Showing 1–50 of 77 results for author: Roughgarden, T

Accountable Liveness

Authors: Andrew Lewis-Pye, Joachim Neu, Tim Roughgarden, Luca Zanolini

Abstract: Safety and liveness are the two classical security properties of consensus protocols. Recent works have strengthened safety with accountability: should any safety violation occur, a sizable fraction of adversary nodes can be proven to be protocol violators. This paper studies to what extent analogous accountability guarantees are achievable for liveness. To reveal the full complexity of this quest… ▽ More Safety and liveness are the two classical security properties of consensus protocols. Recent works have strengthened safety with accountability: should any safety violation occur, a sizable fraction of adversary nodes can be proven to be protocol violators. This paper studies to what extent analogous accountability guarantees are achievable for liveness. To reveal the full complexity of this question, we introduce an interpolation between the classical synchronous and partially-synchronous models that we call the $x$-partially-synchronous network model in which, intuitively, at most an $x$ fraction of the time steps in any sufficiently long interval are asynchronous (and, as with a partially-synchronous network, all time steps are synchronous following the passage of an unknown "global stablization time"). We prove a precise characterization of the parameter regime in which accountable liveness is achievable: if and only if $x < 1/2$ and $f < n/2$, where $n$ denotes the number of nodes and $f$ the number of nodes controlled by an adversary. We further refine the problem statement and our analysis by parameterizing by the number of violating nodes identified following a liveness violation, and provide evidence that the guarantees achieved by our protocol are near-optimal (as a function of $x$ and $f$). Our results provide rigorous foundations for liveness-accountability heuristics such as the "inactivity leaks" employed in Ethereum. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Incentive-Compatible Recovery from Manipulated Signals, with Applications to Decentralized Physical Infrastructure

Authors: Jason Milionis, Jens Ernstberger, Joseph Bonneau, Scott Duke Kominers, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: We introduce the first formal model capturing the elicitation of unverifiable information from a party (the "source") with implicit signals derived by other players (the "observers"). Our model is motivated in part by applications in decentralized physical infrastructure networks (a.k.a. "DePIN"), an emerging application domain in which physical services (e.g., sensor information, bandwidth, or en… ▽ More We introduce the first formal model capturing the elicitation of unverifiable information from a party (the "source") with implicit signals derived by other players (the "observers"). Our model is motivated in part by applications in decentralized physical infrastructure networks (a.k.a. "DePIN"), an emerging application domain in which physical services (e.g., sensor information, bandwidth, or energy) are provided at least in part by untrusted and self-interested parties. A key challenge in these signal network applications is verifying the level of service that was actually provided by network participants. We first establish a condition called source identifiability, which we show is necessary for the existence of a mechanism for which truthful signal reporting is a strict equilibrium. For a converse, we build on techniques from peer prediction to show that in every signal network that satisfies the source identifiability condition, there is in fact a strictly truthful mechanism, where truthful signal reporting gives strictly higher total expected payoff than any less informative equilibrium. We furthermore show that this truthful equilibrium is in fact the unique equilibrium of the mechanism if there is positive probability that any one observer is unconditionally honest (e.g., if an observer were run by the network owner). Also, by extending our condition to coalitions, we show that there are generally no collusion-resistant mechanisms in the settings that we consider. We apply our framework and results to two DePIN applications: proving location, and proving bandwidth. In the location-proving setting observers learn (potentially enlarged) Euclidean distances to the source. Here, our condition has an appealing geometric interpretation, implying that the source's location can be truthfully elicited if and only if it is guaranteed to lie inside the convex hull of the observers. △ Less

Submitted 10 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.

Beyond Optimal Fault Tolerance

Authors: Andrew Lewis-Pye, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: The optimal fault-tolerance achievable by any protocol has been characterized in a wide range of settings. For example, for state machine replication (SMR) protocols operating in the partially synchronous setting, it is possible to simultaneously guarantee consistency against $α$-bounded adversaries (i.e., adversaries that control less than an $α$ fraction of the participants) and liveness against… ▽ More The optimal fault-tolerance achievable by any protocol has been characterized in a wide range of settings. For example, for state machine replication (SMR) protocols operating in the partially synchronous setting, it is possible to simultaneously guarantee consistency against $α$-bounded adversaries (i.e., adversaries that control less than an $α$ fraction of the participants) and liveness against $β$-bounded adversaries if and only if $α+ 2β\leq 1$. This paper characterizes to what extent "better-than-optimal" fault-tolerance guarantees are possible for SMR protocols when the standard consistency requirement is relaxed to allow a bounded number $r$ of consistency violations. We prove that bounding rollback is impossible without additional timing assumptions and investigate protocols that tolerate and recover from consistency violations whenever message delays around the time of an attack are bounded by a parameter $Δ^*$ (which may be arbitrarily larger than the parameter $Δ$ that bounds post-GST message delays in the partially synchronous model). Here, a protocol's fault-tolerance can be a non-constant function of $r$, and we prove, for each $r$, matching upper and lower bounds on the optimal "recoverable fault-tolerance" achievable by any SMR protocol. For example, for protocols that guarantee liveness against 1/3-bounded adversaries in the partially synchronous setting, a 5/9-bounded adversary can always cause one consistency violation but not two, and a 2/3-bounded adversary can always cause two consistency violations but not three. Our positive results are achieved through a generic "recovery procedure" that can be grafted on to any accountable SMR protocol and restores consistency following a violation while rolling back only transactions that were finalized in the previous $2Δ^*$ timesteps. △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2025; v1 submitted 10 January, 2025; originally announced January 2025.

Toward Optimal-Complexity Hash-Based Asynchronous MVBA with Optimal Resilience

Authors: Jovan Komatovic, Joachim Neu, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: Multi-valued validated Byzantine agreement (MVBA), a fundamental primitive of distributed computing, allows $n$ processes to agree on a valid $\ell$-bit value, despite $t$ faulty processes behaving maliciously. Among hash-based solutions for the asynchronous setting with adaptive faults, the state-of-the-art HMVBA protocol achieves optimal $O(n^2)$ message complexity, (near-)optimal… ▽ More Multi-valued validated Byzantine agreement (MVBA), a fundamental primitive of distributed computing, allows $n$ processes to agree on a valid $\ell$-bit value, despite $t$ faulty processes behaving maliciously. Among hash-based solutions for the asynchronous setting with adaptive faults, the state-of-the-art HMVBA protocol achieves optimal $O(n^2)$ message complexity, (near-)optimal $O(n\ell+n^2 λ\log n)$ bit complexity, and optimal $O(1)$ time complexity. However, it only tolerates up to $t < \frac15 n$ adaptive failures. In contrast, the best known optimally resilient protocol, FIN-MVBA, exchanges $O(n^3)$ messages and $O(n^2\ell + n^3λ)$ bits. This highlights a fundamental question: can a hash-based protocol be designed for the asynchronous setting with adaptive faults that simultaneously achieves both optimal complexity and optimal resilience? In this paper, we take a significant step toward answering the question. Namely, we introduce Reducer, an MVBA protocol that retains HMVBA's complexity while improving its resilience to $t<\frac14 n$. Like HMVBA and FIN-MVBA, Reducer relies exclusively on collision-resistant hash functions. A key innovation in Reducer's design is its internal use of strong multi-valued Byzantine agreement (SMBA), a variant of strong consensus we introduce and construct, which ensures agreement on a correct process's proposal. To further advance resilience toward the optimal one-third bound, we then propose Reducer++, an MVBA protocol that tolerates up to $t < (\frac13-ε)n$ adaptive failures, for any fixed constant $ε> 0$. Unlike Reducer, Reducer++ does not rely on SMBA. Instead, it employs a novel approach involving hash functions modeled as random oracles to ensure termination. Reducer++ maintains constant time complexity, quadratic message complexity, and quasi-quadratic bit complexity, with constants dependent on $ε$. △ Less

Submitted 28 February, 2025; v1 submitted 16 October, 2024; originally announced October 2024.

Robust Restaking Networks

Authors: Naveen Durvasula, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: We study the risks of validator reuse across multiple services in a restaking protocol. We characterize the robust security of a restaking network as a function of the buffer between the costs and profits from attacks. For example, our results imply that if attack costs always exceed attack profits by 10\%, then a sudden loss of .1\% of the overall stake (e.g., due to a software error) cannot resu… ▽ More We study the risks of validator reuse across multiple services in a restaking protocol. We characterize the robust security of a restaking network as a function of the buffer between the costs and profits from attacks. For example, our results imply that if attack costs always exceed attack profits by 10\%, then a sudden loss of .1\% of the overall stake (e.g., due to a software error) cannot result in the ultimate loss of more than 1.1\% of the overall stake. We also provide local analogs of these overcollateralization conditions and robust security guarantees that apply specifically for a target service or coalition of services. All of our bounds on worst-case stake loss are the best possible. Finally, we bound the maximum-possible length of a cascade of attacks. Our results suggest measures of robustness that could be exposed to the participants in a restaking protocol. We also suggest polynomial-time computable sufficient conditions that can proxy for these measures. △ Less

Submitted 31 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Online Stackelberg Optimization via Nonlinear Control

Authors: William Brown, Christos Papadimitriou, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: In repeated interaction problems with adaptive agents, our objective often requires anticipating and optimizing over the space of possible agent responses. We show that many problems of this form can be cast as instances of online (nonlinear) control which satisfy \textit{local controllability}, with convex losses over a bounded state space which encodes agent behavior, and we introduce a unified… ▽ More In repeated interaction problems with adaptive agents, our objective often requires anticipating and optimizing over the space of possible agent responses. We show that many problems of this form can be cast as instances of online (nonlinear) control which satisfy \textit{local controllability}, with convex losses over a bounded state space which encodes agent behavior, and we introduce a unified algorithmic framework for tractable regret minimization in such cases. When the instance dynamics are known but otherwise arbitrary, we obtain oracle-efficient $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret by reduction to online convex optimization, which can be made computationally efficient if dynamics are locally \textit{action-linear}. In the presence of adversarial disturbances to the state, we give tight bounds in terms of either the cumulative or per-round disturbance magnitude (for \textit{strongly} or \textit{weakly} locally controllable dynamics, respectively). Additionally, we give sublinear regret results for the cases of unknown locally action-linear dynamics as well as for the bandit feedback setting. Finally, we demonstrate applications of our framework to well-studied problems including performative prediction, recommendations for adaptive agents, adaptive pricing of real-valued goods, and repeated gameplay against no-regret learners, directly yielding extensions beyond prior results in each case. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: COLT 2024

The Economic Limits of Permissionless Consensus

Authors: Eric Budish, Andrew Lewis-Pye, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: The purpose of a consensus protocol is to keep a distributed network of nodes "in sync," even in the presence of an unpredictable communication network and adversarial behavior by some of the participating nodes. In the permissionless setting, these nodes may be operated by unknown players, with each player free to use multiple identifiers and to start or stop running the protocol at any time. Est… ▽ More The purpose of a consensus protocol is to keep a distributed network of nodes "in sync," even in the presence of an unpredictable communication network and adversarial behavior by some of the participating nodes. In the permissionless setting, these nodes may be operated by unknown players, with each player free to use multiple identifiers and to start or stop running the protocol at any time. Establishing that a permissionless consensus protocol is "secure" thus requires both a distributed computing argument (that the protocol guarantees consistency and liveness unless the fraction of adversarial participation is sufficiently large) and an economic argument (that carrying out an attack would be prohibitively expensive for an attacker). There is a mature toolbox for assembling arguments of the former type; the goal of this paper is to lay the foundations for arguments of the latter type. An ideal permissionless consensus protocol would, in addition to satisfying standard consistency and liveness guarantees, render consistency violations prohibitively expensive for the attacker without collateral damage to honest participants. We make this idea precise with our notion of the EAAC (expensive to attack in the absence of collapse) property, and prove the following results: 1. In the synchronous and dynamically available setting, with an adversary that controls at least one-half of the overall resources, no protocol can be EAAC. 2. In the partially synchronous and quasi-permissionless setting, with an adversary that controls at least one-third of the overall resources, no protocol can be EAAC. 3. In the synchronous and quasi-permissionless setting, there is a proof-of-stake protocol that, provided the adversary controls less than two-thirds of the overall stake, satisfies the EAAC property. All three results are optimal with respect to the size of the adversary. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2024; v1 submitted 15 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Shill-Proof Auctions

Authors: Andrew Komo, Scott Duke Kominers, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: In an auction, a seller may masquerade as one or more bidders in order to manipulate the clearing price. We characterize single-item auction formats that are shill-proof in the sense that a profit-maximizing seller has no incentive to submit shill bids. We distinguish between strong shill-proofness, in which a seller with full knowledge of bidders' valuations can never profit from shilling, and we… ▽ More In an auction, a seller may masquerade as one or more bidders in order to manipulate the clearing price. We characterize single-item auction formats that are shill-proof in the sense that a profit-maximizing seller has no incentive to submit shill bids. We distinguish between strong shill-proofness, in which a seller with full knowledge of bidders' valuations can never profit from shilling, and weak shill-proofness, which requires only that the expected equilibrium profit from shilling is nonpositive. The Dutch auction (with a suitable reserve) is the unique (revenue-)optimal and strongly shill-proof auction. Moreover, the Dutch auction (with no reserve) is the unique prior-independent auction that is both efficient and weakly shill-proof. While there are multiple ex-post incentive compatible, weakly shill-proof, and optimal auctions; any optimal auction can satisfy only two properties in the set {static, ex-post incentive compatible, weakly shill-proof}. △ Less

Submitted 17 November, 2024; v1 submitted 30 March, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Collusion-Resilience in Transaction Fee Mechanism Design

Authors: Hao Chung, Tim Roughgarden, Elaine Shi

Abstract: Users bid in a transaction fee mechanism (TFM) to get their transactions included and confirmed by a blockchain protocol. Roughgarden (EC'21) initiated the formal treatment of TFMs and proposed three requirements: user incentive compatibility (UIC), miner incentive compatibility (MIC), and a form of collusion-resilience called OCA-proofness. Ethereum's EIP-1559 mechanism satisfies all three proper… ▽ More Users bid in a transaction fee mechanism (TFM) to get their transactions included and confirmed by a blockchain protocol. Roughgarden (EC'21) initiated the formal treatment of TFMs and proposed three requirements: user incentive compatibility (UIC), miner incentive compatibility (MIC), and a form of collusion-resilience called OCA-proofness. Ethereum's EIP-1559 mechanism satisfies all three properties simultaneously when there is no contention between transactions, but loses the UIC property when there are too many eligible transactions to fit in a single block. Chung and Shi (SODA'23) considered an alternative notion of collusion-resilience, called c-side-contract-proofness (c-SCP), and showed that, when there is contention between transactions, no TFM can satisfy UIC, MIC, and c-SCP for any c at least 1. OCA-proofness asserts that the users and a miner should not be able to "steal from the protocol." On the other hand, the c-SCP condition requires that a coalition of a miner and a subset of users should not be able to profit through strategic deviations (whether at the expense of the protocol or of the users outside the coalition). Our main result is the first proof that, when there is contention between transactions, no (possibly randomized) TFM in which users are expected to bid truthfully satisfies UIC, MIC, and OCA-proofness. This result resolves the main open question in Roughgarden (EC'21). We also suggest several relaxations of the basic model that allow our impossibility result to be circumvented. △ Less

Submitted 19 June, 2024; v1 submitted 14 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Centralization in Block Building and Proposer-Builder Separation

Authors: Maryam Bahrani, Pranav Garimidi, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: The goal of this paper is to rigorously interrogate conventional wisdom about centralization in block-building (due to, e.g., MEV and private order flow) and the outsourcing of block-building by validators to specialists (i.e., proposer-builder separation): 1. Does heterogeneity in skills and knowledge across block producers inevitably lead to centralization? 2. Does proposer-builder separatio… ▽ More The goal of this paper is to rigorously interrogate conventional wisdom about centralization in block-building (due to, e.g., MEV and private order flow) and the outsourcing of block-building by validators to specialists (i.e., proposer-builder separation): 1. Does heterogeneity in skills and knowledge across block producers inevitably lead to centralization? 2. Does proposer-builder separation eliminate heterogeneity and preserve decentralization among proposers? This paper develops mathematical models and results that offer answers to these questions: 1. In a game-theoretic model with endogenous staking, heterogeneous block producer rewards, and staking costs, we quantify the extent to which heterogeneous rewards lead to concentration in the equilibrium staking distribution. 2. In a stochastic model in which heterogeneous block producers repeatedly reinvest rewards into staking, we quantify, as a function of the block producer heterogeneity, the rate at which stake concentrates on the most sophisticated block producers. 3. In a model with heterogeneous proposers and specialized builders, we quantify, as a function of the competitiveness of the builder ecosystem, the extent to which proposer-builder separation reduces the heterogeneity in rewards across different proposers. Our models and results take advantage of connections to contest design, Pólya urn processes, and auction theory. △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Utilitarian Algorithm Configuration

Authors: Devon R. Graham, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: We present the first nontrivial procedure for configuring heuristic algorithms to maximize the utility provided to their end users while also offering theoretical guarantees about performance. Existing procedures seek configurations that minimize expected runtime. However, very recent theoretical work argues that expected runtime minimization fails to capture algorithm designers' preferences. Here… ▽ More We present the first nontrivial procedure for configuring heuristic algorithms to maximize the utility provided to their end users while also offering theoretical guarantees about performance. Existing procedures seek configurations that minimize expected runtime. However, very recent theoretical work argues that expected runtime minimization fails to capture algorithm designers' preferences. Here we show that the utilitarian objective also confers significant algorithmic benefits. Intuitively, this is because mean runtime is dominated by extremely long runs even when they are incredibly rare; indeed, even when an algorithm never gives rise to such long runs, configuration procedures that provably minimize mean runtime must perform a huge number of experiments to demonstrate this fact. In contrast, utility is bounded and monotonically decreasing in runtime, allowing for meaningful empirical bounds on a configuration's performance. This paper builds on this idea to describe effective and theoretically sound configuration procedures. We prove upper bounds on the runtime of these procedures that are similar to theoretical lower bounds, while also demonstrating their performance empirically. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Transaction Fee Mechanism Design with Active Block Producers

Authors: Maryam Bahrani, Pranav Garimidi, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: The incentive-compatibility properties of blockchain transaction fee mechanisms have been investigated with *passive* block producers that are motivated purely by the net rewards earned at the consensus layer. This paper introduces a model of *active* block producers that have their own private valuations for blocks (representing, for example, additional value derived from the application layer).… ▽ More The incentive-compatibility properties of blockchain transaction fee mechanisms have been investigated with *passive* block producers that are motivated purely by the net rewards earned at the consensus layer. This paper introduces a model of *active* block producers that have their own private valuations for blocks (representing, for example, additional value derived from the application layer). The block producer surplus in our model can be interpreted as one of the more common colloquial meanings of the term ``MEV.'' The main results of this paper show that transaction fee mechanism design is fundamentally more difficult with active block producers than with passive ones: with active block producers, no non-trivial or approximately welfare-maximizing transaction fee mechanism can be incentive-compatible for both users and block producers. These results can be interpreted as a mathematical justification for the current interest in augmenting transaction fee mechanisms with additional components such as order flow auctions, block producer competition, trusted hardware, or cryptographic techniques. △ Less

Submitted 3 October, 2023; v1 submitted 4 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

When Bidders Are DAOs

Authors: Maryam Bahrani, Pranav Garimidi, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: In a typical decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), people organize themselves into a group that is programmatically managed. DAOs can act as bidders in auctions, with a DAO's bid treated by the auctioneer as if it had been submitted by an individual, without regard to the internal structure of the DAO. We study auctions in which the bidders are DAOs. More precisely, we consider the design o… ▽ More In a typical decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), people organize themselves into a group that is programmatically managed. DAOs can act as bidders in auctions, with a DAO's bid treated by the auctioneer as if it had been submitted by an individual, without regard to the internal structure of the DAO. We study auctions in which the bidders are DAOs. More precisely, we consider the design of two-level auctions in which the "participants" are groups of bidders rather than individuals. Bidders form DAOs to pool resources, but must then also negotiate the terms by which the DAO's winnings are shared. We model the outcome of a DAO's negotiations by an aggregation function (which aggregates DAO members' bids into a single group bid), and a budget-balanced cost-sharing mechanism (that determines DAO members' access to the DAO's allocation and distributes the total payment demanded from the DAO to its members). We pursue two-level mechanisms that are incentive-compatible (with truthful bidding a dominant strategy for members of each DAO) and approximately welfare-optimal. We prove that, even in the case of a single-item auction, incentive-compatible welfare maximization is not possible: No matter what the outer mechanism and the cost-sharing mechanisms used by DAOs, the welfare of the resulting two-level mechanism can be a $\approx \ln n$ factor less than optimal. We complement this lower bound with a natural two-level mechanism that achieves a matching approximate welfare guarantee. Our upper bound also extends to multi-item auctions where individuals have additive valuations. Finally, we show that our positive results cannot be extended much further: Even in multi-item settings with unit-demand bidders, truthful two-level mechanisms form a highly restricted class and as a consequence cannot guarantee any non-trivial approximation of the maximum social welfare. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Permissionless Consensus

Authors: Andrew Lewis-Pye, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: Blockchain protocols typically aspire to run in the permissionless setting, in which nodes are owned and operated by a large number of diverse and unknown entities, with each node free to start or stop running the protocol at any time. This setting is more challenging than the traditional permissioned setting, in which the set of nodes that will be running the protocol is fixed and known at the ti… ▽ More Blockchain protocols typically aspire to run in the permissionless setting, in which nodes are owned and operated by a large number of diverse and unknown entities, with each node free to start or stop running the protocol at any time. This setting is more challenging than the traditional permissioned setting, in which the set of nodes that will be running the protocol is fixed and known at the time of protocol deployment. The goal of this paper is to provide a framework for reasoning about the rich design space of blockchain protocols and their capabilities and limitations in the permissionless setting. We propose a hierarchy of settings with different "degrees of permissionlessness", specified by the amount of knowledge that a protocol has about the current participants: These are the fully permissionless, dynamically available and quasi-permissionless settings. The paper also proves several results illustrating the utility of our analysis framework for reasoning about blockchain protocols in these settings. For example: (1) In the fully permissionless setting, even with synchronous communication and with severe restrictions on the total size of the Byzantine players, every deterministic protocol for Byzantine agreement has a non-terminating execution. (2) In the dynamically available and partially synchronous setting, no protocol can solve the Byzantine agreement problem with high probability, even if there are no Byzantine players at all. (3) In the quasi-permissionless and partially synchronous setting, by contrast, assuming a bound on the total size of the Byzantine players, there is a deterministic protocol solving state machine replication. (4) In the quasi-permissionless and synchronous setting, every proof-of-stake state machine replication protocol that uses only time-malleable cryptographic primitives is vulnerable to long-range attacks. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2024; v1 submitted 28 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: This is a journal version of the paper that subsumes earlier (conference) versions "Byzantine Generals in the Permissionless Setting" and "Resource Pools and the CAP Theorem"

A Myersonian Framework for Optimal Liquidity Provision in Automated Market Makers

Authors: Jason Milionis, Ciamac C. Moallemi, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: In decentralized finance ("DeFi"), automated market makers (AMMs) enable traders to programmatically exchange one asset for another. Such trades are enabled by the assets deposited by liquidity providers (LPs). The goal of this paper is to characterize and interpret the optimal (i.e., profit-maximizing) strategy of a monopolist liquidity provider, as a function of that LP's beliefs about asset pri… ▽ More In decentralized finance ("DeFi"), automated market makers (AMMs) enable traders to programmatically exchange one asset for another. Such trades are enabled by the assets deposited by liquidity providers (LPs). The goal of this paper is to characterize and interpret the optimal (i.e., profit-maximizing) strategy of a monopolist liquidity provider, as a function of that LP's beliefs about asset prices and trader behavior. We introduce a general framework for reasoning about AMMs based on a Bayesian-like belief inference framework, where LPs maintain an asset price estimate. In this model, the market maker (i.e., LP) chooses a demand curve that specifies the quantity of a risky asset to be held at each dollar price. Traders arrive sequentially and submit a price bid that can be interpreted as their estimate of the risky asset price; the AMM responds to this submitted bid with an allocation of the risky asset to the trader, a payment that the trader must pay, and a revised internal estimate for the true asset price. We define an incentive-compatible (IC) AMM as one in which a trader's optimal strategy is to submit its true estimate of the asset price, and characterize the IC AMMs as those with downward-sloping demand curves and payments defined by a formula familiar from Myerson's optimal auction theory. We generalize Myerson's virtual values, and characterize the profit-maximizing IC AMM. The optimal demand curve generally has a jump that can be interpreted as a "bid-ask spread," which we show is caused by a combination of adverse selection risk (dominant when the degree of information asymmetry is large) and monopoly pricing (dominant when asymmetry is small). This work opens up new research directions into the study of automated exchange mechanisms from the lens of optimal auction theory and iterative belief inference, using tools of theoretical computer science in a novel way. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2023; v1 submitted 28 February, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: 20 pages, to appear in the 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science conference (ITCS 2024)

Complexity-Approximation Trade-offs in Exchange Mechanisms: AMMs vs. LOBs

Authors: Jason Milionis, Ciamac C. Moallemi, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: This paper presents a general framework for the design and analysis of exchange mechanisms between two assets that unifies and enables comparisons between the two dominant paradigms for exchange, constant function market markers (CFMMs) and limit order books (LOBs). In our framework, each liquidity provider (LP) submits to the exchange a downward-sloping demand curve, specifying the quantity of th… ▽ More This paper presents a general framework for the design and analysis of exchange mechanisms between two assets that unifies and enables comparisons between the two dominant paradigms for exchange, constant function market markers (CFMMs) and limit order books (LOBs). In our framework, each liquidity provider (LP) submits to the exchange a downward-sloping demand curve, specifying the quantity of the risky asset it wishes to hold at each price; the exchange buys and sells the risky asset so as to satisfy the aggregate submitted demand. In general, such a mechanism is budget-balanced and enables price discovery. Different exchange mechanisms correspond to different restrictions on the set of acceptable demand curves. The primary goal of this paper is to formalize an approximation-complexity trade-off that pervades the design of exchange mechanisms. For example, CFMMs give up expressiveness in favor of simplicity: the aggregate demand curve of the LPs can be described using constant space, but most demand curves cannot be well approximated by any function in the corresponding single-dimensional family. LOBs, intuitively, make the opposite trade-off: any downward-slowing demand curve can be well approximated by a collection of limit orders, but the space needed to describe the state of a LOB can be large. This paper introduces a general measure of {\em exchange complexity}, defined by the minimal set of basis functions that generate, through their conical hull, all of the demand functions allowed by an exchange. With this complexity measure in place, we investigate the design of {\em optimally expressive} exchange mechanisms, meaning the lowest complexity mechanisms that allow for arbitrary downward-sloping demand curves to be well approximated. As a case study, we interpret the complexity-approximation trade-offs in the widely-used Uniswap v3 AMM through the lens of our framework. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2023; v1 submitted 22 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: 16 pages, 1 figure, accepted for publication in FC'23

Formalizing Preferences Over Runtime Distributions

Authors: Devon R. Graham, Kevin Leyton-Brown, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: When trying to solve a computational problem, we are often faced with a choice between algorithms that are guaranteed to return the right answer but differ in their runtime distributions (e.g., SAT solvers, sorting algorithms). This paper aims to lay theoretical foundations for such choices by formalizing preferences over runtime distributions. It might seem that we should simply prefer the algori… ▽ More When trying to solve a computational problem, we are often faced with a choice between algorithms that are guaranteed to return the right answer but differ in their runtime distributions (e.g., SAT solvers, sorting algorithms). This paper aims to lay theoretical foundations for such choices by formalizing preferences over runtime distributions. It might seem that we should simply prefer the algorithm that minimizes expected runtime. However, such preferences would be driven by exactly how slow our algorithm is on bad inputs, whereas in practice we are typically willing to cut off occasional, sufficiently long runs before they finish. We propose a principled alternative, taking a utility-theoretic approach to characterize the scoring functions that describe preferences over algorithms. These functions depend on the way our value for solving our problem decreases with time and on the distribution from which captimes are drawn. We describe examples of realistic utility functions and show how to leverage a maximum-entropy approach for modeling underspecified captime distributions. Finally, we show how to efficiently estimate an algorithm's expected utility from runtime samples. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2023; v1 submitted 25 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

No-Regret Learning with Unbounded Losses: The Case of Logarithmic Pooling

Authors: Eric Neyman, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: For each of $T$ time steps, $m$ experts report probability distributions over $n$ outcomes; we wish to learn to aggregate these forecasts in a way that attains a no-regret guarantee. We focus on the fundamental and practical aggregation method known as logarithmic pooling -- a weighted average of log odds -- which is in a certain sense the optimal choice of pooling method if one is interested in m… ▽ More For each of $T$ time steps, $m$ experts report probability distributions over $n$ outcomes; we wish to learn to aggregate these forecasts in a way that attains a no-regret guarantee. We focus on the fundamental and practical aggregation method known as logarithmic pooling -- a weighted average of log odds -- which is in a certain sense the optimal choice of pooling method if one is interested in minimizing log loss (as we take to be our loss function). We consider the problem of learning the best set of parameters (i.e. expert weights) in an online adversarial setting. We assume (by necessity) that the adversarial choices of outcomes and forecasts are consistent, in the sense that experts report calibrated forecasts. Imposing this constraint creates a (to our knowledge) novel semi-adversarial setting in which the adversary retains a large amount of flexibility. In this setting, we present an algorithm based on online mirror descent that learns expert weights in a way that attains $O(\sqrt{T} \log T)$ expected regret as compared with the best weights in hindsight. △ Less

Submitted 9 October, 2023; v1 submitted 22 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: 21 pages

Are You Smarter Than a Random Expert? The Robust Aggregation of Substitutable Signals

Authors: Eric Neyman, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: The problem of aggregating expert forecasts is ubiquitous in fields as wide-ranging as machine learning, economics, climate science, and national security. Despite this, our theoretical understanding of this question is fairly shallow. This paper initiates the study of forecast aggregation in a context where experts' knowledge is chosen adversarially from a broad class of information structures. W… ▽ More The problem of aggregating expert forecasts is ubiquitous in fields as wide-ranging as machine learning, economics, climate science, and national security. Despite this, our theoretical understanding of this question is fairly shallow. This paper initiates the study of forecast aggregation in a context where experts' knowledge is chosen adversarially from a broad class of information structures. While in full generality it is impossible to achieve a nontrivial performance guarantee, we show that doing so is possible under a condition on the experts' information structure that we call \emph{projective substitutes}. The projective substitutes condition is a notion of informational substitutes: that there are diminishing marginal returns to learning the experts' signals. We show that under the projective substitutes condition, taking the average of the experts' forecasts improves substantially upon the strategy of trusting a random expert. We then consider a more permissive setting, in which the aggregator has access to the prior. We show that by averaging the experts' forecasts and then \emph{extremizing} the average by moving it away from the prior by a constant factor, the aggregator's performance guarantee is substantially better than is possible without knowledge of the prior. Our results give a theoretical grounding to past empirical research on extremization and help give guidance on the appropriate amount to extremize. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2022; v1 submitted 4 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 23 pages, 2 figures

How Does Blockchain Security Dictate Blockchain Implementation?

Authors: Andrew Lewis-Pye, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: Blockchain protocols come with a variety of security guarantees. For example, BFT-inspired protocols such as Algorand tend to be secure in the partially synchronous setting, while longest chain protocols like Bitcoin will normally require stronger synchronicity to be secure. Another fundamental distinction, directly relevant to scalability solutions such as sharding, is whether or not a single unt… ▽ More Blockchain protocols come with a variety of security guarantees. For example, BFT-inspired protocols such as Algorand tend to be secure in the partially synchronous setting, while longest chain protocols like Bitcoin will normally require stronger synchronicity to be secure. Another fundamental distinction, directly relevant to scalability solutions such as sharding, is whether or not a single untrusted user is able to point to *certificates*, which provide incontrovertible proof of block confirmation. Algorand produces such certificates, while Bitcoin does not. Are these properties accidental? Or are they inherent consequences of the paradigm of protocol design? Our aim in this paper is to understand what, fundamentally, governs the nature of security for permissionless blockchain protocols. Using the framework developed in (Lewis-Pye and Roughgarden, 2021), we prove general results showing that these questions relate directly to properties of the user selection process, i.e., the method (such as proof-of-work or proof-of-stake) which is used to select users with the task of updating state. Our results suffice to establish, for example, that the production of certificates is impossible for proof-of-work protocols, but is automatic for standard forms of proof-of-stake protocols. As a byproduct of our work, we also define a number of security notions and identify the equivalences and inequivalences among them. △ Less

Submitted 5 November, 2021; v1 submitted 10 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: To appear in the 28th Annual ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS). arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2009.09480

Strictly Proper Contract Functions Can Be Arbitrage-Free

Authors: Eric Neyman, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: We consider mechanisms for truthfully eliciting probabilistic predictions from a group of experts. The standard approach -- using a proper scoring rule to separately reward each expert -- is not robust to collusion: experts may collude to misreport their beliefs in a way that guarantees them a larger total reward no matter the eventual outcome. Chun and Shachter (2011) termed any such collusion "a… ▽ More We consider mechanisms for truthfully eliciting probabilistic predictions from a group of experts. The standard approach -- using a proper scoring rule to separately reward each expert -- is not robust to collusion: experts may collude to misreport their beliefs in a way that guarantees them a larger total reward no matter the eventual outcome. Chun and Shachter (2011) termed any such collusion "arbitrage" and asked whether there is any truthful elicitation mechanism that makes arbitrage impossible. We resolve this question positively, exhibiting a class of strictly proper arbitrage-free contract functions. These contract functions have two parts: one ensures that the total reward of a coalition of experts depends only on the average of their reports; the other ensures that changing this average report hurts the experts under at least one outcome. △ Less

Submitted 5 September, 2021; v1 submitted 3 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: 11 pages

Transaction Fee Mechanism Design

Authors: Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: Demand for blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum is far larger than supply, necessitating a mechanism that selects a subset of transactions to include "on-chain" from the pool of all pending transactions. This paper investigates the problem of designing a blockchain transaction fee mechanism through the lens of mechanism design. We introduce two new forms of incentive-compatibility that capture… ▽ More Demand for blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum is far larger than supply, necessitating a mechanism that selects a subset of transactions to include "on-chain" from the pool of all pending transactions. This paper investigates the problem of designing a blockchain transaction fee mechanism through the lens of mechanism design. We introduce two new forms of incentive-compatibility that capture some of the idiosyncrasies of the blockchain setting, one (MMIC) that protects against deviations by profit-maximizing miners and one (OCA-proofness) that protects against off-chain collusion between miners and users. This study is immediately applicable to a recent (August 5, 2021) and major change to Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism, based on a proposal called "EIP-1559." Historically, Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism was a first-price (pay-as-bid) auction. EIP-1559 suggested making several tightly coupled changes, including the introduction of variable-size blocks, a history-dependent reserve price, and the burning of a significant portion of the transaction fees. We prove that this new mechanism earns an impressive report card: it satisfies the MMIC and OCA-proofness conditions, and is also dominant-strategy incentive compatible (DSIC) except when there is a sudden demand spike. We also introduce an alternative design, the "tipless mechanism," which offers an incomparable slate of incentive-compatibility guarantees -- it is MMIC and DSIC, and OCA-proof unless in the midst of a demand spike. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2023; v1 submitted 2 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: Under review at Journal of the ACM. Preliminary version appeared in the 22nd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC '21). This academic paper partially overlaps with the longer general-audience report published as arXiv:2012.00854

Smoothed Analysis with Adaptive Adversaries

Authors: Nika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek Shetty

Abstract: We prove novel algorithmic guarantees for several online problems in the smoothed analysis model. In this model, at each time an adversary chooses an input distribution with density function bounded above by $\tfrac{1}σ$ times that of the uniform distribution; nature then samples an input from this distribution. Crucially, our results hold for {\em adaptive} adversaries that can choose an input di… ▽ More We prove novel algorithmic guarantees for several online problems in the smoothed analysis model. In this model, at each time an adversary chooses an input distribution with density function bounded above by $\tfrac{1}σ$ times that of the uniform distribution; nature then samples an input from this distribution. Crucially, our results hold for {\em adaptive} adversaries that can choose an input distribution based on the decisions of the algorithm and the realizations of the inputs in the previous time steps. This paper presents a general technique for proving smoothed algorithmic guarantees against adaptive adversaries, in effect reducing the setting of adaptive adversaries to the simpler case of oblivious adversaries. We apply this technique to prove strong smoothed guarantees for three problems: -Online learning: We consider the online prediction problem, where instances are generated from an adaptive sequence of $σ$-smooth distributions and the hypothesis class has VC dimension $d$. We bound the regret by $\tilde{O}\big(\sqrt{T d\ln(1/σ)} + d\sqrt{\ln(T/σ)}\big)$. This answers open questions of [RST11,Hag18]. -Online discrepancy minimization: We consider the online Komlós problem, where the input is generated from an adaptive sequence of $σ$-smooth and isotropic distributions on the $\ell_2$ unit ball. We bound the $\ell_\infty$ norm of the discrepancy vector by $\tilde{O}\big(\ln^2\!\big( \frac{nT}σ\big) \big)$. -Dispersion in online optimization: We consider online optimization of piecewise Lipschitz functions where functions with $\ell$ discontinuities are chosen by a smoothed adaptive adversary and show that the resulting sequence is $\big( σ/{\sqrt{T\ell}}, \tilde O\big(\sqrt{T\ell} \big)\big)$-dispersed. This matches the parameters of [BDV18] for oblivious adversaries, up to log factors. △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2021; v1 submitted 16 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Accepted to FOCS 2021

From Proper Scoring Rules to Max-Min Optimal Forecast Aggregation

Authors: Eric Neyman, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: This paper forges a strong connection between two seemingly unrelated forecasting problems: incentive-compatible forecast elicitation and forecast aggregation. Proper scoring rules are the well-known solution to the former problem. To each such rule $s$ we associate a corresponding method of aggregation, mapping expert forecasts and expert weights to a "consensus forecast," which we call *quasi-ar… ▽ More This paper forges a strong connection between two seemingly unrelated forecasting problems: incentive-compatible forecast elicitation and forecast aggregation. Proper scoring rules are the well-known solution to the former problem. To each such rule $s$ we associate a corresponding method of aggregation, mapping expert forecasts and expert weights to a "consensus forecast," which we call *quasi-arithmetic (QA) pooling* with respect to $s$. We justify this correspondence in several ways: - QA pooling with respect to the two most well-studied scoring rules (quadratic and logarithmic) corresponds to the two most well-studied forecast aggregation methods (linear and logarithmic). - Given a scoring rule $s$ used for payment, a forecaster agent who sub-contracts several experts, paying them in proportion to their weights, is best off aggregating the experts' reports using QA pooling with respect to $s$, meaning this strategy maximizes its worst-case profit (over the possible outcomes). - The score of an aggregator who uses QA pooling is concave in the experts' weights. As a consequence, online gradient descent can be used to learn appropriate expert weights from repeated experiments with low regret. - The class of all QA pooling methods is characterized by a natural set of axioms (generalizing classical work by Kolmogorov on quasi-arithmetic means). △ Less

Submitted 19 August, 2023; v1 submitted 14 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: 41 pages, 2 figures

Byzantine Generals in the Permissionless Setting

Authors: Andrew Lewis-Pye, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: Consensus protocols have traditionally been studied in a setting where all participants are known to each other from the start of the protocol execution. In the parlance of the 'blockchain' literature, this is referred to as the permissioned setting. What differentiates Bitcoin from these previously studied protocols is that it operates in a permissionless setting, i.e. it is a protocol for establ… ▽ More Consensus protocols have traditionally been studied in a setting where all participants are known to each other from the start of the protocol execution. In the parlance of the 'blockchain' literature, this is referred to as the permissioned setting. What differentiates Bitcoin from these previously studied protocols is that it operates in a permissionless setting, i.e. it is a protocol for establishing consensus over an unknown network of participants that anybody can join, with as many identities as they like in any role. The arrival of this new form of protocol brings with it many questions. Beyond Bitcoin, what can we prove about permissionless protocols in a general sense? How does recent work on permissionless protocols in the blockchain literature relate to the well-developed history of research on permissioned protocols in distributed computing? To answer these questions, we describe a formal framework for the analysis of both permissioned and permissionless systems. Our framework allows for "apples-to-apples" comparisons between different categories of protocols and, in turn, the development of theory to formally discuss their relative merits. A major benefit of the framework is that it facilitates the application of a rich history of proofs and techniques in distributed computing to problems in blockchain and the study of permissionless systems. Within our framework, we then address the questions above. We consider the Byzantine Generals Problem as a formalisation of the problem of reaching consensus, and address a programme of research that asks, "Under what adversarial conditions, and for what types of permissionless protocol, is consensus possible?" We prove a number of results for this programme, our main result being that deterministic consensus is not possible for decentralised permissionless protocols. To close, we give a list of eight open questions. △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2023; v1 submitted 18 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Transaction Fee Mechanism Design for the Ethereum Blockchain: An Economic Analysis of EIP-1559

Authors: Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: EIP-1559 is a proposal to make several tightly coupled additions to Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism, including variable-size blocks and a burned base fee that rises and falls with demand. This report assesses the game-theoretic strengths and weaknesses of the proposal and explores some alternative designs. EIP-1559 is a proposal to make several tightly coupled additions to Ethereum's transaction fee mechanism, including variable-size blocks and a burned base fee that rises and falls with demand. This report assesses the game-theoretic strengths and weaknesses of the proposal and explores some alternative designs. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

A General Framework for the Security Analysis of Blockchain Protocols

Authors: Andrew Lewis-Pye, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: Blockchain protocols differ in fundamental ways, including the mechanics of selecting users to produce blocks (e.g., proof-of-work vs. proof-of-stake) and the method to establish consensus (e.g., longest chain rules vs. Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) inspired protocols). These fundamental differences have hindered "apples-to-apples" comparisons between different categories of blockchain protocols… ▽ More Blockchain protocols differ in fundamental ways, including the mechanics of selecting users to produce blocks (e.g., proof-of-work vs. proof-of-stake) and the method to establish consensus (e.g., longest chain rules vs. Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) inspired protocols). These fundamental differences have hindered "apples-to-apples" comparisons between different categories of blockchain protocols and, in turn, the development of theory to formally discuss their relative merits. This paper presents a parsimonious abstraction sufficient for capturing and comparing properties of many well-known permissionless blockchain protocols, simultaneously capturing essential properties of both proof-of-work (PoW) and proof-of-stake (PoS) protocols, and of both longest-chain-type and BFT-type protocols. Our framework blackboxes the precise mechanics of the user selection process, allowing us to isolate the properties of the selection process that are significant for protocol design. We demonstrate the utility of our general framework with several concrete results: 1. We prove a CAP-type impossibility theorem asserting that liveness with an unknown level of participation rules out security in a partially synchronous setting. 2. Delving deeper into the partially synchronous setting, we prove that a necessary and sufficient condition for security is the production of "certificates," meaning stand-alone proofs of block confirmation. 3. Restricting to synchronous settings, we prove that typical protocols with a known level of participation (including longest chain-type PoS protocols) can be adapted to provide certificates, but those with an unknown level of participation cannot. 4. Finally, we use our framework to articulate a modular two-step approach to blockchain security analysis that effectively reduces the permissionless case to the permissioned case. △ Less

Submitted 4 February, 2021; v1 submitted 20 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: This paper has been merged with arXiv:2101.07095

Distribution-Free Models of Social Networks

Authors: Tim Roughgarden, C. Seshadhri

Abstract: The structure of large-scale social networks has predominantly been articulated using generative models, a form of average-case analysis. This chapter surveys recent proposals of more robust models of such networks. These models posit deterministic and empirically supported combinatorial structure rather than a specific probability distribution. We discuss the formal definitions of these models an… ▽ More The structure of large-scale social networks has predominantly been articulated using generative models, a form of average-case analysis. This chapter surveys recent proposals of more robust models of such networks. These models posit deterministic and empirically supported combinatorial structure rather than a specific probability distribution. We discuss the formal definitions of these models and how they relate to empirical observations in social networks, as well as the known structural and algorithmic results for the corresponding graph classes. △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Chapter 28 of the book Beyond the Worst-Case Analysis of Algorithms, edited by Tim Roughgarden and published by Cambridge University Press (2020)

Beyond the Worst-Case Analysis of Algorithms (Introduction)

Authors: Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: One of the primary goals of the mathematical analysis of algorithms is to provide guidance about which algorithm is the "best" for solving a given computational problem. Worst-case analysis summarizes the performance profile of an algorithm by its worst performance on any input of a given size, implicitly advocating for the algorithm with the best-possible worst-case performance. Strong worst-case… ▽ More One of the primary goals of the mathematical analysis of algorithms is to provide guidance about which algorithm is the "best" for solving a given computational problem. Worst-case analysis summarizes the performance profile of an algorithm by its worst performance on any input of a given size, implicitly advocating for the algorithm with the best-possible worst-case performance. Strong worst-case guarantees are the holy grail of algorithm design, providing an application-agnostic certification of an algorithm's robustly good performance. However, for many fundamental problems and performance measures, such guarantees are impossible and a more nuanced analysis approach is called for. This chapter surveys several alternatives to worst-case analysis that are discussed in detail later in the book. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Chapter 1 of the book Beyond the Worst-Case Analysis of Algorithms, edited by Tim Roughgarden and published by Cambridge University Press (2020)

Distributional Analysis

Authors: Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: In distributional or average-case analysis, the goal is to design an algorithm with good-on-average performance with respect to a specific probability distribution. Distributional analysis can be useful for the study of general-purpose algorithms on "non-pathological" inputs, and for the design of specialized algorithms in applications in which there is detailed understanding of the relevant input… ▽ More In distributional or average-case analysis, the goal is to design an algorithm with good-on-average performance with respect to a specific probability distribution. Distributional analysis can be useful for the study of general-purpose algorithms on "non-pathological" inputs, and for the design of specialized algorithms in applications in which there is detailed understanding of the relevant input distribution. For some problems, however, pure distributional analysis encourages "overfitting" an algorithmic solution to a particular distributional assumption and a more robust analysis framework is called for. This chapter presents numerous examples of the pros and cons of distributional analysis, highlighting some of its greatest hits while also setting the stage for the hybrids of worst- and average-case analysis studied in later chapters. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Chapter 8 of the book Beyond the Worst-Case Analysis of Algorithms, edited by Tim Roughgarden and published by Cambridge University Press (2020)

Resource Augmentation

Authors: Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: This chapter introduces resource augmentation, in which the performance of an algorithm is compared to the best-possible solution that is handicapped by less resources. We consider three case studies: online paging, with cache size as the resource; selfish routing, with capacity as the resource; and scheduling, with processor speed as the resource. Resource augmentation bounds also imply "loosely… ▽ More This chapter introduces resource augmentation, in which the performance of an algorithm is compared to the best-possible solution that is handicapped by less resources. We consider three case studies: online paging, with cache size as the resource; selfish routing, with capacity as the resource; and scheduling, with processor speed as the resource. Resource augmentation bounds also imply "loosely competitive" bounds, which show that an algorithm's performance is near-optimal for most resource levels. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Chapter 4 of the book Beyond the Worst-Case Analysis of Algorithms, edited by Tim Roughgarden and published by Cambridge University Press (2020)

FPT Algorithms for Finding Near-Cliques in $c$-Closed Graphs

Authors: Balaram Behera, Edin Husić, Shweta Jain, Tim Roughgarden, C. Seshadhri

Abstract: Finding large cliques or cliques missing a few edges is a fundamental algorithmic task in the study of real-world graphs, with applications in community detection, pattern recognition, and clustering. A number of effective backtracking-based heuristics for these problems have emerged from recent empirical work in social network analysis. Given the NP-hardness of variants of clique counting, these… ▽ More Finding large cliques or cliques missing a few edges is a fundamental algorithmic task in the study of real-world graphs, with applications in community detection, pattern recognition, and clustering. A number of effective backtracking-based heuristics for these problems have emerged from recent empirical work in social network analysis. Given the NP-hardness of variants of clique counting, these results raise a challenge for beyond worst-case analysis of these problems. Inspired by the triadic closure of real-world graphs, Fox et al. (SICOMP 2020) introduced the notion of $c$-closed graphs and proved that maximal clique enumeration is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $c$. In practice, due to noise in data, one wishes to actually discover "near-cliques", which can be characterized as cliques with a sparse subgraph removed. In this work, we prove that many different kinds of maximal near-cliques can be enumerated in polynomial time (and FPT in $c$) for $c$-closed graphs. We study various established notions of such substructures, including $k$-plexes, complements of bounded-degeneracy and bounded-treewidth graphs. Interestingly, our algorithms follow relatively simple backtracking procedures, analogous to what is done in practice. Our results underscore the significance of the $c$-closed graph class for theoretical understanding of social network analysis. △ Less

Submitted 19 November, 2021; v1 submitted 19 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Accepted to ITCS 2022

MSC Class: 68W01; 68R10; 05C85

Mathematical Foundations for Social Computing

Authors: Yiling Chen, Arpita Ghosh, Michael Kearns, Tim Roughgarden, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan

Abstract: Social computing encompasses the mechanisms through which people interact with computational systems: crowdsourcing systems, ranking and recommendation systems, online prediction markets, citizen science projects, and collaboratively edited wikis, to name a few. These systems share the common feature that humans are active participants, making choices that determine the input to, and therefore the… ▽ More Social computing encompasses the mechanisms through which people interact with computational systems: crowdsourcing systems, ranking and recommendation systems, online prediction markets, citizen science projects, and collaboratively edited wikis, to name a few. These systems share the common feature that humans are active participants, making choices that determine the input to, and therefore the output of, the system. The output of these systems can be viewed as a joint computation between machine and human, and can be richer than what either could produce alone. The term social computing is often used as a synonym for several related areas, such as "human computation" and subsets of "collective intelligence"; we use it in its broadest sense to encompass all of these things. Social computing is blossoming into a rich research area of its own, with contributions from diverse disciplines including computer science, economics, and other social sciences. Yet a broad mathematical foundation for social computing is yet to be established, with a plethora of under-explored opportunities for mathematical research to impact social computing. As in other fields, there is great potential for mathematical work to influence and shape the future of social computing. However, we are far from having the systematic and principled understanding of the advantages, limitations, and potentials of social computing required to match the impact on applications that has occurred in other fields. In June 2015, we brought together roughly 25 experts in related fields to discuss the promise and challenges of establishing mathematical foundations for social computing. This document captures several of the key ideas discussed. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: A Computing Community Consortium (CCC) workshop report, 15 pages

Report number: ccc2014report_5

Resource Pools and the CAP Theorem

Authors: Andrew Lewis-Pye, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: Blockchain protocols differ in fundamental ways, including the mechanics of selecting users to produce blocks (e.g., proof-of-work vs. proof-of-stake) and the method to establish consensus (e.g., longest chain rules vs. BFT-inspired protocols). These fundamental differences have hindered "apples-to-apples" comparisons between different categories of blockchain protocols and, in turn, the developme… ▽ More Blockchain protocols differ in fundamental ways, including the mechanics of selecting users to produce blocks (e.g., proof-of-work vs. proof-of-stake) and the method to establish consensus (e.g., longest chain rules vs. BFT-inspired protocols). These fundamental differences have hindered "apples-to-apples" comparisons between different categories of blockchain protocols and, in turn, the development of theory to formally discuss their relative merits. This paper presents a parsimonious abstraction sufficient for capturing and comparing properties of many well-known permissionless blockchain protocols, simultaneously capturing essential properties of both proof-of-work and proof-of-stake protocols, and of both longest-chain-type and BFT-type protocols. Our framework blackboxes the precise mechanics of the user selection process, allowing us to isolate the properties of the selection process which are significant for protocol design. We illustrate our framework's utility with two results. First, we prove an analog of the CAP theorem from distributed computing for our framework in a partially synchronous setting. This theorem shows that a fundamental dichotomy holds between protocols (such as Bitcoin) that are adaptive, in the sense that they can function given unpredictable levels of participation, and protocols (such as Algorand) that have certain finality properties. Second, we formalize the idea that proof-of-work (PoW) protocols and non-PoW protocols can be distinguished by the forms of permission that users are given to carry out updates to the state. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Smoothed Analysis of Online and Differentially Private Learning

Authors: Nika Haghtalab, Tim Roughgarden, Abhishek Shetty

Abstract: Practical and pervasive needs for robustness and privacy in algorithms have inspired the design of online adversarial and differentially private learning algorithms. The primary quantity that characterizes learnability in these settings is the Littlestone dimension of the class of hypotheses [Ben-David et al., 2009, Alon et al., 2019]. This characterization is often interpreted as an impossibility… ▽ More Practical and pervasive needs for robustness and privacy in algorithms have inspired the design of online adversarial and differentially private learning algorithms. The primary quantity that characterizes learnability in these settings is the Littlestone dimension of the class of hypotheses [Ben-David et al., 2009, Alon et al., 2019]. This characterization is often interpreted as an impossibility result because classes such as linear thresholds and neural networks have infinite Littlestone dimension. In this paper, we apply the framework of smoothed analysis [Spielman and Teng, 2004], in which adversarially chosen inputs are perturbed slightly by nature. We show that fundamentally stronger regret and error guarantees are possible with smoothed adversaries than with worst-case adversaries. In particular, we obtain regret and privacy error bounds that depend only on the VC dimension and the bracketing number of a hypothesis class, and on the magnitudes of the perturbations. △ Less

Submitted 17 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

The Complexity of Contracts

Authors: Paul Duetting, Tim Roughgarden, Inbal Talgam-Cohen

Abstract: We initiate the study of computing (near-)optimal contracts in succinctly representable principal-agent settings. Here optimality means maximizing the principal's expected payoff over all incentive-compatible contracts---known in economics as "second-best" solutions. We also study a natural relaxation to approximately incentive-compatible contracts. We focus on principal-agent settings with succ… ▽ More We initiate the study of computing (near-)optimal contracts in succinctly representable principal-agent settings. Here optimality means maximizing the principal's expected payoff over all incentive-compatible contracts---known in economics as "second-best" solutions. We also study a natural relaxation to approximately incentive-compatible contracts. We focus on principal-agent settings with succinctly described (and exponentially large) outcome spaces. We show that the computational complexity of computing a near-optimal contract depends fundamentally on the number of agent actions. For settings with a constant number of actions, we present a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for the separation oracle of the dual of the problem of minimizing the principal's payment to the agent, and use this subroutine to efficiently compute a delta-incentive-compatible (delta-IC) contract whose expected payoff matches or surpasses that of the optimal IC contract. With an arbitrary number of actions, we prove that the problem is hard to approximate within any constant c. This inapproximability result holds even for delta-IC contracts where delta is a sufficiently rapidly-decaying function of c. On the positive side, we show that simple linear delta-IC contracts with constant delta are sufficient to achieve a constant-factor approximation of the "first-best" (full-welfare-extracting) solution, and that such a contract can be computed in polynomial time. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: An extended abstract appeared in Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2020 (SODA'20)

An Axiomatic Approach to Block Rewards

Authors: Xi Chen, Christos Papadimitriou, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: Proof-of-work blockchains reward each miner for one completed block by an amount that is, in expectation, proportional to the number of hashes the miner contributed to the mining of the block. Is this proportional allocation rule optimal? And in what sense? And what other rules are possible? In particular, what are the desirable properties that any "good" allocation rule should satisfy? To answer… ▽ More Proof-of-work blockchains reward each miner for one completed block by an amount that is, in expectation, proportional to the number of hashes the miner contributed to the mining of the block. Is this proportional allocation rule optimal? And in what sense? And what other rules are possible? In particular, what are the desirable properties that any "good" allocation rule should satisfy? To answer these questions, we embark on an axiomatic theory of incentives in proof-of-work blockchains at the time scale of a single block. We consider desirable properties of allocation rules including: symmetry; budget balance (weak or strong); sybil-proofness; and various grades of collusion-proofness. We show that Bitcoin's proportional allocation rule is the unique allocation rule satisfying a certain system of properties, but this does not hold for slightly weaker sets of properties, or when the miners are not risk-neutral. We also point out that a rich class of allocation rules can be approximately implemented in a proof-of-work blockchain. △ Less

Submitted 23 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Approximately Optimal Mechanism Design

Authors: Tim Roughgarden, Inbal Talgam-Cohen

Abstract: Optimal mechanism design enjoys a beautiful and well-developed theory, and also a number of killer applications. Rules of thumb produced by the field influence everything from how governments sell wireless spectrum licenses to how the major search engines auction off online advertising. There are, however, some basic problems for which the traditional optimal mechanism design approach is ill-suite… ▽ More Optimal mechanism design enjoys a beautiful and well-developed theory, and also a number of killer applications. Rules of thumb produced by the field influence everything from how governments sell wireless spectrum licenses to how the major search engines auction off online advertising. There are, however, some basic problems for which the traditional optimal mechanism design approach is ill-suited---either because it makes overly strong assumptions, or because it advocates overly complex designs. This survey reviews several common issues with optimal mechanisms, including exorbitant communication, computation, and informational requirements; and it presents several examples demonstrating that passing to the relaxed goal of an approximately optimal mechanism allows us to reason about fundamental questions that seem out of reach of the traditional theory. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2020; v1 submitted 31 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: Preprint; final version to appear in Annual Reviews of Economics, August 2019. August 2020: Fixed small typo in funding info. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1406.6773

Simple versus Optimal Contracts

Authors: Paul Dütting, Tim Roughgarden, Inbal Talgam-Cohen

Abstract: We consider the classic principal-agent model of contract theory, in which a principal designs an outcome-dependent compensation scheme to incentivize an agent to take a costly and unobservable action. When all of the model parameters---including the full distribution over principal rewards resulting from each agent action---are known to the designer, an optimal contract can in principle be comput… ▽ More We consider the classic principal-agent model of contract theory, in which a principal designs an outcome-dependent compensation scheme to incentivize an agent to take a costly and unobservable action. When all of the model parameters---including the full distribution over principal rewards resulting from each agent action---are known to the designer, an optimal contract can in principle be computed by linear programming. In addition to their demanding informational requirements, such optimal contracts are often complex and unintuitive, and do not resemble contracts used in practice. This paper examines contract theory through the theoretical computer science lens, with the goal of developing novel theory to explain and justify the prevalence of relatively simple contracts, such as linear (pure commission) contracts. First, we consider the case where the principal knows only the first moment of each action's reward distribution, and we prove that linear contracts are guaranteed to be worst-case optimal, ranging over all reward distributions consistent with the given moments. Second, we study linear contracts from a worst-case approximation perspective, and prove several tight parameterized approximation bounds. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2020; v1 submitted 10 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Comments: 30 pages, 4 figures, Latex; minor revision

On the Computational Power of Online Gradient Descent

Authors: Vaggos Chatziafratis, Tim Roughgarden, Joshua R. Wang

Abstract: We prove that the evolution of weight vectors in online gradient descent can encode arbitrary polynomial-space computations, even in very simple learning settings. Our results imply that, under weak complexity-theoretic assumptions, it is impossible to reason efficiently about the fine-grained behavior of online gradient descent. We prove that the evolution of weight vectors in online gradient descent can encode arbitrary polynomial-space computations, even in very simple learning settings. Our results imply that, under weak complexity-theoretic assumptions, it is impossible to reason efficiently about the fine-grained behavior of online gradient descent. △ Less

Submitted 6 February, 2019; v1 submitted 3 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: Added results, linear regression, neural nets. Fixed typos

Beyond Worst-Case Analysis

Authors: Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: In the worst-case analysis of algorithms, the overall performance of an algorithm is summarized by its worst performance on any input. This approach has countless success stories, but there are also important computational problems --- like linear programming, clustering, online caching, and neural network training --- where the worst-case analysis framework does not provide any helpful advice on… ▽ More In the worst-case analysis of algorithms, the overall performance of an algorithm is summarized by its worst performance on any input. This approach has countless success stories, but there are also important computational problems --- like linear programming, clustering, online caching, and neural network training --- where the worst-case analysis framework does not provide any helpful advice on how to solve the problem. This article covers a number of modeling methods for going beyond worst-case analysis and articulating which inputs are the most relevant. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Comments: To appear in Communications of the ACM

An Optimal Algorithm for Online Unconstrained Submodular Maximization

Authors: Tim Roughgarden, Joshua R. Wang

Abstract: We consider a basic problem at the interface of two fundamental fields: submodular optimization and online learning. In the online unconstrained submodular maximization (online USM) problem, there is a universe $[n]=\{1,2,...,n\}$ and a sequence of $T$ nonnegative (not necessarily monotone) submodular functions arrive over time. The goal is to design a computationally efficient online algorithm, w… ▽ More We consider a basic problem at the interface of two fundamental fields: submodular optimization and online learning. In the online unconstrained submodular maximization (online USM) problem, there is a universe $[n]=\{1,2,...,n\}$ and a sequence of $T$ nonnegative (not necessarily monotone) submodular functions arrive over time. The goal is to design a computationally efficient online algorithm, which chooses a subset of $[n]$ at each time step as a function only of the past, such that the accumulated value of the chosen subsets is as close as possible to the maximum total value of a fixed subset in hindsight. Our main result is a polynomial-time no-$1/2$-regret algorithm for this problem, meaning that for every sequence of nonnegative submodular functions, the algorithm's expected total value is at least $1/2$ times that of the best subset in hindsight, up to an error term sublinear in $T$. The factor of $1/2$ cannot be improved upon by any polynomial-time online algorithm when the submodular functions are presented as value oracles. Previous work on the offline problem implies that picking a subset uniformly at random in each time step achieves zero $1/4$-regret. A byproduct of our techniques is an explicit subroutine for the two-experts problem that has an unusually strong regret guarantee: the total value of its choices is comparable to twice the total value of either expert on rounds it did not pick that expert. This subroutine may be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Comments: COLT 2018

Optimal Algorithms for Continuous Non-monotone Submodular and DR-Submodular Maximization

Authors: Rad Niazadeh, Tim Roughgarden, Joshua R. Wang

Abstract: In this paper we study the fundamental problems of maximizing a continuous non-monotone submodular function over the hypercube, both with and without coordinate-wise concavity. This family of optimization problems has several applications in machine learning, economics, and communication systems. Our main result is the first $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation algorithm for continuous submodular function… ▽ More In this paper we study the fundamental problems of maximizing a continuous non-monotone submodular function over the hypercube, both with and without coordinate-wise concavity. This family of optimization problems has several applications in machine learning, economics, and communication systems. Our main result is the first $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation algorithm for continuous submodular function maximization; this approximation factor of $\frac{1}{2}$ is the best possible for algorithms that only query the objective function at polynomially many points. For the special case of DR-submodular maximization, i.e. when the submodular functions is also coordinate wise concave along all coordinates, we provide a different $\frac{1}{2}$-approximation algorithm that runs in quasilinear time. Both of these results improve upon prior work [Bian et al, 2017, Soma and Yoshida, 2017]. Our first algorithm uses novel ideas such as reducing the guaranteed approximation problem to analyzing a zero-sum game for each coordinate, and incorporates the geometry of this zero-sum game to fix the value at this coordinate. Our second algorithm exploits coordinate-wise concavity to identify a monotone equilibrium condition sufficient for getting the required approximation guarantee, and hunts for the equilibrium point using binary search. We further run experiments to verify the performance of our proposed algorithms in related machine learning applications. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

The idemetric property: when most distances are (almost) the same

Authors: George Barmpalias, Neng Huang, Andrew Lewis-Pye, Angsheng Li, Xuechen Li, Yicheng Pan, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: We introduce the \emph{idemetric} property, which formalises the idea that most nodes in a graph have similar distances between them, and which turns out to be quite standard amongst small-world network models. Modulo reasonable sparsity assumptions, we are then able to show that a strong form of idemetricity is actually equivalent to a very weak expander condition (PUMP). This provides a direct w… ▽ More We introduce the \emph{idemetric} property, which formalises the idea that most nodes in a graph have similar distances between them, and which turns out to be quite standard amongst small-world network models. Modulo reasonable sparsity assumptions, we are then able to show that a strong form of idemetricity is actually equivalent to a very weak expander condition (PUMP). This provides a direct way of providing short proofs that small-world network models such as the Watts-Strogatz model are strongly idemetric (for a wide range of parameters), and also provides further evidence that being idemetric is a common property. We then consider how satisfaction of the idemetric property is relevant to algorithm design. For idemetric graphs we observe, for example, that a single breadth-first search provides a solution to the all-pairs shortest paths problem, so long as one is prepared to accept paths which are of stretch close to 2 with high probability. Since we are able to show that Kleinberg's model is idemetric, these results contrast nicely with the well known negative results of Kleinberg concerning efficient decentralised algorithms for finding short paths: for precisely the same model as Kleinberg's negative results hold, we are able to show that very efficient (and decentralised) algorithms exist if one allows for reasonable preprocessing. For deterministic distributed routing algorithms we are also able to obtain results proving that less routing information is required for idemetric graphs than the worst case in order to achieve stretch less than 3 with high probability: while $Ω(n^2)$ routing information is required in the worst case for stretch strictly less than 3 on almost all pairs, for idemetric graphs the total routing information required is $O(nlog(n))$. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2019; v1 submitted 30 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Finding Cliques in Social Networks: A New Distribution-Free Model

Authors: Jacob Fox, Tim Roughgarden, C. Seshadhri, Fan Wei, Nicole Wein

Abstract: We propose a new distribution-free model of social networks. Our definitions are motivated by one of the most universal signatures of social networks, triadic closure---the property that pairs of vertices with common neighbors tend to be adjacent. Our most basic definition is that of a "$c$-closed" graph, where for every pair of vertices $u,v$ with at least $c$ common neighbors, $u$ and $v$ are ad… ▽ More We propose a new distribution-free model of social networks. Our definitions are motivated by one of the most universal signatures of social networks, triadic closure---the property that pairs of vertices with common neighbors tend to be adjacent. Our most basic definition is that of a "$c$-closed" graph, where for every pair of vertices $u,v$ with at least $c$ common neighbors, $u$ and $v$ are adjacent. We study the classic problem of enumerating all maximal cliques, an important task in social network analysis. We prove that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $c$ on $c$-closed graphs. Our results carry over to "weakly $c$-closed graphs", which only require a vertex deletion ordering that avoids pairs of non-adjacent vertices with $c$ common neighbors. Numerical experiments show that well-studied social networks tend to be weakly $c$-closed for modest values of $c$. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: main text 13 pages; 2 figures; appendix 9 pages

MSC Class: 68W01; 68R10; 05C85; 05D99

Complexity Theory, Game Theory, and Economics: The Barbados Lectures

Authors: Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: This document collects the lecture notes from my mini-course "Complexity Theory, Game Theory, and Economics," taught at the Bellairs Research Institute of McGill University, Holetown, Barbados, February 19--23, 2017, as the 29th McGill Invitational Workshop on Computational Complexity. The goal of this mini-course is twofold: (i) to explain how complexity theory has helped illuminate several bar… ▽ More This document collects the lecture notes from my mini-course "Complexity Theory, Game Theory, and Economics," taught at the Bellairs Research Institute of McGill University, Holetown, Barbados, February 19--23, 2017, as the 29th McGill Invitational Workshop on Computational Complexity. The goal of this mini-course is twofold: (i) to explain how complexity theory has helped illuminate several barriers in economics and game theory; and (ii) to illustrate how game-theoretic questions have led to new and interesting complexity theory, including recent several breakthroughs. It consists of two five-lecture sequences: the Solar Lectures, focusing on the communication and computational complexity of computing equilibria; and the Lunar Lectures, focusing on applications of complexity theory in game theory and economics. No background in game theory is assumed. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2020; v1 submitted 2 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: Revised v2 from December 2019 corrects some errors in and adds some recent citations to v1 Revised v3 corrects a few typos in v2

Communication Complexity of Discrete Fair Division

Authors: Benjamin Plaut, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: We initiate the study of the communication complexity of fair division with indivisible goods. We focus on some of the most well-studied fairness notions (envy-freeness, proportionality, and approximations thereof) and valuation classes (submodular, subadditive and unrestricted). Within these parameters, our results completely resolve whether the communication complexity of computing a fair alloca… ▽ More We initiate the study of the communication complexity of fair division with indivisible goods. We focus on some of the most well-studied fairness notions (envy-freeness, proportionality, and approximations thereof) and valuation classes (submodular, subadditive and unrestricted). Within these parameters, our results completely resolve whether the communication complexity of computing a fair allocation (or determining that none exist) is polynomial or exponential (in the number of goods), for every combination of fairness notion, valuation class, and number of players, for both deterministic and randomized protocols. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2018; v1 submitted 10 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: Accepted to SODA 2019

Journal ref: SIAM Journal on Computing 49.1 (2020): 206-243

Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuations

Authors: Benjamin Plaut, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: The goal of fair division is to distribute resources among competing players in a "fair" way. Envy-freeness is the most extensively studied fairness notion in fair division. Envy-free allocations do not always exist with indivisible goods, motivating the study of relaxed versions of envy-freeness. We study the envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) property, which states that no player prefers the bun… ▽ More The goal of fair division is to distribute resources among competing players in a "fair" way. Envy-freeness is the most extensively studied fairness notion in fair division. Envy-free allocations do not always exist with indivisible goods, motivating the study of relaxed versions of envy-freeness. We study the envy-freeness up to any good (EFX) property, which states that no player prefers the bundle of another player following the removal of any single good, and prove the first general results about this property. We use the leximin solution to show existence of EFX allocations in several contexts, sometimes in conjunction with Pareto optimality. For two players with valuations obeying a mild assumption, one of these results provides stronger guarantees than the currently deployed algorithm on Spliddit, a popular fair division website. Unfortunately, finding the leximin solution can require exponential time. We show that this is necessary by proving an exponential lower bound on the number of value queries needed to identify an EFX allocation, even for two players with identical valuations. We consider both additive and more general valuations, and our work suggests that there is a rich landscape of problems to explore in the fair division of indivisible goods with different classes of player valuations. △ Less

Submitted 10 November, 2017; v1 submitted 15 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: Accepted to SODA 2018

Pricing Multi-Unit Markets

Authors: Tomer Ezra, Michal Feldman, Tim Roughgarden, Warut Suksompong

Abstract: We study the power and limitations of posted prices in multi-unit markets, where agents arrive sequentially in an arbitrary order. We prove upper and lower bounds on the largest fraction of the optimal social welfare that can be guaranteed with posted prices, under a range of assumptions about the designer's information and agents' valuations. Our results provide insights about the relative power… ▽ More We study the power and limitations of posted prices in multi-unit markets, where agents arrive sequentially in an arbitrary order. We prove upper and lower bounds on the largest fraction of the optimal social welfare that can be guaranteed with posted prices, under a range of assumptions about the designer's information and agents' valuations. Our results provide insights about the relative power of uniform and non-uniform prices, the relative difficulty of different valuation classes, and the implications of different informational assumptions. Among other results, we prove constant-factor guarantees for agents with (symmetric) subadditive valuations, even in an incomplete-information setting and with uniform prices. △ Less

Submitted 11 March, 2018; v1 submitted 18 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Journal ref: ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 7(4):20 (2020)

Stability and Recovery for Independence Systems

Authors: Vaggos Chatziafratis, Tim Roughgarden, Jan Vondrak

Abstract: Two genres of heuristics that are frequently reported to perform much better on "real-world" instances than in the worst case are greedy algorithms and local search algorithms. In this paper, we systematically study these two types of algorithms for the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular set function subject to downward-closed feasibility constraints. We consider perturbation-stable insta… ▽ More Two genres of heuristics that are frequently reported to perform much better on "real-world" instances than in the worst case are greedy algorithms and local search algorithms. In this paper, we systematically study these two types of algorithms for the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular set function subject to downward-closed feasibility constraints. We consider perturbation-stable instances, in the sense of Bilu and Linial, and precisely identify the stability threshold beyond which these algorithms are guaranteed to recover the optimal solution. Byproducts of our work include the first definition of perturbation-stability for non-additive objective functions, and a resolution of the worst-case approximation guarantee of local search in p-extendible systems. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2017; v1 submitted 29 April, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: version 3, after some reviews/fixes in pdf