Open-Source Verification with Chisel and Scala
Authors:
Andrew Dobis,
Tjark Petersen,
Kasper Juul Hesse Rasmussen,
Enrico Tolotto,
Hans Jakob Damsgaard,
Simon Thye Andersen,
Richard Lin,
Martin Schoeberl
Abstract:
Performance increase with general-purpose processors has come to a halt. We can no longer depend on Moore's Law to increase computing performance. The only way to achieve higher performance or lower energy consumption is by building domain-specific hardware accelerators. To efficiently design and verify those domain-specific accelerators, we need agile hardware development. One of the main obstacl…
▽ More
Performance increase with general-purpose processors has come to a halt. We can no longer depend on Moore's Law to increase computing performance. The only way to achieve higher performance or lower energy consumption is by building domain-specific hardware accelerators. To efficiently design and verify those domain-specific accelerators, we need agile hardware development. One of the main obstacles when proposing such a modern method is the lack of modern tools to attack it. To be able to verify a design in such a time-constrained development method, one needs to have efficient tools both for design and verification.
This paper thus proposes ChiselVerify, an open-source tool for verifying circuits described in any Hardware Description Language. It builds on top of the Chisel hardware construction language and uses Scala to drive the verification using a testing strategy inspired by the Universal Verification Methodology (UVM) and adapted for designs described in Chisel. ChiselVerify is created based on three key ideas. First, our solution highly increases the productivity of the verification engineer, by allowing hardware testing to be done in a modern high-level programming environment. Second, the framework functions with any hardware description language thanks to the flexibility of Chisel blackboxes. Finally, the solution is well integrated into the existing Chisel universe, making it an extension of currently existing testing libraries.
We implement ChiselVerify in a way inspired by the functionalities found in SystemVerilog. This allows one to use functional coverage, constrained-random verification, bus functional models, transaction-level modeling and much more during the verification process of a design in a contemporary high-level programming ecosystem.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
Evolutionary Dynamics of Scientific Collaboration Networks: Multi-Levels and Cross-time Analysis
Authors:
Alireza Abbasi,
Liaquat Hossain,
Shahadat Uddin,
Kim J. R. Rasmussen
Abstract:
Several studies exist which use scientific literature for comparing scientific activities (e.g., productivity, and collaboration). In this study, using co-authorship data over the last 40 years, we present the evolutionary dynamics of multi level (i.e., individual, institutional and national) collaboration networks for exploring the emergence of collaborations in the research field of "steel struc…
▽ More
Several studies exist which use scientific literature for comparing scientific activities (e.g., productivity, and collaboration). In this study, using co-authorship data over the last 40 years, we present the evolutionary dynamics of multi level (i.e., individual, institutional and national) collaboration networks for exploring the emergence of collaborations in the research field of "steel structures". The collaboration network of scientists in the field has been analyzed using author affiliations extracted from Scopus between 1970 and 2009. We have studied collaboration distribution networks at the micro-, meso- and macro-levels for the 40 years. We compared and analyzed a number of properties of these networks (i.e., density, centrality measures, the giant component and clustering coefficient) for presenting a longitudinal analysis and statistical validation of the evolutionary dynamics of "steel structures" collaboration networks. At all levels, the scientific collaborations network structures were central considering the closeness centralization while betweenness and degree centralization were much lower. In general networks density, connectedness, centralization and clustering coefficient were highest in marco-level and decreasing as the network size grow to the lowest in micro-level. We also find that the average distance between countries about two and institutes five and for authors eight meaning that only about eight steps are necessary to get from one randomly chosen author to another.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
