Showing 1–1 of 1 results for author: Schwitzgebel, D

Creating a Large Language Model of a Philosopher

Authors: Eric Schwitzgebel, David Schwitzgebel, Anna Strasser

Abstract: Can large language models be trained to produce philosophical texts that are difficult to distinguish from texts produced by human philosophers? To address this question, we fine-tuned OpenAI's GPT-3 with the works of philosopher Daniel C. Dennett as additional training data. To explore the Dennett model, we asked the real Dennett ten philosophical questions and then posed the same questions to th… ▽ More Can large language models be trained to produce philosophical texts that are difficult to distinguish from texts produced by human philosophers? To address this question, we fine-tuned OpenAI's GPT-3 with the works of philosopher Daniel C. Dennett as additional training data. To explore the Dennett model, we asked the real Dennett ten philosophical questions and then posed the same questions to the language model, collecting four responses for each question without cherry-picking. We recruited 425 participants to distinguish Dennett's answer from the four machine-generated answers. Experts on Dennett's work (N = 25) succeeded 51% of the time, above the chance rate of 20% but short of our hypothesized rate of 80% correct. For two of the ten questions, the language model produced at least one answer that experts selected more frequently than Dennett's own answer. Philosophy blog readers (N = 302) performed similarly to the experts, while ordinary research participants (N = 98) were near chance distinguishing GPT-3's responses from those of an "actual human philosopher". △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 1 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: Earlier version (Nov 2, 2022) available at http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzPapers/GPT-3-Dennett-221102.pdf; stable URL for updated versions http://faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/GPT3Dennett.htm