Privacy-Preserving Fair Synthetic Tabular Data
Authors:
Fatima J. Sarmin,
Atiquer R. Rahman,
Christopher J. Henry,
Noman Mohammed
Abstract:
Sharing of tabular data containing valuable but private information is limited due to legal and ethical issues. Synthetic data could be an alternative solution to this sharing problem, as it is artificially generated by machine learning algorithms and tries to capture the underlying data distribution. However, machine learning models are not free from memorization and may introduce biases, as they…
▽ More
Sharing of tabular data containing valuable but private information is limited due to legal and ethical issues. Synthetic data could be an alternative solution to this sharing problem, as it is artificially generated by machine learning algorithms and tries to capture the underlying data distribution. However, machine learning models are not free from memorization and may introduce biases, as they rely on training data. Producing synthetic data that preserves privacy and fairness while maintaining utility close to the real data is a challenging task. This research simultaneously addresses both the privacy and fairness aspects of synthetic data, an area not explored by other studies. In this work, we present PF-WGAN, a privacy-preserving, fair synthetic tabular data generator based on the WGAN-GP model. We have modified the original WGAN-GP by adding privacy and fairness constraints forcing it to produce privacy-preserving fair data. This approach will enable the publication of datasets that protect individual's privacy and remain unbiased toward any particular group. We compared the results with three state-of-the-art synthetic data generator models in terms of utility, privacy, and fairness across four different datasets. We found that the proposed model exhibits a more balanced trade-off among utility, privacy, and fairness.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
Synthetic Data: Revisiting the Privacy-Utility Trade-off
Authors:
Fatima Jahan Sarmin,
Atiquer Rahman Sarkar,
Yang Wang,
Noman Mohammed
Abstract:
Synthetic data has been considered a better privacy-preserving alternative to traditionally sanitized data across various applications. However, a recent article challenges this notion, stating that synthetic data does not provide a better trade-off between privacy and utility than traditional anonymization techniques, and that it leads to unpredictable utility loss and highly unpredictable privac…
▽ More
Synthetic data has been considered a better privacy-preserving alternative to traditionally sanitized data across various applications. However, a recent article challenges this notion, stating that synthetic data does not provide a better trade-off between privacy and utility than traditional anonymization techniques, and that it leads to unpredictable utility loss and highly unpredictable privacy gain. The article also claims to have identified a breach in the differential privacy guarantees provided by PATE-GAN and PrivBayes. When a study claims to refute or invalidate prior findings, it is crucial to verify and validate the study. In our work, we analyzed the implementation of the privacy game described in the article and found that it operated in a highly specialized and constrained environment, which limits the applicability of its findings to general cases. Our exploration also revealed that the game did not satisfy a crucial precondition concerning data distributions, which contributed to the perceived violation of the differential privacy guarantees offered by PATE-GAN and PrivBayes. We also conducted a privacy-utility trade-off analysis in a more general and unconstrained environment. Our experimentation demonstrated that synthetic data indeed achieves a more favorable privacy-utility trade-off compared to the provided implementation of k-anonymization, thereby reaffirming earlier conclusions.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2025; v1 submitted 9 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
