-
Teaching Simple Constructive Proofs with Haskell Programs
Authors:
Matthew Farrugia-Roberts,
Bryn Jeffries,
Harald Søndergaard
Abstract:
In recent years we have explored using Haskell alongside a traditional mathematical formalism in our large-enrolment university course on topics including logic and formal languages, aiming to offer our students a programming perspective on these mathematical topics. We have found it possible to offer almost all formative and summative assessment through an interactive learning platform, using Has…
▽ More
In recent years we have explored using Haskell alongside a traditional mathematical formalism in our large-enrolment university course on topics including logic and formal languages, aiming to offer our students a programming perspective on these mathematical topics. We have found it possible to offer almost all formative and summative assessment through an interactive learning platform, using Haskell as a lingua franca for digital exercises across our broad syllabus. One of the hardest exercises to convert into this format are traditional written proofs conveying constructive arguments. In this paper we reflect on the digitisation of this kind of exercise. We share many examples of Haskell exercises designed to target similar skills to written proof exercises across topics in propositional logic and formal languages, discussing various aspects of the design of such exercises. We also catalogue a sample of student responses to such exercises. This discussion contributes to our broader exploration of programming problems as a flexible digital medium for learning and assessment.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Transformation-Enabled Precondition Inference
Authors:
Bishoksan Kafle,
Graeme Gange,
Peter J. Stuckey,
Peter Schachte,
Harald Sondergaard
Abstract:
Precondition inference is a non-trivial problem with important applications in program analysis and verification. We present a novel iterative method for automatically deriving preconditions for the safety and unsafety of programs. Each iteration maintains over-approximations of the set of safe and unsafe initial states; which are used to partition the program's initial states into those known to…
▽ More
Precondition inference is a non-trivial problem with important applications in program analysis and verification. We present a novel iterative method for automatically deriving preconditions for the safety and unsafety of programs. Each iteration maintains over-approximations of the set of safe and unsafe initial states; which are used to partition the program's initial states into those known to be safe, known to be unsafe and unknown. We then construct revised programs with those unknown initial states and iterate the procedure until the approximations are disjoint or some termination criteria are met. An experimental evaluation of the method on a set of software verification benchmarks shows that it can infer precise preconditions (sometimes optimal) that are not possible using previous methods.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Precondition Inference via Partitioning of Initial States
Authors:
Bishoksan Kafle,
Graeme Gange,
Peter Schachte,
Harald Sondergaard,
Peter J. Stuckey
Abstract:
Precondition inference is a non-trivial task with several applications in program analysis and verification. We present a novel iterative method for automatically deriving sufficient preconditions for safety and unsafety of programs which introduces a new dimension of modularity. Each iteration maintains over-approximations of the set of \emph{safe} and \emph{unsafe} \emph{initial} states. Then we…
▽ More
Precondition inference is a non-trivial task with several applications in program analysis and verification. We present a novel iterative method for automatically deriving sufficient preconditions for safety and unsafety of programs which introduces a new dimension of modularity. Each iteration maintains over-approximations of the set of \emph{safe} and \emph{unsafe} \emph{initial} states. Then we repeatedly use the current abstractions to partition the program's \emph{initial} states into those known to be safe, known to be unsafe and unknown, and construct a revised program focusing on those initial states that are not yet known to be safe or unsafe. An experimental evaluation of the method on a set of software verification benchmarks shows that it can solve problems which are not solvable using previous methods.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
An iterative approach to precondition inference using constrained Horn clauses
Authors:
Bishoksan Kafle,
John P. Gallagher,
Graeme Gange,
Peter Schachte,
Harald Sondergaard,
Peter J. Stuckey
Abstract:
We present a method for automatic inference of conditions on the initial states of a program that guarantee that the safety assertions in the program are not violated. Constrained Horn clauses (CHCs) are used to model the program and assertions in a uniform way, and we use standard abstract interpretations to derive an over-approximation of the set of unsafe initial states. The precondition then i…
▽ More
We present a method for automatic inference of conditions on the initial states of a program that guarantee that the safety assertions in the program are not violated. Constrained Horn clauses (CHCs) are used to model the program and assertions in a uniform way, and we use standard abstract interpretations to derive an over-approximation of the set of unsafe initial states. The precondition then is the constraint corresponding to the complement of that set, under-approximating the set of safe initial states. This idea of complementation is not new, but previous attempts to exploit it have suffered from the loss of precision. Here we develop an iterative specialisation algorithm to give more precise, and in some cases optimal safety conditions. The algorithm combines existing transformations, namely constraint specialisation, partial evaluation and a trace elimination transformation. The last two of these transformations perform polyvariant specialisation, leading to disjunctive constraints which improve precision. The algorithm is implemented and tested on a benchmark suite of programs from the literature in precondition inference and software verification competitions.
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Horn Clauses as an Intermediate Representation for Program Analysis and Transformation
Authors:
Graeme Gange,
Jorge A. Navas,
Peter Schachte,
Harald Sondergaard,
Peter J. Stuckey
Abstract:
Many recent analyses for conventional imperative programs begin by transforming programs into logic programs, capitalising on existing LP analyses and simple LP semantics. We propose using logic programs as an intermediate program representation throughout the compilation process. With restrictions ensuring determinism and single-modedness, a logic program can easily be transformed to machine lang…
▽ More
Many recent analyses for conventional imperative programs begin by transforming programs into logic programs, capitalising on existing LP analyses and simple LP semantics. We propose using logic programs as an intermediate program representation throughout the compilation process. With restrictions ensuring determinism and single-modedness, a logic program can easily be transformed to machine language or other low-level language, while maintaining the simple semantics that makes it suitable as a language for program analysis and transformation. We present a simple LP language that enforces determinism and single-modedness, and show that it makes a convenient program representation for analysis and transformation.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
-
A Complete Refinement Procedure for Regular Separability of Context-Free Languages
Authors:
Graeme Gange,
Jorge A. Navas,
Peter Schachte,
Harald Sondergaard,
Peter J. Stuckey
Abstract:
Often, when analyzing the behaviour of systems modelled as context-free languages, we wish to know if two languages overlap. To this end, we present an effective semi-decision procedure for regular separability of context-free languages, based on counter-example guided abstraction refinement. We propose two refinement methods, one inexpensive but incomplete, and the other complete but more expensi…
▽ More
Often, when analyzing the behaviour of systems modelled as context-free languages, we wish to know if two languages overlap. To this end, we present an effective semi-decision procedure for regular separability of context-free languages, based on counter-example guided abstraction refinement. We propose two refinement methods, one inexpensive but incomplete, and the other complete but more expensive. We provide an experimental evaluation of this procedure, and demonstrate its practicality on a range of verification and language-theoretic instances.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
A Partial-Order Approach to Array Content Analysis
Authors:
Graeme Gange,
Jorge A. Navas,
Peter Schachte,
Harald Sondergaard,
Peter J. Stuckey
Abstract:
We present a parametric abstract domain for array content analysis. The method maintains invariants for contiguous regions of the array, similar to the methods of Gopan, Reps and Sagiv, and of Halbwachs and Peron. However, it introduces a novel concept of an array content graph, avoiding the need for an up-front factorial partitioning step. The resulting analysis can be used with arbitrary numeric…
▽ More
We present a parametric abstract domain for array content analysis. The method maintains invariants for contiguous regions of the array, similar to the methods of Gopan, Reps and Sagiv, and of Halbwachs and Peron. However, it introduces a novel concept of an array content graph, avoiding the need for an up-front factorial partitioning step. The resulting analysis can be used with arbitrary numeric relational abstract domains; we evaluate the domain on a range of array manipulating program fragments.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2014;
originally announced August 2014.
-
Truth versus information in logic programming
Authors:
Lee Naish,
Harald Søndergaard
Abstract:
The semantics of logic programs was originally described in terms of two-valued logic. Soon, however, it was realised that three-valued logic had some natural advantages, as it provides distinct values not only for truth and falsehood, but also for "undefined". The three-valued semantics proposed by Fitting and by Kunen are closely related to what is computed by a logic program, the third truth va…
▽ More
The semantics of logic programs was originally described in terms of two-valued logic. Soon, however, it was realised that three-valued logic had some natural advantages, as it provides distinct values not only for truth and falsehood, but also for "undefined". The three-valued semantics proposed by Fitting and by Kunen are closely related to what is computed by a logic program, the third truth value being associated with non-termination. A different three-valued semantics, proposed by Naish, shared much with those of Fitting and Kunen but incorporated allowances for programmer intent, the third truth value being associated with underspecification. Naish used an (apparently) novel "arrow" operator to relate the intended meaning of left and right sides of predicate definitions. In this paper we suggest that the additional truth values of Fitting/Kunen and Naish are best viewed as duals. We use Belnap's four-valued logic, also used elsewhere by Fitting, to unify the two three-valued approaches. The truth values are arranged in a bilattice which supports the classical ordering on truth values as well as the "information ordering". We note that the "arrow" operator of Naish (and our four-valued extension) is essentially the information ordering, whereas the classical arrow denotes the truth ordering. This allows us to shed new light on many aspects of logic programming, including program analysis, type and mode systems, declarative debugging and the relationships between specifications and programs, and successive executions states of a program. This paper is to appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2013; v1 submitted 1 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
Binary Decision Diagrams for Affine Approximation
Authors:
Kevin Henshall,
Peter Schachte,
Harald Søndergaard,
Leigh Whiting
Abstract:
Selman and Kautz's work on ``knowledge compilation'' established how approximation (strengthening and/or weakening) of a propositional knowledge-base can be used to speed up query processing, at the expense of completeness. In this classical approach, querying uses Horn over- and under-approximations of a given knowledge-base, which is represented as a propositional formula in conjunctive normal…
▽ More
Selman and Kautz's work on ``knowledge compilation'' established how approximation (strengthening and/or weakening) of a propositional knowledge-base can be used to speed up query processing, at the expense of completeness. In this classical approach, querying uses Horn over- and under-approximations of a given knowledge-base, which is represented as a propositional formula in conjunctive normal form (CNF). Along with the class of Horn functions, one could imagine other Boolean function classes that might serve the same purpose, owing to attractive deduction-computational properties similar to those of the Horn functions. Indeed, Zanuttini has suggested that the class of affine Boolean functions could be useful in knowledge compilation and has presented an affine approximation algorithm. Since CNF is awkward for presenting affine functions, Zanuttini considers both a sets-of-models representation and the use of modulo 2 congruence equations. In this paper, we propose an algorithm based on reduced ordered binary decision diagrams (ROBDDs). This leads to a representation which is more compact than the sets of models and, once we have established some useful properties of affine Boolean functions, a more efficient algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2008;
originally announced April 2008.
