-
Polynomial-Time Random Oracles and Separating Complexity Classes
Authors:
John M. Hitchcock,
Adewale Sekoni,
Hadi Shafei
Abstract:
Bennett and Gill (1981) showed that P^A != NP^A != coNP^A for a random oracle A, with probability 1. We investigate whether this result extends to individual polynomial-time random oracles. We consider two notions of random oracles: p-random oracles in the sense of martingales and resource-bounded measure (Lutz, 1992; Ambos-Spies et al., 1997), and p-betting-game random oracles using the betting g…
▽ More
Bennett and Gill (1981) showed that P^A != NP^A != coNP^A for a random oracle A, with probability 1. We investigate whether this result extends to individual polynomial-time random oracles. We consider two notions of random oracles: p-random oracles in the sense of martingales and resource-bounded measure (Lutz, 1992; Ambos-Spies et al., 1997), and p-betting-game random oracles using the betting games generalization of resource-bounded measure (Buhrman et al., 2000). Every p-betting-game random oracle is also p-random; whether the two notions are equivalent is an open problem.
(1) We first show that P^A != NP^A for every oracle A that is p-betting-game random.
Ideally, we would extend (1) to p-random oracles. We show that answering this either way would imply an unrelativized complexity class separation:
(2) If P^A != NP^A relative to every p-random oracle A, then BPP != EXP.
(3) If P^A = NP^A relative to some p-random oracle A, then P != PSPACE.
Rossman, Servedio, and Tan (2015) showed that the polynomial-time hierarchy is infinite relative to a random oracle, solving a longstanding open problem. We consider whether we can extend (1) to show that PHA is infinite relative to oracles A that are p-betting-game random. Showing that PHA separates at even its first level would also imply an unrelativized complexity class separation:
(4) If NP^A != coNP^A for a p-betting-game measure 1 class of oracles A, then NP != EXP.
(5) If PH^A is infinite relative to every p-random oracle A, then PH != EXP.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Nonuniform Reductions and NP-Completeness
Authors:
John M. Hitchcock,
Hadi Shafei
Abstract:
Nonuniformity is a central concept in computational complexity with powerful connections to circuit complexity and randomness. Nonuniform reductions have been used to study the isomorphism conjecture for NP and completeness for larger complexity classes. We study the power of nonuniform reductions for NP-completeness, obtaining both separations and upper bounds for nonuniform completeness vs unifo…
▽ More
Nonuniformity is a central concept in computational complexity with powerful connections to circuit complexity and randomness. Nonuniform reductions have been used to study the isomorphism conjecture for NP and completeness for larger complexity classes. We study the power of nonuniform reductions for NP-completeness, obtaining both separations and upper bounds for nonuniform completeness vs uniform completeness in NP.
Under various hypotheses, we obtain the following separations:
1. There is a set complete for NP under nonuniform many-one reductions, but not under uniform many-one reductions. This is true even with a single bit of nonuniform advice.
2. There is a set complete for NP under nonuniform many-one reductions with polynomial-size advice, but not under uniform Turing reductions. That is, polynomial nonuniformity is stronger than a polynomial number of queries.
3. For any fixed polynomial p(n), there is a set complete for NP under uniform 2-truth-table reductions, but not under nonuniform many-one reductions that use p(n) advice. That is, giving a uniform reduction a second query makes it more powerful than a nonuniform reduction with fixed polynomial advice.
4. There is a set complete for NP under nonuniform many-one reductions with polynomial advice, but not under nonuniform many-one reductions with logarithmic advice. This hierarchy theorem also holds for other reducibilities, such as truth-table and Turing.
We also consider uniform upper bounds on nonuniform completeness. Hirahara (2015) showed that unconditionally every set that is complete for NP under nonuniform truth-table reductions that use logarithmic advice is also uniformly Turing-complete. We show that under a derandomization hypothesis, the same statement for truth-table reductions and truth-table completeness also holds.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Autoreducibility of NP-Complete Sets
Authors:
John M. Hitchcock,
Hadi Shafei
Abstract:
We study the polynomial-time autoreducibility of NP-complete sets and obtain separations under strong hypotheses for NP. Assuming there is a p-generic set in NP, we show the following:
- For every $k \geq 2$, there is a $k$-T-complete set for NP that is $k$-T autoreducible, but is not $k$-tt autoreducible or $(k-1)$-T autoreducible.
- For every $k \geq 3$, there is a $k$-tt-complete set for NP…
▽ More
We study the polynomial-time autoreducibility of NP-complete sets and obtain separations under strong hypotheses for NP. Assuming there is a p-generic set in NP, we show the following:
- For every $k \geq 2$, there is a $k$-T-complete set for NP that is $k$-T autoreducible, but is not $k$-tt autoreducible or $(k-1)$-T autoreducible.
- For every $k \geq 3$, there is a $k$-tt-complete set for NP that is $k$-tt autoreducible, but is not $(k-1)$-tt autoreducible or $(k-2)$-T autoreducible.
- There is a tt-complete set for NP that is tt-autoreducible, but is not btt-autoreducible.
Under the stronger assumption that there is a p-generic set in NP $\cap$ coNP, we show:
- For every $k \geq 2$, there is a $k$-tt-complete set for NP that is $k$-tt autoreducible, but is not $(k-1)$-T autoreducible.
Our proofs are based on constructions from separating NP-completeness notions. For example, the construction of a 2-T-complete set for NP that is not 2-tt-complete also separates 2-T-autoreducibility from 2-tt-autoreducibility.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
