-
Eliminating Multicollinearity Issues in Neural Network Ensembles: Incremental, Negatively Correlated, Optimal Convex Blending
Authors:
Pola Lydia Lagari,
Lefteri H. Tsoukalas,
Salar Safarkhani,
Isaac E. Lagaris
Abstract:
Given a {features, target} dataset, we introduce an incremental algorithm that constructs an aggregate regressor, using an ensemble of neural networks. It is well known that ensemble methods suffer from the multicollinearity issue, which is the manifestation of redundancy arising mainly due to the common training-dataset. In the present incremental approach, at each stage we optimally blend the ag…
▽ More
Given a {features, target} dataset, we introduce an incremental algorithm that constructs an aggregate regressor, using an ensemble of neural networks. It is well known that ensemble methods suffer from the multicollinearity issue, which is the manifestation of redundancy arising mainly due to the common training-dataset. In the present incremental approach, at each stage we optimally blend the aggregate regressor with a newly trained neural network under a convexity constraint which, if necessary, induces negative correlations. Under this framework, collinearity issues do not arise at all, rendering so the method both accurate and robust.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Towards a Theory of Systems Engineering Processes: A Principal-Agent Model of a One-Shot, Shallow Process
Authors:
Salar Safarkhani,
Ilias Bilionis,
Jitesh Panchal
Abstract:
Systems engineering processes coordinate the effort of different individuals to generate a product satisfying certain requirements. As the involved engineers are self-interested agents, the goals at different levels of the systems engineering hierarchy may deviate from the system-level goals which may cause budget and schedule overruns. Therefore, there is a need of a systems engineering theory th…
▽ More
Systems engineering processes coordinate the effort of different individuals to generate a product satisfying certain requirements. As the involved engineers are self-interested agents, the goals at different levels of the systems engineering hierarchy may deviate from the system-level goals which may cause budget and schedule overruns. Therefore, there is a need of a systems engineering theory that accounts for the human behavior in systems design. To this end, the objective of this paper is to develop and analyze a principal-agent model of a one-shot (single iteration), shallow (one level of hierarchy) systems engineering process. We assume that the systems engineer maximizes the expected utility of the system, while the subsystem engineers seek to maximize their expected utilities. Furthermore, the systems engineer is unable to monitor the effort of the subsystem engineer and may not have a complete information about their types or the complexity of the design task. However, the systems engineer can incentivize the subsystem engineers by proposing specific contracts. To obtain an optimal incentive, we pose and solve numerically a bi-level optimization problem. Through extensive simulations, we study the optimal incentives arising from different system-level value functions under various combinations of effort costs, problem-solving skills, and task complexities.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2019; v1 submitted 28 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
A Principal-Agent Model of Systems Engineering Processes with Application to Satellite Design
Authors:
Salar Safarkhani,
Vikranth Reddy Kattakuri,
Ilias Bilionis,
Jitesh Panchal
Abstract:
We present a principal-agent model of a one-shot, shallow, systems engineering process. The process is one-shot in the sense that decisions are made during one time step and that they are final. The term shallow refers to a one-layer hierarchy of the process. Specifically, we assume that the systems engineer has already decomposed the problem in subsystems, and that each subsystem is assigned to a…
▽ More
We present a principal-agent model of a one-shot, shallow, systems engineering process. The process is one-shot in the sense that decisions are made during one time step and that they are final. The term shallow refers to a one-layer hierarchy of the process. Specifically, we assume that the systems engineer has already decomposed the problem in subsystems, and that each subsystem is assigned to a different subsystem engineer. Each subsystem engineer works independently to maximize their own expected payoff. The goal of the systems engineer is to maximize the system-level payoff by incentivizing the subsystem engineers. We restrict our attention to requirement-based system-level payoffs, i.e., the systems engineer makes a profit only if all the design requirements are met. We illustrate the model using the design of an Earth-orbiting satellite system where the systems engineer determines the optimum incentive structures and requirements for two subsystems: the propulsion subsystem and the power subsystem. The model enables the analysis of a systems engineer's decisions about optimal passed-down requirements and incentives for sub-system engineers under different levels of task difficulty and associated costs. Sample results, for the case of risk-neutral systems and subsystems engineers, show that it is not always in the best interest of the systems engineer to pass down the true requirements. As expected, the model predicts that for small to moderate task uncertainties the optimal requirements are higher than the true ones, effectively eliminating the probability of failure for the systems engineer. In contrast, the model predicts that for large task uncertainties the optimal requirements should be smaller than the true ones in order to lure the subsystem engineers into participation.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
