-
Polynomial Prenexing of QBFs with Non-Monotone Boolean Operators
Authors:
Abdallah Saffidine,
Andreas Herzig
Abstract:
It is well-known that every quantified boolean formula (QBF) can be transformed into a prenex QBF whose only boolean operators are negation, conjunction, and disjunction. It is also well-known that the transformation is polynomial if the boolean operators of the original QBF are restricted to negation, conjunction, and disjunction. In contrast, up to now no polynomial transformation has been found…
▽ More
It is well-known that every quantified boolean formula (QBF) can be transformed into a prenex QBF whose only boolean operators are negation, conjunction, and disjunction. It is also well-known that the transformation is polynomial if the boolean operators of the original QBF are restricted to negation, conjunction, and disjunction. In contrast, up to now no polynomial transformation has been found when the original QBF contains other boolean operators such as biconditionals or exclusive disjunction. We define such a transformation and show that it is polynomial and preserves quantifier depth.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
-
Refuting the Direct Sum Conjecture for Total Functions in Deterministic Communication Complexity
Authors:
Simon Mackenzie,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
In communication complexity the input of a function $f:X\times Y\rightarrow Z$ is distributed between two players Alice and Bob.
If Alice knows only $x\in X$ and Bob only $y\in Y$, how much information must Alice and Bob share to be able to elicit the value of $f(x,y)$?
Do we need $\ell$ more resources to solve $\ell$ instances of a problem?
This question is the direct sum question and has b…
▽ More
In communication complexity the input of a function $f:X\times Y\rightarrow Z$ is distributed between two players Alice and Bob.
If Alice knows only $x\in X$ and Bob only $y\in Y$, how much information must Alice and Bob share to be able to elicit the value of $f(x,y)$?
Do we need $\ell$ more resources to solve $\ell$ instances of a problem?
This question is the direct sum question and has been studied in many computational models.
In this paper we focus on the case of 2-party deterministic communication complexity and give a counterexample to the direct sum conjecture in its strongest form.
To do so we exhibit a family of functions for which the complexity of solving $\ell$ instances is less than $(1 -ε)\ell$ times the complexity of solving one instance for some small enough $ε>0$.
We use a customised method in the analysis of our family of total functions, showing that one can force the alternation of rounds between players.
This idea allows us to exploit the integrality of the complexity measure to create an increasing gap between the complexity of solving the instances independently with that of solving them together.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Fair Railway Network Design
Authors:
Zixu He,
Sirin Botan,
Jérôme Lang,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Florian Sikora,
Silas Workman
Abstract:
When designing a public transportation network in a country, one may want to minimise the sum of travel duration of all inhabitants. This corresponds to a purely utilitarian view and does not involve any fairness consideration, as the resulting network will typically benefit the capital city and/or large central cities while leaving some peripheral cities behind. On the other hand, a more egalitar…
▽ More
When designing a public transportation network in a country, one may want to minimise the sum of travel duration of all inhabitants. This corresponds to a purely utilitarian view and does not involve any fairness consideration, as the resulting network will typically benefit the capital city and/or large central cities while leaving some peripheral cities behind. On the other hand, a more egalitarian view will allow some people to travel between peripheral cities without having to go through a central city. We define a model, propose algorithms for computing solution networks, and report on experiments based on real data.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
Enhancing Reinforcement Learning Through Guided Search
Authors:
Jérôme Arjonilla,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Tristan Cazenave
Abstract:
With the aim of improving performance in Markov Decision Problem in an Off-Policy setting, we suggest taking inspiration from what is done in Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL). In Offline RL, it is a common practice during policy learning to maintain proximity to a reference policy to mitigate uncertainty, reduce potential policy errors, and help improve performance. We find ourselves in a diffe…
▽ More
With the aim of improving performance in Markov Decision Problem in an Off-Policy setting, we suggest taking inspiration from what is done in Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL). In Offline RL, it is a common practice during policy learning to maintain proximity to a reference policy to mitigate uncertainty, reduce potential policy errors, and help improve performance. We find ourselves in a different setting, yet it raises questions about whether a similar concept can be applied to enhance performance ie, whether it is possible to find a guiding policy capable of contributing to performance improvement, and how to incorporate it into our RL agent. Our attention is particularly focused on algorithms based on Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) as a guide.MCTS renowned for its state-of-the-art capabilities across various domains, catches our interest due to its ability to converge to equilibrium in single-player and two-player contexts. By harnessing the power of MCTS as a guide for our RL agent, we observed a significant performance improvement, surpassing the outcomes achieved by utilizing each method in isolation. Our experiments were carried out on the Atari 100k benchmark.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Perfect Information Monte Carlo with Postponing Reasoning
Authors:
Jérôme Arjonilla,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Tristan Cazenave
Abstract:
Imperfect information games, such as Bridge and Skat, present challenges due to state-space explosion and hidden information, posing formidable obstacles for search algorithms. Determinization-based algorithms offer a resolution by sampling hidden information and solving the game in a perfect information setting, facilitating rapid and effective action estimation. However, transitioning to perfect…
▽ More
Imperfect information games, such as Bridge and Skat, present challenges due to state-space explosion and hidden information, posing formidable obstacles for search algorithms. Determinization-based algorithms offer a resolution by sampling hidden information and solving the game in a perfect information setting, facilitating rapid and effective action estimation. However, transitioning to perfect information introduces challenges, notably one called strategy fusion.This research introduces `Extended Perfect Information Monte Carlo' (EPIMC), an online algorithm inspired by the state-of-the-art determinization-based approach Perfect Information Monte Carlo (PIMC). EPIMC enhances the capabilities of PIMC by postponing the perfect information resolution, reducing alleviating issues related to strategy fusion. However, the decision to postpone the leaf evaluator introduces novel considerations, such as the interplay between prior levels of reasoning and the newly deferred resolution. In our empirical analysis, we investigate the performance of EPIMC across a range of games, with a particular focus on those characterized by varying degrees of strategy fusion. Our results demonstrate notable performance enhancements, particularly in games where strategy fusion significantly impacts gameplay. Furthermore, our research contributes to the theoretical foundation of determinization-based algorithms addressing challenges associated with strategy fusion.%, thereby enhancing our understanding of these algorithms within the context of imperfect information game scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 5 August, 2024;
originally announced August 2024.
-
Constructions, bounds, and algorithms for peaceable queens
Authors:
Katie Clinch,
Matthew Drescher,
Tony Huynh,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
The peaceable queens problem asks to determine the maximum number $a(n)$ such that there is a placement of $a(n)$ white queens and $a(n)$ black queens on an $n \times n$ chessboard so that no queen can capture any queen of the opposite color. In this paper, we consider the peaceable queens problem and its variant on the toroidal board. For the regular board, we show that $a(n) \leq 0.1716n^2$, for…
▽ More
The peaceable queens problem asks to determine the maximum number $a(n)$ such that there is a placement of $a(n)$ white queens and $a(n)$ black queens on an $n \times n$ chessboard so that no queen can capture any queen of the opposite color. In this paper, we consider the peaceable queens problem and its variant on the toroidal board. For the regular board, we show that $a(n) \leq 0.1716n^2$, for all sufficiently large $n$. This improves on the bound $a(n) \leq 0.25n^2$ of van Bommel and MacEachern.
For the toroidal board, we provide new upper and lower bounds. Somewhat surprisingly, our bounds show that there is a sharp contrast in behaviour between the odd torus and the even torus. Our lower bounds are given by explicit constructions. For the upper bounds, we formulate the problem as a non-linear optimization problem with at most $100$ variables, regardless of the size of the board. We solve our non-linear program exactly using modern optimization software.
We also provide a local search algorithm and a software implementation which converges very rapidly to solutions which appear optimal. Our algorithm is sufficiently robust that it works on both the regular and toroidal boards. For example, for the regular board, the algorithm quickly finds the so-called Ainley construction. Thus, our work provides some further evidence that the Ainley construction is indeed optimal.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2024; v1 submitted 11 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Mixture of Public and Private Distributions in Imperfect Information Games
Authors:
Jérôme Arjonilla,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Tristan Cazenave
Abstract:
In imperfect information games (e.g. Bridge, Skat, Poker), one of the fundamental considerations is to infer the missing information while at the same time avoiding the disclosure of private information. Disregarding the issue of protecting private information can lead to a highly exploitable performance. Yet, excessive attention to it leads to hesitations that are no longer consistent with our pr…
▽ More
In imperfect information games (e.g. Bridge, Skat, Poker), one of the fundamental considerations is to infer the missing information while at the same time avoiding the disclosure of private information. Disregarding the issue of protecting private information can lead to a highly exploitable performance. Yet, excessive attention to it leads to hesitations that are no longer consistent with our private information. In our work, we show that to improve performance, one must choose whether to use a player's private information. We extend our work by proposing a new belief distribution depending on the amount of private and public information desired. We empirically demonstrate an increase in performance and, with the aim of further improving performance, the new distribution should be used according to the position in the game. Our experiments have been done on multiple benchmarks and in multiple determinization-based algorithms (PIMC and IS-MCTS).
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Deep Reinforcement Learning for 5*5 Multiplayer Go
Authors:
Brahim Driss,
Jérôme Arjonilla,
Hui Wang,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Tristan Cazenave
Abstract:
In recent years, much progress has been made in computer Go and most of the results have been obtained thanks to search algorithms (Monte Carlo Tree Search) and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL). In this paper, we propose to use and analyze the latest algorithms that use search and DRL (AlphaZero and Descent algorithms) to automatically learn to play an extended version of the game of Go with more…
▽ More
In recent years, much progress has been made in computer Go and most of the results have been obtained thanks to search algorithms (Monte Carlo Tree Search) and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL). In this paper, we propose to use and analyze the latest algorithms that use search and DRL (AlphaZero and Descent algorithms) to automatically learn to play an extended version of the game of Go with more than two players. We show that using search and DRL we were able to improve the level of play, even though there are more than two players.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Generalizing Roberts' characterization of unit interval graphs
Authors:
Virginia Ardévol Martínez,
Romeo Rizzi,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Florian Sikora,
Stéphane Vialette
Abstract:
For any natural number $d$, a graph $G$ is a (disjoint) $d$-interval graph if it is the intersection graph of (disjoint) $d$-intervals, the union of $d$ (disjoint) intervals on the real line. Two important subclasses of $d$-interval graphs are unit and balanced $d$-interval graphs (where every interval has unit length or all the intervals associated to a same vertex have the same length, respectiv…
▽ More
For any natural number $d$, a graph $G$ is a (disjoint) $d$-interval graph if it is the intersection graph of (disjoint) $d$-intervals, the union of $d$ (disjoint) intervals on the real line. Two important subclasses of $d$-interval graphs are unit and balanced $d$-interval graphs (where every interval has unit length or all the intervals associated to a same vertex have the same length, respectively). A celebrated result by Roberts gives a simple characterization of unit interval graphs being exactly claw-free interval graphs. Here, we study the generalization of this characterization for $d$-interval graphs. In particular, we prove that for any $d \geq 2$, if $G$ is a $K_{1,2d+1}$-free interval graph, then $G$ is a unit $d$-interval graph. However, somehow surprisingly, under the same assumptions, $G$ is not always a \emph{disjoint} unit $d$-interval graph. This implies that the class of disjoint unit $d$-interval graphs is strictly included in the class of unit $d$-interval graphs. Finally, we study the relationships between the classes obtained under disjoint and non-disjoint $d$-intervals in the balanced case and show that the classes of disjoint balanced 2-intervals and balanced 2-intervals coincide, but this is no longer true for $d>2$.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
A Piecewise Approach for the Analysis of Exact Algorithms
Authors:
Katie Clinch,
Serge Gaspers,
Zixu He,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Tiankuang Zhang
Abstract:
To analyze the worst-case running time of branching algorithms, the majority of work in exponential time algorithms focuses on designing complicated branching rules over developing better analysis methods for simple algorithms. In the mid-$2000$s, Fomin et al. [2005] introduced measure & conquer, an advanced general analysis method, sparking widespread adoption for obtaining tighter worst-case run…
▽ More
To analyze the worst-case running time of branching algorithms, the majority of work in exponential time algorithms focuses on designing complicated branching rules over developing better analysis methods for simple algorithms. In the mid-$2000$s, Fomin et al. [2005] introduced measure & conquer, an advanced general analysis method, sparking widespread adoption for obtaining tighter worst-case running time upper bounds for many fundamental NP-complete problems. Yet, much potential in this direction remains untapped, as most subsequent work applied it without further advancement. Motivated by this, we present piecewise analysis, a new general method that analyzes the running time of branching algorithms. Our approach is to define a similarity ratio that divides instances into groups and then analyze the running time within each group separately. The similarity ratio is a scale between two parameters of an instance I. Instead of relying on a single measure and a single analysis for the whole instance space, our method allows to take advantage of different intrinsic properties of instances with different similarity ratios. To showcase its potential, we reanalyze two $17$-year-old algorithms from Fomin et al. [2007] that solve $4$-Coloring and #$3$-Coloring respectively. The original analysis in their paper gave running times of $O(1.7272^n)$ and $O(1.6262^n)$ respectively for these algorithms, our analysis improves these running times to $O(1.7207^n)$ and $O(1.6225^n)$.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2024; v1 submitted 15 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Vision Transformers for Computer Go
Authors:
Amani Sagri,
Tristan Cazenave,
Jérôme Arjonilla,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
Motivated by the success of transformers in various fields, such as language understanding and image analysis, this investigation explores their application in the context of the game of Go. In particular, our study focuses on the analysis of the Transformer in Vision. Through a detailed analysis of numerous points such as prediction accuracy, win rates, memory, speed, size, or even learning rate,…
▽ More
Motivated by the success of transformers in various fields, such as language understanding and image analysis, this investigation explores their application in the context of the game of Go. In particular, our study focuses on the analysis of the Transformer in Vision. Through a detailed analysis of numerous points such as prediction accuracy, win rates, memory, speed, size, or even learning rate, we have been able to highlight the substantial role that transformers can play in the game of Go. This study was carried out by comparing them to the usual Residual Networks.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Towards Tackling MaxSAT by Combining Nested Monte Carlo with Local Search
Authors:
Hui Wang,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Tristan Cazenave
Abstract:
Recent work proposed the UCTMAXSAT algorithm to address Maximum Satisfiability Problems (MaxSAT) and shown improved performance over pure Stochastic Local Search algorithms (SLS). UCTMAXSAT is based on Monte Carlo Tree Search but it uses SLS instead of purely random playouts. In this work, we introduce two algorithmic variations over UCTMAXSAT. We carry an empirical analysis on MaxSAT benchmarks f…
▽ More
Recent work proposed the UCTMAXSAT algorithm to address Maximum Satisfiability Problems (MaxSAT) and shown improved performance over pure Stochastic Local Search algorithms (SLS). UCTMAXSAT is based on Monte Carlo Tree Search but it uses SLS instead of purely random playouts. In this work, we introduce two algorithmic variations over UCTMAXSAT. We carry an empirical analysis on MaxSAT benchmarks from recent competitions and establish that both ideas lead to performance improvements. First, a nesting of the tree search inspired by the Nested Monte Carlo Search algorithm is effective on most instance types in the benchmark. Second, we observe that using a static flip limit in SLS, the ideal budget depends heavily on the instance size and we propose to set it dynamically. We show that it is a robust way to achieve comparable performance on a variety of instances without requiring additional tuning.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Implicit State and Goals in QBF Encodings for Positional Games (extended version)
Authors:
Irfansha Shaik,
Valentin Mayer-Eichberger,
Jaco van de Pol,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
We address two bottlenecks for concise QBF encodings of maker-breaker positional games, like Hex and Tic-Tac-Toe. Our baseline is a QBF encoding with explicit variables for board positions and an explicit representation of winning configurations. The first improvement is inspired by lifted planning and avoids variables for explicit board positions, introducing a universal quantifier representing a…
▽ More
We address two bottlenecks for concise QBF encodings of maker-breaker positional games, like Hex and Tic-Tac-Toe. Our baseline is a QBF encoding with explicit variables for board positions and an explicit representation of winning configurations. The first improvement is inspired by lifted planning and avoids variables for explicit board positions, introducing a universal quantifier representing a symbolic board state. The second improvement represents the winning configurations implicitly, exploiting their structure. The paper evaluates the size of several encodings, depending on board size and game depth. It also reports the performance of QBF solvers on these encodings. We evaluate the techniques on Hex instances and also apply them to Harary's Tic-Tac-Toe. In particular, we study scalability to 19$\times$19 boards, played in human Hex tournaments.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
HSVI can solve zero-sum Partially Observable Stochastic Games
Authors:
Aurélien Delage,
Olivier Buffet,
Jilles S. Dibangoye,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
State-of-the-art methods for solving 2-player zero-sum imperfect information games rely on linear programming or regret minimization, though not on dynamic programming (DP) or heuristic search (HS), while the latter are often at the core of state-of-the-art solvers for other sequential decision-making problems. In partially observable or collaborative settings (e.g., POMDPs and Dec- POMDPs), DP an…
▽ More
State-of-the-art methods for solving 2-player zero-sum imperfect information games rely on linear programming or regret minimization, though not on dynamic programming (DP) or heuristic search (HS), while the latter are often at the core of state-of-the-art solvers for other sequential decision-making problems. In partially observable or collaborative settings (e.g., POMDPs and Dec- POMDPs), DP and HS require introducing an appropriate statistic that induces a fully observable problem as well as bounding (convex) approximators of the optimal value function. This approach has succeeded in some subclasses of 2-player zero-sum partially observable stochastic games (zs- POSGs) as well, but how to apply it in the general case still remains an open question. We answer it by (i) rigorously defining an equivalent game to work with, (ii) proving mathematical properties of the optimal value function that allow deriving bounds that come with solution strategies, (iii) proposing for the first time an HSVI-like solver that provably converges to an $ε$-optimal solution in finite time, and (iv) empirically analyzing it. This opens the door to a novel family of promising approaches complementing those relying on linear programming or iterative methods.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
On Bellman's Optimality Principle for zs-POSGs
Authors:
Olivier Buffet,
Jilles Dibangoye,
Aurélien Delage,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Vincent Thomas
Abstract:
Many non-trivial sequential decision-making problems are efficiently solved by relying on Bellman's optimality principle, i.e., exploiting the fact that sub-problems are nested recursively within the original problem. Here we show how it can apply to (infinite horizon) 2-player zero-sum partially observable stochastic games (zs-POSGs) by (i) taking a central planner's viewpoint, which can only rea…
▽ More
Many non-trivial sequential decision-making problems are efficiently solved by relying on Bellman's optimality principle, i.e., exploiting the fact that sub-problems are nested recursively within the original problem. Here we show how it can apply to (infinite horizon) 2-player zero-sum partially observable stochastic games (zs-POSGs) by (i) taking a central planner's viewpoint, which can only reason on a sufficient statistic called occupancy state, and (ii) turning such problems into zero-sum occupancy Markov games (zs-OMGs). Then, exploiting the Lipschitz-continuity of the value function in occupancy space, one can derive a version of the HSVI algorithm (Heuristic Search Value Iteration) that provably finds an $ε$-Nash equilibrium in finite time.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2022; v1 submitted 29 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Positional Games and QBF: A Polished Encoding
Authors:
Valentin Mayer-Eichberger,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
Positional games are a mathematical class of two-player games comprising Tic-tac-toe and its generalizations. We propose a novel encoding of these games into Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs) such that a game instance admits a winning strategy for the first player if and only if the corresponding formula is true. Our approach improves over previous QBF encodings of games in multiple ways. First,…
▽ More
Positional games are a mathematical class of two-player games comprising Tic-tac-toe and its generalizations. We propose a novel encoding of these games into Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs) such that a game instance admits a winning strategy for the first player if and only if the corresponding formula is true. Our approach improves over previous QBF encodings of games in multiple ways. First, it is generic and lets us encode other positional games, such as Hex. Second, the structural properties of positional games, together with careful treatment of illegal moves, let us generate more compact instances that can be solved faster by state-of-the-art QBF solvers. We establish the latter fact through extensive experiments. Finally, the compactness of our new encoding makes it feasible to translate realistic game problems. We identify a few such problems of historical significance and put them forward to the QBF community as milestones of increasing difficulty.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2023; v1 submitted 11 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
The Packed Interval Covering Problem is NP-complete
Authors:
Abdallah Saffidine,
Sébastien Lê Cong,
Sophie Pinchinat,
François Schwarzentruber
Abstract:
We introduce a new decision problem, called Packed Interval Covering (PIC) and show that it is NP-complete.
We introduce a new decision problem, called Packed Interval Covering (PIC) and show that it is NP-complete.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Foundations of Digital Archæoludology
Authors:
Cameron Browne,
Dennis J. N. J. Soemers,
Éric Piette,
Matthew Stephenson,
Michael Conrad,
Walter Crist,
Thierry Depaulis,
Eddie Duggan,
Fred Horn,
Steven Kelk,
Simon M. Lucas,
João Pedro Neto,
David Parlett,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Ulrich Schädler,
Jorge Nuno Silva,
Alex de Voogt,
Mark H. M. Winands
Abstract:
Digital Archaeoludology (DAL) is a new field of study involving the analysis and reconstruction of ancient games from incomplete descriptions and archaeological evidence using modern computational techniques. The aim is to provide digital tools and methods to help game historians and other researchers better understand traditional games, their development throughout recorded human history, and the…
▽ More
Digital Archaeoludology (DAL) is a new field of study involving the analysis and reconstruction of ancient games from incomplete descriptions and archaeological evidence using modern computational techniques. The aim is to provide digital tools and methods to help game historians and other researchers better understand traditional games, their development throughout recorded human history, and their relationship to the development of human culture and mathematical knowledge. This work is being explored in the ERC-funded Digital Ludeme Project.
The aim of this inaugural international research meeting on DAL is to gather together leading experts in relevant disciplines - computer science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, computational phylogenetics, mathematics, history, archaeology, anthropology, etc. - to discuss the key themes and establish the foundations for this new field of research, so that it may continue beyond the lifetime of its initiating project.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
How does uncertainty about other voters determine a strategic vote?
Authors:
Zeinab Bakhtiari,
Hans van Ditmarsch,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
We propose a framework for strategic voting when a voter may lack knowledge about the preferences of other voters, or about other voters' knowledge about her own preference. In this setting we define notions of manipulation, equilibrium, and dominance, under uncertainty. We provide scenarios wherein the profiles of true preferences are the same but the equilibrium profiles are different, because t…
▽ More
We propose a framework for strategic voting when a voter may lack knowledge about the preferences of other voters, or about other voters' knowledge about her own preference. In this setting we define notions of manipulation, equilibrium, and dominance, under uncertainty. We provide scenarios wherein the profiles of true preferences are the same but the equilibrium profiles are different, because the voters have different knowledge about other voters. We also model actions that change such uncertainty about preferences, such as a voter revealing her preference. We show that some forms of manipulation and equilibrium are preserved under such uncertainty updates and others not. We then formalize epistemic voting terminology in a logic. Our aim is to provide the epistemic background for the analysis and design of voting rules that incorporate uncertainty.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2019; v1 submitted 27 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
The Complexity of Limited Belief Reasoning -- The Quantifier-Free Case
Authors:
Yijia Chen,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Christoph Schwering
Abstract:
The classical view of epistemic logic is that an agent knows all the logical consequences of their knowledge base. This assumption of logical omniscience is often unrealistic and makes reasoning computationally intractable. One approach to avoid logical omniscience is to limit reasoning to a certain belief level, which intuitively measures the reasoning "depth." This paper investigates the computa…
▽ More
The classical view of epistemic logic is that an agent knows all the logical consequences of their knowledge base. This assumption of logical omniscience is often unrealistic and makes reasoning computationally intractable. One approach to avoid logical omniscience is to limit reasoning to a certain belief level, which intuitively measures the reasoning "depth." This paper investigates the computational complexity of reasoning with belief levels. First we show that while reasoning remains tractable if the level is constant, the complexity jumps to PSPACE-complete -- that is, beyond classical reasoning -- when the belief level is part of the input. Then we further refine the picture using parameterized complexity theory to investigate how the belief level and the number of non-logical symbols affect the complexity.
△ Less
Submitted 8 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
The Parameterized Complexity of Positional Games
Authors:
Édouard Bonnet,
Serge Gaspers,
Antonin Lambilliotte,
Stefan Rümmele,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
We study the parameterized complexity of several positional games. Our main result is that Short Generalized Hex is W[1]-complete parameterized by the number of moves. This solves an open problem from Downey and Fellows' influential list of open problems from 1999. Previously, the problem was thought of as a natural candidate for AW[*]-completeness. Our main tool is a new fragment of first-order l…
▽ More
We study the parameterized complexity of several positional games. Our main result is that Short Generalized Hex is W[1]-complete parameterized by the number of moves. This solves an open problem from Downey and Fellows' influential list of open problems from 1999. Previously, the problem was thought of as a natural candidate for AW[*]-completeness. Our main tool is a new fragment of first-order logic where universally quantified variables only occur in inequalities. We show that model-checking on arbitrary relational structures for a formula in this fragment is W[1]-complete when parameterized by formula size. We also consider a general framework where a positional game is represented as a hypergraph and two players alternately pick vertices. In a Maker-Maker game, the first player to have picked all the vertices of some hyperedge wins the game. In a Maker-Breaker game, the first player wins if she picks all the vertices of some hyperedge, and the second player wins otherwise. In an Enforcer-Avoider game, the first player wins if the second player picks all the vertices of some hyperedge, and the second player wins otherwise. Short Maker-Maker is AW[*]-complete, whereas Short Maker-Breaker is W[1]-complete and Short Enforcer-Avoider co-W[1]-complete parameterized by the number of moves. This suggests a rough parameterized complexity categorization into positional games that are complete for the first level of the W-hierarchy when the winning configurations only depend on which vertices one player has been able to pick, but AW[*]-completeness when the winning condition depends on which vertices both players have picked. However, some positional games where the board and the winning configurations are highly structured are fixed-parameter tractable. We give another example of such a game, Short k-Connect, which is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of moves.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
-
On the Complexity of Connection Games
Authors:
Édouard Bonnet,
Florian Jamain,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
In this paper, we study three connection games among the most widely played: Havannah, Twixt, and Slither. We show that determining the outcome of an arbitrary input position is PSPACE-complete in all three cases. Our reductions are based on the popular graph problem Generalized Geography and on Hex itself. We also consider the complexity of generalizations of Hex parameterized by the length of th…
▽ More
In this paper, we study three connection games among the most widely played: Havannah, Twixt, and Slither. We show that determining the outcome of an arbitrary input position is PSPACE-complete in all three cases. Our reductions are based on the popular graph problem Generalized Geography and on Hex itself. We also consider the complexity of generalizations of Hex parameterized by the length of the solution and establish that while Short Generalized Hex is W[1]-hard, Short Hex is FPT. Finally, we prove that the ultra-weak solution to the empty starting position in hex cannot be fully adapted to any of these three games.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
Depth, balancing, and limits of the Elo model
Authors:
Marie-Liesse Cauwet,
Olivier Teytaud,
Hua-Min Liang,
Shi-Jim Yen,
Hung-Hsuan Lin,
I-Chen Wu,
Tristan Cazenave,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
-Much work has been devoted to the computational complexity of games. However, they are not necessarily relevant for estimating the complexity in human terms. Therefore, human-centered measures have been proposed, e.g. the depth. This paper discusses the depth of various games, extends it to a continuous measure. We provide new depth results and present tool (given-first-move, pie rule, size exten…
▽ More
-Much work has been devoted to the computational complexity of games. However, they are not necessarily relevant for estimating the complexity in human terms. Therefore, human-centered measures have been proposed, e.g. the depth. This paper discusses the depth of various games, extends it to a continuous measure. We provide new depth results and present tool (given-first-move, pie rule, size extension) for increasing it. We also use these measures for analyzing games and opening moves in Y, NoGo, Killall Go, and the effect of pie rules.
△ Less
Submitted 6 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
-
Havannah and TwixT are PSPACE-complete
Authors:
Edouard Bonnet,
Florian Jamain,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
Numerous popular abstract strategy games ranging from Hex and Havannah to Lines of Action belong to the class of connection games. Still, very few complexity results on such games have been obtained since Hex was proved PSPACE-complete in the early eighties. We study the complexity of two connection games among the most widely played. Namely, we prove that Havannah and TwixT are PSPACE-complete. T…
▽ More
Numerous popular abstract strategy games ranging from Hex and Havannah to Lines of Action belong to the class of connection games. Still, very few complexity results on such games have been obtained since Hex was proved PSPACE-complete in the early eighties. We study the complexity of two connection games among the most widely played. Namely, we prove that Havannah and TwixT are PSPACE-complete. The proof for Havannah involves a reduction from Generalized Geography and is based solely on ring-threats to represent the input graph. On the other hand, the reduction for TwixT builds up on previous work as it is a straightforward encoding of Hex.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2014;
originally announced March 2014.
-
Strategic Voting and the Logic of Knowledge
Authors:
Hans van Ditmarsch,
Jerome Lang,
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
We propose a general framework for strategic voting when a voter may lack knowledge about other votes or about other voters' knowledge about her own vote. In this setting we define notions of manipulation and equilibrium. We also model action changing knowledge about votes, such as a voter revealing its preference or as a central authority performing a voting poll. Some forms of manipulation are p…
▽ More
We propose a general framework for strategic voting when a voter may lack knowledge about other votes or about other voters' knowledge about her own vote. In this setting we define notions of manipulation and equilibrium. We also model action changing knowledge about votes, such as a voter revealing its preference or as a central authority performing a voting poll. Some forms of manipulation are preserved under such updates and others not. Another form of knowledge dynamics is the effect of a voter declaring its vote. We envisage Stackelberg games for uncertain profiles. The purpose of this investigation is to provide the epistemic background for the analysis and design of voting rules that incorporate uncertainty.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
-
Monte Carlo *-Minimax Search
Authors:
Marc Lanctot,
Abdallah Saffidine,
Joel Veness,
Christopher Archibald,
Mark H. M. Winands
Abstract:
This paper introduces Monte Carlo *-Minimax Search (MCMS), a Monte Carlo search algorithm for turned-based, stochastic, two-player, zero-sum games of perfect information. The algorithm is designed for the class of of densely stochastic games; that is, games where one would rarely expect to sample the same successor state multiple times at any particular chance node. Our approach combines sparse sa…
▽ More
This paper introduces Monte Carlo *-Minimax Search (MCMS), a Monte Carlo search algorithm for turned-based, stochastic, two-player, zero-sum games of perfect information. The algorithm is designed for the class of of densely stochastic games; that is, games where one would rarely expect to sample the same successor state multiple times at any particular chance node. Our approach combines sparse sampling techniques from MDP planning with classic pruning techniques developed for adversarial expectimax planning. We compare and contrast our algorithm to the traditional *-Minimax approaches, as well as MCTS enhanced with the Double Progressive Widening, on four games: Pig, EinStein Würfelt Nicht!, Can't Stop, and Ra. Our results show that MCMS can be competitive with enhanced MCTS variants in some domains, while consistently outperforming the equivalent classic approaches given the same amount of thinking time.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
-
Minimal Proof Search for Modal Logic K Model Checking
Authors:
Abdallah Saffidine
Abstract:
Most modal logics such as S5, LTL, or ATL are extensions of Modal Logic K. While the model checking problems for LTL and to a lesser extent ATL have been very active research areas for the past decades, the model checking problem for the more basic Multi-agent Modal Logic K (MMLK) has important applications as a formal framework for perfect information multi-player games on its own.
We present M…
▽ More
Most modal logics such as S5, LTL, or ATL are extensions of Modal Logic K. While the model checking problems for LTL and to a lesser extent ATL have been very active research areas for the past decades, the model checking problem for the more basic Multi-agent Modal Logic K (MMLK) has important applications as a formal framework for perfect information multi-player games on its own.
We present Minimal Proof Search (MPS), an effort number based algorithm solving the model checking problem for MMLK. We prove two important properties for MPS beyond its correctness. The (dis)proof exhibited by MPS is of minimal cost for a general definition of cost, and MPS is an optimal algorithm for finding (dis)proofs of minimal cost. Optimality means that any comparable algorithm either needs to explore a bigger or equal state space than MPS, or is not guaranteed to find a (dis)proof of minimal cost on every input.
As such, our work relates to A* and AO* in heuristic search, to Proof Number Search and DFPN+ in two-player games, and to counterexample minimization in software model checking.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2012; v1 submitted 7 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.