Authors:
Brian Liu,
Nathan S. Sheffield,
Alek Westover
Abstract:
We study the following generalization of the Hamiltonian cycle problem: Given integers $a,b$ and graph $G$, does there exist a closed walk in $G$ that visits every vertex at least $a$ times and at most $b$ times? Equivalently, does there exist a connected $[2a,2b]$ factor of $2b \cdot G$ with all degrees even? This problem is NP-hard for any constants $1 \leq a \leq b$. However, the graphs produce…
▽ More
We study the following generalization of the Hamiltonian cycle problem: Given integers $a,b$ and graph $G$, does there exist a closed walk in $G$ that visits every vertex at least $a$ times and at most $b$ times? Equivalently, does there exist a connected $[2a,2b]$ factor of $2b \cdot G$ with all degrees even? This problem is NP-hard for any constants $1 \leq a \leq b$. However, the graphs produced by known reductions have maximum degree growing linearly in $b$. The case $a = b = 1 $ -- i.e. Hamiltonicity -- remains NP-hard even in $3$-regular graphs; a natural question is whether this is true for other $a$, $b$.
In this work, we study which $a, b$ permit polynomial time algorithms and which lead to NP-hardness in graphs with constrained degrees. We give tight characterizations for regular graphs and graphs of bounded max-degree, both directed and undirected.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Matching Algorithms in the Sparse Stochastic Block Model
Authors:
Anna Brandenberger,
Byron Chin,
Nathan S. Sheffield,
Divya Shyamal
Abstract:
The stochastic block model (SBM) is a generalization of the Erdős--Rényi model of random graphs that describes the interaction of a finite number of distinct communities. In sparse Erdős--Rényi graphs, it is known that a linear-time algorithm of Karp and Sipser achieves near-optimal matching sizes asymptotically almost surely, giving a law-of-large numbers for the matching sizes of such graphs in…
▽ More
The stochastic block model (SBM) is a generalization of the Erdős--Rényi model of random graphs that describes the interaction of a finite number of distinct communities. In sparse Erdős--Rényi graphs, it is known that a linear-time algorithm of Karp and Sipser achieves near-optimal matching sizes asymptotically almost surely, giving a law-of-large numbers for the matching sizes of such graphs in terms of solutions to an ODE. We provide an extension of this analysis, identifying broad ranges of stochastic block model parameters for which the Karp--Sipser algorithm achieves near-optimal matching sizes, but demonstrating that it cannot perform optimally on general SBM instances.
We also consider the problem of constructing a matching online, in which the vertices of one half of a bipartite stochastic block model arrive one-at-a-time, and must be matched as they arrive. We show that the competitive ratio lower bound of 0.837 found by Mastin and Jaillet for the Erdős--Rényi case is tight whenever the expected degrees in all communities are equal. We propose several linear-time algorithms for online matching in the general stochastic block model, but prove that despite very good experimental performance, none of these achieve online asymptotic optimality.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
A duality principle for selection games
Authors:
Lionel Levine,
Scott Sheffield,
Katherine E. Stange
Abstract:
A dinner table seats k guests and holds n discrete morsels of food. Guests select morsels in turn until all are consumed. Each guest has a ranking of the morsels according to how much he would enjoy eating them; these rankings are commonly known.
A gallant knight always prefers one food division over another if it provides strictly more enjoyable collections of food to one or more other players…
▽ More
A dinner table seats k guests and holds n discrete morsels of food. Guests select morsels in turn until all are consumed. Each guest has a ranking of the morsels according to how much he would enjoy eating them; these rankings are commonly known.
A gallant knight always prefers one food division over another if it provides strictly more enjoyable collections of food to one or more other players (without giving a less enjoyable collection to any other player) even if it makes his own collection less enjoyable. A boorish lout always selects the morsel that gives him the most enjoyment on the current turn, regardless of future consumption by himself and others.
We show the way the food is divided when all guests are gallant knights is the same as when all guests are boorish louts but turn order is reversed. This implies and generalizes a classical result of Kohler and Chandrasekaran (1971) about two players strategically maximizing their own enjoyments. We also treat the case that the table contains a mixture of boorish louts and gallant knights.
Our main result can also be formulated in terms of games in which selections are made by groups. In this formulation, the surprising fact is that a group can always find a selection that is simultaneously optimal for each member of the group.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2012; v1 submitted 12 October, 2011;
originally announced October 2011.
