Showing 1–12 of 12 results for author: Rouault, S

On Monotonicity in AI Alignment

Authors: Gilles Bareilles, Julien Fageot, Lê-Nguyên Hoang, Peva Blanchard, Wassim Bouaziz, Sébastien Rouault, El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi

Abstract: Comparison-based preference learning has become central to the alignment of AI models with human preferences. However, these methods may behave counterintuitively. After empirically observing that, when accounting for a preference for response $y$ over $z$, the model may actually decrease the probability (and reward) of generating $y$ (an observation also made by others), this paper investigates t… ▽ More Comparison-based preference learning has become central to the alignment of AI models with human preferences. However, these methods may behave counterintuitively. After empirically observing that, when accounting for a preference for response $y$ over $z$, the model may actually decrease the probability (and reward) of generating $y$ (an observation also made by others), this paper investigates the root causes of (non) monotonicity, for a general comparison-based preference learning framework that subsumes Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), Generalized Preference Optimization (GPO) and Generalized Bradley-Terry (GBT). Under mild assumptions, we prove that such methods still satisfy what we call local pairwise monotonicity. We also provide a bouquet of formalizations of monotonicity, and identify sufficient conditions for their guarantee, thereby providing a toolbox to evaluate how prone learning models are to monotonicity violations. These results clarify the limitations of current methods and provide guidance for developing more trustworthy preference learning algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2025; originally announced June 2025.

On the Impossible Safety of Large AI Models

Authors: El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi, Sadegh Farhadkhani, Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, Lê-Nguyên Hoang, Rafael Pinot, Sébastien Rouault, John Stephan

Abstract: Large AI Models (LAIMs), of which large language models are the most prominent recent example, showcase some impressive performance. However they have been empirically found to pose serious security issues. This paper systematizes our knowledge about the fundamental impossibility of building arbitrarily accurate and secure machine learning models. More precisely, we identify key challenging featur… ▽ More Large AI Models (LAIMs), of which large language models are the most prominent recent example, showcase some impressive performance. However they have been empirically found to pose serious security issues. This paper systematizes our knowledge about the fundamental impossibility of building arbitrarily accurate and secure machine learning models. More precisely, we identify key challenging features of many of today's machine learning settings. Namely, high accuracy seems to require memorizing large training datasets, which are often user-generated and highly heterogeneous, with both sensitive information and fake users. We then survey statistical lower bounds that, we argue, constitute a compelling case against the possibility of designing high-accuracy LAIMs with strong security guarantees. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 30 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: 40 pages

Combining Differential Privacy and Byzantine Resilience in Distributed SGD

Authors: Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, Rafael Pinot, Sebastien Rouault, John Stephan

Abstract: Privacy and Byzantine resilience (BR) are two crucial requirements of modern-day distributed machine learning. The two concepts have been extensively studied individually but the question of how to combine them effectively remains unanswered. This paper contributes to addressing this question by studying the extent to which the distributed SGD algorithm, in the standard parameter-server architectu… ▽ More Privacy and Byzantine resilience (BR) are two crucial requirements of modern-day distributed machine learning. The two concepts have been extensively studied individually but the question of how to combine them effectively remains unanswered. This paper contributes to addressing this question by studying the extent to which the distributed SGD algorithm, in the standard parameter-server architecture, can learn an accurate model despite (a) a fraction of the workers being malicious (Byzantine), and (b) the other fraction, whilst being honest, providing noisy information to the server to ensure differential privacy (DP). We first observe that the integration of standard practices in DP and BR is not straightforward. In fact, we show that many existing results on the convergence of distributed SGD under Byzantine faults, especially those relying on $(α,f)$-Byzantine resilience, are rendered invalid when honest workers enforce DP. To circumvent this shortcoming, we revisit the theory of $(α,f)$-BR to obtain an approximate convergence guarantee. Our analysis provides key insights on how to improve this guarantee through hyperparameter optimization. Essentially, our theoretical and empirical results show that (1) an imprudent combination of standard approaches to DP and BR might be fruitless, but (2) by carefully re-tuning the learning algorithm, we can obtain reasonable learning accuracy while simultaneously guaranteeing DP and BR. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2023; v1 submitted 8 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Tournesol: A quest for a large, secure and trustworthy database of reliable human judgments

Authors: Lê-Nguyên Hoang, Louis Faucon, Aidan Jungo, Sergei Volodin, Dalia Papuc, Orfeas Liossatos, Ben Crulis, Mariame Tighanimine, Isabela Constantin, Anastasiia Kucherenko, Alexandre Maurer, Felix Grimberg, Vlad Nitu, Chris Vossen, Sébastien Rouault, El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi

Abstract: Today's large-scale algorithms have become immensely influential, as they recommend and moderate the content that billions of humans are exposed to on a daily basis. They are the de-facto regulators of our societies' information diet, from shaping opinions on public health to organizing groups for social movements. This creates serious concerns, but also great opportunities to promote quality info… ▽ More Today's large-scale algorithms have become immensely influential, as they recommend and moderate the content that billions of humans are exposed to on a daily basis. They are the de-facto regulators of our societies' information diet, from shaping opinions on public health to organizing groups for social movements. This creates serious concerns, but also great opportunities to promote quality information. Addressing the concerns and seizing the opportunities is a challenging, enormous and fabulous endeavor, as intuitively appealing ideas often come with unwanted {\it side effects}, and as it requires us to think about what we deeply prefer. Understanding how today's large-scale algorithms are built is critical to determine what interventions will be most effective. Given that these algorithms rely heavily on {\it machine learning}, we make the following key observation: \emph{any algorithm trained on uncontrolled data must not be trusted}. Indeed, a malicious entity could take control over the data, poison it with dangerously manipulative fabricated inputs, and thereby make the trained algorithm extremely unsafe. We thus argue that the first step towards safe and ethical large-scale algorithms must be the collection of a large, secure and trustworthy dataset of reliable human judgments. To achieve this, we introduce \emph{Tournesol}, an open source platform available at \url{https://tournesol.app}. Tournesol aims to collect a large database of human judgments on what algorithms ought to widely recommend (and what they ought to stop widely recommending). We outline the structure of the Tournesol database, the key features of the Tournesol platform and the main hurdles that must be overcome to make it a successful project. Most importantly, we argue that, if successful, Tournesol may then serve as the essential foundation for any safe and ethical large-scale algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 27 pages, 13 figures

Differential Privacy and Byzantine Resilience in SGD: Do They Add Up?

Authors: Rachid Guerraoui, Nirupam Gupta, Rafaël Pinot, Sébastien Rouault, John Stephan

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of combining Byzantine resilience with privacy in machine learning (ML). Specifically, we study if a distributed implementation of the renowned Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) learning algorithm is feasible with both differential privacy (DP) and $(α,f)$-Byzantine resilience. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to tackle this problem from a theor… ▽ More This paper addresses the problem of combining Byzantine resilience with privacy in machine learning (ML). Specifically, we study if a distributed implementation of the renowned Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) learning algorithm is feasible with both differential privacy (DP) and $(α,f)$-Byzantine resilience. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to tackle this problem from a theoretical point of view. A key finding of our analyses is that the classical approaches to these two (seemingly) orthogonal issues are incompatible. More precisely, we show that a direct composition of these techniques makes the guarantees of the resulting SGD algorithm depend unfavourably upon the number of parameters of the ML model, making the training of large models practically infeasible. We validate our theoretical results through numerical experiments on publicly-available datasets; showing that it is impractical to ensure DP and Byzantine resilience simultaneously. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2021; v1 submitted 16 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Garfield: System Support for Byzantine Machine Learning

Authors: Rachid Guerraoui, Arsany Guirguis, Jérémy Max Plassmann, Anton Alexandre Ragot, Sébastien Rouault

Abstract: We present Garfield, a library to transparently make machine learning (ML) applications, initially built with popular (but fragile) frameworks, e.g., TensorFlow and PyTorch, Byzantine-resilient. Garfield relies on a novel object-oriented design, reducing the coding effort, and addressing the vulnerability of the shared-graph architecture followed by classical ML frameworks. Garfield encompasses va… ▽ More We present Garfield, a library to transparently make machine learning (ML) applications, initially built with popular (but fragile) frameworks, e.g., TensorFlow and PyTorch, Byzantine-resilient. Garfield relies on a novel object-oriented design, reducing the coding effort, and addressing the vulnerability of the shared-graph architecture followed by classical ML frameworks. Garfield encompasses various communication patterns and supports computations on CPUs and GPUs, allowing addressing the general question of the very practical cost of Byzantine resilience in SGD-based ML applications. We report on the usage of Garfield on three main ML architectures: (a) a single server with multiple workers, (b) several servers and workers, and (c) peer-to-peer settings. Using Garfield, we highlight several interesting facts about the cost of Byzantine resilience. In particular, (a) Byzantine resilience, unlike crash resilience, induces an accuracy loss, (b) the throughput overhead comes more from communication than from robust aggregation, and (c) tolerating Byzantine servers costs more than tolerating Byzantine workers. △ Less

Submitted 31 December, 2020; v1 submitted 12 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: 31 pages; 16 figures; 2 tables

Collaborative Learning in the Jungle (Decentralized, Byzantine, Heterogeneous, Asynchronous and Nonconvex Learning)

Authors: El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi, Sadegh Farhadkhani, Rachid Guerraoui, Arsany Guirguis, Lê Nguyên Hoang, Sébastien Rouault

Abstract: We study Byzantine collaborative learning, where $n$ nodes seek to collectively learn from each others' local data. The data distribution may vary from one node to another. No node is trusted, and $f < n$ nodes can behave arbitrarily. We prove that collaborative learning is equivalent to a new form of agreement, which we call averaging agreement. In this problem, nodes start each with an initial v… ▽ More We study Byzantine collaborative learning, where $n$ nodes seek to collectively learn from each others' local data. The data distribution may vary from one node to another. No node is trusted, and $f < n$ nodes can behave arbitrarily. We prove that collaborative learning is equivalent to a new form of agreement, which we call averaging agreement. In this problem, nodes start each with an initial vector and seek to approximately agree on a common vector, which is close to the average of honest nodes' initial vectors. We present two asynchronous solutions to averaging agreement, each we prove optimal according to some dimension. The first, based on the minimum-diameter averaging, requires $ n \geq 6f+1$, but achieves asymptotically the best-possible averaging constant up to a multiplicative constant. The second, based on reliable broadcast and coordinate-wise trimmed mean, achieves optimal Byzantine resilience, i.e., $n \geq 3f+1$. Each of these algorithms induces an optimal Byzantine collaborative learning protocol. In particular, our equivalence yields new impossibility theorems on what any collaborative learning algorithm can achieve in adversarial and heterogeneous environments. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2021; v1 submitted 3 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: 34 pages, 1 figure

Journal ref: NeurIPS 2021

Distributed Momentum for Byzantine-resilient Learning

Authors: El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Sébastien Rouault

Abstract: Momentum is a variant of gradient descent that has been proposed for its benefits on convergence. In a distributed setting, momentum can be implemented either at the server or the worker side. When the aggregation rule used by the server is linear, commutativity with addition makes both deployments equivalent. Robustness and privacy are however among motivations to abandon linear aggregation rules… ▽ More Momentum is a variant of gradient descent that has been proposed for its benefits on convergence. In a distributed setting, momentum can be implemented either at the server or the worker side. When the aggregation rule used by the server is linear, commutativity with addition makes both deployments equivalent. Robustness and privacy are however among motivations to abandon linear aggregation rules. In this work, we demonstrate the benefits on robustness of using momentum at the worker side. We first prove that computing momentum at the workers reduces the variance-norm ratio of the gradient estimation at the server, strengthening Byzantine resilient aggregation rules. We then provide an extensive experimental demonstration of the robustness effect of worker-side momentum on distributed SGD. △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2020; v1 submitted 28 February, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: Source code (for academic use only): https://github.com/LPD-EPFL/ByzantineMomentum

Fast and Robust Distributed Learning in High Dimension

Authors: El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Sébastien Rouault

Abstract: Could a gradient aggregation rule (GAR) for distributed machine learning be both robust and fast? This paper answers by the affirmative through multi-Bulyan. Given $n$ workers, $f$ of which are arbitrary malicious (Byzantine) and $m=n-f$ are not, we prove that multi-Bulyan can ensure a strong form of Byzantine resilience, as well as an ${\frac{m}{n}}$ slowdown, compared to averaging, the fastest (… ▽ More Could a gradient aggregation rule (GAR) for distributed machine learning be both robust and fast? This paper answers by the affirmative through multi-Bulyan. Given $n$ workers, $f$ of which are arbitrary malicious (Byzantine) and $m=n-f$ are not, we prove that multi-Bulyan can ensure a strong form of Byzantine resilience, as well as an ${\frac{m}{n}}$ slowdown, compared to averaging, the fastest (but non Byzantine resilient) rule for distributed machine learning. When $m \approx n$ (almost all workers are correct), multi-Bulyan reaches the speed of averaging. We also prove that multi-Bulyan's cost in local computation is $O(d)$ (like averaging), an important feature for ML where $d$ commonly reaches $10^9$, while robust alternatives have at least quadratic cost in $d$. Our theoretical findings are complemented with an experimental evaluation which, in addition to supporting the linear $O(d)$ complexity argument, conveys the fact that multi-Bulyan's parallelisability further adds to its efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 5 February, 2021; v1 submitted 5 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: preliminary theoretical draft, complements the SysML 2019 practical paper of which the code is provided at https://github.com/LPD-EPFL/AggregaThor. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1703.02757

Genuinely Distributed Byzantine Machine Learning

Authors: El-Mahdi El-Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Arsany Guirguis, Lê Nguyên Hoang, Sébastien Rouault

Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) solutions are nowadays distributed, according to the so-called server/worker architecture. One server holds the model parameters while several workers train the model. Clearly, such architecture is prone to various types of component failures, which can be all encompassed within the spectrum of a Byzantine behavior. Several approaches have been proposed recently to tolerate B… ▽ More Machine Learning (ML) solutions are nowadays distributed, according to the so-called server/worker architecture. One server holds the model parameters while several workers train the model. Clearly, such architecture is prone to various types of component failures, which can be all encompassed within the spectrum of a Byzantine behavior. Several approaches have been proposed recently to tolerate Byzantine workers. Yet all require trusting a central parameter server. We initiate in this paper the study of the ``general'' Byzantine-resilient distributed machine learning problem where no individual component is trusted. We show that this problem can be solved in an asynchronous system, despite the presence of $\frac{1}{3}$ Byzantine parameter servers and $\frac{1}{3}$ Byzantine workers (which is optimal). We present a new algorithm, ByzSGD, which solves the general Byzantine-resilient distributed machine learning problem by relying on three major schemes. The first, Scatter/Gather, is a communication scheme whose goal is to bound the maximum drift among models on correct servers. The second, Distributed Median Contraction (DMC), leverages the geometric properties of the median in high dimensional spaces to bring parameters within the correct servers back close to each other, ensuring learning convergence. The third, Minimum-Diameter Averaging (MDA), is a statistically-robust gradient aggregation rule whose goal is to tolerate Byzantine workers. MDA requires loose bound on the variance of non-Byzantine gradient estimates, compared to existing alternatives (e.g., Krum). Interestingly, ByzSGD ensures Byzantine resilience without adding communication rounds (on a normal path), compared to vanilla non-Byzantine alternatives. ByzSGD requires, however, a larger number of messages which, we show, can be reduced if we assume synchrony. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2020; v1 submitted 5 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: This is a merge of arXiv:1905.03853 and arXiv:1911.07537; arXiv:1911.07537 will be retracted

The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantium

Authors: El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Sébastien Rouault

Abstract: While machine learning is going through an era of celebrated success, concerns have been raised about the vulnerability of its backbone: stochastic gradient descent (SGD). Recent approaches have been proposed to ensure the robustness of distributed SGD against adversarial (Byzantine) workers sending poisoned gradients during the training phase. Some of these approaches have been proven Byzantine-r… ▽ More While machine learning is going through an era of celebrated success, concerns have been raised about the vulnerability of its backbone: stochastic gradient descent (SGD). Recent approaches have been proposed to ensure the robustness of distributed SGD against adversarial (Byzantine) workers sending poisoned gradients during the training phase. Some of these approaches have been proven Byzantine-resilient: they ensure the convergence of SGD despite the presence of a minority of adversarial workers. We show in this paper that convergence is not enough. In high dimension $d \gg 1$, an adver\-sary can build on the loss function's non-convexity to make SGD converge to ineffective models. More precisely, we bring to light that existing Byzantine-resilient schemes leave a margin of poisoning of $Ω\left(f(d)\right)$, where $f(d)$ increases at least like $\sqrt{d~}$. Based on this leeway, we build a simple attack, and experimentally show its strong to utmost effectivity on CIFAR-10 and MNIST. We introduce Bulyan, and prove it significantly reduces the attackers leeway to a narrow $O( \frac{1}{\sqrt{d~}})$ bound. We empirically show that Bulyan does not suffer the fragility of existing aggregation rules and, at a reasonable cost in terms of required batch size, achieves convergence as if only non-Byzantine gradients had been used to update the model. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2018; v1 submitted 22 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: Accepted to ICML 2018 as a long talk

On The Robustness of a Neural Network

Authors: El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Sebastien Rouault

Abstract: With the development of neural networks based machine learning and their usage in mission critical applications, voices are rising against the \textit{black box} aspect of neural networks as it becomes crucial to understand their limits and capabilities. With the rise of neuromorphic hardware, it is even more critical to understand how a neural network, as a distributed system, tolerates the failu… ▽ More With the development of neural networks based machine learning and their usage in mission critical applications, voices are rising against the \textit{black box} aspect of neural networks as it becomes crucial to understand their limits and capabilities. With the rise of neuromorphic hardware, it is even more critical to understand how a neural network, as a distributed system, tolerates the failures of its computing nodes, neurons, and its communication channels, synapses. Experimentally assessing the robustness of neural networks involves the quixotic venture of testing all the possible failures, on all the possible inputs, which ultimately hits a combinatorial explosion for the first, and the impossibility to gather all the possible inputs for the second. In this paper, we prove an upper bound on the expected error of the output when a subset of neurons crashes. This bound involves dependencies on the network parameters that can be seen as being too pessimistic in the average case. It involves a polynomial dependency on the Lipschitz coefficient of the neurons activation function, and an exponential dependency on the depth of the layer where a failure occurs. We back up our theoretical results with experiments illustrating the extent to which our prediction matches the dependencies between the network parameters and robustness. Our results show that the robustness of neural networks to the average crash can be estimated without the need to neither test the network on all failure configurations, nor access the training set used to train the network, both of which are practically impossible requirements. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2017; v1 submitted 25 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: 36th IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems 26 - 29 September 2017. Hong Kong, China