Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Rybalchenko, A

Efficient CTL Verification via Horn Constraints Solving

Authors: Tewodros A. Beyene, Corneliu Popeea, Andrey Rybalchenko

Abstract: The use of temporal logics has long been recognised as a fundamental approach to the formal specification and verification of reactive systems. In this paper, we take on the problem of automatically verifying a temporal property, given by a CTL formula, for a given (possibly infinite-state) program. We propose a method based on encoding the problem as a set of Horn constraints. The method takes a… ▽ More The use of temporal logics has long been recognised as a fundamental approach to the formal specification and verification of reactive systems. In this paper, we take on the problem of automatically verifying a temporal property, given by a CTL formula, for a given (possibly infinite-state) program. We propose a method based on encoding the problem as a set of Horn constraints. The method takes a program, modeled as a transition system, and a property given by a CTL formula as input. It first generates a set of forall-exists quantified Horn constraints and well-foundedness constraints by exploiting the syntactic structure of the CTL formula. Then, the generated set of constraints are solved by applying an off-the-shelf Horn constraints solving engine. The program is said to satisfy the property if and only if the generated set of constraints has a solution. We demonstrate the practical promises of the method by applying it on a set of challenging examples. Although our method is based on a generic Horn constraint solving engine, it is able to outperform state-of-art methods specialised for CTL verification. △ Less

Submitted 15 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: In Proceedings HCVS2016, arXiv:1607.04033

ACM Class: D.2.4; F.4.1

Journal ref: EPTCS 219, 2016, pp. 1-14

Proceedings First Workshop on Horn Clauses for Verification and Synthesis

Authors: Nikolaj Bjørner, Fabio Fioravanti, Andrey Rybalchenko, Valerio Senni

Abstract: This volume contains the proceedings of HCVS 2014, the First Workshop on Horn Clauses for Verification and Synthesis which was held on July 17, 2014 in Vienna, Austria as a satellite event of the Federated Logic Conference (FLoC) and part of the Vienna Summer of Logic (VSL 2014). HCVS 2014 was affiliated to the 26th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV 2014) and to the 30… ▽ More This volume contains the proceedings of HCVS 2014, the First Workshop on Horn Clauses for Verification and Synthesis which was held on July 17, 2014 in Vienna, Austria as a satellite event of the Federated Logic Conference (FLoC) and part of the Vienna Summer of Logic (VSL 2014). HCVS 2014 was affiliated to the 26th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV 2014) and to the 30th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2014). Most Program Verification and Synthesis problems of interest can be modeled directly using Horn clauses and many recent advances in the Constraint/Logic Programming and Program Verification communities have centered around efficiently solving problems presented as Horn clauses. Since Horn clauses for verification and synthesis have been advocated by these communities in different times and from different perspectives, the HCVS workshop was organized to stimulate interaction and a fruitful exchange and integration of experiences. △ Less

Submitted 2 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

ACM Class: D.2.4; F.3.1; I.2.2;

Journal ref: EPTCS 169, 2014

CTL+FO Verification as Constraint Solving

Authors: Tewodros A. Beyene, Marc Brockschmidt, Andrey Rybalchenko

Abstract: Expressing program correctness often requires relating program data throughout (different branches of) an execution. Such properties can be represented using CTL+FO, a logic that allows mixing temporal and first-order quantification. Verifying that a program satisfies a CTL+FO property is a challenging problem that requires both temporal and data reasoning. Temporal quantifiers require discovery o… ▽ More Expressing program correctness often requires relating program data throughout (different branches of) an execution. Such properties can be represented using CTL+FO, a logic that allows mixing temporal and first-order quantification. Verifying that a program satisfies a CTL+FO property is a challenging problem that requires both temporal and data reasoning. Temporal quantifiers require discovery of invariants and ranking functions, while first-order quantifiers demand instantiation techniques. In this paper, we present a constraint-based method for proving CTL+FO properties automatically. Our method makes the interplay between the temporal and first-order quantification explicit in a constraint encoding that combines recursion and existential quantification. By integrating this constraint encoding with an off-the-shelf solver we obtain an automatic verifier for CTL+FO. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2014; v1 submitted 16 June, 2014; originally announced June 2014.

(Quantified) Horn Constraint Solving for Program Verification and Synthesis

Authors: Andrey Rybalchenko

Abstract: We show how automatic tools for the verification of linear and branching time properties of procedural, multi-threaded, and functional programs as well as program synthesis can be naturally and uniformly seen as solvers of constraints in form of (quantified) Horn clauses over background logical theories. Such a perspective can offer various advantages, e. g., a logical separation of concerns betwe… ▽ More We show how automatic tools for the verification of linear and branching time properties of procedural, multi-threaded, and functional programs as well as program synthesis can be naturally and uniformly seen as solvers of constraints in form of (quantified) Horn clauses over background logical theories. Such a perspective can offer various advantages, e. g., a logical separation of concerns between constraint generation (also known as generation of proof obligations) and constraint solving (also known as proof discovery), reuse of solvers across different verifications tasks, and liberation of proof designers from low level algorithmic concerns and vice versa. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP) △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2014; originally announced May 2014.

Higher-order Program Verification as Satisfiability Modulo Theories with Algebraic Data-types

Authors: Nikolaj Bjorner, Ken McMillan, Andrey Rybalchenko

Abstract: We report on work in progress on automatic procedures for proving properties of programs written in higher-order functional languages. Our approach encodes higher-order programs directly as first-order SMT problems over Horn clauses. It is straight-forward to reduce Hoare-style verification of first-order programs into satisfiability of Horn clauses. The presence of closures offers several challen… ▽ More We report on work in progress on automatic procedures for proving properties of programs written in higher-order functional languages. Our approach encodes higher-order programs directly as first-order SMT problems over Horn clauses. It is straight-forward to reduce Hoare-style verification of first-order programs into satisfiability of Horn clauses. The presence of closures offers several challenges: relatively complete proof systems have to account for closures; and in practice, the effectiveness of search procedures depend on encoding strategies and capabilities of underlying solvers. We here use algebraic data-types to encode closures and rely on solvers that support algebraic data-types. The viability of the approach is examined using examples from the literature on higher-order program verification. △ Less

Submitted 21 June, 2013; originally announced June 2013.

An Epistemic Perspective on Consistency of Concurrent Computations

Authors: Klaus v. Gleissenthall, Andrey Rybalchenko

Abstract: Consistency properties of concurrent computations, e.g., sequential consistency, linearizability, or eventual consistency, are essential for devising correct concurrent algorithms. In this paper, we present a logical formalization of such consistency properties that is based on a standard logic of knowledge. Our formalization provides a declarative perspective on what is imposed by consistency req… ▽ More Consistency properties of concurrent computations, e.g., sequential consistency, linearizability, or eventual consistency, are essential for devising correct concurrent algorithms. In this paper, we present a logical formalization of such consistency properties that is based on a standard logic of knowledge. Our formalization provides a declarative perspective on what is imposed by consistency requirements and provides some interesting unifying insight on differently looking properties. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2013; originally announced May 2013.

Generalised Interpolation by Solving Recursion-Free Horn Clauses

Authors: Ashutosh Gupta, Corneliu Popeea, Andrey Rybalchenko

Abstract: In this paper we present InterHorn, a solver for recursion-free Horn clauses. The main application domain of InterHorn lies in solving interpolation problems arising in software verification. We show how a range of interpolation problems, including path, transition, nested, state/transition and well-founded interpolation can be handled directly by InterHorn. By detailing these interpolation proble… ▽ More In this paper we present InterHorn, a solver for recursion-free Horn clauses. The main application domain of InterHorn lies in solving interpolation problems arising in software verification. We show how a range of interpolation problems, including path, transition, nested, state/transition and well-founded interpolation can be handled directly by InterHorn. By detailing these interpolation problems and their Horn clause representations, we hope to encourage the emergence of a common back-end interpolation interface useful for diverse verification tools. △ Less

Submitted 2 December, 2014; v1 submitted 29 March, 2013; originally announced March 2013.

Comments: In Proceedings HCVS 2014, arXiv:1412.0825

Journal ref: EPTCS 169, 2014, pp. 31-38

Separation Logic Modulo Theories

Authors: Juan Antonio Navarro-Pérez, Andrey Rybalchenko

Abstract: Logical reasoning about program data often requires dealing with heap structures as well as scalar data types. Recent advances in Satisfiability Modular Theory (SMT) already offer efficient procedures for dealing with scalars, yet they lack any support for dealing with heap structures. In this paper, we present an approach that integrates Separation Logic---a prominent logic for reasoning about li… ▽ More Logical reasoning about program data often requires dealing with heap structures as well as scalar data types. Recent advances in Satisfiability Modular Theory (SMT) already offer efficient procedures for dealing with scalars, yet they lack any support for dealing with heap structures. In this paper, we present an approach that integrates Separation Logic---a prominent logic for reasoning about list segments on the heap---and SMT. We follow a model-based approach that communicates aliasing among heap cells between the SMT solver and the Separation Logic reasoning part. An experimental evaluation using the Z3 solver indicates that our approach can effectively put to work the advances in SMT for dealing with heap structures. This is the first decision procedure for the combination of separation logic with SMT theories. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2013; originally announced March 2013.

Comments: 16 pages

Applying Prolog to Develop Distributed Systems

Authors: Nuno P. Lopes, Juan A. Navarro, Andrey Rybalchenko, Atul Singh

Abstract: Development of distributed systems is a difficult task. Declarative programming techniques hold a promising potential for effectively supporting programmer in this challenge. While Datalog-based languages have been actively explored for programming distributed systems, Prolog received relatively little attention in this application area so far. In this paper we present a Prolog-based programming s… ▽ More Development of distributed systems is a difficult task. Declarative programming techniques hold a promising potential for effectively supporting programmer in this challenge. While Datalog-based languages have been actively explored for programming distributed systems, Prolog received relatively little attention in this application area so far. In this paper we present a Prolog-based programming system, called DAHL, for the declarative development of distributed systems. DAHL extends Prolog with an event-driven control mechanism and built-in networking procedures. Our experimental evaluation using a distributed hash-table data structure, a protocol for achieving Byzantine fault tolerance, and a distributed software model checker - all implemented in DAHL - indicates the viability of the approach. △ Less

Submitted 22 July, 2010; originally announced July 2010.

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 26th Int'l. Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP'10) Special Issue, 10(4-6):691-707, July 2010

HMC: Verifying Functional Programs Using Abstract Interpreters

Authors: Ranjit Jhala, Rupak Majumdar, Andrey Rybalchenko

Abstract: We present Hindley-Milner-Cousots (HMC), an algorithm that allows any interprocedural analysis for first-order imperative programs to be used to verify safety properties of typed higher-order functional programs. HMC works as follows. First, it uses the type structure of the functional program to generate a set of logical refinement constraints whose satisfaction implies the safety of the source p… ▽ More We present Hindley-Milner-Cousots (HMC), an algorithm that allows any interprocedural analysis for first-order imperative programs to be used to verify safety properties of typed higher-order functional programs. HMC works as follows. First, it uses the type structure of the functional program to generate a set of logical refinement constraints whose satisfaction implies the safety of the source program. Next, it transforms the logical refinement constraints into a simple first-order imperative program that is safe iff the constraints are satisfiable. Thus, in one swoop, HMC makes tools for invariant generation, e.g., based on abstract domains, predicate abstraction, counterexample-guided refinement, and Craig interpolation be directly applicable to verify safety properties of modern functional languages in a fully automatic manner. We have implemented HMC and describe preliminary experimental results using two imperative checkers -- ARMC and InterProc -- to verify OCaml programs. Thus, by composing type-based reasoning grounded in program syntax and state-based reasoning grounded in abstract interpretation, HMC opens the door to automatic verification of programs written in modern programming languages. △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2010; v1 submitted 16 April, 2010; originally announced April 2010.

Comments: 12 pages