Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Schweizer, L

Privacy-Preserving Multi-Center Differential Protein Abundance Analysis with FedProt

Authors: Yuliya Burankova, Miriam Abele, Mohammad Bakhtiari, Christine von Törne, Teresa Barth, Lisa Schweizer, Pieter Giesbertz, Johannes R. Schmidt, Stefan Kalkhof, Janina Müller-Deile, Peter A van Veelen, Yassene Mohammed, Elke Hammer, Lis Arend, Klaudia Adamowicz, Tanja Laske, Anne Hartebrodt, Tobias Frisch, Chen Meng, Julian Matschinske, Julian Späth, Richard Röttger, Veit Schwämmle, Stefanie M. Hauck, Stefan Lichtenthaler , et al. (6 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Quantitative mass spectrometry has revolutionized proteomics by enabling simultaneous quantification of thousands of proteins. Pooling patient-derived data from multiple institutions enhances statistical power but raises significant privacy concerns. Here we introduce FedProt, the first privacy-preserving tool for collaborative differential protein abundance analysis of distributed data, which uti… ▽ More Quantitative mass spectrometry has revolutionized proteomics by enabling simultaneous quantification of thousands of proteins. Pooling patient-derived data from multiple institutions enhances statistical power but raises significant privacy concerns. Here we introduce FedProt, the first privacy-preserving tool for collaborative differential protein abundance analysis of distributed data, which utilizes federated learning and additive secret sharing. In the absence of a multicenter patient-derived dataset for evaluation, we created two, one at five centers from LFQ E.coli experiments and one at three centers from TMT human serum. Evaluations using these datasets confirm that FedProt achieves accuracy equivalent to DEqMS applied to pooled data, with completely negligible absolute differences no greater than $\text{$4 \times 10^{-12}$}$. In contrast, -log10(p-values) computed by the most accurate meta-analysis methods diverged from the centralized analysis results by up to 25-27. FedProt is available as a web tool with detailed documentation as a FeatureCloud App. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: 52 pages, 16 figures, 12 tables. Last two authors listed are joint last authors

Bound Your Models! How to Make OWL an ASP Modeling Language

Authors: Sarah Alice Gaggl, Sebastian Rudolph, Lukas Schweizer

Abstract: To exploit the Web Ontology Language OWL as an answer set programming (ASP) language, we introduce the notion of bounded model semantics, as an intuitive and computationally advantageous alternative to its classical semantics. We show that a translation into ASP allows for solving a wide range of bounded-model reasoning tasks, including satisfiability and axiom entailment but also novel ones such… ▽ More To exploit the Web Ontology Language OWL as an answer set programming (ASP) language, we introduce the notion of bounded model semantics, as an intuitive and computationally advantageous alternative to its classical semantics. We show that a translation into ASP allows for solving a wide range of bounded-model reasoning tasks, including satisfiability and axiom entailment but also novel ones such as model extraction and enumeration. Ultimately, our work facilitates harnessing advanced semantic web modeling environments for the logic programming community through an "off-label use" of OWL. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: International Workshop on User-Oriented Logic Programming (IULP 2015), co-located with the 31st International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2015), Proceedings of the International Workshop on User-Oriented Logic Programming (IULP 2015), Editors: Stefan Ellmauthaler and Claudia Schulz, pages 33-49, August 2015