-
Open Science Practices by Early Career HCI Researchers: Perceptions, Challenges, and Benefits
Authors:
Tatiana Chakravorti,
Sanjana Gautam,
Priya Silverstein,
Sarah M. Rajtmajer
Abstract:
Many fields of science, including Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), have heightened introspection in the wake of concerns around reproducibility and replicability of published findings. Notably, in recent years the HCI community has worked to implement policy changes and mainstream open science practices. Our work investigates early-career HCI researchers' perceptions of open science and engagemen…
▽ More
Many fields of science, including Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), have heightened introspection in the wake of concerns around reproducibility and replicability of published findings. Notably, in recent years the HCI community has worked to implement policy changes and mainstream open science practices. Our work investigates early-career HCI researchers' perceptions of open science and engagement with best practices through 18 semi-structured interviews. Our findings highlight key barriers to the widespread adoption of data and materials sharing, and preregistration, namely: lack of clear incentives; cultural resistance; limited training; time constraints; concerns about intellectual property; and data privacy issues. We observe that small changes at major conferences like CHI could meaningfully impact community norms. We offer recommendations to address these barriers and to promote transparency and openness in HCI.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
[Re] Network Deconvolution
Authors:
Rochana R. Obadage,
Kumushini Thennakoon,
Sarah M. Rajtmajer,
Jian Wu
Abstract:
Our work aims to reproduce the set of findings published in "Network Deconvolution" by Ye et al. (2020)[1]. That paper proposes an optimization technique for model training in convolutional neural networks. The proposed technique "network deconvolution" is used in convolutional neural networks to remove pixel-wise and channel-wise correlations before data is fed into each layer. In particular, we…
▽ More
Our work aims to reproduce the set of findings published in "Network Deconvolution" by Ye et al. (2020)[1]. That paper proposes an optimization technique for model training in convolutional neural networks. The proposed technique "network deconvolution" is used in convolutional neural networks to remove pixel-wise and channel-wise correlations before data is fed into each layer. In particular, we interrogate the validity of the authors' claim that using network deconvolution instead of batch normalization improves deep learning model performance. Our effort confirms the validity of this claim, successfully reproducing the results reported in Tables 1 and 2 of the original paper. Our study involved 367 unique experiments across multiple architectures, datasets, and hyper parameter configurations. For Table 1, while there were some minor deviations in accuracy when compared to the original values (within 10%), the overall trend was consistent with the original study's findings when training the models with epochs 20 and 100. For Table 2, all 14 reproduced values were consistent with the original values. Additionally, we document the training and testing times for each architecture in Table 1 with 1, 20, and 100 epoch settings for both CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets. We document the total execution times for Table 2 architectures with the ImageNet dataset. The data and software used for this reproducibility study are publicly available at https://github.com/lamps-lab/rep-network-deconvolution.
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Can citations tell us about a paper's reproducibility? A case study of machine learning papers
Authors:
Rochana R. Obadage,
Sarah M. Rajtmajer,
Jian Wu
Abstract:
The iterative character of work in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) and reliance on comparisons against benchmark datasets emphasize the importance of reproducibility in that literature. Yet, resource constraints and inadequate documentation can make running replications particularly challenging. Our work explores the potential of using downstream citation contexts as a signa…
▽ More
The iterative character of work in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) and reliance on comparisons against benchmark datasets emphasize the importance of reproducibility in that literature. Yet, resource constraints and inadequate documentation can make running replications particularly challenging. Our work explores the potential of using downstream citation contexts as a signal of reproducibility. We introduce a sentiment analysis framework applied to citation contexts from papers involved in Machine Learning Reproducibility Challenges in order to interpret the positive or negative outcomes of reproduction attempts. Our contributions include training classifiers for reproducibility-related contexts and sentiment analysis, and exploring correlations between citation context sentiment and reproducibility scores. Study data, software, and an artifact appendix are publicly available at https://github.com/lamps-lab/ccair-ai-reproducibility .
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Active Class Selection for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning
Authors:
Christopher McClurg,
Ali Ayub,
Harsh Tyagi,
Sarah M. Rajtmajer,
Alan R. Wagner
Abstract:
For real-world applications, robots will need to continually learn in their environments through limited interactions with their users. Toward this, previous works in few-shot class incremental learning (FSCIL) and active class selection (ACS) have achieved promising results but were tested in constrained setups. Therefore, in this paper, we combine ideas from FSCIL and ACS to develop a novel fram…
▽ More
For real-world applications, robots will need to continually learn in their environments through limited interactions with their users. Toward this, previous works in few-shot class incremental learning (FSCIL) and active class selection (ACS) have achieved promising results but were tested in constrained setups. Therefore, in this paper, we combine ideas from FSCIL and ACS to develop a novel framework that can allow an autonomous agent to continually learn new objects by asking its users to label only a few of the most informative objects in the environment. To this end, we build on a state-of-the-art (SOTA) FSCIL model and extend it with techniques from ACS literature. We term this model Few-shot Incremental Active class SeleCtiOn (FIASco). We further integrate a potential field-based navigation technique with our model to develop a complete framework that can allow an agent to process and reason on its sensory data through the FIASco model, navigate towards the most informative object in the environment, gather data about the object through its sensors and incrementally update the FIASco model. Experimental results on a simulated agent and a real robot show the significance of our approach for long-term real-world robotics applications.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Predicting the Reproducibility of Social and Behavioral Science Papers Using Supervised Learning Models
Authors:
Jian Wu,
Rajal Nivargi,
Sree Sai Teja Lanka,
Arjun Manoj Menon,
Sai Ajay Modukuri,
Nishanth Nakshatri,
Xin Wei,
Zhuoer Wang,
James Caverlee,
Sarah M. Rajtmajer,
C. Lee Giles
Abstract:
In recent years, significant effort has been invested verifying the reproducibility and robustness of research claims in social and behavioral sciences (SBS), much of which has involved resource-intensive replication projects. In this paper, we investigate prediction of the reproducibility of SBS papers using machine learning methods based on a set of features. We propose a framework that extracts…
▽ More
In recent years, significant effort has been invested verifying the reproducibility and robustness of research claims in social and behavioral sciences (SBS), much of which has involved resource-intensive replication projects. In this paper, we investigate prediction of the reproducibility of SBS papers using machine learning methods based on a set of features. We propose a framework that extracts five types of features from scholarly work that can be used to support assessments of reproducibility of published research claims. Bibliometric features, venue features, and author features are collected from public APIs or extracted using open source machine learning libraries with customized parsers. Statistical features, such as p-values, are extracted by recognizing patterns in the body text. Semantic features, such as funding information, are obtained from public APIs or are extracted using natural language processing models. We analyze pairwise correlations between individual features and their importance for predicting a set of human-assessed ground truth labels. In doing so, we identify a subset of 9 top features that play relatively more important roles in predicting the reproducibility of SBS papers in our corpus. Results are verified by comparing performances of 10 supervised predictive classifiers trained on different sets of features.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2021; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
