Exploring the Impact of Virtualization on the Usability of the Deep Learning Applications
Authors:
Davood G. Samani,
Mohsen Amini Salehi
Abstract:
Deep Learning-based (DL) applications are becoming increasingly popular and advancing at an unprecedented pace. While many research works are being undertaken to enhance Deep Neural Networks (DNN) -- the centerpiece of DL applications -- practical deployment challenges of these applications in the Cloud and Edge systems, and their impact on the usability of the applications have not been sufficien…
▽ More
Deep Learning-based (DL) applications are becoming increasingly popular and advancing at an unprecedented pace. While many research works are being undertaken to enhance Deep Neural Networks (DNN) -- the centerpiece of DL applications -- practical deployment challenges of these applications in the Cloud and Edge systems, and their impact on the usability of the applications have not been sufficiently investigated. In particular, the impact of deploying different virtualization platforms, offered by the Cloud and Edge, on the usability of DL applications (in terms of the End-to-End (E2E) inference time) has remained an open question. Importantly, resource elasticity (by means of scale-up), CPU pinning, and processor type (CPU vs GPU) configurations have shown to be influential on the virtualization overhead. Accordingly, the goal of this research is to study the impact of these potentially decisive deployment options on the E2E performance, thus, usability of the DL applications. To that end, we measure the impact of four popular execution platforms (namely, bare-metal, virtual machine (VM), container, and container in VM) on the E2E inference time of four types of DL applications, upon changing processor configuration (scale-up, CPU pinning) and processor types. This study reveals a set of interesting and sometimes counter-intuitive findings that can be used as best practices by Cloud solution architects to efficiently deploy DL applications in various systems. The notable finding is that the solution architects must be aware of the DL application characteristics, particularly, their pre- and post-processing requirements, to be able to optimally choose and configure an execution platform, determine the use of GPU, and decide the efficient scale-up range.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
The Art of CPU-Pinning: Evaluating and Improving the Performance of Virtualization and Containerization Platforms
Authors:
Davood Ghatreh Samani,
Chavit Denninnart,
Josef Bacik,
Mohsen Amini Salehi
Abstract:
Cloud providers offer a variety of execution platforms in form of bare-metal, VM, and containers. However, due to the pros and cons of each execution platform, choosing the appropriate platform for a specific cloud-based application has become a challenge for solution architects. The possibility to combine these platforms (e.g. deploying containers within VMs) offers new capacities that makes the…
▽ More
Cloud providers offer a variety of execution platforms in form of bare-metal, VM, and containers. However, due to the pros and cons of each execution platform, choosing the appropriate platform for a specific cloud-based application has become a challenge for solution architects. The possibility to combine these platforms (e.g. deploying containers within VMs) offers new capacities that makes the challenge even further complicated. However, there is a little study in the literature on the pros and cons of deploying different application types on various execution platforms. In particular, evaluation of diverse hardware configurations and different CPU provisioning methods, such as CPU pinning, have not been sufficiently studied in the literature. In this work, the performance overhead of container, VM, and bare-metal execution platforms are measured and analyzed for four categories of real-world applications, namely video processing, parallel processing (MPI), web processing, and No-SQL, respectively representing CPU intensive, parallel processing, and two IO intensive processes. Our analyses reveal a set of interesting and sometimes counterintuitive findings that can be used as best practices by the solution architects to efficiently deploy cloud-based applications. Here are some notable mentions: (A) Under specific circumstances, containers can impose a higher overhead than VMs; (B) Containers on top of VMs can mitigate the overhead of VMs for certain applications; (C) Containers with a large number of cores impose a lower overhead than those with a few cores.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
