-
Explaining Search Result Stances to Opinionated People
Authors:
Z. Wu,
T. Draws,
F. Cau,
F. Barile,
A. Rieger,
N. Tintarev
Abstract:
People use web search engines to find information before forming opinions, which can lead to practical decisions with different levels of impact. The cognitive effort of search can leave opinionated users vulnerable to cognitive biases, e.g., the confirmation bias. In this paper, we investigate whether stance labels and their explanations can help users consume more diverse search results. We auto…
▽ More
People use web search engines to find information before forming opinions, which can lead to practical decisions with different levels of impact. The cognitive effort of search can leave opinionated users vulnerable to cognitive biases, e.g., the confirmation bias. In this paper, we investigate whether stance labels and their explanations can help users consume more diverse search results. We automatically classify and label search results on three topics (i.e., intellectual property rights, school uniforms, and atheism) as against, neutral, and in favor, and generate explanations for these labels. In a user study (N =203), we then investigate whether search result stance bias (balanced vs biased) and the level of explanation (plain text, label only, label and explanation) influence the diversity of search results clicked. We find that stance labels and explanations lead to a more diverse search result consumption. However, we do not find evidence for systematic opinion change among users in this context. We believe these results can help designers of search engines to make more informed design decisions.
△ Less
Submitted 15 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Federated Learning: Organizational Opportunities, Challenges, and Adoption Strategies
Authors:
Joaquin Delgado Fernandez,
Martin Brennecke,
Tom Barbereau,
Alexander Rieger,
Gilbert Fridgen
Abstract:
Restrictive rules for data sharing in many industries have led to the development of federated learning. Federated learning is a machine-learning technique that allows distributed clients to train models collaboratively without the need to share their respective training data with others. In this paper, we first explore the technical foundations of federated learning and its organizational opportu…
▽ More
Restrictive rules for data sharing in many industries have led to the development of federated learning. Federated learning is a machine-learning technique that allows distributed clients to train models collaboratively without the need to share their respective training data with others. In this paper, we first explore the technical foundations of federated learning and its organizational opportunities. Second, we present a conceptual framework for the adoption of federated learning, mapping four types of organizations by their artificial intelligence capabilities and limits to data sharing. We then discuss why exemplary organizations in different contexts - including public authorities, financial service providers, manufacturing companies, as well as research and development consortia - might consider different approaches to federated learning. To conclude, we argue that federated learning presents organizational challenges with ample interdisciplinary opportunities for information systems researchers.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2023; v1 submitted 4 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Probably Something: A Multi-Layer Taxonomy of Non-Fungible Tokens
Authors:
Eduard Hartwich,
Philipp Ollig,
Gilbert Fridgen,
Alexander Rieger
Abstract:
Purpose: This paper aims to establish a fundamental and comprehensive understanding of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) by identifying and structuring common characteristics within a taxonomy. NFTs are hyped and increasingly marketed as essential building blocks of the Metaverse. However, the dynamic evolution of the NFT space has posed challenges for those seeking to develop a deep and comprehensive un…
▽ More
Purpose: This paper aims to establish a fundamental and comprehensive understanding of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) by identifying and structuring common characteristics within a taxonomy. NFTs are hyped and increasingly marketed as essential building blocks of the Metaverse. However, the dynamic evolution of the NFT space has posed challenges for those seeking to develop a deep and comprehensive understanding of NFTs, their features, and capabilities.
Design/methodology/approach: Utilizing common guidelines for the creation of taxonomies, we developed (over three iterations), a multi-layer taxonomy based on workshops and interviews with 11 academic and 15 industry experts. Through an evaluation of 25 NFTs, we demonstrate the usefulness of our taxonomy.
Findings: The taxonomy has four layers, 14 dimensions and 42 characteristics, which describe NFTs in terms of reference object, token properties, token distribution, and realizable value.
Originality: Our framework is the first to systematically cover the emerging NFT phenomenon. It is concise yet extendible and presents many avenues for future research in a plethora of disciplines. The characteristics identified in our taxonomy are useful for NFT and Metaverse related research in Finance, Marketing, Law, and Information Systems. Additionally, the taxonomy can serve as an information source for policymakers as they consider NFT regulation.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation
Authors:
Alejandra Bringas Colmenarejo,
Luca Nannini,
Alisa Rieger,
Kristen M. Scott,
Xuan Zhao,
Gourab K. Patro,
Gjergji Kasneci,
Katharina Kinder-Kurlanda
Abstract:
With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness an…
▽ More
With increasing digitalization, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming ubiquitous. AI-based systems to identify, optimize, automate, and scale solutions to complex economic and societal problems are being proposed and implemented. This has motivated regulation efforts, including the Proposal of an EU AI Act. This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them, focusing on (but not limited to) the Proposal. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. Then, we map these perspectives along three axes of interests: (i) Standardization vs. Localization, (ii) Utilitarianism vs. Egalitarianism, and (iii) Consequential vs. Deontological ethics which leads us to identify a pattern of common arguments and tensions between these axes. Positioning the discussion within the axes of interest and with a focus on reconciling the key tensions, we identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
