Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Rothan, B
-
Peerus Review: a tool for scientific experts finding
Authors:
Robin Brochier,
Adrien Guille,
Julien Velcin,
Benjamin Rothan,
Di Cioccio
Abstract:
We propose a tool for experts finding applied to academic data generated by the start-up DSRT in the context of its application Peerus. A user may submit the title, the abstract and optionnally the authors and the journal of publication of a scientific article and the application then returns a list of experts, potential reviewers of the submitted article. The retrieval algorithm is a voting syste…
▽ More
We propose a tool for experts finding applied to academic data generated by the start-up DSRT in the context of its application Peerus. A user may submit the title, the abstract and optionnally the authors and the journal of publication of a scientific article and the application then returns a list of experts, potential reviewers of the submitted article. The retrieval algorithm is a voting system based on a language modeling technique trained on several millions of scientific papers.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
Impact of the Query Set on the Evaluation of Expert Finding Systems
Authors:
Robin Brochier,
Adrien Guille,
Benjamin Rothan,
Julien Velcin
Abstract:
Expertise is a loosely defined concept that is hard to formalize. Much research has focused on designing efficient algorithms for expert finding in large databases in various application domains. The evaluation of such recommender systems lies most of the time on human-annotated sets of experts associated with topics. The protocol of evaluation consists in using the namings or short descriptions o…
▽ More
Expertise is a loosely defined concept that is hard to formalize. Much research has focused on designing efficient algorithms for expert finding in large databases in various application domains. The evaluation of such recommender systems lies most of the time on human-annotated sets of experts associated with topics. The protocol of evaluation consists in using the namings or short descriptions of these topics as raw queries in order to rank the available set of candidates. Several measures taken from the field of information retrieval are then applied to rate the rankings of candidates against the ground truth set of experts. In this paper, we apply this topic-query evaluation methodology with the AMiner data and explore a new document-query methodology to evaluate experts retrieval from a set of queries sampled directly from the experts documents. Specifically, we describe two datasets extracted from AMiner, three baseline algorithms from the literature based on several document representations and provide experiment results to show that using a wide range of more realistic queries provides different evaluation results to the usual topic-queries.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
