-
A Comparison of Super-Resolution and Nearest Neighbors Interpolation Applied to Object Detection on Satellite Data
Authors:
Evan Koester,
Cem Safak Sahin
Abstract:
As Super-Resolution (SR) has matured as a research topic, it has been applied to additional topics beyond image reconstruction. In particular, combining classification or object detection tasks with a super-resolution preprocessing stage has yielded improvements in accuracy especially with objects that are small relative to the scene. While SR has shown promise, a study comparing SR and naive upsc…
▽ More
As Super-Resolution (SR) has matured as a research topic, it has been applied to additional topics beyond image reconstruction. In particular, combining classification or object detection tasks with a super-resolution preprocessing stage has yielded improvements in accuracy especially with objects that are small relative to the scene. While SR has shown promise, a study comparing SR and naive upscaling methods such as Nearest Neighbors (NN) interpolation when applied as a preprocessing step for object detection has not been performed. We apply the topic to satellite data and compare the Multi-scale Deep Super-Resolution (MDSR) system to NN on the xView challenge dataset. To do so, we propose a pipeline for processing satellite data that combines multi-stage image tiling and upscaling, the YOLOv2 object detection architecture, and label stitching. We compare the effects of training models using an upscaling factor of 4, upscaling images from 30cm Ground Sample Distance (GSD) to an effective GSD of 7.5cm. Upscaling by this factor significantly improves detection results, increasing Average Precision (AP) of a generalized vehicle class by 23 percent. We demonstrate that while SR produces upscaled images that are more visually pleasing than their NN counterparts, object detection networks see little difference in accuracy with images upsampled using NN obtaining nearly identical results to the MDSRx4 enhanced images with a difference of 0.0002 AP between the two methods.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Consistent Alignment of Word Embedding Models
Authors:
Cem Safak Sahin,
Rajmonda S. Caceres,
Brandon Oselio,
William M. Campbell
Abstract:
Word embedding models offer continuous vector representations that can capture rich contextual semantics based on their word co-occurrence patterns. While these word vectors can provide very effective features used in many NLP tasks such as clustering similar words and inferring learning relationships, many challenges and open research questions remain. In this paper, we propose a solution that al…
▽ More
Word embedding models offer continuous vector representations that can capture rich contextual semantics based on their word co-occurrence patterns. While these word vectors can provide very effective features used in many NLP tasks such as clustering similar words and inferring learning relationships, many challenges and open research questions remain. In this paper, we propose a solution that aligns variations of the same model (or different models) in a joint low-dimensional latent space leveraging carefully generated synthetic data points. This generative process is inspired by the observation that a variety of linguistic relationships is captured by simple linear operations in embedded space. We demonstrate that our approach can lead to substantial improvements in recovering embeddings of local neighborhoods.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
General Framework for Evaluating Password Complexity and Strength
Authors:
Cem S. Sahin,
Robert Lychev,
Neal Wagner
Abstract:
Although it is common for users to select bad passwords that can be easily cracked by attackers, password-based authentication remains the most widely-used method. To encourage users to select good passwords, enterprises often enforce policies. Such policies have been proven to be ineffectual in practice. Accurate assessment of a password's resistance to cracking attacks is still an unsolved probl…
▽ More
Although it is common for users to select bad passwords that can be easily cracked by attackers, password-based authentication remains the most widely-used method. To encourage users to select good passwords, enterprises often enforce policies. Such policies have been proven to be ineffectual in practice. Accurate assessment of a password's resistance to cracking attacks is still an unsolved problem, and our work addresses this challenge. Although the best way to determine how difficult it may be to crack a user-selected password is to check its resistance to cracking attacks employed by attackers in the wild, implementing such a strategy at an enterprise would be infeasible in practice. We first formalize the concepts of password complexity and strength with concrete definitions emphasizing their differences. Our framework captures human biases and many known techniques attackers use to recover stolen credentials in real life, such as brute-force attacks. Building on our definitions, we develop a general framework for calculating password complexity and strength that could be used in practice. Our approach is based on the key insight that an attacker's success at cracking a password must be defined by its available computational resources, time, function used to store that password, as well as the topology that bounds that attacker's search space based on that attacker's available inputs, transformations it can use to tweak and explore its inputs, and the path of exploration which can be based on the attacker's perceived probability of success. We also provide a general framework for assessing the accuracy of password complexity and strength estimators that can be used to compare other tools available in the wild.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
