Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Rondogiannis, P

Recursive Function Definitions in Static Dataflow Graphs and their Implementation in TensorFlow

Authors: Kelly Kostopoulou, Angelos Charalambidis, Panos Rondogiannis

Abstract: Modern machine learning systems represent their computations as dataflow graphs. The increasingly complex neural network architectures crave for more powerful yet efficient programming abstractions. In this paper we propose an efficient technique for supporting recursive function definitions in dataflow-based systems such as TensorFlow. The proposed approach transforms the given recursive definiti… ▽ More Modern machine learning systems represent their computations as dataflow graphs. The increasingly complex neural network architectures crave for more powerful yet efficient programming abstractions. In this paper we propose an efficient technique for supporting recursive function definitions in dataflow-based systems such as TensorFlow. The proposed approach transforms the given recursive definitions into a static dataflow graph that is enriched with two simple yet powerful dataflow operations. Since static graphs do not change during execution, they can be easily partitioned and executed efficiently in distributed and heterogeneous environments. The proposed technique makes heavy use of the idea of tagging, which was one of the cornerstones of dataflow systems since their inception. We demonstrate that our technique is compatible with the idea of automatic differentiation, a notion that is crucial for dataflow systems that focus on deep learning applications. We describe the principles of an actual implementation of the technique in the TensorFlow framework, and present experimental results that demonstrate that the use of tagging is of paramount importance for developing efficient high-level abstractions for modern dataflow systems. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2024; originally announced October 2024.

The Stable Model Semantics for Higher-Order Logic Programming

Authors: Bart Bogaerts, Angelos Charalambidis, Giannos Chatziagapis, Babis Kostopoulos, Samuele Pollaci, Panos Rondogiannis

Abstract: We propose a stable model semantics for higher-order logic programs. Our semantics is developed using Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT), a powerful formalism that has successfully been used to give meaning to diverse non-monotonic formalisms. The proposed semantics generalizes the classical two-valued stable model semantics of (Gelfond and Lifschitz 1988) as-well-as the three-valued one of (Przy… ▽ More We propose a stable model semantics for higher-order logic programs. Our semantics is developed using Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT), a powerful formalism that has successfully been used to give meaning to diverse non-monotonic formalisms. The proposed semantics generalizes the classical two-valued stable model semantics of (Gelfond and Lifschitz 1988) as-well-as the three-valued one of (Przymusinski 1990), retaining their desirable properties. Due to the use of AFT, we also get for free alternative semantics for higher-order logic programs, namely supported model, Kripke-Kleene, and well-founded. Additionally, we define a broad class of stratified higher-order logic programs and demonstrate that they have a unique two-valued higher-order stable model which coincides with the well-founded semantics of such programs. We provide a number of examples in different application domains, which demonstrate that higher-order logic programming under the stable model semantics is a powerful and versatile formalism, which can potentially form the basis of novel ASP systems. △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2024; originally announced August 2024.

ACM Class: I.2.3; I.2.5; F.3.2

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 24 (2024) 737-754

Strong Equivalence of Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction: a Logical Perspective

Authors: Angelos Charalambidis, Christos Nomikos, Panos Rondogiannis

Abstract: Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction (LPODs) extend classical logic programs with the capability of expressing preferential disjunctions in the heads of program rules. The initial semantics of LPODs, although simple and quite intuitive, is not purely model-theoretic. A consequence of this is that certain properties of programs appear non-trivial to formalize in purely logical terms. An example… ▽ More Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction (LPODs) extend classical logic programs with the capability of expressing preferential disjunctions in the heads of program rules. The initial semantics of LPODs, although simple and quite intuitive, is not purely model-theoretic. A consequence of this is that certain properties of programs appear non-trivial to formalize in purely logical terms. An example of this state of affairs is the characterization of the notion of strong equivalence for LPODs. Although the results of Faber et al. (2008) are accurately developed, they fall short of characterizing strong equivalence of LPODs as logical equivalence in some specific logic. This comes in sharp contrast with the well-known characterization of strong equivalence for classical logic programs, which, as proved by Lifschitz et al. (2001), coincides with logical equivalence in the logic of here-and-there. In this paper we obtain a purely logical characterization of strong equivalence of LPODs as logical equivalence in a four-valued logic. Moreover, we provide a new proof of the coNP-completeness of strong equivalence for LPODs, which has an interest in its own right since it relies on the special structure of such programs. Our results are based on the recent logical semantics of LPODs introduced by Charalambidis et al. (2021), a fact which we believe indicates that this new semantics may prove to be a useful tool in the further study of LPODs. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: Paper presented at the 38th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2022), 15 pages + 3 pages appendix

A Logical Characterization of the Preferred Models of Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction

Authors: Angelos Charalambidis, Panos Rondogiannis, Antonis Troumpoukis

Abstract: Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction (LPODs) extend classical logic programs with the capability of expressing alternatives with decreasing degrees of preference in the heads of program rules. Despite the fact that the operational meaning of ordered disjunction is clear, there exists an important open issue regarding its semantics. In particular, there does not exist a purely model-theoretic ap… ▽ More Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction (LPODs) extend classical logic programs with the capability of expressing alternatives with decreasing degrees of preference in the heads of program rules. Despite the fact that the operational meaning of ordered disjunction is clear, there exists an important open issue regarding its semantics. In particular, there does not exist a purely model-theoretic approach for determining the most preferred models of an LPOD. At present, the selection of the most preferred models is performed using a technique that is not based exclusively on the models of the program and in certain cases produces counterintuitive results. We provide a novel, model-theoretic semantics for LPODs, which uses an additional truth value in order to identify the most preferred models of a program. We demonstrate that the proposed approach overcomes the shortcomings of the traditional semantics of LPODs. Moreover, the new approach can be used to define the semantics of a natural class of logic programs that can have both ordered and classical disjunctions in the heads of clauses. This allows programs that can express not only strict levels of preferences but also alternatives that are equally preferred. This work is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: Paper presented at the 37th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2021), 16 pages + 13 pages appendix

ACM Class: I.2.4

Lexicographic Logic: a Many-valued Logic for Preference Representation

Authors: Angelos Charalambidis, Giorgos Papadimitriou, Panos Rondogiannis, Antonis Troumpoukis

Abstract: Logical formalisms provide a natural and concise means for specifying and reasoning about preferences. In this paper, we propose lexicographic logic, an extension of classical propositional logic that can express a variety of preferences, most notably lexicographic ones. The proposed logic supports a simple new connective whose semantics can be defined in terms of finite lists of truth values. We… ▽ More Logical formalisms provide a natural and concise means for specifying and reasoning about preferences. In this paper, we propose lexicographic logic, an extension of classical propositional logic that can express a variety of preferences, most notably lexicographic ones. The proposed logic supports a simple new connective whose semantics can be defined in terms of finite lists of truth values. We demonstrate that, despite the well-known theoretical limitations that pose barriers to the quantitative representation of lexicographic preferences, there exists a subset of the rational numbers over which the proposed new connective can be naturally defined. Lexicographic logic can be used to define in a simple way some well-known preferential operators, like "$A$ and if possible $B$", and "$A$ or failing that $B$". Moreover, many other hierarchical preferential operators can be defined using a systematic approach. We argue that the new logic is an effective formalism for ranking query results according to the satisfaction level of user preferences. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

The Expressive Power of Higher-Order Datalog

Authors: Angelos Charalambidis, Christos Nomikos, Panos Rondogiannis

Abstract: A classical result in descriptive complexity theory states that Datalog expresses exactly the class of polynomially computable queries on ordered databases. In this paper we extend this result to the case of higher-order Datalog. In particular, we demonstrate that on ordered databases, for all $k\geq2$, $k$-order Datalog captures $(k-1)$-EXPTIME. This result suggests that higher-order extensions o… ▽ More A classical result in descriptive complexity theory states that Datalog expresses exactly the class of polynomially computable queries on ordered databases. In this paper we extend this result to the case of higher-order Datalog. In particular, we demonstrate that on ordered databases, for all $k\geq2$, $k$-order Datalog captures $(k-1)$-EXPTIME. This result suggests that higher-order extensions of Datalog possess superior expressive power and they are worthwhile of further investigation both in theory and in practice. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP. △ Less

Submitted 24 July, 2019; v1 submitted 23 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Paper presented at the 35th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2019), Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA, 20-25 September 2019, 24 pages, LaTeX

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 19 (2019) 925-940

Approximation Fixpoint Theory and the Well-Founded Semantics of Higher-Order Logic Programs

Authors: Angelos Charalambidis, Panos Rondogiannis, Ioanna Symeonidou

Abstract: We define a novel, extensional, three-valued semantics for higher-order logic programs with negation. The new semantics is based on interpreting the types of the source language as three-valued Fitting-monotonic functions at all levels of the type hierarchy. We prove that there exists a bijection between such Fitting-monotonic functions and pairs of two-valued-result functions where the first memb… ▽ More We define a novel, extensional, three-valued semantics for higher-order logic programs with negation. The new semantics is based on interpreting the types of the source language as three-valued Fitting-monotonic functions at all levels of the type hierarchy. We prove that there exists a bijection between such Fitting-monotonic functions and pairs of two-valued-result functions where the first member of the pair is monotone-antimonotone and the second member is antimonotone-monotone. By deriving an extension of consistent approximation fixpoint theory (Denecker et al. 2004) and utilizing the above bijection, we define an iterative procedure that produces for any given higher-order logic program a distinguished extensional model. We demonstrate that this model is actually a minimal one. Moreover, we prove that our construction generalizes the familiar well-founded semantics for classical logic programs, making in this way our proposal an appealing formulation for capturing the well-founded semantics for higher-order logic programs. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: Paper presented at the 34nd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2018), Oxford, UK, July 14 to July 17, 2018 31 pages, LaTeX

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 18 (2018) 421-437

The Intricacies of 3-Valued Extensional Semantics for Higher-Order Logic Programs

Authors: Panos Rondogiannis, Ioanna Symeonidou

Abstract: In (Bezem 1999; Bezem 2001), M. Bezem defined an extensional semantics for positive higher-order logic programs. Recently, it was demonstrated in (Rondogiannis and Symeonidou 2016) that Bezem's technique can be extended to higher-order logic programs with negation, retaining its extensional properties, provided that it is interpreted under a logic with an infinite number of truth values. In (Rondo… ▽ More In (Bezem 1999; Bezem 2001), M. Bezem defined an extensional semantics for positive higher-order logic programs. Recently, it was demonstrated in (Rondogiannis and Symeonidou 2016) that Bezem's technique can be extended to higher-order logic programs with negation, retaining its extensional properties, provided that it is interpreted under a logic with an infinite number of truth values. In (Rondogiannis and Symeonidou 2017) it was also demonstrated that Bezem's technique, when extended under the stable model semantics, does not in general lead to extensional stable models. In this paper we consider the problem of extending Bezem's technique under the well-founded semantics. We demonstrate that the well-founded extension fails to retain extensionality in the general case. On the positive side, we demonstrate that for stratified higher-order logic programs, extensionality is indeed achieved. We analyze the reasons of the failure of extensionality in the general case, arguing that a three-valued setting can not distinguish between certain predicates that appear to have a different behaviour inside a program context, but which happen to be identical as three-valued relations. The paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP. △ Less

Submitted 15 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: Paper presented at the 33rd International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2017), Melbourne, Australia, August 28 to September 1, 2017. Under consideration for acceptance in TPLP. 16 pages (article) + 9 pages (appendix)

Extensional Semantics for Higher-Order Logic Programs with Negation

Authors: Panos Rondogiannis, Ioanna Symeonidou

Abstract: We develop an extensional semantics for higher-order logic programs with negation, generalizing the technique that was introduced in [Bezem99,Bezem01] for positive higher-order programs. In this way we provide an alternative extensional semantics for higher-order logic programs with negation to the one proposed in [CharalambidisER14]. As an immediate useful consequence of our developments, we defi… ▽ More We develop an extensional semantics for higher-order logic programs with negation, generalizing the technique that was introduced in [Bezem99,Bezem01] for positive higher-order programs. In this way we provide an alternative extensional semantics for higher-order logic programs with negation to the one proposed in [CharalambidisER14]. As an immediate useful consequence of our developments, we define for the language we consider the notions of stratification and local stratification, which generalize the familiar such notions from classical logic programming. We demonstrate that for stratified and locally stratified higher-order logic programs, the proposed semantics never assigns the unknown truth value. We conclude the paper by providing a negative result: we demonstrate that the well-known stable model semantics of classical logic programming, if extended according to the technique of [Bezem99,Bezem01] to higher-order logic programs, does not in general lead to extensional stable models. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2018; v1 submitted 30 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: 24 pages. Submitted to Logical Methods in Computer Science

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 14, Issue 2 (June 29, 2018) lmcs:2675

Equivalence of two Fixed-Point Semantics for Definitional Higher-Order Logic Programs

Authors: Angelos Charalambidis, Panos Rondogiannis, Ioanna Symeonidou

Abstract: Two distinct research approaches have been proposed for assigning a purely extensional semantics to higher-order logic programming. The former approach uses classical domain theoretic tools while the latter builds on a fixed-point construction defined on a syntactic instantiation of the source program. The relationships between these two approaches had not been investigated until now. In this pape… ▽ More Two distinct research approaches have been proposed for assigning a purely extensional semantics to higher-order logic programming. The former approach uses classical domain theoretic tools while the latter builds on a fixed-point construction defined on a syntactic instantiation of the source program. The relationships between these two approaches had not been investigated until now. In this paper we demonstrate that for a very broad class of programs, namely the class of definitional programs introduced by W. W. Wadge, the two approaches coincide (with respect to ground atoms that involve symbols of the program). On the other hand, we argue that if existential higher-order variables are allowed to appear in the bodies of program rules, the two approaches are in general different. The results of the paper contribute to a better understanding of the semantics of higher-order logic programming. △ Less

Submitted 10 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: In Proceedings FICS 2015, arXiv:1509.02826

ACM Class: D.1.6; F.3.2; F.4.1

Journal ref: EPTCS 191, 2015, pp. 18-32

Minimum Model Semantics for Extensional Higher-order Logic Programming with Negation

Authors: Angelos Charalambidis, Zoltán Ésik, Panos Rondogiannis

Abstract: Extensional higher-order logic programming has been introduced as a generalization of classical logic programming. An important characteristic of this paradigm is that it preserves all the well-known properties of traditional logic programming. In this paper we consider the semantics of negation in the context of the new paradigm. Using some recent results from non-monotonic fixed-point theory, we… ▽ More Extensional higher-order logic programming has been introduced as a generalization of classical logic programming. An important characteristic of this paradigm is that it preserves all the well-known properties of traditional logic programming. In this paper we consider the semantics of negation in the context of the new paradigm. Using some recent results from non-monotonic fixed-point theory, we demonstrate that every higher-order logic program with negation has a unique minimum infinite-valued model. In this way we obtain the first purely model-theoretic semantics for negation in extensional higher-order logic programming. Using our approach, we resolve an old paradox that was introduced by W. W. Wadge in order to demonstrate the semantic difficulties of higher-order logic programming. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2014; originally announced May 2014.

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 14 (2014) 725-737

A Fixed Point Theorem for Non-Monotonic Functions

Authors: Zoltán Ésik, Panos Rondogiannis

Abstract: We present a fixed point theorem for a class of (potentially) non-monotonic functions over specially structured complete lattices. The theorem has as a special case the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem when restricted to the case of monotonic functions and Kleene's theorem when the functions are additionally continuous. From the practical side, the theorem has direct applications in the semantic… ▽ More We present a fixed point theorem for a class of (potentially) non-monotonic functions over specially structured complete lattices. The theorem has as a special case the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem when restricted to the case of monotonic functions and Kleene's theorem when the functions are additionally continuous. From the practical side, the theorem has direct applications in the semantics of negation in logic programming. In particular, it leads to a more direct and elegant proof of the least fixed point result of [Rondogiannis and W.W.Wadge, ACM TOCL 6(2): 441-467 (2005)]. Moreover, the theorem appears to have potential for possible applications outside the logic programming domain. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2015; v1 submitted 3 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: 34 pages. Accepted in: Theoretical Computer Science (to appear)

Extensional Higher-Order Logic Programming

Authors: A. Charalambidis, K. Handjopoulos, P. Rondogiannis, W. W. Wadge

Abstract: We propose a purely extensional semantics for higher-order logic programming. In this semantics program predicates denote sets of ordered tuples, and two predicates are equal iff they are equal as sets. Moreover, every program has a unique minimum Herbrand model which is the greatest lower bound of all Herbrand models of the program and the least fixed-point of an immediate consequence operator. W… ▽ More We propose a purely extensional semantics for higher-order logic programming. In this semantics program predicates denote sets of ordered tuples, and two predicates are equal iff they are equal as sets. Moreover, every program has a unique minimum Herbrand model which is the greatest lower bound of all Herbrand models of the program and the least fixed-point of an immediate consequence operator. We also propose an SLD-resolution proof procedure which is proven sound and complete with respect to the minimum model semantics. In other words, we provide a purely extensional theoretical framework for higher-order logic programming which generalizes the familiar theory of classical (first-order) logic programming. △ Less

Submitted 17 June, 2011; originally announced June 2011.

Comments: 45 pages

Minimum Model Semantics for Logic Programs with Negation-as-Failure

Authors: Panos Rondogiannis, William W. Wadge

Abstract: We give a purely model-theoretic characterization of the semantics of logic programs with negation-as-failure allowed in clause bodies. In our semantics the meaning of a program is, as in the classical case, the unique minimum model in a program-independent ordering. We use an expanded truth domain that has an uncountable linearly ordered set of truth values between False (the minimum element) a… ▽ More We give a purely model-theoretic characterization of the semantics of logic programs with negation-as-failure allowed in clause bodies. In our semantics the meaning of a program is, as in the classical case, the unique minimum model in a program-independent ordering. We use an expanded truth domain that has an uncountable linearly ordered set of truth values between False (the minimum element) and True (the maximum), with a Zero element in the middle. The truth values below Zero are ordered like the countable ordinals. The values above Zero have exactly the reverse order. Negation is interpreted as reflection about Zero followed by a step towards Zero; the only truth value that remains unaffected by negation is Zero. We show that every program has a unique minimum model M_P, and that this model can be constructed with a T_P iteration which proceeds through the countable ordinals. Furthermore, we demonstrate that M_P can also be obtained through a model intersection construction which generalizes the well-known model intersection theorem for classical logic programming. Finally, we show that by collapsing the true and false values of the infinite-valued model M_P to (the classical) True and False, we obtain a three-valued model identical to the well-founded one. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2003; originally announced June 2003.

Comments: 28 pages

ACM Class: F.3.2; F.4.1; D.1.6; I.2.3

Journal ref: ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 6(2): 441-467 (2005)