Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Sami, M A

Distributed Approach to Haskell Based Applications Refactoring with LLMs Based Multi-Agent Systems

Authors: Shahbaz Siddeeq, Zeeshan Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Mahade Hasan, Muhammad Waseem, Jussi Rasku, Mika Saari, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract: We present a large language models (LLMs) based multi-agent system to automate the refactoring of Haskell codebases. The multi-agent system consists of specialized agents performing tasks such as context analysis, refactoring, validation, and testing. Refactoring improvements are using metrics such as cyclomatic complexity, run-time, and memory allocation. Experimental evaluations conducted on Has… ▽ More We present a large language models (LLMs) based multi-agent system to automate the refactoring of Haskell codebases. The multi-agent system consists of specialized agents performing tasks such as context analysis, refactoring, validation, and testing. Refactoring improvements are using metrics such as cyclomatic complexity, run-time, and memory allocation. Experimental evaluations conducted on Haskell codebases demonstrate improvements in code quality. Cyclomatic complexity was reduced by 13.64% and 47.06% in the respective codebases. Memory allocation improved by 4.17% and 41.73%, while runtime efficiency increased by up to 50%. These metrics highlight the systems ability to optimize Haskells functional paradigms while maintaining correctness and scalability. Results show reductions in complexity and performance enhancements across codebases. The integration of LLMs based multi-agent system enables precise task execution and inter-agent collaboration, addressing the challenges of refactoring in functional programming. This approach aims to address the challenges of refactoring functional programming languages through distributed and modular systems. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2025; originally announced February 2025.

Large Language Models for Code Generation: The Practitioners Perspective

Authors: Zeeshan Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Kai Kristian Kemell, Aakash Ahmad, Malik Abdul Sami, Jussi Rasku, Kari Systä, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as coding assistants, capable of generating source code from natural language prompts. With the increasing adoption of LLMs in software development, academic research and industry based projects are developing various tools, benchmarks, and metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of LLM-generated code. However, there is a lack of solutions evaluated through… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as coding assistants, capable of generating source code from natural language prompts. With the increasing adoption of LLMs in software development, academic research and industry based projects are developing various tools, benchmarks, and metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of LLM-generated code. However, there is a lack of solutions evaluated through empirically grounded methods that incorporate practitioners perspectives to assess functionality, syntax, and accuracy in real world applications. To address this gap, we propose and develop a multi-model unified platform to generate and execute code based on natural language prompts. We conducted a survey with 60 software practitioners from 11 countries across four continents working in diverse professional roles and domains to evaluate the usability, performance, strengths, and limitations of each model. The results present practitioners feedback and insights into the use of LLMs in software development, including their strengths and weaknesses, key aspects overlooked by benchmarks and metrics, and a broader understanding of their practical applicability. These findings can help researchers and practitioners make informed decisions for systematically selecting and using LLMs in software development projects. Future research will focus on integrating more diverse models into the proposed system, incorporating additional case studies, and conducting developer interviews for deeper empirical insights into LLM-driven software development. △ Less

Submitted 28 January, 2025; originally announced January 2025.

Comments: 20 pages, 4 figures, 2 table

TimeLess: A Vision for the Next Generation of Software Development

Authors: Zeeshan Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Jussi Rasku, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Zheying Zhang, Janne Harjamaki, Shahbaz Siddeeq, Sami Lahti, Tomas Herda, Mikko Nurminen, Niklas Lavesson, Jose Siqueira de Cerqueira, Toufique Hasan, Ayman Khan, Mahade Hasan, Mika Saari, Petri Rantanen, Jari Soini, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract: Present-day software development faces three major challenges: complexity, time consumption, and high costs. Developing large software systems often requires battalions of teams and considerable time for meetings, which end without any action, resulting in unproductive cycles, delayed progress, and increased cost. What if, instead of large meetings with no immediate results, the software product i… ▽ More Present-day software development faces three major challenges: complexity, time consumption, and high costs. Developing large software systems often requires battalions of teams and considerable time for meetings, which end without any action, resulting in unproductive cycles, delayed progress, and increased cost. What if, instead of large meetings with no immediate results, the software product is completed by the end of the meeting? In response, we present a vision for a system called TimeLess, designed to reshape the software development process by enabling immediate action during meetings. The goal is to shift meetings from planning discussions to productive, action-oriented sessions. This approach minimizes the time and effort required for development, allowing teams to focus on critical decision-making while AI agents execute development tasks based on the meeting discussions. We will employ multiple AI agents that work collaboratively to capture human discussions and execute development tasks in real time. This represents a step toward next-generation software development environments, where human expertise drives strategy and AI accelerates task execution. △ Less

Submitted 13 November, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

Comments: 5 pages, 4 figure, and 1 table

AI based Multiagent Approach for Requirements Elicitation and Analysis

Authors: Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem, Zheying Zhang, Zeeshan Rasheed, Kari Systä, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract: Requirements Engineering (RE) plays a pivotal role in software development, encompassing tasks such as requirements elicitation, analysis, specification, and change management. Despite its critical importance, RE faces challenges including communication complexities, early-stage uncertainties, and accurate resource estimation. This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of utilizing Larg… ▽ More Requirements Engineering (RE) plays a pivotal role in software development, encompassing tasks such as requirements elicitation, analysis, specification, and change management. Despite its critical importance, RE faces challenges including communication complexities, early-stage uncertainties, and accurate resource estimation. This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate requirements analysis tasks. We implemented a multi-agent system that deploys AI models as agents to generate user stories from initial requirements, assess and improve their quality, and prioritize them using a selected technique. In our implementation, we deployed four models, namely GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Omni, LLaMA3-70, and Mixtral-8B, and conducted experiments to analyze requirements on four real-world projects. We evaluated the results by analyzing the semantic similarity and API performance of different models, as well as their effectiveness and efficiency in requirements analysis, gathering users' feedback on their experiences. Preliminary results indicate notable variations in task completion among the models. Mixtral-8B provided the quickest responses, while GPT-3.5 performed exceptionally well when processing complex user stories with a higher similarity score, demonstrating its capability in deriving accurate user stories from project descriptions. Feedback and suggestions from the four project members further corroborate the effectiveness of LLMs in improving and streamlining RE phases. △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2024; originally announced September 2024.

Experimenting with Multi-Agent Software Development: Towards a Unified Platform

Authors: Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem, Zeeshan Rasheed, Mika Saari, Kari Systä, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract: Large language models are redefining software engineering by implementing AI-powered techniques throughout the whole software development process, including requirement gathering, software architecture, code generation, testing, and deployment. However, it is still difficult to develop a cohesive platform that consistently produces the best outcomes across all stages. The objective of this study i… ▽ More Large language models are redefining software engineering by implementing AI-powered techniques throughout the whole software development process, including requirement gathering, software architecture, code generation, testing, and deployment. However, it is still difficult to develop a cohesive platform that consistently produces the best outcomes across all stages. The objective of this study is to develop a unified platform that utilizes multiple artificial intelligence agents to automate the process of transforming user requirements into well-organized deliverables. These deliverables include user stories, prioritization, and UML sequence diagrams, along with the modular approach to APIs, unit tests, and end-to-end tests. Additionally, the platform will organize tasks, perform security and compliance, and suggest design patterns and improvements for non-functional requirements. We allow users to control and manage each phase according to their preferences. In addition, the platform provides security and compliance checks following European standards and proposes design optimizations. We use multiple models, such as GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama3 to enable to generation of modular code as per user choice. The research also highlights the limitations and future research discussions to overall improve the software development life cycle. The source code for our uniform platform is hosted on GitHub, enabling additional experimentation and supporting both research and practical uses. \end △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Prioritizing Software Requirements Using Large Language Models

Authors: Malik Abdul Sami, Zeeshan Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Zheying Zhang, Tomas Herda, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing Software Engineering (SE) by introducing innovative methods for tasks such as collecting requirements, designing software, generating code, and creating test cases, among others. This article focuses on requirements engineering, typically seen as the initial phase of software development that involves multiple system stakeholders. Despite its key ro… ▽ More Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing Software Engineering (SE) by introducing innovative methods for tasks such as collecting requirements, designing software, generating code, and creating test cases, among others. This article focuses on requirements engineering, typically seen as the initial phase of software development that involves multiple system stakeholders. Despite its key role, the challenge of identifying requirements and satisfying all stakeholders within time and budget constraints remains significant. To address the challenges in requirements engineering, this study introduces a web-based software tool utilizing AI agents and prompt engineering to automate task prioritization and apply diverse prioritization techniques, aimed at enhancing project management within the agile framework. This approach seeks to transform the prioritization of agile requirements, tackling the substantial challenge of meeting stakeholder needs within set time and budget limits. Furthermore, the source code of our developed prototype is available on GitHub, allowing for further experimentation and prioritization of requirements, facilitating research and practical application. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

Authors: Zeeshan Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen, Kari Systä, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract: In this paper, we present a novel approach to improving software quality and efficiency through a Large Language Model (LLM)-based model designed to review code and identify potential issues. Our proposed LLM-based AI agent model is trained on large code repositories. This training includes code reviews, bug reports, and documentation of best practices. It aims to detect code smells, identify pote… ▽ More In this paper, we present a novel approach to improving software quality and efficiency through a Large Language Model (LLM)-based model designed to review code and identify potential issues. Our proposed LLM-based AI agent model is trained on large code repositories. This training includes code reviews, bug reports, and documentation of best practices. It aims to detect code smells, identify potential bugs, provide suggestions for improvement, and optimize the code. Unlike traditional static code analysis tools, our LLM-based AI agent has the ability to predict future potential risks in the code. This supports a dual goal of improving code quality and enhancing developer education by encouraging a deeper understanding of best practices and efficient coding techniques. Furthermore, we explore the model's effectiveness in suggesting improvements that significantly reduce post-release bugs and enhance code review processes, as evidenced by an analysis of developer sentiment toward LLM feedback. For future work, we aim to assess the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-generated documentation updates in comparison to manual methods. This will involve an empirical study focusing on manually conducted code reviews to identify code smells and bugs, alongside an evaluation of best practice documentation, augmented by insights from developer discussions and code reviews. Our goal is to not only refine the accuracy of our LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education. △ Less

Submitted 29 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 8 pages

CodePori: Large-Scale System for Autonomous Software Development Using Multi-Agent Technology

Authors: Zeeshan Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Muhammad Waseem, Mika Saari, Kari Systä, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract: Context: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) have transformed the field of Software Engineering (SE). Existing LLM-based multi-agent models have successfully addressed basic dialogue tasks. However, the potential of LLMs for more challenging tasks, such as automated code generation for large and complex projects, has been investigated in only a few existing… ▽ More Context: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) have transformed the field of Software Engineering (SE). Existing LLM-based multi-agent models have successfully addressed basic dialogue tasks. However, the potential of LLMs for more challenging tasks, such as automated code generation for large and complex projects, has been investigated in only a few existing works. Objective: This paper aims to investigate the potential of LLM-based agents in the software industry, particularly in enhancing productivity and reducing time-to-market for complex software solutions. Our primary objective is to gain insights into how these agents can fundamentally transform the development of large-scale software. Methods: We introduce CodePori, a novel system designed to automate code generation for large and complex software projects based on functional and non-functional requirements defined by stakeholders. To assess the proposed system performance, we utilized the HumanEval benchmark and manually tested the CodePori model, providing 20 different project descriptions as input and then evaluated the code accuracy by manually executing the code. Results: CodePori is able to generate running code for large-scale projects, aligned with the typical software development process. The HumanEval benchmark results indicate that CodePori improves code accuracy by 89%. A manual assessment conducted by the first author shows that the CodePori system achieved an accuracy rate of 85%. Conclusion: Based on the results, our conclusion is that proposed system demonstrates the transformative potential of LLM-based agents in SE, highlighting their practical applications and opening new opportunities for broader adoption in both industry and academia. Our project is publicly available at https://github.com/GPT-Laboratory/CodePori. △ Less

Submitted 17 September, 2024; v1 submitted 2 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: 18 pages, 2 figures, and 5 Table