ChaTEAU: A Universal Toolkit for Applying the Chase
Authors:
Tanja Auge,
Nic Scharlau,
Andreas Görres,
Jakob Zimmer,
Andreas Heuer
Abstract:
What do applications like semantic optimization, data exchange and integration, answering queries under dependencies, query reformulation with constraints, and data cleaning have in common? All these applications can be processed by the Chase, a family of algorithms for reasoning with constraints. While the theory of the Chase is well understood, existing implementations are confined to specific u…
▽ More
What do applications like semantic optimization, data exchange and integration, answering queries under dependencies, query reformulation with constraints, and data cleaning have in common? All these applications can be processed by the Chase, a family of algorithms for reasoning with constraints. While the theory of the Chase is well understood, existing implementations are confined to specific use cases and application scenarios, making it difficult to reuse them in other settings. ChaTEAU overcomes this limitation: It takes the logical core of the Chase, generalizes it, and provides a software library for different Chase applications in a single toolkit.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
Privacy Aspects of Provenance Queries
Authors:
Tanja Auge,
Nic Scharlau,
Andreas Heuer
Abstract:
Given a query result of a big database, why-provenance can be used to calculate the necessary part of this database, consisting of so-called witnesses. If this database consists of personal data, privacy protection has to prevent the publication of these witnesses. This implies a natural conflict of interest between publishing original data (provenance) and protecting these data (privacy).
In th…
▽ More
Given a query result of a big database, why-provenance can be used to calculate the necessary part of this database, consisting of so-called witnesses. If this database consists of personal data, privacy protection has to prevent the publication of these witnesses. This implies a natural conflict of interest between publishing original data (provenance) and protecting these data (privacy).
In this paper, privacy goes beyond the concept of personal data protection. The paper gives an extended definition of privacy as intellectual property protection. If the provenance information is not sufficient to reconstruct a query result, additional data such as witnesses or provenance polynomials have to be published to guarantee traceability. Nevertheless, publishing this provenance information might be a problem if (significantly) more tuples than necessary can be derived from the original database. At this point, it is already possible to violate privacy policies, provided that quasi identifiers are included in this provenance information. With this poster, we point out fundamental problems and discuss first proposals for solutions.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
