Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Roitblat, H L
-
An Essay concerning machine understanding
Authors:
Herbert L. Roitblat
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence systems exhibit many useful capabilities, but they appear to lack understanding. This essay describes how we could go about constructing a machine capable of understanding. As John Locke (1689) pointed out words are signs for ideas, which we can paraphrase as thoughts and concepts. To understand a word is to know and be able to work with the underlying concepts for which it…
▽ More
Artificial intelligence systems exhibit many useful capabilities, but they appear to lack understanding. This essay describes how we could go about constructing a machine capable of understanding. As John Locke (1689) pointed out words are signs for ideas, which we can paraphrase as thoughts and concepts. To understand a word is to know and be able to work with the underlying concepts for which it is an indicator. Understanding between a speaker and a listener occurs when the speaker casts his or her concepts into words and the listener recovers approximately those same concepts. Current models rely on the listener to construct any potential meaning. The diminution of behaviorism as a psychological paradigm and the rise of cognitivism provide examples of many experimental methods that can be used to determine whether and to what extent a machine might understand and to make suggestions about how that understanding might be instantiated.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Probably Reasonable Search in eDiscovery
Authors:
Herbert L. Roitblat
Abstract:
In eDiscovery, a party to a lawsuit or similar action must search through available information to identify those documents and files that are relevant to the suit. Search efforts tend to identify less than 100% of the relevant documents and courts are frequently asked to adjudicate whether the search effort has been reasonable, or whether additional effort to find more of the relevant documents i…
▽ More
In eDiscovery, a party to a lawsuit or similar action must search through available information to identify those documents and files that are relevant to the suit. Search efforts tend to identify less than 100% of the relevant documents and courts are frequently asked to adjudicate whether the search effort has been reasonable, or whether additional effort to find more of the relevant documents is justified. This article provides a method for estimating the probability that significant additional information will be found from extended effort. Modeling and two data sets indicate that the probability that facts/topics exist among the so-far unidentified documents that have not been observed in the identified documents is low for even moderate levels of Recall.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Is there something I'm missing? Topic Modeling in eDiscovery
Authors:
Herbert L. Roitblat
Abstract:
In legal eDiscovery, the parties are required to search through their electronically stored information to find documents that are relevant to a specific case. Negotiations over the scope of these searches are often based on a fear that something will be missed. This paper continues an argument that discovery should be based on identifying the facts of a case. If a search process is less than comp…
▽ More
In legal eDiscovery, the parties are required to search through their electronically stored information to find documents that are relevant to a specific case. Negotiations over the scope of these searches are often based on a fear that something will be missed. This paper continues an argument that discovery should be based on identifying the facts of a case. If a search process is less than complete (if it has Recall less than 100%), it may still be complete in presenting all of the relevant available topics. In this study, Latent Dirichlet Allocation was used to identify 100 topics from all of the known relevant documents. The documents were then categorized to about 80% Recall (i.e., 80% of the relevant documents were found by the categorizer, designated the hit set and 20% were missed, designated the missed set). Despite the fact that less than all of the relevant documents were identified by the categorizer, the documents that were identified contained all of the topics derived from the full set of documents. This same pattern held whether the categorizer was a naïve Bayes categorizer trained on a random selection of documents or a Support Vector Machine trained with Continuous Active Learning (which focuses evaluation on the most-likely-to-be-relevant documents). No topics were identified in either categorizer's missed set that were not already seen in the hit set. Not only is a computer-assisted search process reasonable (as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), it is also complete when measured by topics.
△ Less
Submitted 30 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
